I Screen, You Screen, We All Screen For…?

Dr. Kathryn Birkenbach is a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Neuroscience at Columbia University, and Manager of Research at Early Medical in New York.

Kathryn has things to tell us about kids’ neurological development, and screen time spent with electronic devices including phones, tablets, computers, and TVs.

From the 1960s criticism of “the gogglebox” to the modern-day critiques of “iPad babies” as a watchword of parental neglect, there’s plenty people can say against screen time, but Dr. Birkenbach tells us the that the reality is more nuanced:

Context Is Key

On a positive note”: consistent exposure to age-appropriate educational material results in quicker language acquisition than media that’s purely for entertainment purposes, or not age-appropriate.

Contrary to popular belief, children do not in fact learn by osmosis!

Interaction Is Far More Valuable Than Inaction

Kathryn advises that while adults tend to quite easily grasp things from instructional videos, the same does not go for small children.

This means that a lot of educational programming can be beneficial to small children if and only if there is an adult with them to help translate the visual into the practical!

There’s a story that does the rounds on the Internet: a young boy wanted to train his puppy, but didn’t know how. He asked, and was told “search for puppy training on YouTube”. His parents came back later and found him with his iPad, earnestly showing the training videos to the puppy.

We can laugh at the child’s naïvety, knowing that’s not how it works and the puppy will not learn that way, so why make the same mistake in turn?

❝The phenomenon known as the “video deficit effect” can be overcome, when an on-screen guide interacts with the child or a parent is physically present and draws the child’s attention to relevant information.

In other words, interaction with others appears to enhance the perceived salience of on-screen information, unlocking a child’s ability to learn from a medium which would otherwise offer no real-world benefit.❞

Screens Can Supplement, But Can’t Replace, Live Learning & Play

Sci-fi may show us “education pods” in which children learn all they need to from their screen… but according to our most up-to-date science, Dr. Birkenbach says, that simply would not work at all.

Screen time without adult interactions will typically fail to provide small children any benefit.

There is one thing it’s good at, though… attracting and keeping attention.

Thus, even a mere background presence of a TV show in the room will tend to actively reduce the time a small child spends on other activities, including live learning and exploratory play.

The attention-grabbing abilities of TV shows don’t stop at children, though! Adult caregivers will also tend to engage in fewer interactions with their children… and the interactions will be shorter and of lower quality.

In Summary:

• Young children will tend not to learn from non-interactive screen time
• Interactive screen time, ideally with a caregiver, can be educational
• Interactive screen time, not with a carer, can be beneficial (but a weak substitute)
  • Interactive screen time refers to shows such as Dora The Explorer, where Dora directly addresses the viewer and asks questions…But it’s reliant on the child caring to answer!
  • It can also mean interactive educational apps, provided the child does consciously interact!
  • Randomly pressing things is not conscious interaction! The key here is engaging with it intelligently and thoughtfully
• A screen will take a child’s time and attention away from non-screen things: that’s a genuine measurable loss to their development!

Absolute Bottom Line:

Screens can be of benefit to small children, if and only if the material is:

• Age-Appropriate
• Educational
• Interactive

If it’s missing one of those three, it’ll be of little to no benefit, and can even harm, as it reduces the time spent on more beneficial activities.

This is Andy Frisella. He’s not a doctor, scientist, nutritionist, personal trainer, or professional athlete, but he has kicked off a viral fitness challenge, so let’s take a look at it:

What it is

Firstly, Frisella asserts that it’s not a fitness challenge, but rather, he describes it as a “transformative mental toughness program”.

Here’s what it consists of:

• Follow a healthy diet plan with no deviations from it (i.e. no “cheat days”)
• Abstain from alcohol
• Exercise 2x per day, 45 minutes each
• One of the exercise sessions each day must be outside
• No rest days
• Drink 3.5 liters of water per day

And the duration? 75 days, hence the name of the fitness challenge transformative mental toughness program.

Why it is

Frisella’s rationale is:

• we must cultivate mental toughness by doing hard things
• allowing ourselves any deviation would be a sign of mental weakness
• if we allow ourselves to deviate, it becomes a habit

For this reason, he does not “allow” any substitutions, for example if somebody wants to do such-and-such a thing slightly differently instead. We put “allow” in quotation marks because of course, he’s not the boss of you, but per the rules of his challenge, at least.

These reasonings are in and of themselves somewhat sound, however, we at 10almonds would argue:

• before doing hard things, it is good to first consider “is it a good idea?” (amputating your leg using only a spork is a “hard thing”, and demonstrates incredible mental toughness, but that doesn’t make it a good idea)
• while being able to decide to do a thing and then do it is great characteristic to have, it’s good to first consider science; for example, restrictive diets with no flexibility simply do not work, and our bodies do require adequate rest, especially if being pushed through hard things, or problems will happen (injuries, illnesses, etc).
• while it’s true that allowing ourselves to deviate can become a habit, it’s good to first consider what habits we want to make, and make those habits, instead of potentially unsustainable or even simply unpleasant ones.

See also: What Flexible Dieting Really Means: When Flexibility Is The Dish Of The Day

And for that matter: How To Really Pick Up (And Keep!) Those Habits

Want a “75 Gentle” instead?

If you like the idea of making new habits, but are not sure if extreme (and perhaps arbitrary) standards are the ones you want to hold, check out:

Cori Lefkowith’s 25 Healthy Habits That Will Change Your Life

Take care!