It’s Not A Diet – by Davinia Taylor

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

A lot of diet books claim “it’s not a diet”, even when the titles are things like “The Such-and-Such Diet”.

This time, we get to see the claim as the title itself, so, how does it measure up?

Honestly, we’ll agree it’s not a diet. Yes, there is nutritional advice, and nothing that will be too shocking to regular 10almonds readers. Avoid processed foods, get plenty of fruit and veg, skip the alcohol. She leans towards keto, but isn’t evangelical about it despite selling a line of keto products herself. All in all, it can be called dietary guidance, but not reasonably “a diet” in any meaningful sense of the word.

The only counterpoint is that there is, for those who like that sort of thing, a “two-week reset programme”, which we might consider a diet, given it is clearly prescriptive with its meal plan.

She also talks sleep, hydration, stress management, movement, and so forth. Again, nothing that will surprise the well-informed reader. So, what does this book have to offer that we’re not assuming knowledge of?

Informationally, very little. But inspirationally, rather more, and a lot is about integrating healthier changes into your life and making them actually stick—and that’s where the real value of the book lies.

The style is, as with her other book “Futureproof” that we reviewed all so recently, again very direct and personable, and/but has a normal British amount of casual swearing that might shock some American readers. There’s a lot less science in this book than her other one, so there’s no bibliography per se, just an “acknowledgements” section at the back.

Bottom line: if you know what you need to do but struggle more with actually doing it, this book can help with that.

Click here to check out It’s Not A Diet, and do not diet!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • The Common Pesticide That Causes Brain Damage

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    …and other items from this week’s health news:

    Kills insects and isn’t great for humans either

    In few words: exposure to the insecticide chlorpyrifos (CPF) causes lasting structural and metabolic abnormalities in the brain, leading to poorer motor skills.

    In particular, researchers (Dr. Virginia Rauh et al.) found that higher prenatal CPF exposure was directly linked to:

    • widespread disruptions in brain metabolism and tissue integrity
    • greater structural and functional brain differences on imaging
    • reduced motor speed and coordination

    In the study cohort, most exposure came from indoor pesticide use in the US before the 2001 residential ban. However, CPF remains widely used in agriculture, most dangerously exposing farmworkers, pregnant people, and nearby communities via contaminated air and dust.

    Read in full: Common pesticide linked to hidden brain damage, scientists warn

    Related: Healthy Living in a Contaminated World – by Dr. Donald Hoernschemeyer

    Let’s make this clear

    Water is essential for human life, and the quality of that water matters a lot.

    Researchers (Dr. Hamid Noghanibehambari & Dr. Jason Fletcher) used data from the Death Master Files (DMF) of Social Security Administration death records, looking at deaths that occurred between 1975 and 2005, and tallied those people’s year and city of birth and childhood with the water filtration data on file for that place and time, to see what effect one thing had on the other.

    Now, as with any observational study, especially retrospective analysis, this cannot outright prove cause and effect, but the numbers were strong not just for healthy longevity being associated with water filtration, but also increased height and cognitive health:

    Read in full: New study shows drinking water filtration systems may add months to lifespan

    Related: New Way To Remove 98% Of PFAS “Forever Chemicals” From Water!

    Exercise vs Multiple Sclerosis

    We’ve written before about how multiple sclerosis (MS) can be put into remission with lifestyle management, allowing such a person to then enjoy greater athletic ability (amongst the more obvious benefits), but new research shows that irisin, an exercise hormone, itself reduces MS symptoms.

    Importantly, it directly protects neurons in a way that medications have as yet been able to adequately (let alone safely) do.

    Now, bearing in mind that MS is an autoimmune disorder, many medications that target it are immunosuppressants. In the case of the exercise hormone irisin, however, it not only has powerful neuroprotective effects (thus shielding the central nervous system from much of the adverse effects of MS), but also, it does it without directly suppressing peripheral immunity, which is quite a bonus too.

    In the words of Dr. Christiane Wrann, corresponding author for this study, neuroscientist, and leader of the “Program in Neuroprotection in Exercise”,

    ❝We are optimistic that our study will open up further developments of irisin as a therapeutic for, in particular, progressive MS. Our findings strengthen the argument that irisin can help protect neurons in the context of multiple types of neurodegenerative diseases.❞

    Read in full: New study shows how exercise hormone reduces multiple sclerosis symptoms

    Related: Lifestyle vs Multiple Sclerosis & More

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • New research challenges the idea of a ‘vicious cycle’ between psychological distress and conspiracy beliefs

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    A lot of research has been dedicated to understanding what makes people believe in conspiracies – and how they might be able to climb out of the rabbit hole again.

    Conspiracies do happen. The Watergate scandal in the 1970s, which led to the resignation of US President Richard Nixon, is arguably the most infamous example. The questioning of authority and the official narrative is something that should be encouraged.

    But some people believe conspiracy theories that are contrary to evidence. Recent research found 8.9% of New Zealand participants and 10.1% of Australian participants agreed with the (false) claim fluoride is being intentionally added to the water supply by the government to make people less intelligent and easier to control.

    What draws people to conspiracies like these?

    One prominent theory is that conspiracy beliefs are linked to psychological distress such as anxiety and depression.

    Our new research explores the causal relationship – whether psychological distress actually makes people more likely to believe in conspiracy theories. We found very limited evidence for a link between elevated distress and conspiracy beliefs.

    Getty Images

    What research suggests about conspiracy beliefs

    The existential threat model of conspiracy theories suggests experiences of psychological distress can make people more likely to develop conspiracy beliefs because they search for explanations for distressing events.

    This model argues distress actually worsens once a conspiracy belief is formed, creating a vicious cycle where distress breeds conspiracy belief which, in turn, generates more distress.

    The model also suggests this belief is exacerbated when a despised outgroup (political elites, for example) becomes salient as people try to make sense of their experience.

    However, few have rigorously tested this claim. While substantial evidence for a correlation between psychological distress and belief in conspiracy theories has been established, correlation does not imply a causal link.

    Some analyses of longitudinal data haven’t found evidence to support the hypothesis. But no one has directly tested the claims of the existential threat model.

    We set out to do this using a longitudinal survey.

    A longitudinal study isn’t as conclusive as a true experiment but it can establish the sequence of cause and effect and rule out some alternative explanations for a relationship.

    Our sample consisted of 995 participants with representatives groups from New Zealand, Australia and the United Kingdom. Each month from September 2022 to February 2023, we presented participants with a survey, including 11 conspiracy theories and common measures of anxiety, depression and stress. Each month we asked them about their level of agreement with the conspiracy theories, and their levels of psychological distress.

    Prior to collecting the data, we preregistered our hypotheses. These boiled down to the ideas that increased distress of different types (anxiety, depression, stress) will subsequently increase belief in conspiracy theories and that such beliefs will subsequently increase distress.

    Rethinking the vicious cycle

    We found very limited evidence for elevated distress subsequently increasing belief in conspiracy theories.

    We also found no evidence to support the converse – that belief in conspiracy theories increases distress.

    Our findings suggest beliefs in conspiracy theories may mostly reflect a relatively stable worldview rather than being driven by temporary changes in distress.

    This matters because some researchers have suggested interventions that reduce stress could be used to help reduce conspiracy beliefs. However, if stress is not driving conspiracy beliefs, as our results suggest, this approach is unlikely to be effective.

    We also found no evidence that conspiracy beliefs cause short-term distress. This challenges the common assumption that beliefs in conspiracy theories inherently cause harm to one’s mental health, particularly stress, anxiety and depression. That said, conspiracy beliefs could still cause harm in other ways – such as by contributing to the flow of misinformation.

    Our research challenges the idea of a vicious cycle of conspiracy beliefs. It appears distress may not have a key role in making people “spiral” down the rabbit hole.

    Interventions that foster an analytical mindset or include critical thinking skills may be more useful.

    Nick Fox, Researcher in Psychology, Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa – Massey University; Matt Williams, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa – Massey University, and Stephen Hill, Associate Professor of Psychology, Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa – Massey University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • 5 Things You Can Change About Your Personality (But: Should You?)

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    There are many personality-typing systems that, with varying degrees of validity*, aim to describe a person’s personality.

    *and often pseudoscience:

    • sometimes obviously so like astrology
    • sometimes dressed up in clinical words like the Meyers-Briggs
    • sometimes openly, per “this is not science but you may find it useful to frame things this way”, like the Enneagram

    There is currently one kind of personality-typing system (with some minor variations) that is used in the actual field of clinical psychology, specifically under the umbrella of “trait theory”, and that is…

    The “Big Five” personality traits

    Also called the OCEAN or CANOE model, based on its 5 components:

    • openness to experience: inventive/curious rather than consistent/cautious
    • conscientiousness: efficient/organized rather than extravagant/careless
    • extroversion: outgoing/energetic rather than solitary/reserved
    • agreeableness: friendly/compassionate rather than critical/judgmental
    • neuroticism: sensitive/nervous rather than resilient/confident

    The latter (neuroticism) is not to be confused with neurosis, which is very different and beyond the scope of today’s article.

    Note that some of these seem more positive/negative than others at a glance, but really, any of these could be a virtue or a vice depending on specifics or extremity.

    For scientific reference, here’s an example paper:

    The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values

    Quick self-assessment

    There are of course many lengthy questionnaires for this, but in the interests of expediency:

    Take a moment to rate yourself as honestly as you can, on a scale of 1–10, for each of those components, with 10 being highest for the named trait.

    For example, this writer gives herself: O7, C6, E3, A8, N2 (in other words I’d say I’m fairly open, moderately conscientious, on the reserved side, quite agreeable, and quite resilient)

    Now, put your rating aside (in your phone’s notes app is fine, if you hadn’t written it down already) and forget about it for the moment, because we want you to do the next exercise from scratch.

    Who would you be, at your best?

    Now imagine your perfect idealized self, the best you could ever be, with no constraints.

    Take a moment to rate your idealized self’s personality, on a scale of 1–10, for each of those components, with 10 being highest for the named trait.

    For example, this writer picks: O9, C10, E5, A8, N1.

    Maybe this, or maybe your own idealized self’s personality, will surprise you. That some traits might already be perfect for you already; others might just be nudged a little here or there; maybe there’s some big change you’d like. Chances are you didn’t go for a string of 10s or 1s (though if you did, you do you; there are no wrong answers here as this one is about your preferences).

    We become who we practice being

    There are some aspects of personality that can naturally change with age. For example:

    • confidence/resilience will usually gradually increase with age due to life experience (politely overlook teenagers’ bravado; they are usually a bundle of nerves inside, resulting in the overcompensatory displays of confidence)
    • openness to experience may decrease with age, as we can get into a rut of thinking/acting a certain way, and/or simply consciously decide that our position on something is already complete and does not need revision.

    But, we can decide for ourselves how to nudge our “Big Five” traits, for example:

    1. We can make a point of seeking out new experiences, and considering new ideas, or develop strategies for reining ourselves in
    2. We can use systems to improve our organization, or go out of our way to introduce a little well-placed chaos
    3. We can “put ourselves out there” socially, or make the decision to decline more social invitations because we simply don’t want to
    4. We can make a habit of thinking kindly of others and ourselves, or we can consciously detach ourselves and look on the cynical side more
    5. We can build on our strengths and eliminate our weaknesses, or lean into uncomfortable emotions

    Some of those may provoke a “why would anyone want to…?” response, but the truth is we are all different. An artist and a police officer may have very different goals for who they want to be as a person, for example.

    Interventions to change personality can and do work:

    A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention

    There are many ways to go about “being the change we want to see” in ourselves, and yes there can be a degree of “fake it until you make it” if that works for you, but it doesn’t have to be so. It can also simply be a matter of setting yourself reminders about the things that are most important to you.

    Writer’s example: pinned above my digital workspace I have a note from my late beloved, written just under a week before death. The final line reads, “keep being the good person that you are” (on a human level, the whole note is uplifting and soothing to me and makes me smile and remember the love we shared; or to put it in clinical terms, it promotes high agreeableness, low neuroticism).

    Other examples could be a daily practice of gratitude (promotes lower neuroticism), or going out of your way to speak to your neighbors (promotes higher extraversion), signing up for a new educational course (promotes higher openness) or downloading a budgeting app (promotes higher conscientiousness).

    In short: be the person you want to be, and be that person deliberately, because you can.

    Some resources that may help for each of the 5 traits:

    1. Curiosity Kills The Neurodegeneration
    2. How (And Why) To Train Your Pre-Frontal Cortex
    3. How To Beat Loneliness & Isolation
    4. Optimism Seriously Increases Longevity!
    5. Building Psychological Resilience (Without Undue Hardship)

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: