Pear vs Peach – Which is Healthier?

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

Our Verdict

When comparing pears to peaches, we picked the peaches.

Why?

Both are great! But peaches are exceptional in some ways that pears just can’t match up to:

In terms of macros, pears have more carbs and fiber, the ratio of which results in an approximately equal glycemic index. Thus, we’ll say that pears win this round by virtue of being the nutritionally denser option.

Looking at the vitamins, pears have (slightly) more of vitamins B6, B9, and K, while peaches have (much) more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, C, E, and choline—thus sweeping this category easily for peaches.

In the category of minerals, pears have more calcium and copper, while peaches have more iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc. This time, the margins of difference for each mineral are comparably low (i.e. pears are close behind peaches on all those minerals), but still, by strength of numbers, it’s a clear win for peaches.

When it comes to polyphenols, not only do peaches have more, but also, they have anticancer properties that pears don’t—see our link below for more about that!

Meanwhile, adding up the sections makes for an overall win for peaches, but as ever when it comes to fruits, by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!

Want to learn more?

You might like to read:

Top 8 Fruits That Prevent & Kill Cancer ← peaches in the #2 spot! They induce cell death in cancer cells while sparing healthy ones

Enjoy!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Rethinking Exercise: The Workout Paradox

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    The notion of running a caloric deficit (i.e., expending more calories than we consume) to reduce bodyfat is appealing in its simplicity, but… we’d say “it doesn’t actually work outside of a lab”, but honestly, it doesn’t actually work outside of a calculator.

    Why?

    For a start, exercise calorie costs are quite small numbers compared to metabolic base rate. Our brain alone uses a huge portion of our daily calories, and the rest of our body literally never stops doing stuff. Even if we’re lounging in bed and ostensibly not moving, on a cellular level we stay incredibly busy, and all that costs (and the currency is: calories).

    Since that cost is reflected in the body’s budget per kg of bodyweight, a larger body (regardless of its composition) will require more calories than a smaller one. We say “regardless of its composition” because this is true regardless—but for what it’s worth, muscle is more “costly” to maintain than fat, which is one of several reasons why the average man requires more daily calories than the average woman, since on average men will tend to have more muscle.

    And if you do exercise because you want to run out the budget so the body has to “spend” from fat stores?

    Good luck, because while it may work in the very short term, the body will quickly adapt, like an accountant seeing your reckless spending and cutting back somewhere else. That’s why in all kinds of exercise except high-intensity interval training, a period of exercise will be followed by a metabolic slump, the body’s “austerity measures”, to balance the books.

    You may be wondering: why is it different for HIIT? It’s because it changes things up frequently enough that the body doesn’t get a chance to adapt. To labor the financial metaphor, it involves lying to your accountant, so that the compensation is not made. Congratulations: you’re committing calorie fraud (but it’s good for the body, so hey).

    That doesn’t mean other kinds of exercise are useless (or worse, necessarily counterproductive), though! Just, that we must acknowledge that other forms of exercise are great for various aspects of physical health (strengthening the body, mobilizing blood and lymph, preventing disease, enjoying mental health benefits, etc) that don’t really affect fat levels much (which are decided more in the kitchen than the gym—and even in the category of diet, it’s more about what and how and when you eat, rather than how much).

    For more information on metabolic balance in the context of exercise, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like to read:

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • New Alzheimer’s Test Makes Diagnoses 94.5% Accurate

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We’ve written before about early Alzheimer’s screening by means of blood tests:

    So, what’s the latest?

    Protein P-Tau217 has something to say

    Researchers (Dr. Sara Matarranz-González et al.) followed 200 consecutive new patients aged 50 and older with adverse cognitive symptoms to test whether adding a blood biomarker (p-tau217) improves Alzheimer’s diagnosis in routine clinical settings.

    In few words: elevated levels of this protein in the blood are one of the most accurate early warning signs of Alzheimer’s.

    What it actually is: phosphorylated tau 217 (so, p-tau217) is a form of tau protein that becomes abnormally modified and forms tangles in the brain, inconveniently disrupting communication between neurons, and/but conveniently serving as a highly accurate biomarker of the underlying Alzheimer’s pathology (and thus, a top-tier diagnostic clue).

    We wrote a bit about tau tangles before, here: Spermine vs Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s!

    As for the accuracy of p-tau217 test results as a predictor of Alzheimer’s disease, accuracy rose from 75.5% using standard clinical evaluation alone to 94.5% accuracy after incorporating p-tau217 blood test results.

    For those who like more detailed numbers:

    • Confidence levels: neurologists’ average diagnostic confidence increased from 6.90 ± 1.74 to 8.49 ± 1.68 on a 10-point scale after seeing the biomarker data.
    • Clinical findings: benefits were seen in both general neurology clinics and specialized memory units, and across all stages—subjective cognitive complaints (38.5%), mild cognitive impairment (47.5%), and dementia (14%).
    • Agreement stats: pre-biomarker diagnoses matched final diagnoses in 71 of 200 cases (75.5%, kappa = 0.576), while post-biomarker diagnoses matched in 189 of 200 cases (94.5%, kappa = 0.906).

    About that “kappa”: this is about Cohen’s kappa coefficient, a statistical measure of agreement. And in this case…

    • Pre-biomarker diagnosis: kappa = 0.576, which indicates moderate agreement.
    • Post-biomarker diagnosis: kappa = 0.906, which indicates almost perfect agreement.

    So in other words, after adding the p-tau217 blood test, doctors’ diagnoses didn’t just improve in percentage accuracy, they also aligned much more strongly with the final confirmed diagnosis, far beyond what would be expected by chance.

    And as for how much difference all this makes in real-world terms, 51 out of 200 patients had their diagnostic category changed after clinicians reviewed the p-tau217 results, correcting both false positives and missed Alzheimer’s cases.

    In summary, a simple blood test for p-tau217 can provide a more accessible, less invasive alternative to expensive brain scans or deeply unpleasant spinal taps, improving early and accurate Alzheimer’s diagnosis and with it, improving people’s chances of getting a head start on managing the condition.

    You can read the paper in full, here: Impact of blood p-tau217 testing on diagnosis and diagnostic confidence in cognitive disorders: a real-world clinical study

    Want something more accessible than the latest blood tests?

    People often forget and/or get confused about what the signs and symptoms of Alzheimer’s are, especially when it comes to forgetting and/or getting confused.

    For example, dementia-related memory loss is less “where did I put my car keys?”, and more“what is this thing for?” (it’s your car keys). Or at a less advanced stage: “whose are these car keys?” (they are yours).

    To learn more about this sort of distinction, see:

    Is It Dementia? Spot The Signs (Because None Of Us Are Immune) ← If you’d like an objective test of memory and other cognitive impairments, this article also has a link to the industry’s gold standard test (it’s free)

    (The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Exam (SAGE) is designed to detect early signs of cognitive, memory or thinking impairments)

    Want to learn more?

    For a much more in-depth coverage of the topic of Alzheimer’s treatment on the level of the personal rather than the molecular, you might like this excellent book we reviewed a while back:

    The Spectrum of Hope: An Optimistic and New Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias – by Dr. Gayatri Devi

    …and if you just want to reduce your risk, then check out:

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Artichoke vs Olives – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing artichoke to olives, we picked the artichoke.

    Why?

    Both are great! And the battle of the antipasti…

    In terms of macros, artichoke has 4x the protein and nearly 2x the fiber as well as slightly more carbs, while olives have more (famously healthy) fats. This one really comes down to whether we want to prioritize the fiber or the fats more, so in the interests of fairness, we’re calling this round a tie.

    In the category of vitamins, artichoke has more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, B9, C, and K, while olives have more of vitamins A & E, yielding a 9:2 win to artichokes here.

    Looking at minerals, artichokes have more magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc, while olives have more calcium, iron, and selenium, for a more modest 5:3 win for olives in this round.

    In other considerations, they’re both abundant sources of polyphenols, and we’re calling this final round a tie on that basis.

    Adding up the sections makes for an overall win for artichoke, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    Black Olives vs Green Olives – Which is Healthier? ← for some nuance, which doesn’t affect the outcome of today’s choice, but is good to know

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • Eat This Daily For No Wrinkles (& How It Works)

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Dr. Andrea Suarez explains:

    Go nuts for…

    Almonds! They’re rich in vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol), beta-sitosterol, squalane, protein, and fiber:

    • Vitamin E acts as an antioxidant, protecting skin lipids.
    • Lipids in almonds support the skin barrier and hydration.
    • Protein is necessary for collagen synthesis.
    • Fiber promotes gut health, indirectly benefiting skin.
    • Polyphenolic compounds in almond skins (not the shells, the skins, the fibrous brown part that slides off if you blanch them) provide additional skin protection.

    The science (yes, there have been almond intervention studies!):

    1. 2019 Study:
      • Participants: 28 post-menopausal women with fair skin (Fitzpatrick phototype 1-2).
      • Design: 20% of daily calories from almonds vs. a calorie-matched snack.
      • Results: 9% decrease in facial wrinkles in the almond group, no change in oil production or barrier function.
    2. 2021 Study:
      • Extended Duration: 24 weeks with a similar design as the 2019 study.
      • Findings: further wrinkle reduction and improvement in skin pigmentation.
      • Mechanism: vitamin E may reduce hyperpigmentation and support antioxidant defense.
    3. UV Protection Study (2021):
      • Participants: healthy Asian women (18–45 years, Fitzpatrick phototype 2-4).
      • Method: daily almond snack vs pretzel snack for 12 weeks.
      • Outcome: increased skin resistance to UV damage in the almond group.

    Obviously, a limitation is there is not really an option to make a RCT with a blinded control; “…and group B will only think they are eating almonds” doesn’t really work. Hence, interventional RCTs with a non-blinded control (the calorie-matched snack).

    Almonds may not be the cure to all things, but they certainly are potent nuts. Best enjoyed, of course, as part of a healthy overall diet (Mediterranean diet is great), and it’s certainly advisable to take care of your skin from the outside too (sunscreen as a must; other things optional).

    For more on all of this, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like to read:

    Why You Should Diversify Your Nuts

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Small Pleasures – by Ryan Riley

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    When Hippocrates said “let food be thy medicine, and let medicine be thy food”, he may or may not have had this book in mind.

    In terms of healthiness, this one’s not the very most nutritionist-approved recipe book we’ve ever reviewed. It’s not bad, to be clear!

    But the physical health aspect is secondary to the mental health aspects, in this one, as you’ll see. And as we say, “mental health is also just health”.

    The book is divided into three sections:

    1. Comfort—for when you feel at your worst, for when eating is a chore, for when something familiar and reassuring will bring you solace. Here we find flavor and simplicity; pastas, eggs, stews, potato dishes, and the like.
    2. Restoration—for when your energy needs reawakening. Here we find flavors fresh and tangy, enlivening and bright. Things to make you feel alive.
    3. Pleasure—while there’s little in the way of health-food here, the author describes the dishes in this section as “a love letter to yourself; they tell you that you’re special as you ready yourself to return to the world”.

    And sometimes, just sometimes, we probably all need a little of that.

    Bottom line: if you’d like to bring a little more joie de vivre to your cuisine, this book can do that.

    Click here to check out Small Pleasures, and rekindle joy in your kitchen!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • The Five Key Traits Of Healthy Aging

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    The Five Keys Of Aging Healthily

    Image courtesy of Peter Prato.

    This is Dr. Daniel Levitin. He’s a neuroscientist, and his research focuses on aging, the brain, health, productivity, and creativity. Also music, and he himself is an accomplished musician also, but we’re not going to be focusing on that today.

    We’re going to be looking at the traits that, according to science, promote healthy longevity in old age. In other words, the things that increase our healthspan, from the perspective of a cognitive scientist.

    What does he say we should do?

    Dr. Levitin offers us what he calls the “COACH” traits:

    1. Curiosity
    2. Openness
    3. Associations
    4. Conscientiousness
    5. Healthy practices

    By “associations”, he means relationships. However, that would have made the acronym “CORCH”, and decisions had to be made.

    Curiosity

    Leonardo da Vinci had a list of seven traits he considered most important.

    We’ll not go into those today (he is not our featured expert of the day!), but we will say that he agreed with Dr. Levitin on what goes at the top of the list: curiosity.

    • Without curiosity, we will tend not to learn things, and learning things is key to keeping good cognitive function in old age
    • Without curiosity, we will tend not to form hypotheses about how/why things are the way they are, so we will not exercise imagination, creativity, problem-solving, and other key functions of our brain
    • Without curiosity, we will tend not to seek out new experiences, and consequently, our stimuli will be limited—and thus, so will our brains

    Openness

    Being curious about taking up ballroom dancing will do little for you, if you are not also open to actually trying it. But, openness is not just a tag-on to curiosity; it deserves its spot in its own right too.

    Sometimes, ideas and opportunities come to us unbidden, and we have to be able to be open to those too. This doesn’t mean being naïve, but it does mean having at least a position of open-minded skepticism.

    Basically, Dr. Levitin is asking us to be the opposite of the pejorative stereotype of “an old person stuck in their ways”.

    Associations

    People are complex, and so they bring complexities to our lives. Hopefully, positively stimulating ones. Without them to challenge us (again, hopefully in a positive way), we can get very stuck in a narrow field of experience.

    And of course, having at least a few good friends has numerous benefits to health. There’s been a lot of research on this; 5 appears to be optimal.

    • More than that, and the depth tends to tail off, and/or stresses ensue from juggling too many relationships
    • Fewer than that, and we might be only a calendar clash away from loneliness

    Friends provide social stimulation and mutual support; they’re good for our mental health and even our physiological immunity (counterintuitively, by means of shared germs).

    And, a strong secure romantic relationship is something that has been found time and again to extend healthy life.

    Note: by popular statistics, this benefit is conferred upon men partnered with women, men partnered with men, women partnered with women, but not women partnered with men.

    There may be a causative factor that’s beyond the scope of this article which is about cognitive science, not feminism, but there could also be a mathematical explanation for this apparent odd-one-out:

    Since women tend to live longer than men (who are also often older than their female partners), women who live the longest are often not in a relationship—precisely because they are widows. So these long-lived widows will tend to skew the stats, through no fault of their husbands.

    On the flipside of this, for a woman to predecease her (statistically older and shorter-lived) husband will often require that she die quite early (perhaps due to accident or illness unrelated to age), which will again skew the stats to “women married to men die younger”, without anything nefarious going on.

    Conscientiousness

    People who score highly in the character trait “conscientiousness” will tend to live longer. The impact is so great, that a child’s scores will tend to dictate who dies in their 60s or their 80s, for example.

    What does conscientiousness mean? It’s a broad character trait that’s scored in psychometric tests, so it can be things that have a direct impact on health, such as brushing one’s teeth, or things that are merely correlated, such as checking one’s work for typos (this writer does her best!).

    In short, if you are the sort of person who attends to the paperwork for your taxes on time, you are probably also the sort of person who remembers to get your flu vaccination and cancer screening.

    Healthy practices

    This means “the usual things”, such as:

    Want to learn more?

    You can check out his book, which we reviewed all so recently, and you can also enjoy this video, in which he talks about matters concerning healthy aging from a neuroscientist’s perspective, ranging from heart health and neurodegeneration, to the myth of failing memory, to music and lifespan and more:

    !

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: