Spermine vs Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s!

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s are both neurodegenerative disorders that involve an accumulation of harmful proteins in the brain, including α-synuclein, β-amyloid (also called amyloid-β; it’s the exact same protein just written down differently), and tau protein*.

*…which just gets written like that instead of using a Greek letter τ, probably to avoid looking like the Greek letter τ that in mathematics denotes the ratio of the circumference to the radius of a circle (so in other words, 2π).

Back to biology

Because of the association of those harmful proteins with the development and progression of neurodegenerative disorders, a lot of attention has been given to how to get rid of them.

In a health brain, the glymphatic system (a portmanteau of glial cells doing the job of the lymphatic system, but in the brain, where there is no lymph) does this adequately.

We’ve written about this previously, for example:

How To Clean Your Brain (Glymphatic Health Primer)

Take Care Of Your Lymphatic System To Beat Cognitive Decline ← still relevant because once the waste products have been removed from the brain, they still need to be removed further, or else they would just pile up right outside the brain, as though a city’s sanitation workers went on strike.

On which note, because the glymphatic system is strongly affected by gravity, the brain’s ability to remove toxins is dependent on the orientation of the head. This is critical for the clearance of α-synuclein and β-amyloid proteins, amongst others, and so this has a consequence that we’ve done a main feature about before:

  • sleeping sideways is far better than sleeping on one’s back.
  • sleeping on one’s right side is better than sleeping on one’s left side.

For more details on that, see:

Goodnight, Glymphatic System: How Your Sleep Position Changes Dementia Risk

Now, about spermine!

Firstly, what is it? Spermine is a rather small polyamine (protein made of more than one amino acid) that occurs naturally in most living cells of the body that are capable of mitosis.

Next, why is called that? Spermine was first identified in seminal fluid about 150 years ago, as it’s present in relatively high concentrations there. Aside from that, there is no particular connection with sperm, and as we say, it’s made throughout the body.

Finally, why is there a chef’s hat on the brain in the image next to this article’s title? For this one, you can blame the lead researcher, Dr. Jinghui Lui, who explained spermine’s anti-Alzheimer’s and anti-Parkinson’s powers in the following way:

Autophagy is more effective at handling larger protein clumps. And spermine is, so to speak, the binding agent that brings the strands together. There are only weakly attractive electrical forces between the molecules, and these organize them but do not firmly bind them together.

The spermine is like cheese that connects the long, thin noodles without gluing them together, making them easier to digest.

If we better understand the underlying processes, we can cook tastier and more digestible dishes, so to speak, because then we’ll know exactly which spices, in which amounts, make the sauce especially tasty.❞

Lexical note: Autophagy = literally, “eating oneself”; it’s the name given to the cellular process of “eating” old cells, either for recycling or waste disposal, or a combination of the above.

Now, maybe she got carried away in the last bit there about making the sauce especially tasty, but her point is that the presence of spermine causes the harmful proteins to clump in ways that make them easier for the body to eliminate.

You might be wondering how it does that, and to use slightly more scientific words than Dr. Lui’s cooking metaphor, spermine promotes biomolecular condensation—gently drawing protein fibers together through weak electrical interactions (like how static charge makes things cling together)—so that the cell’s waste-removal system can degrade them more efficiently.

You might next be wondering what level testing is at, and it’s currently at the level of our dear old friend C. elegans (a nematode, a kind of tiny worm, used a lot in biological research). Now, that may not sound inspiring of confidence, but C. elegans is used a lot in medical research of this kind because:

  • Despite being very small and very simple, C. elegans shares many fundamental biological pathways with humans, including those governing aging, metabolism, stress responses, autophagy, and cell death. This makes it a great choice for first-line experiments in things pertaining to those areas of biology.
  • Of particular relevance to this study, it has 302 neurons with a complete, published connectome—the only animal with a fully mapped neural wiring diagram—making it awesome for studying neurobiology and degeneration.
  • And, as a bonus, the worm’s entire body is transparent, allowing real-time imaging of cellular processes, protein aggregation (yes, exactly of the kinds we’ve been talking about today), and more (we’ll be here all day if we list the things) without invasive procedures (that would create a confounding observer bias by killing the worm and thus halting the process, or at the very least injuring the worm and thus interfering with the process).

So that’s why Dr. Liu and her team used that.

Of course, C. elegans is only the first step, and future experiments will need to scale things up—probably mice next, then humans. A full step-by-step progression would go something like C. elegans D. melanogaster (fruit fly) → mouse → non-human primate of some kind → human, but realistically, the only stages probably needed for this are nematode → mouse → human.

In summary: spermine’s protein-clustering effect can now accelerate the development of new treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.

You can read the (fascinating) paper in full, here: Spermine modulation of Alzheimer’s Tau and Parkinson’s α-synuclein: implications for biomolecular condensation and neurodegeneration

So… Should I eat sperm?

Well, don’t let us stop you if you feel so inclined, but no, there’s no medical reason to do so that we’re aware of, including the above.

We hit a similar issue issue with: Spermidine For Longevity ← note that this is spermidine, not spermine; similar name and similar etymology; different molecule!

…in which we noted:

Does that mean that consuming semen is good for longevity?

Aside from the health benefits of a healthy sex life… No, not really. Semen does contain spermidine as well as some important minerals, but you’d need to consume approximately 1 cup of semen to get the equivalent spermidine you’d get from 1 tbsp of edamame (young soy) beans.

Unless your lifestyle is rather more exciting than this writer’s, it’s a lot easier to get 1 tbsp of edamame beans than 1 cup of semen.

Learn more: Frontiers in Nutrition | Polyamines in Food

Enjoy!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Recommended

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Cabbage vs Spinach – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing cabbage to spinach, we picked the spinach.

    Why?

    Why, oh why indeed? ← lamentations of this cabbage-loving writer

    But more seriously:

    In terms of macros, these are very similar: mostly water, small amounts of carbs and protein, and enough fiber to hold them together. The only notable point of distinction here is that cabbage higher in soluble fiber, while spinach has more insoluble fiber, however these are both important, just different, and ultimately balanced in any case, so we’ll call this round a tie.

    In the category of vitamins, cabbage has more of vitamins B5 and C, while spinach has more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B6, B7, B9, E, K, and choline; a clear win for spinach.

    When it comes to minerals, cabbage is not higher in any minerals, and spinach has more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc. Another easy win for spinach.

    With regard to phytochemicals, spinach has a much higher polyphenol content (mostly flavonols), and on the flipside, spinach has a much higher oxalate content (that’s not a problem for most people, but bad if you have certain kidney issues). So this category could be swung any which way depending on the state of your kidneys. For simplicity, we’ll record this round as a tie, but its constituent parts are worth bearing in mind.

    Adding up the sections makes for an overall win for spinach, but by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    What Do The Different Kinds Of Fiber Do? 30 Foods That Rank Highest

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • How to Stop Negative Thinking – by Daniel Paul

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Just think positive thoughts” is all well and good, but it doesn’t get much mileage in the real world, does it?

    What Daniel Paul offers is a lot better than that. Taking a CBT approach, he recommends tips and tricks, gives explanations and exercises, and in short, puts tools in the reader’s toolbox.

    But it doesn’t stop at just stopping negative thinking. Rather, it takes a holistic approach to also improve your general life…

    • Bookending your day with a good start and finish
    • Scheduling a time for any negative thinking that does need to occur (again with the useful realism!)
    • Inviting the reader to take on small challenges, of the kind that’ll have knock-on effects that add and multiply and compound as we go

    The format is very easy-reading, and we love that there are clear section headings and chapter summaries, too.

    Bottom line: definitely a book with the potential to improve your life from day one, and that’ll keep you coming back to it as a cheatsheet and references source.

    Get your copy of “How to Stop Negative Thinking” from Amazon today!

    Share This Post

  • The Cluttered Mind – by Deborah McKenna

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Coming from an eclectic psychotherapy background, Deborah McKenna outlines a wide array of techniques to “do what it says on the tin”, that is:

    Organizing the junk drawer of your mind.

    McKenna argues that it’s natural for something so gargantuan as our mind to get cluttered… but that it’s perfectly possible, with a good system, to tidy up considerably.

    The benefit of this is much like the benefit of tidying a room:

    Imagine a kitchen in which half the things have not been put away; there are dishes in the sink, something is growing behind the trash can… and you have a vague suspicion that if you open a certain cupboard, its contents are going to come falling out on your head. How are you going to cook a meal here?

    Imagine a mind when many thoughts have been left untended; there are things you needed to process, and there’s a steady resentment of something growing in some dark part of your mind… and there’s some part of your memory that you’re afraid to even look at it, because of all it’ll cause to come surging back at you. How are you going to strategize your life here?

    Fortunately, McKenna is here to guide you through doing for your mind what Marie Kondo would do for your home. And, even better, McKenna does it with a simple and clear writing style, assorted diagrams, and a step-by-step approach to getting everything in order.

    Give Your Mind A Spring-Cleaning With This Book From Amazon Today

    Share This Post

Related Posts

  • Canned Tuna vs Canned Sardines – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing canned tuna to canned sardines, we picked the sardines.

    Why?

    This comparison is unfair, but practical—because both are sold next to each other in the supermarket and often used for similar things.

    It’s unfair because in a can of tuna, there is tuna meat, whereas in a can of sardines, there is sardine meat, skin, and bones.

    Consequently, sardines outperform tuna in almost everything, because a lot of nutrients are in the skin and bones.

    To be completely unambiguous:

    Sardines have more vitamins and minerals by far (special shout-out to calcium, of which sardines contain 6000% more), and more choline (which is sometimes reckoned as a vitamin, sometimes not).

    Tuna does have marginally more protein, and less fat. If you are trying to limit your cholesterol intake, then that could be an argument for choosing tuna over sardines.

    All in all: the sardines are more nutrient dense by far, are good sources of vitamins and minerals that tuna contains less of (and in many cases only trace amounts of), and for most people this will more than offset the difference in cholesterol, especially if having not more than one can per day.

    About that skin and bones…

    That’s where the real benefit for your joints lies, by the way!

    See: We Are Such Stuff As Fish Are Made Of

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Apricots vs Peaches – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing apricots to peaches, we picked the apricots.

    Why?

    Both are great! But there’s a clear winner:

    In terms of macros, apricots have more fiber and, which is less important because the numbers are small, more protein. Apricots do also have more carbs, and/but carbs from whole fruit are not a problem for most people (especially because of the fiber), unless undertaking a very carb-controlled diet.

    When it comes to vitamins, apricots sweep with more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B5, B6, B9, C, E, & K. Peaches meanwhile boast more vitamin B3, and that only marginally, as well as more choline.

    In the category of minerals, apricots sweep again with more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc. Peaches are not higher in any minerals.

    Finally, if we consider polyphenols, apricots sweep yet again. The flavonols that peaches have, apricots have more of, and apricots have a long list of flavonols that peaches don’t.

    Outside of flavonols, there is one (1) phenolic acid that peaches have more of (it’s 3-Caffeoylquinic acid), and it’s only slightly more, and it’s mostly in the skin which isn’t included if you buy your fruit ready-chopped. So in those cases, apricots would have the higher 3-Caffeoylquinic acid content anyway.

    All in all, with their higher content of fiber, vitamins, minerals, and polyphenols, apricots easily win the day.

    Enjoy both, though! Diversity is healthy!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like to read:

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Blueberries vs Jackfruit – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing blueberries to jackfruit, we picked the blueberries.

    Why?

    Both have their merits!

    In terms of macros, blueberries have more fiber and jackfruit has more protein. However, notwithstanding jackfruit being a common culinary stand-in for animal-based meats due to its texture, it doesn’t actually have that much more protein than blueberries (and, for what it’s worth, less protein than avocado), so we say the extra fiber in blueberries counts for more, and thus blueberries get a small nominal win in this category.

    As for vitamins, jackfruit does sweep this category: blueberries have more of vitamins E and K, while jackfruit has more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, B9, and C, winning.

    Looking at minerals, blueberries have more iron, manganese, selenium, and zinc, while jackfruit has more calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and potassium, for a 4:4 tie here.

    In other considerations, blueberries are famous for their antioxidants and not without reason; blueberries are much higher in polyphenols, so that’s another point in their favor.

    Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for blueberries, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    Jackfruit vs Durian – Which is Healthier? ← including some fun durian facts (such as how to pick a good one, and what happens if you eat durian and drink alcohol)

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: