
The Hidden Danger Of Sorbitol
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Sorbitol, a common sweetener in many foods, is a sugar alcohol, which means it is neither a sugar nor an alcohol in the sense that most people understand those words, but chemists have their classification systems and sorbitol’s chemical structure is such that, with its hydroxyl groups each attached to one carbon atom, it’s a sugar alcohol.
So, what’s the problem?
We’ll cut right to the chase: it can be indirectly quite harmful to the liver.
To understand why, first understand how fructose is so bad for the liver. It’s so bad, because while glucose and fructose (the monosaccharides found in equal parts in the disaccharide that is sucrose, i.e. table sugar) both ultimately get converted into glycogen (if not used immediately for energy), but for fructose, this happens mostly* in the liver, which a) taxes it b) goes very unregulated by the pancreas, causing potentially dangerous blood sugar spikes.
This has several interesting effects:
- Because fructose doesn’t directly affect insulin levels, it doesn’t cause insulin insensitivity (yay)
- Because fructose doesn’t directly affect insulin levels, this leaves hyperglycemia untreated (oh dear)
- Because fructose is metabolized by the liver and converted to glycogen which is stored there, it’s one of the main contributors to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (at this point, we’re retracting our “yay”)
Read more: Fructose and sugar: a major mediator of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
*”Mostly” in the liver being about 80% in the liver. The remaining 20%ish is processed by the kidneys, where it contributes to kidney stones instead. So, still not fabulous.
Now know this: sorbitol can be converted very quickly and easily into fructose (oops!)
Researchers (Dr. Madelyn Jackstadt et al.) found that if you have sufficient quantities of certain Aeromonas bacteria, they degrade sorbitol into harmless byproducts, but without them sorbitol passes to the liver, where it is converted into fructose and fructose derivatives.
However, you cannot rely on “well, I’m pretty sure my gut is in good shape”, because excess sorbitol—whether eaten directly or generated from high glucose intake—can overwhelm even those beneficial bacteria.
You can find the paper itself, here: Intestine-derived sorbitol drives steatotic liver disease in the absence of gut bacteria
What should we use instead?
Honestly, there are no sweeteners that we’re aware of that have no drawbacks.
Simply sweetness itself can cause problems: we can build tolerance to sweetness. Many sugar substitutes are many times (in some cases, hundreds of times) sweeter than sugar. This leads to people craving increasingly sweeter foods for the same experiential sweetness level.
Because of this, the World Health Organization has released a report offering guidance regards the use of sugar-free sweeteners.
In a nutshell, the guidance is: don’t
- Here’s the report itself: Use of non-sugar sweeteners: WHO guideline
- And it was based on this huge systematic review: Health effects of the use of non-sugar sweeteners: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Here’s the WHO’s own press release about it: WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
Nevertheless, if you really want to, we previously did a rundown on:
- Sucrose (metabolic problems)
- Sucralose (genotoxic)
- Erythritol (ischemiagenic)
- Xylitol (gut disruptor)
- Acesulfame K (gut disruptor)
- Stevia (strong risk of sweetness tolerance problem)
- Glycine (beneficial in moderation, sweetness problem though)
For more details than those one-or-few-word summaries, see: What’s The Healthiest Sweetener?
We’ve also talked about: The Fascinating Truth About Aspartame, Cancer, & Neurotoxicity
…which covers how the most popular beliefs about aspartame are myths, and in large part stemming from a single viral hoax chain letter in the 90s!
Want to do more for your liver?
Consider: N-Acetyl Cysteine For The Liver & More
Or if you prefer a purely dietary approach, then: How To Unfatty A Fatty Liver
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Mythbusting The Mask Debate
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Mythbusting The Mask Debate
We asked you for your mask policy this respiratory virus season, and got the above-depicted, below-described, set of responses:
- A little under half of you said you will be masking when practical in indoor public places
- A little over a fifth of you said you will mask only if you have respiratory virus symptoms
- A little under a fifth of you said that you will not mask, because you don’t think it helps
- A much smaller minority of you (7%) said you will go with whatever people around you are doing
- An equally small minority of you said that you will not mask, because you’re not concerned about infections
So, what does the science say?
Wearing a mask reduces the transmission of respiratory viruses: True or False?
True…with limitations. The limitations include:
- The type of mask
- A homemade polyester single-sheet is not the same as an N95 respirator, for instance
- How well it is fitted
- It needs to be a physical barrier, so a loose-fitting “going through the motions” fit won’t help
- The condition of the mask
- And if applicable, the replaceable filter in the mask
- What exactly it has to stop
- What kind of virus, what kind of viral load, what kind of environment, is someone coughing/sneezing, etc
More details on these things can be found in the link at the end of today’s main feature, as it’s more than we could fit here!
Note: We’re talking about respiratory viruses in general in this main feature, but most extant up-to-date research is on COVID, so that’s going to appear quite a lot. Remember though, even COVID is not one beast, but many different variants, each with their own properties.
Nevertheless, the scientific consensus is “it does help, but is not a magical amulet”:
- 2021: Effectiveness of Face Masks in Reducing the Spread of COVID-19: A Model-Based Analysis
- 2022: Why Masks are Important during COVID‐19 Pandemic
- 2023: The mitigating effect of masks on the spread of COVID-19
Wearing a mask is actually unhygienic: True or False?
False, assuming your mask is clean when you put it on.
This (the fear of breathing more of one’s own germs in a cyclic fashion) was a point raised by some of those who expressed mask-unfavorable views in response to our poll.
There have been studies testing this, and they mostly say the same thing, “if it’s clean when you put it on, great, if not, then well yes, that can be a problem”:
❝A longer mask usage significantly increased the fungal colony numbers but not the bacterial colony numbers.
Although most identified microbes were non-pathogenic in humans; Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Cladosporium, we found several pathogenic microbes; Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Aspergillus, and Microsporum.
We also found no associations of mask-attached microbes with the transportation methods or gargling.
We propose that immunocompromised people should avoid repeated use of masks to prevent microbial infection.❞
Source: Bacterial and fungal isolation from face masks under the COVID-19 pandemic
Wearing a mask can mean we don’t get enough oxygen: True or False?
False, for any masks made-for-purpose (i.e., are by default “breathable”), under normal conditions:
- COVID‐19 pandemic: do surgical masks impact respiratory nasal functions?
- Performance Comparison of Single and Double Masks: Filtration Efficiencies, Breathing Resistance and CO2 Content
However, wearing a mask while engaging in strenuous best-effort cardiovascular exercise, will reduce VO₂max. To be clear, you will still have more than enough oxygen to function; it’s not considered a health hazard. However, it will reduce peak athletic performance:
…so if you are worrying about whether the mask will impede you breathing, ask yourself: am I engaging in an activity that requires my peak athletic performance?
Also: don’t let it get soaked with water, because…
Writer’s anecdote as an additional caveat: in the earliest days of the COVID pandemic, I had a simple cloth mask on, the one-piece polyester kind that we later learned quite useless. The fit wasn’t perfect either, but one day I was caught in heavy rain (I had left it on while going from one store to another while shopping), and suddenly, it fitted perfectly, as being soaked through caused it to cling beautifully to my face.
However, I was now effectively being waterboarded. I will say, it was not pleasant, but also I did not die. I did buy a new mask in the next store, though.
tl;dr = an exception to “no it won’t impede your breathing” is that a mask may indeed impede your breathing if it is made of cloth and literally soaked with water; that is how waterboarding works!
Want up-to-date information?
Most of the studies we cited today were from 2022 or 2023, but you can get up-to-date information and guidance from the World Health Organization, who really do not have any agenda besides actual world health, here:
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Masks | Frequently Asked Questions
At the time of writing this newsletter, the above information was last updated yesterday.
Take care!
Share This Post
-
5 Ways To Beat Afternoon Energy Slumps
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
This is Nisha Vora, of Rainbow Plant Life fame. After graduating from Harvard Law School, she realized she hated being a lawyer, and pivoted completely to become what she now is 12 years later, a chef and health coach.
Here are her tips for boosting energy through the day:
Caffeine timing
If you don’t do caffeine at all, no need to change that, but if you do, Vora advises that midday is the best time for it, with a very good rationale:
- of course it should not be too late in the day, because the elimination half-life of caffeine (4–8 hours to eliminate just half of the caffeine, depending on genes, call it 6 hours as an average though honestly for most people it will either be 4 or 8, not 6) is such that it can easily interfere with sleep for most people
- because caffeine is an adenosine blocker, not an adenosine inhibitor, taking caffeine in the morning means either there’s no adenosine to block, or it’ll just “save” that adenosine for later, i.e. when the caffeine is eliminated, then the adenosine will kick in, meaning that your morning sleepiness has now been deferred to the afternoon, rather than eliminated.
Another reminder that caffeine is the “payday loan” of energy. So, midday it is. No morning sleepiness to defer, and yet also not so late as to interfere with sleep.
See also: Calculate (And Enjoy) The Perfect Night’s Sleep
Simplify what can be simplified
This one’s not from a physiological basis, but rather, that a lot of the time most of us have much of our energy being taken by constant task-switching (what gets called multitasking, but as our brain is a single processor, it really means switching rapidly between different kinds of cognition, which is not efficient). In order to avoid that energy drain, try to streamline things and make a particular effort to not only single-task, but to do so without distractions.
Counterpoint: if you have unmedicated ADHD, then chances are you’ll do better with a single small distraction chosen by you, than trying to go without distractions, because your brain will find distractions anyway, so you might as well choose one (for many people it is background music, or a podcast or TV show that one doesn’t may attention to but it’s there) as a matter of harm reduction, and that way you’ll do better at focusing on your primary task than if your brain were reaching out for every and any possible distraction.
Manage your blood sugars
In particular, she advocates for avoiding sugary breakfasts, opting instead for protein, fat, and fiber-rich options. For more in this regard, see:
10 Ways To Balance Your Blood Sugars
Walk after meals
You don’t have to don hiking boots and “I am just going outside and may be some time“; rather, even a 2–5 minute walk after a meal helps regulate digestion and glucose levels, avoiding postprandial energy slumps.
So,
- if you have a treadmill, after eating is a great time to use it for a few minutes
- if you have stairs, now’s a great time to go up and down them a few times
One last technique for when everything else fails
We’ll quote her directly on this one:
❝Despite my best efforts, soemtimes I just have one of those days. Maybe I didn’t sleep well or I’m distracted by my never ending thoughts. If I need to be productive or energized on those days, I will do something that I absolutely hate:
I will take a cold shower.
And I hate it because I’m already always cold all the time, so why would I want to get a cold shower?
Well, it’s because cold water immersion has been shown to dramatically boost your dopamine levels, which gives you more energy and motivation.
In the moment though, it’s mostly painful and I hate everything and everyone around me.
But I know that if I can suffer through two minutes of a cold shower, I will feel so refreshed.❞
There are more benefits than just that, though, see:
A Cold Shower A Day Keeps The Doctor Away?
Want more from Nisha Vora?
We reviewed one of her books a while back:
The Vegan Instant Pot Cookbook – by Nisha Vora
Enjoy!
Share This Post
-
Is It Worth Taking Testosterone In Menopause?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!
Have a question or a request? We love to hear from you!
In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!
As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!
So, no question/request too big or small 😎
❝Why are some people recommending taking testosterone for menopause, doesn’t testosterone go up in menopause anyway?❞
A good question with an interesting answer!
To answer the second part first though: testosterone goes up relative to estrogen, and this relative rise of testosterone is part of what’s responsible for androgenic (masculinizing) effects that occur in menopause. This is a process that, if untreated, will continue to have cumulative effects over time for the rest of one’s life.
See also: Menopause, & When Not To Let Your Guard Down
However, while testosterone goes up relative to estrogen, it actually goes down in terms of its own actual numbers—it’s just that testosterone undergoes a slow, gradual decline, while estrogen plummets quickly. Thus, because of the shortage of estrogen to oppose its masculinizing effects, even the technically now-lower total amount of testosterone is able to do more than the previously higher (but opposed by estrogen) levels were able to do.
It’s worth noting that prior to menopause, most women produce about 3x more testosterone than estrogen—it’s just that estrogen is a lot more powerful, mol for mol, mg for mg.
So of course, when that estrogen drops off, testosterone takes the wheel.
See also: What You Should Have Been Told About The Menopause Beforehand
You may be wondering where this testosterone comes from: circulating testosterone is produced by the ovaries (25%) and the adrenal glands (25%), and the rest comes from peripheral conversion of adrenal androgens in fat cells (50%). So, if for example you have a bilateral ovariectomy (also called oophorectomy), then you’ll only actually take a 25% hit to testosterone levels, assuming normal function beforehand. In contrast, someone having a bilateral orchiectomy (also called orchidectomy, and is the removal of the testes) would take a 95% hit to testosterone levels, assuming normal function beforehand.
This is because the ovaries/testes are (usually, aside from in some intersex conditions) specialized to produce mostly estrogen or testosterone, respectively, since they were differentiated during gestation (prior to that, they were the same basic undifferentiated gonads).
Alright, that’s the “doesn’t testosterone go up in menopause anyway?” part covered, now onto the “why are some people recommending taking testosterone for menopause?” part!
Why it gets prescribed
Testosterone—albeit at much lower levels than for men—can be important in women for bone density and muscle mass, cognitive function, mood, sexual function, and energy.
Of those 5 things, there is one that stands out as the reason that’s usually the reason, and that’s…
❝Numerous studies have shown that adding testosterone to hormonal therapy can improve sexual function and general wellbeing among women during their menopause. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of testosterone treatment in women has provided robust support for a trial of testosterone in women when clinically indicated. In postmenopausal women, testosterone supplementation improved several domains of sexual response, including sexual desire, pleasure, arousal, orgasm, and self-image.❞
You may be wondering: are there any side effects?
And the answer is yes, but with nuance that’s worth understanding:
❝A significant rise in the amount of LDL-cholesterol, and reductions in the amounts of total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides, were seen with testosterone administered orally, but not when administered non-orally (e.g. by transdermal patch or cream).
An overall increase in weight* was recorded with testosterone treatment. No effects of testosterone were reported for body composition, musculoskeletal variables, or cognitive measures, although the number of women who contributed data for these outcomes was small.
Testosterone was associated with a significantly greater likelihood of reporting acne and [facial] hair growth, but no serious adverse events were recorded.❞
*However, since no effects were reported for body composition (i.e. they probably didn’t record it), there is a strong chance that the increase in weight was due to testosterone-induced increase in muscle mass, not an increase in fat. If anything, testosterone will tend towards reducing body fat percentage (which is why men’s healthy body fat levels are lower than women’s healthy body fat levels, on average; it is hormones that mediate this).
Read in full: Safety and efficacy of testosterone for women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trial data
Further,
❝Androgenic Side Effects:
Exogenous androgen given to women in sufficient quantities or for a sufficient duration can promote androgenic side effects such as acne, hirsutism, and, in extreme cases, virilization.
Virilization includes deepening of the voice, clitoromegaly, masculinization of body habitus, and androgenic alopecia.❞
About some those terms:
- Androgenic alopecia = male pattern baldness; actually the same condition as female pattern baldness, but the visual pattern is slightly different according to testosterone levels.
- Clitoromegaly = the clitoris is receiving hormone-mediated instructions to be a penis (bearing in mind, these two organs are analogous, and were the same undifferentiated organ before they were normally differentiated during gestation), and as such, the visible glans clitoris (the part you can see) will grow (up to an inch or so) and start responding to stimulation like a penis instead of like a clitoris (what feels good to it will change accordingly), and the sensation of orgasm will change too. While many people might not mind this, it’s definitely something worth knowing about in advance!
Read in full: The Safety of Testosterone Therapy in Women
So, while we are neither your gynecologist nor your endocrinologist, we can say that the decision-making process might look something like this:
- Are your T-levels in healthy female ranges (5–55ng/DL, or 0.2–1.9nmol/L)? If so, supplementation will not be indicated for most women.
- If they’re below that, are you experiencing any of the problems commonly associated with such, of which the most evident is usually sexual function (where other* causes of loss of sexual function have been ruled out or otherwise adequately addressed)?
- If you are, do you want to fix that more than you want to avoid the side effects of taking T?
*for example, such as discussed in Come As You Are – by Dr. Emily Nagoski
If so, then talking to a potential prescriber seems like a fine option.
But! There is one last problem, and it’s hardly insurmountable, but it is an inconvenience. For obvious reasons, that vast majority of supplemental testosterone produced is made for men. Now, in and of itself this isn’t an issue; it’s the exact same substance and will work the exact same way in you as it will in a man.
However, it does mean that the doses in which testosterone is most readily available, tend to be aimed at delivering testosterone in normal male quantities, which is about 10x what you’ll want (unless your intention is actually to trans your gender, in which case, congratulations on your manliness). This means that, assuming you want a normal female amount of testosterone, then—depending on the source—you may have to get a bit fiddly with it, since you’re going to be taking the amount that the manufacturer expected to be a daily dose, and making that last 10 days.
For example, if you get T-gel in a dispenser at the standard 1.62% percent/20.25mg per pump, then if a man is prescribed 2 pumps per day then you might be prescribed 0.2 pumps per day. It’s the medical equivalent of a recipe that calls for ⅕ of an egg, which is awkward, and does create risks of accidentally taking more than you wanted.
One last note…
If the issue is libido, you might want to try progesterone (if you’re not already on it) before you try testosterone, as that does boost libido, and is also responsible for a number of other important things, including playing a critical role in bone turnover rates:
Progesterone Menopausal HRT: When, Why, And How To Benefit
And if it’s specifically vaginal dryness that’s the issue, often testosterone is the opposite of what’s needed (though DHEA can help):
Vaginal Dryness In Menopause | Causes & Solutions
Enjoy!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Gluten Sensitivity May Not Be About The Gluten
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
When it comes to understanding of how gluten affects different people’s bodies, there’s a lot that’s not well-understood.
By this we mean: there’s a lot that’s not well-understood by science, and there’s even more that’s not well-understood by people in general.
We did some demystification, covering such things as celiac disease and the differences between an allergy, intolerance, and sensitivity, here:
And now…
A new culprit arises
Well, actually a moderately well-known culprit, just, not usually associated with this.
Researchers (Dr. Jessica Biesiekierski et al.) found that non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) appears to be driven by gut–brain interactions rather than gluten itself.
You may be thinking: “yes, but the gut is reacting to the gluten, right?”
A very reasonable assumption! And the answer is: no
As Dr. Biesiekierski put it:
❝Contrary to popular belief, most people with NCGS aren’t reacting to gluten. Our findings show that symptoms are more often triggered by fermentable carbohydrates, commonly known as FODMAPs, by other wheat components or by people’s expectations and prior experiences with food.❞
As for how she and her team figured this out, they did the largest combined analysis of its kind that’s ever been done on this topic, and found:
❝Across recent studies, people with IBS who believe they’re gluten-sensitive react similarly to gluten, wheat, and placebo.
This suggests that how people anticipate and interpret gut sensations can strongly influence their symptoms.
Taken together, this redefines NCGS as part of the gut–brain interaction spectrum, closer to conditions like irritable bowel syndrome, rather than a distinct gluten disorder.❞
You can find the paper itself, here: Non-coeliac gluten sensitivity ← where you can also read the insights of Dr. Daisy Jonkers and other researchers!
If you do want to avoid FODMAPs while still getting enough other important plant nutrients, see: Fruit, Fiber, & Leafy Greens… On A Low-FODMAP Diet!
So, with this in mind, one might wonder: is there any harm in going gluten-free as well just to be on the safe side?
And yes, there may be issues! See: Why Going Gluten-Free Could Be A Bad Idea
And as for grains in general (for most people) enjoying whole grains remains a very good idea:
3 servings (each being 90g, or about ½ cup) of whole grains per day is associated with a 22% reduction in risk of heart disease, 5% reduction in all-cause mortality, and a lot of benefits across a lot of other disease risks:
❝This meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grain intake is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and total cancer, and mortality from all causes, respiratory diseases, infectious diseases, diabetes, and all non-cardiovascular, non-cancer causes.
These findings support dietary guidelines that recommend increased intake of whole grain to reduce the risk of chronic diseases and premature mortality.❞
~ Dr. Dagfinn Aune et al.
We’d like to give a lot more sources for the same findings, as well as papers for all the individual claims, but frankly, there are so many that there isn’t room. Suffice it to say, this is neither controversial nor uncertain; these benefits are well-established.
Want to learn more?
Here’s a guest article written by none other than Dr. Jessica Biesiekierski, the lead researcher on the first study we linked today:
Your gluten sensitivity might be something else entirely, new study shows
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
The Philosophy Gym – by Dr. Stephen Law
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
If you’d like to give those “little gray cells” an extra workout, this book is a great starting place.
Dr. Stephen Law is Director of Philosophy at the Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford. As such, he’s no stranger to providing education that’s both attainable and yet challenging. Here, he lays out important philosophical questions, and challenges the reader to get to grips with them in a systematic fashion.
Each of the 25 questions/problems has a chapter devoted to it, and is ranked:
- Warm-up
- Moderate
- More Challenging
But, he doesn’t leave us to our own devices, nor does he do like a caricature of a philosopher and ask us endless rhetorical questions. Instead, he looks at various approaches taken by other philosophers over time, and invites the reader to try out those methods.
The real gain of this book is not the mere enjoyment of reading, but rather in taking those thinking skills and applying them in life… because most if not all of them do have real-world applications and/or implications too.
The book’s strongest point? That it doesn’t assume prior knowledge (and yet also doesn’t patronize the reader). Philosophy can be difficult to dip one’s toes into without a guide, because philosophers writing about philosophy can at first be like finding yourself at a party where you know nobody, but they all know each other.
In contrast, Law excels at giving quick, to-the-point ground-up summaries of key ideas and their progenitors.
In short: a wonderful way to get your brain doing things it might not have tried before!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Wasting Your Vitamins?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Are you flushing away your vitamins?
Most likely…but you don’t have to.
We all know what a wasteful expense supplements can sometimes be, but you can optimise your intake to get more bang for your buck!
Top Tips for Getting Your Money’s Worth:
- Liquids are better than tablets—the body can’t absorb nutrients from tablets anywhere as easily as it can from liquids, with some saying as low as a 50% absorption rate for tablets, so if your supplement can come in drinkable form, take it that way!
- Capsules are better than tablets—capsules, depending on the kind, contain either a powder (true capsules) or a liquid (softgels). Once the capsule/softgel is broken down in the stomach, it releases its contents, which will now be absorbed as though you took it as a drink.
- Stay hydrated—on that note, your body can only make use of nutrients that it can easily transport, and if you’re dehydrated, the process is sluggish! Having a big glass of water with your supplements will go a long way to helping your body get them where they’re needed.
- Take with black pepper—studies disagree on exactly how much black pepper improves absorption of nutrients. Some say it improves it by 50%, others say as much as 7x better. The truth is probably that it varies from one nutrient to the next, but what is (almost) universally accepted is that black pepper helps you absorb many nutrients you take orally.
- Take with a meal—bonus if you seasoned it with black pepper! But also: many nutrients are best absorbed alongside food, and many are specifically fat-soluble (so you want to take a little fat around the same time for maximum absorption)
- Consider split doses—a lot of nutrients are best absorbed when spread out a bit. Why? Your body can often only absorb so much at once, and what it couldn’t absorb can, depending on the nutrient, pass right through you. So better to space out the doses—breakfast and dinner make for great times to take them.
- Consider cycling—no, not the two-wheeled kind, though feel free to do that too! What cycling means when it comes to supplements is to understand that your body can build a tolerance to some supplements, so you’ll get gradually less effect for the same dose. Combat this by scheduling a break—five days on, two days off is a common schedule—allowing your body to optimise itself in the process!
- Check Medications—and, as is always safe, make sure you check whether any medications you take can interrupt your supplement absorption!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:









