
Instant Quiz Results, No Email Needed
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
❓ Q&A With 10almonds Subscribers!
Q: I like that the quizzes (I’ve done two so far) give immediate results , with no “give us your email to get your results”. Thanks!
A: You’re welcome! That’s one of the factors that influences what things we include here! Our mission statement is “to make health and productivity crazy simple”, and the unwritten part of that is making sure to save your time and energy wherever we reasonably can!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Move – by Caroline Williams
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
- Get 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week, says the American Heart Association
- There are over 10,000 minutes per week, says the pocket calculator
Is 150/10,000 really the goal here? Really?
For Caroline Williams, the answer is no.
In this book that’s practically a manifesto, she outlines the case that:
- Humans evolved to move
- Industrialization and capitalism scuppered that
- We now spend far too long each day without movement
Furthermore, for Williams this isn’t just an anthropological observation, it’s a problem to be solved, because:
- Our lack of movement is crippling us—literally
- Our stagnation affects not just our bodies, but also our minds
- (again literally—there’s a direct correlation with mental health)
- We urgently need to fix this
So, what now, do we need to move in to the gym and become full-time athletes to clock up enough hours of movement? No.
Williams convincingly argues the case (using data from supercentenarian “blue zones” around the world) that even non-exertive movement is sufficient. In other words, you don’t have to be running; walking is great. You don’t have to be lifting weights; doing the housework or gardening will suffice.
From that foundational axiom, she calls on us to find ways to build our life around movement… rather than production-efficiency and/or convenience. She gives plenty of tips for such too!
Bottom line: some books are “I couldn’t put it down!” books. This one’s more of a “I got the urge to get up and get moving!” book.
Get your get-up-and-go up and going with “Move”—order yours from Amazon today!
Share This Post
-
The Hidden Danger Of Sorbitol
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Sorbitol, a common sweetener in many foods, is a sugar alcohol, which means it is neither a sugar nor an alcohol in the sense that most people understand those words, but chemists have their classification systems and sorbitol’s chemical structure is such that, with its hydroxyl groups each attached to one carbon atom, it’s a sugar alcohol.
So, what’s the problem?
We’ll cut right to the chase: it can be indirectly quite harmful to the liver.
To understand why, first understand how fructose is so bad for the liver. It’s so bad, because while glucose and fructose (the monosaccharides found in equal parts in the disaccharide that is sucrose, i.e. table sugar) both ultimately get converted into glycogen (if not used immediately for energy), but for fructose, this happens mostly* in the liver, which a) taxes it b) goes very unregulated by the pancreas, causing potentially dangerous blood sugar spikes.
This has several interesting effects:
- Because fructose doesn’t directly affect insulin levels, it doesn’t cause insulin insensitivity (yay)
- Because fructose doesn’t directly affect insulin levels, this leaves hyperglycemia untreated (oh dear)
- Because fructose is metabolized by the liver and converted to glycogen which is stored there, it’s one of the main contributors to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (at this point, we’re retracting our “yay”)
Read more: Fructose and sugar: a major mediator of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
*”Mostly” in the liver being about 80% in the liver. The remaining 20%ish is processed by the kidneys, where it contributes to kidney stones instead. So, still not fabulous.
Now know this: sorbitol can be converted very quickly and easily into fructose (oops!)
Researchers (Dr. Madelyn Jackstadt et al.) found that if you have sufficient quantities of certain Aeromonas bacteria, they degrade sorbitol into harmless byproducts, but without them sorbitol passes to the liver, where it is converted into fructose and fructose derivatives.
However, you cannot rely on “well, I’m pretty sure my gut is in good shape”, because excess sorbitol—whether eaten directly or generated from high glucose intake—can overwhelm even those beneficial bacteria.
You can find the paper itself, here: Intestine-derived sorbitol drives steatotic liver disease in the absence of gut bacteria
What should we use instead?
Honestly, there are no sweeteners that we’re aware of that have no drawbacks.
Simply sweetness itself can cause problems: we can build tolerance to sweetness. Many sugar substitutes are many times (in some cases, hundreds of times) sweeter than sugar. This leads to people craving increasingly sweeter foods for the same experiential sweetness level.
Because of this, the World Health Organization has released a report offering guidance regards the use of sugar-free sweeteners.
In a nutshell, the guidance is: don’t
- Here’s the report itself: Use of non-sugar sweeteners: WHO guideline
- And it was based on this huge systematic review: Health effects of the use of non-sugar sweeteners: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Here’s the WHO’s own press release about it: WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
Nevertheless, if you really want to, we previously did a rundown on:
- Sucrose (metabolic problems)
- Sucralose (genotoxic)
- Erythritol (ischemiagenic)
- Xylitol (gut disruptor)
- Acesulfame K (gut disruptor)
- Stevia (strong risk of sweetness tolerance problem)
- Glycine (beneficial in moderation, sweetness problem though)
For more details than those one-or-few-word summaries, see: What’s The Healthiest Sweetener?
We’ve also talked about: The Fascinating Truth About Aspartame, Cancer, & Neurotoxicity
…which covers how the most popular beliefs about aspartame are myths, and in large part stemming from a single viral hoax chain letter in the 90s!
Want to do more for your liver?
Consider: N-Acetyl Cysteine For The Liver & More
Or if you prefer a purely dietary approach, then: How To Unfatty A Fatty Liver
Take care!
Share This Post
-
Walking can prevent low back pain, a new study shows
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Do you suffer from low back pain that recurs regularly? If you do, you’re not alone. Roughly 70% of people who recover from an episode of low back pain will experience a new episode in the following year.
The recurrent nature of low back pain is a major contributor to the enormous burden low back pain places on individuals and the health-care system.
In our new study, published today in The Lancet, we found that a program combining walking and education can effectively reduce the recurrence of low back pain.
PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock The WalkBack trial
We randomly assigned 701 adults who had recently recovered from an episode of low back pain to receive an individualised walking program and education (intervention), or to a no treatment group (control).
Participants in the intervention group were guided by physiotherapists across six sessions, over a six-month period. In the first, third and fifth sessions, the physiotherapist helped each participant to develop a personalised and progressive walking program that was realistic and tailored to their specific needs and preferences.
The remaining sessions were short check-ins (typically less than 15 minutes) to monitor progress and troubleshoot any potential barriers to engagement with the walking program. Due to the COVID pandemic, most participants received the entire intervention via telehealth, using video consultations and phone calls.
Low back pain can be debilitating. Karolina Kaboompics/Pexels The program was designed to be manageable, with a target of five walks per week of roughly 30 minutes daily by the end of the six-month program. Participants were also encouraged to continue walking independently after the program.
Importantly, the walking program was combined with education provided by the physiotherapists during the six sessions. This education aimed to give people a better understanding of pain, reduce fear associated with exercise and movement, and give people the confidence to self-manage any minor recurrences if they occurred.
People in the control group received no preventative treatment or education. This reflects what typically occurs after people recover from an episode of low back pain and are discharged from care.
What the results showed
We monitored the participants monthly from the time they were enrolled in the study, for up to three years, to collect information about any new recurrences of low back pain they may have experienced. We also asked participants to report on any costs related to their back pain, including time off work and the use of health-care services.
The intervention reduced the risk of a recurrence of low back pain that limited daily activity by 28%, while the recurrence of low back pain leading participants to seek care from a health professional decreased by 43%.
Participants who received the intervention had a longer average period before they had a recurrence, with a median of 208 days pain-free, compared to 112 days in the control group.
In our study, regular walking appeared to help with low back pain. PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock Overall, we also found this intervention to be cost-effective. The biggest savings came from less work absenteeism and less health service use (such as physiotherapy and massage) among the intervention group.
This trial, like all studies, had some limitations to consider. Although we tried to recruit a wide sample, we found that most participants were female, aged between 43 and 66, and were generally well educated. This may limit the extent to which we can generalise our findings.
Also, in this trial, we used physiotherapists who were up-skilled in health coaching. So we don’t know whether the intervention would achieve the same impact if it were to be delivered by other clinicians.
Walking has multiple benefits
We’ve all heard the saying that “prevention is better than a cure” – and it’s true. But this approach has been largely neglected when it comes to low back pain. Almost all previous studies have focused on treating episodes of pain, not preventing future back pain.
A limited number of small studies have shown that exercise and education can help prevent low back pain. However, most of these studies focused on exercises that are not accessible to everyone due to factors such as high cost, complexity, and the need for supervision from health-care or fitness professionals.
On the other hand, walking is a free, accessible way to exercise, including for people in rural and remote areas with limited access to health care.
Walking has a variety of advantages. Cast Of Thousands/Shutterstock Walking also delivers many other health benefits, including better heart health, improved mood and sleep quality, and reduced risk of several chronic diseases.
While walking is not everyone’s favourite form of exercise, the intervention was well-received by most people in our study. Participants reported that the additional general health benefits contributed to their ongoing motivation to continue the walking program independently.
Why is walking helpful for low back pain?
We don’t know exactly why walking is effective for preventing back pain, but possible reasons could include the combination of gentle movements, loading and strengthening of the spinal structures and muscles. It also could be related to relaxation and stress relief, and the release of “feel-good” endorphins, which block pain signals between your body and brain – essentially turning down the dial on pain.
It’s possible that other accessible and low-cost forms of exercise, such as swimming, may also be effective in preventing back pain, but surprisingly, no studies have investigated this.
Preventing low back pain is not easy. But these findings give us hope that we are getting closer to a solution, one step at a time.
Tash Pocovi, Postdoctoral research fellow, Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University; Christine Lin, Professor, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney; Mark Hancock, Professor of Physiotherapy, Macquarie University; Petra Graham, Associate Professor, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, and Simon French, Professor of Musculoskeletal Disorders, Macquarie University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Mango vs Pineapple – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing mango to pineapple, we picked the pineapple.
Why?
It was close! Both of these tropical fruits have almost identical macros, and when it comes to vitamins and minerals, mango has slightly more vitamins while pineapple has slightly more minerals, so that balances out too. Their glycemic loads are 11 and 13 respectively, so: very low, and very similar.
See also: Which Sugars Are Healthier, And Which Are Just The Same?
In terms of what sets them apart:
Mango has a lot of vitamin A, to the point that it can interfere with blood-thinners if you take those.
Pineapple has bromelain, an enzyme with unique anti-inflammatory properties that we must devote a Research Review Monday to one of these days, because there’s a lot to say, but the short version is, it’s very powerful.
Since bromelain is found only in pineapples, whereas vitamin A is easy to find in abundance in many foods, we went with the pineapple.
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
The Small Daily Habits That Add 9+ Years To Life
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Things that aren’t on the list:
- Springing out of bed for a 5am run every morning
- Getting a divorce
- Drinking 10% of your bodyweight in kale smoothies
- Regular blood transfusions from a team of healthy teenagers
- Cold water plunges
Instead, the actual habits we’re going to talk about today are quite minor things, but they add up to big differences.
First, we were a little silly with the above list, but actually before we move on, let’s examine it:
- Springing out of bed for a 5am run every morning? Can help: The Optimal Morning Routine, Per Neuroscience
- Getting a divorce? Can help: How Relationships Affect The Heart (For Better Or For Worse)
- Drinking 10% of your bodyweight in kale smoothies? Please don’t do that, but kale is good, yes: Brain Food? The Eyes Have It! ← this is about lutein, and dark green leafy vegetables are lutein superstars: A half cup of kale has 50 times more lutein than an egg.
- Regular blood transfusions from a team of healthy teenagers? Eastern European folklore notwithstanding, this one won’t help unless you have a condition that necessitates such (e.g. hematological cancer). We could quibble about some blood-related anti-aging therapies that involve donating parts of blood, but that’d take a whole article that we haven’t written yet. Maybe soon!
- Cold water plunges? Can help (but watch out): Ice Baths: To Dip Or Not To Dip?
The easier list
We’ll not keep it a mystery:
- Move more
- Sit less
- Sleep better
- Eat better
Now, probably none of those things are a shocking surprise, but what recent science has found is that the amount that most people need to improve by (in order to enjoy benefits) is much smaller than previously believed.
Specifically, two large cohort analyses have shown that very small, realistic daily improvements in movement, sitting time, sleep, and diet are associated with serious reductions in mortality risk and notable gains in lifespan and healthspan.
One of them (Dr. Maria Hagströmer et al.) found adding literally just 5 minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary time by 30 minutes per day could reduce mortality by up to 10%.
You can find that paper here: Deaths potentially averted by small changes in physical activity and sedentary time: an individual participant data meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
Another (Dr. Dorothea Dumuid et al.) found that sleeping 7.2–8.0 hours per day, doing more than 42 minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous exercise, and achieving a diet quality score* of 57.5–72.5 were associated with an average 9.35 additional years of healthy lifespan, compared to not doing those things.
*The diet quality score (DQS) involves assessing dietary components that make things better or worse, such as intake of vegetables, fruits, grains, fish, other meats, dairy, oils, and sugar-sweetened beverages (ranging 0–100; higher indicates better quality)
If those changes seem too much, then note also that as little as 5 extra minutes of sleep per day, 1.9 additional minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day, and improving by just 5 points in the DQS were associated with 1 extra year of healthy lifespan.
There’s a dose-response relationship here, as larger but still modest combined changes—24 more minutes of sleep per day, 3.7 more minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day, and a 23-point DQS improvement—were associated with about 4 additional years lived in good health.
You can find that paper here: Minimum combined sleep, physical activity, and nutrition variations associated with lifeSPAN and healthSPAN improvements: a population cohort study
Ok, but how to implement that?
Short answer: little by little!
Long answer: we’ll give our own long answer another day, as we’re out of room for today, but…
You might like these excellent books that we’ve reviewed by Dr. Rangan Chatterjee, who specializes in getting people to do just this:
- The Four Pillar Plan – by Dr. Rangan Chatterjee
- Feel Better In 5 – by Dr. Rangan Chatterjee
- Make Change That Lasts – by Dr. Rangan Chatterjee
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Rice vs Buckwheat – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing rice to buckwheat, we picked the buckwheat.
Why?
It’s a simple one today:
- The vitamin and mineral profiles are very similar, so neither of these are a swaying factor
- In terms of macros, rice is higher in carbohydrates while buckwheat is higher in fiber
- Buckwheat also has more protein, but not by much
- Buckwheat has the lower glycemic index, and a lower insulin index, too
While buckwheat cannot always be reasonably used as a substitute for rice (often because the texture would not work the same), in many cases it can be.
And if you love rice, well, so do we, but variety is also the spice of life indeed, not to mention important for good health. You know that whole “eat 30 different plants per week” thing? Grains count in that tally! So substituting buckwheat in place of rice sometimes seems like a very good bet.
Not sure where to buy it?
Here for your convenience is an example product on Amazon
Want to know more about today’s topic?
Check out: Carb-Strong or Carb-Wrong?
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:











