
Celery vs Radish – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing celery to radish, we picked the celery.
Why?
It was very close! And yes, surprising, we know. Generally speaking, the more colorful/pigmented an edible plant is, the healthier it is. Celery is just one of those weird exceptions (as is cauliflower, by the way).
Macros-wise, these two are pretty much the same—95% water, with just enough other stuff to hold them together. The proportions of “other stuff” are also pretty much equal.
In the category of vitamins, celery has more vitamin K while radish has more vitamin C; the other vitamins are pretty close to equal. We’ll call this one a minor win for celery, as vitamin K is found in fewer foods than vitamin C.
When it comes to minerals, celery has more calcium, manganese, phosphorus, and potassium, while radish has more copper, iron, selenium, and zinc. We’ll call this a minor win for radish, as the margins are a little wider for its minerals.
So, that makes the score 1–1 so far.
Both plants have an assortment of polyphenols, of which, when we add up the averages, celery comes out on top by some way. Celery also comes out on top when we do a head-to-head of the top flavonoid of each; celery has 5.15mg/100g of apigenin to radish’s 0.63mg/100g kaempferol.
Which means, both are great healthy foods, but celery wins the day.
Want to learn more?
You might like to read:
Celery vs Cucumber – Which is Healthier?
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
What Do PTSD, GABA & MAOI Antidepressants Have In Common?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Those are:
- PTSD: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- GABA: Gamma-Amino Butyric Acid (a neurotransmitter)
- MAOI: Mono-Amine Oxidase Inhibitor (a class of drug that, you guessed it, inhibits monoamine oxidase—and is mostly prescribed as antidepressants)
Aside from being four-letter initialisms, what do they have in common?
The answer is—to borrow from Lemony Snicket—a series of unfortunate events.
Action, reaction
The series of unfortunate events goes like this: trauma → PTSD → astrocyte dysregulation → increased MOAB → increased GABA → decreased forgetting of things we’d rather not keep remembering all the time.
PTSD is, of course, Not Fun™. And, that’s where it starts. A traumatic experience leads to post-traumatic stress; this is not resolved (and quite possibly cannot be resolved, per se) and it persists, having enough of an effect on life to be called a disorder.
In reality, of course, it seems to be a very normal response to such experiences, so calling it a disorder may be a misnomer, but that’s the convention.
Recently, a team of researchers (Dr. Sujung Yoon et al.) investigated how this happens, physiologically, and how that physiological process might be interrupted.
First, they used high-tech tools (single‑cell RNA sequencing and chromatin profiling) to examine postmortem brain tissue from people diagnosed with PTSD, focusing on cells in areas* involved in fear regulation and emotion, to see which genes were turned on or off, and in which specific cell types.
What they found, in few words:
Astrocytes (a kind of glial cell, a support cell in the brain) produce excess GABA in PTSD, which blocks the brain’s ability to extinguish fear memories. Further, the enzyme monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) is responsible for this build-up, meaning that MAOB inhibitors (a subcategory of MAOIs, which as a class can inhibit MAOA, MAOB, or both) could treat PTSD
This next part has only been done in mice so far (there’s a process, working its way to live human trials), but they found that MAOI drug with the snappy name of KDS2010 (which is specifically an inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B) reversed PTSD-like symptoms in mice by lowering GABA, and restoring blood flow to where it was needed, thus enabling the then-natural process of fear memory deletion.
Why this matters: these molecular findings give clinicians actionable targets—and can lead to a physiological treatment for what is currently treated as a purely psychological condition.
You can read the paper in full, here: Astrocytic gamma-aminobutyric acid dysregulation as a therapeutic target for posttraumatic stress disorder ← it goes into more detail than we have here (obviously), including identifying some of trauma’s long-lasting epigenetic marks—changing how genes are regulated in different neuronal and non-neuronal (e.g. glial, like the astrocytes we talked about) cells. We’ll quickly mention, for example, that they identified specific genes (like ELFN1, MAD1L1, KCNIP4, SST, FKBP5) and regulatory variants whose activity shifts in PTSD, so those can become targets for treatment, too.
Want a drug-free way while you wait?
There are some options.
Firstly, let’s mention that if your PTSD is C-PTSD, which is PTSD, But, Well…. Complex, then while that’s less well-understood in popular culture, it is actually easier to treat. We explain how, here: Undoing The Damage Of Life’s Hard Knocks ← which, really, is also a huge key to psychological resilience for everyday life.
If it’s the more classic “there is a singular bad thing that you can easily be caused to remember by unwanted triggers associated with it, and you suffer as a result”, then many people find that this helps: Eye Movement Desensitization & Reprocessing (EMDR) ← keeps the memories, reduces the psychological impact (for those for whom it works).
Then, if that doesn’t work, there is also this: The Dark Side Of Memory (And How To Stop Revisiting Those Memories) ← basically, doesn’t truly delete the memory, but rather removes the memory from easy access, making it nigh-impossible to remember unless given hyperspecific recall cues.
Now, we mentioned in that article that it may not be appropriate for important memories (i.e. that you might need, and/or that form a core part of who you are that you don’t want to change). So, as ever, we recommend getting guidance from your local trustworthy mental health professional, of course. But it’s worth mentioning here, for your information.
Writer’s note: when I wrote that last article about memory removal, I (for obvious reasons) forgot something, which I was given cause to remember this morning. Specifically: that while the above-mentioned memory-removal technique will make the memories very difficult to access by your conscious mind, your subconscious will have still free access to them. In this case, it means that, for example, you will still be able to have nightmares about The Bad Thing™, and if you do, you’ll then remember it when you wake up and thus functionally have full access to those memories again, as the nightmare basically dug it up and left it on your pillow for you to contemplate upon awakening.
Take care!
PS: hiding this in a postscript because it’s very much not a drug-free way… But interestingly (this writer has not tried this one personally, nor does she plan to, but it’s an option worth mentioning), THC gets prescribed for some sleep disorders, in cases where the initial sleep disruption was because of nightmares, as it will reduce those (along with any other dreams, as collateral damage): Clinical Management of Sleep and Sleep Disorders With Cannabis and Cannabinoids: Implications to Practicing Psychiatrists
Share This Post
-
The Immunostimulant Superfood –
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
First, what this book is not: a “detox cleanse” book of the kind that claims you can flush out the autism if you just eat enough celery.
What it rather is: an overview brain chemistry, gut microbiota, and the very many other bodily systems that interact with these “two brains”.
She also does some mythbusting of popular misconceptions (for example with regard to tryptophan), and explains with good science just what exactly such substances as gluten and casein can and can’t do.
The format is less of a textbook and more a multipart (i.e., chapter-by-chapter) lecture, in pop-science style though, making it very readable. There are a lot of practical advices too, and options to look up foods by effect, and what to eat for/against assorted mental states.
Bottom line: anyone who eats food is, effectively, drugging themselves in one fashion or another—so you might as well make a conscious choice about how to do so.
Click here to check out This Is Your Brain On Food, and choose what kind of day you have!
Share This Post
-
How Much THC Is Safe?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!
Have a question or a request? We love to hear from you!
In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!
No question/request too big or small 😎
❝What dose of THC is safe, is there a safe limit or is it more about using it too frequently?❞
Fantastic questions, and science is starting to catch up on these things! We say “catch up”, as research in the US in particular was held up for a long time due to the “war on drugs”, which didn’t really reduce drug usage, but it sure did cramp science.
Now, bad news first:
❝Although the only way of ensuring no harm from cannabis is to not use at all, people who use cannabis could benefit from accurate information regarding their risk❞
For more on that, see: Lower-Risk Cannabis Use Guidelines (LRCUG) for reducing health harms from non-medical cannabis use: A comprehensive evidence and recommendations update
This is a little similar the World Health Organization’s declaration that the only safe amount of alcohol is zero: WHO: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health, and for more on the relative risks of alcohol vs THC, see our previous article on that topic:
More recently, researchers (Dr. Rachel Thorn et al.) have proposed cannabis “units” based on THC content, similar to alcohol units, to help people monitor use and reduce harm.
- How the unit works: one standard THC unit equals 5 mg of THC, shifting focus from how often cannabis is used to how much psychoactive substance is actually consumed.
- Safer-use threshold for adults: the study suggests adults shouldn’t exceed 8 THC units per week.
- Please note that this does not say “safe”, it says “safer”, i.e. it is relatively less unsafe than…
- Higher-risk levels: risk of more severe cannabis use disorder, which rises above about 13 THC units per week in adults.
This numbers are based on a longitudinal study that followed 150 cannabis users over 12 months, and in the study sample…
- 80% of adults using below 8 THC units did not meet criteria for cannabis use disorder
- 70% of adults using above this level did meet the criteria for cannabis use disorder
That’s not an arbitrary distinction; cannabis use disorder is characterized by impaired control, cravings, and interference with work, family, or social functioning, and affects an estimated 22% of regular users.
You can read more about that, here: What is cannabis use disorder? And how do you know if you have a problem?
And, for that matter: Cannabis & Mental Health: Good Or Bad?
As for the study itself, here it is for you: Estimating thresholds for risk of cannabis use disorder using standard delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) units
So, what does this mean for medical usage?
There can be tradeoffs.
For example, another team of researchers (Dr. Danielle Haley et al.) found that states legalizing cannabis for both medical and adult recreational use saw a 9-to-11-percentage-point decline in daily opioid use.
This is important, because as she points out, increased access to regulated cannabis allows for substitution away from an unstable and toxic opioid supply, lowering overdose risk in a population where opioids account for more than 75% of fatal overdoses in the US.
Further,
❝The magnitude of decrease in opioid use that we observed among a population that is experienced with opioid use and likely to experience unpleasant withdrawal symptoms after reducing this use is very profound and important❞
Here’s a pop-science article about that, and you can also click through to the study itself:
Cannabis legalization may lead to a decline in daily opioid use
Want to learn more?
Check out:
Take care!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Slow-Cooker Moroccan Tagine
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Tagine (طاجين) (tā-jīn) is a traditional dish named after, well, the traditional dish that it’s cooked in. Here’s an example tagine pot on Amazon. It’s a very nifty bit of kit, and while it’s often used for cooking over charcoal, one of its features is that if you have a hot sunny day, you can just leave it out in the sun and it will cook the contents nicely. Today though, we’re going to assume you don’t have one of these, and are going to give instructions for cooking a tagine-style dish with a slow cooker, which we’re going to assume you do have.
You will need
- 2 large red onions, finely chopped
- 2 large red peppers, cut into 1″ chunks
- 2 large zucchini, cut into ½” chunks
- 1 large eggplant, cut into ½” chunks
- 3 cups tomato passata
- 2 cups cooked chickpeas
- 16 pitted Medjool dates, chopped
- ½ bulb garlic, finely chopped
- 1 tbsp ras el-hanout
- A little extra virgin olive oil
Method
(we suggest you read everything at least once before doing anything)
1) Let your slow cooker heat up while you chop the things that need chopping
2) Add a splash of olive oil to the slow cooker; ensure the base is coated and there’s a little oil spare in there too; a thin coat to the base plus a couple of tbsp should do it nicely.
3) Add the onions and garlic, and leave for an hour.
4) Add the passata, dates, ras el-hanout, stir it and leave for an hour.
5) Add the chickpeas, peppers, and eggplant; stir it and leave for an hour.
6) Add the zucchini, stir it and leave for an hour.
7) Serve—it goes great with its traditional pairing of wholegrain couscous, but if you prefer, you can use our tasty versatile rice. In broader culinary terms, serving it with any carb is fine.
Enjoy!
Want to learn more?
For those interested in some of the science of what we have going on today:
- Level-Up Your Fiber Intake! (Without Difficulty Or Discomfort)
- What Matters Most For Your Heart? Eat More (Of This) For Lower Blood Pressure
- Our Top 5 Spices: How Much Is Enough For Benefits?
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Treat Your Own Back – by Robin McKenzie
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
A quick note about the author first: he’s a physiotherapist and not a doctor, but with over 40 years of practice to his name and 33 letters after his name (CNZM OBE FCSP (Hon) FNZSP (Hon) Dip MDT Dip MT), he seems to know his stuff. And certainly, if you visit any physiotherapist, they will probably have some of his books on their own shelves.
This book is intended for the layperson, and as such, explains everything that you need to know, in order to diagnose and treat your back. To this end, he includes assorted tests to perform, a lot of details about various possible back conditions, and then exercises to fix it, i.e. fix whatever you have now learned that the problem is, in your case (if indeed you didn’t know for sure already).
Of course, not everything can be treated by exercises, and he does point to what other things may be necessary in those cases, but for the majority, a significant improvement (if not outright symptom-free status) can be enjoyed by applying the techniques described in this book.
Bottom line: for most people, this book gives you the tools required to do exactly what the title says.
Click here to check out Treat Your Own Back, and treat your own back!
PS: if your issue is not with your back, we recommend you check out his other books in the series (neck, shoulder, hip, knee, ankle) 😎
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
The Most Dangerous Ingredients That Aren’t In Your Vape Device (Until You Use It)
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
“No, officer, there are no explosives in this house” says the bomb-maker, truthfully, on account of keeping the ingredients in separate containers to be combined later.
In a similar vein, there are two very toxic substances that aren’t in vapes, and so don’t need to go on any labels, but get created inside the vape once heated.
And them, the newly-created chemicals, that weren’t there when you bought it, go into your lungs.
Spoiler: what they do there is not good
The last place you want a chemical factory to be is in front of your face
In few words: heating the main ingredient in most e-cigarette fluids—propylene glycol—creates two toxic chemicals, methylglyoxal and acetaldehyde, which are very harmful to human lung cells.
Both of these latter two chemicals disrupt key cell functions, but of the two methylglyoxal is the most damaging even at lower concentrations; it impairs mitochondria (famously: the cell’s energy-givers) and weakens the actin cytoskeleton, compromising cell shape and stability.
In case “the actin cytoskeleton” sounds like something that might be encountered as a monster in a Dungeons & Dragons game, we’ll take a moment to clarify:
- actin = a specialized kind of protein
- cyto = of or relating to cells
- skeleton = the most dry part that gives structure to the wetter parts
So, “actin cytoskeleton” = the relatively tougher protein structure that helps a cell to stay the shape it’s supposed to be
…until methylglyoxal comes along and starts breaking it down, that is.
And it’s worth bearing in mind also that lower-powered e-cigarettes—which many users assume are safer—usually generate higher levels of methylglyoxal.
Here’s the paper itself: Acetaldehyde and methylglyoxal: comparative analysis of toxic electronic cigarette degradation products in 3D and 2D exposure systems using human bronchial epithelial models
And here’s a pop-science article about it, that’s lighter reading than the paper, while also having a little more background information: Hidden toxins in vapes can harm lung cells
There are also other “bonus chemicals” from disposable vapes specifically, insofar as the chemicals you will inhale were (again) not included as ingredients, and in this case, they came from the heating element itself:
❝To place the potential for Pb exposure in the context of traditional cigarettes, Figure 3B compares the mass of Pb in a pack of traditional cigarettes (20 cigarettes) to the mass of Pb of a comparable nicotine dose from the Esco Bar devices.
In comparison to the highest Pb delivery measured for traditional cigarettes, on average Esco Bar devices (Flavored and Clear) emitted ∼4 to 13 times more Pb (4.9 and 15.4 μg, respectively) in the first 200 puffs than the highest reported for a pack of cigarettes (20 cigarettes; 1.2 μg).
For context, this level of Pb exposure is equivalent to smoking as many as 19 packs of cigarettes in a single day.❞
Pb = lead, as in the heavy metal of that name
Read in full: Guess How Much Lead Is Released By Disposable Vapes
Of course, even the base ingredients aren’t great either
While they indeed become much worse once turned into methylglyoxal and acetaldehyde, even the raw ingredients are Not Good™, for example:
- Potential harmful health effects of inhaling nicotine-free shisha-pen vapor: a chemical risk assessment of the main components propylene glycol and glycerol
- Inflammatory and Oxidative Responses Induced by Exposure to Commonly Used e-Cigarette Flavoring Chemicals and Flavored e-Liquids without Nicotine
So, the substrate itself can cause irritation, and flavorings (with cinnamaldehyde, the cinnamon flavoring, being one of the worst) can really mess with our body’s inflammatory and oxidative responses.
You can read more about this in our main feature on vaping, here:
Vaping: A Lot Of Hot Air? ← this also looks at which is worst, out of vaping and smoking (both are very bad, but can you guess which is relatively worst?)
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:








