What Harm Can One Sleepless Night Do?

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

We’ll not bury the lede: a study found that just one night of 24-hour sleep deprivation can alter immune cell profiles in young, lean, healthy people to resemble those of people with obesity and chronic inflammation.

Chronic inflammation, in turn, causes very many other chronic diseases, and worsens most of the ones it doesn’t outright cause.

The reason this happens is because in principle, inflammation is supposed to be good for us—it’s our body’s defenses coming to the rescue. However, if we imagine our immune cells as firefighters, then compare:

  • A team of firefighters who are in great shape and ready to deploy at a moment’s notice, are mostly allowed to rest, sometimes get training, and get called out to a fire from time time, just enough to keep them on their toes. Today, something in your house caught fire, and they showed up in 5 minutes and put it out safely.
  • A team of firefighters who have been pulling 24-hour shifts every day for the past 20 years, getting called out constantly for lost cats, burned toast, wrong numbers, the neighbor’s music, a broken fridge, and even the occasional fire. Today, your printer got jammed so they broke down your door and also your windows just for good measure, and blasted your general desk area with a fire hose, which did not resolve the problem but now your computer itself is broken.

Which team would you rather have?

The former team is a healthy immune system; the latter is the immune system of someone with chronic inflammation.

But if it’s one night, it’s not chronic, right?

Contingently true. However, the problem is that because the immune profile was made to be like the bad team we described (imagine that chaos in your house, now remember that for this metaphor, it’s your body that that’s happening to), the immediate strong negative health impact will already have knock-on effects, which in turn make it more likely that you’ll struggle to get your sleep back on track quickly.

For example, the next night you may oversleep “to compensate”, but then the following day your sleep schedule is now slid back considerably; one thing leads to another, and a month later you’re thinking “I really must sort my sleep out”.

See also: How Regularity Of Sleep Can Be Even More Important Than Duration ← A recent, large (n=72,269) 8-year prospective* observational study of adults aged 40-79 found a strong association between irregular sleep and major cardiovascular events, to such an extent that it was worse than undersleeping.

*this means they started the study at a given point, and measured what happened for the next eight years—as opposed to a retrospective study, which would look at what had happened during the previous 8 years.

What about sleep fragmentation?

In other words: getting sleep, but heavily disrupted sleep.

The answer is: basically the same deal as with missed sleep.

Specifically, elevated proinflammatory cytokines (in this context, that’s bad) and an increase in nonclassical monocytes—as are typically seen in people with obesity and chronic inflammation.

Remember: these were young, lean, healthy participants going into the study, who signed up for a controlled sleep deprivation experiment.

This is important, because the unhealthy inflammatory profile means that people with such are a lot more likely to develop diabetes, heart disease, Alzheimer’s, and many more things besides. And, famously, most people in the industrialized world are not sleeping that well.

Even amongst 10almonds readers, a health-conscious demographic by nature, 62% of 10almonds readers do not regularly get the prescribed 7–9 hours sleep (i.e. they get under 7 hours).

You can see the data on this one, here: Why You Probably Need More Sleep ← yes, including if you are in the older age range; we bust that myth in the article too!*

*Unless you have a (rare!) mutated ADRB1 gene, which reduces that. But we also cover that in the article, and how to know whether you have it.

With regard to “most people in the industrialized world are not sleeping that well”, this means that most people in the industrialized world are subject to an unseen epidemic of sleep-deprivation-induced inflammation that is creating vulnerability to many other diseases. In short, the lifestyle of the industrialized world (especially: having to work certain hours) is making most of the working population sick.

Dr. Fatema Al-Rashed, lead researcher, concluded:

❝In the long term, we aim for this research to drive policies and strategies that recognize the critical role of sleep in public health.

We envision workplace reforms and educational campaigns promoting better sleep practices, particularly for populations at risk of sleep disruption due to technological and occupational demands.

Ultimately, this could help mitigate the burden of inflammatory diseases like obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.❞

You can read the paper in full here: Impact of sleep deprivation on monocyte subclasses and function

What can we do about it?

With regard to sleep, we’ve written so much about this, but here are three key articles that contain a lot of valuable information:

…and with regard to inflammation, a good concise overview of how to dial it down is:

How To Prevent Or Reduce Inflammation

Take care!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • The Two Worst Things For Cardiac Aging

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    What do you think? There are some very reasonable top likely candidates!

    Is it ultraprocessed food? It could be, on account of science such as: Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and their circulating receptors predict cardiovascular disease mortality in older women

    For more on that, see: Are You Eating AGEs?

    It it, perhaps, alcohol? There’s a strong argument, as despite the popular myth of the “small glass of red per day”, any amount of alcohol increases mortality risk,, a comprehensive review in “Circulation”, a cardiovascular health journal, has suggested the French Paradox may not be so paradoxical after all, and is likely due to unrelated lifestyle factors, and historic under-reporting of cardiovascular disease by French doctors, and the World Health Organization has declared that the only safe amount of alcohol is zero: WHO: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

    It’s further relevant that alcohol also increases all-cause mortality at any dose (even “low-risk drinking”): Alcohol Consumption Patterns and Mortality Among Older Adults

    For more on that, see: Can We Drink To Good Health? ← this is mostly about red wine and heart health

    Could it be red meat? Definitely a fair contender. It’s… Bad:

    For more on that, see: The Whys and Hows of Cutting Meats Out Of Your Diet

    The very two top worst things

    Researchers (Dr. Nazanin Rajai et al.) looked at this very question and found that the two biggest drivers of cardiac aging were…

    *drumroll please*

    Surprising many, financial strain and food insecurity emerged as the two strongest factors driving accelerated cardiac aging and higher mortality risk, outweighing many traditional clinical risk factors. It was a pretty comprehensive study, a cross-sectional analysis of 280,323 adult patients treated between 2018 and 2023, combining social determinants of health with AI-ECG* data and advanced statistical modeling.

    *Dr. Rajai and her team used electrocardiogram technology combined with AI modeling to estimate cardiac age; a higher cardiac age gap means the heart is biologically older than the person**, and thus indicates a greater future cardiovascular risk.

    **Notably, “biological age” is often thought of as one thing, but in reality, it’s an amalgam of many things, and different body parts/systems can age differently than others, within the same person’s body. We wrote about this here: Age & Aging: What Can (And Can’t) We Do About It? ← our mythbusting special on this topic

    As for the factors that were looked at, this particular study looked at stress, physical activity, social connection, housing instability, financial strain, food insecurity, transportation needs, nutrition, and education.

    That said, it’s worth taking into account that the other factors were important too; especially, social factors such as financial strain, housing instability, and physical inactivity predicted mortality risk at levels comparable to—or exceeding—some conventional cardiovascular risk factors.

    You can read the paper in full, here: Interplay of Social Determinants of Health and Traditional Risk Factors in Predicting Cardiac Aging

    This is consistent with what we wrote about previously, with a list of The Lifestyle Factors That Matter >8 Times More Than Genes

    …and upon narrowing it down: 6 Lifestyle Factors To Measurably Reduce Biological Age

    …and narrowing it further: Want To Age More Slowly? These 4 Social Factors Count The Most

    And in particular, and especially relevant today: Heart Health vs Systemic Stress

    As to how to address that? See: The S.T.E.P.S. To A Healthier Heart

    Want to learn more?

    You might like this book that we reviewed a while back:

    Heart Smarter for Women: Six Weeks to a Healthier Heart – by Dr. Jennifer Mieres

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Anxiety Attack vs Panic Attack: Do You Know The Difference?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    The terms are sometimes used incorrectly, but have quite different meanings. Dr. Julie Smith, psychologist, explains in this short video:

    Important distinctions

    Anxiety attacks are not clinically recognized terms and lack a clear definition, often used to describe a build-up of anxiety before anticipated stressful events (e.g. social gatherings, medical appointments, etc, though of course what it is will vary from person to person—not everyone finds the same things stressful, or has the same kinds of anticipations around things).

    Panic attacks, in contrast, are sudden surges of intense fear or discomfort that peak within minutes. They are characterized by symptoms including at least 4 of:

    • palpitations
    • sweating
    • shortness of breath
    • chest pain
    • dizziness
    • fear of losing control or dying

    There’s a misconception that panic attacks never have identifiable triggers while anxiety attacks always do.

    In reality, both can occur with or without a clear cause. Panic attacks can arise from various conditions, including trauma, OCD, or phobias, and don’t necessarily mean you have a panic disorder. They can also occur as a drug response, without any known underlying psychological condition.

    You may also notice that that list of symptoms has quite a bit of overlap with the symptoms of a heart attack, which a) does not help people to calm down b) can, on the flipside, cause a heart attack to be misdiagnosed as a panic attack.

    In terms of management:

    • In the moment: breathing exercises, like extending your exhalation (a common example is the “7-11” method, inhaling for 7 seconds and exhaling for 11 seconds), can calm the body and reduce panic symptoms.
    • More generally: to prevent panic attacks from becoming more frequent, avoid avoiding safe environments that triggered an attack, like supermarkets or social gatherings. Gradual exposure helps reduce anxiety over time, while avoidance can worsen it.

    If panic attacks persist, Dr. Smith advises to seek help from a doctor or psychologist to understand their root causes and develop effective coping strategies.

    For more on all of this, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like to read:

    How To Set Anxiety Aside

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • The Truth About MMS

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    First, what it is:

    Sodium chlorite solutions are frequently marketed in alternative medicine circles as ‘Miracle Mineral Solution’ (MMS), a panacea for a wide array of illnesses. Distributors of MMS advocate that when mixed with citric acid, it exhibits efficacy against autism and cancer, as well as against various microbial pathogens including SARS-CoV-2-19

    ~ Dr. Ruth Dudek-Wicher

    So, what does the science say about this?

    Sodium chlorite cures autism: True or False?

    False! Or at least, and we’ll say child here because it is invariably a matter of parents trying to cure their children of autism, it will not cure autism except insofar as it could kill your child and then indeed you would no longer have a child with autism.

    Learn more: Dangerous Trend: Chlorine Dioxide and Autism

    Why “chlorine dioxide” when we were talking about sodium chlorite? It’s because marketers advocate for mixing it with citric acid, which produces chlorine dioxide.

    In other words, please do not drink bleach or give bleach to others to drink.

    Sodium chlorite kills cancer cells: True or False?

    True! However, it also kills non-cancerous cells, i.e., the rest of you. So this is a little like the old “yes, this thing kills cancer cells in a petri dish, but so does a handgun”.

    Let’s look at the science here. For example,

    ❝The anticancer activity of CIO2 was assessed on DMS114 small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) as control by WST-1, Annexin V, cell cycle analysis, and acridine orange staining. We for the first time investigated the possible therapeutic effects of long-term stabilized ClO2 solution (LTSCD).

    Our preliminary findings showed that LTSCD significantly inhibited the proliferation of SCLC cells (p < 0.01) with less toxicity in HUVEC cells. Additionally, LTSCD induced apoptotic cell death in SCLC cells through nuclear blebbing and vacuolar formation.

    LTSCD can be a therapeutic potential for the treatment of SCLC. However, further investigations are required to assess the LTSCD-induced cell death in SCLC both in vitro and in vivo.❞

    Read in full: The Anticancer Potential of Chlorine Dioxide in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells

    Sounds promising, doesn’t it?

    Just one problem, and it’s found in the bonus content you got if you clicked through to read the study

    ❝This article has been retracted by the Editors-in-Chief due to the presence of fundamental errors and methodological flaws which undermine the credibility of the study’s results and conclusions.

    The authors disagree with the decision to retract.❞

    Oops!

    Sodium chlorite kills pathogenic microbes: True or False?

    True! Mostly. It doesn’t kill all pathogenic microbes, but it does kill many. So that one is a health claim that can be at least somewhat justified by good science.

    Unfortunately… Do you remember that satirical song about the pharmaceuticals industry, featuring the fictional wonder-drug paracetamoxyfrusibendroneomycin? It has a couplet that goes:

    🎵 We tested it on animals, and none of them survived!
    But that’s ok ‘cos when we wrote the paper up, we lied 🎵

    If you’ve never heard this song, here it is on YouTube 🙂

    More seriously, this is more or less what happened in the case of sodium chlorite.

    ❝This study evaluates the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy and cytotoxicity of acidified sodium chlorite (ASC), a source of chlorine dioxide.

    Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the activity of ASC against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Lactobacillus sp. or an organic acid (ASC1, ASC2, respectively). The lowest antimicrobial concentration of ASC registered was 0.002992% (29.92 ppm) but did not exhibit stronger antimicrobial activity than polyhexamethylene biguanide. Biofilms of S. mutans and E. coli were the most susceptible to tested formulations. Biofilm formed by L. rhamnosus displayed susceptibility to concentrations lower than the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (0.09575%, 957.5 ppm). In the in vitro cytotoxic assay towards eukaryotic fibroblasts and in vivo model of Galleria mellonella larvae concentration-related increase of cytotoxic effects was observed.

    Chlorine dioxide generated from ASC does destroy pathogens, but effective levels (around 30 ppm) also damage skin cells and caused high mortality in the in vivo model.

    Our findings demonstrate that these concentrations of ASC which can effectively eradicate biofilms, also pose potential health risks due to their in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity.❞

    In other words, yes it can eradicate biofilms, but alas, it can also eradicate you, so please don’t.

    You can read this paper in full, here: Antimicrobial properties and toxicity challenges of chlorine dioxide used in alternative medicine

    As an aside, “toxicity challenges of chlorine dioxide used in alternative medicine” is really a very polite way of putting it. Because yes, that sure does present challenges.

    Want to learn more?

    Check out:

    How To Know Whom To Trust In The Health World

    And also: How Science News Outlets Can Lie To You (Yes, Even If They Cite Studies!)

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Meal Timings vs Osteoporosis Fracture Risk

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    …and other items from this week’s health news:

    Worse than smoking?

    The following factors were found to have the following effects on osteoporotic fracture risk:

    1. skipping breakfast: 18% higher risk
    2. slow gait speed: 16% higher risk
    3. smoking: 11% higher risk
    4. late dinner: 8% higher risk
    5. regular exercise: 1% lower risk
    6. enough sleep: 5% lower risk
    7. daily alcohol consumption: 9% lower risk

    That last one’s not a typo! But it also doesn’t mean that alcohol is protective against osteoporosis itself, or against fractures.

    So, what does it mean? It means that binge-drinking is more likely to result in someone falling over and breaking something, than moderate daily drinking.

    Note: the term “binge-drinking” is popularly associated with young people getting intentionally drunk at the weekend, but please understand that if you don’t drink for months and then have several drinks on some special occasion (e.g. Christmas, New Year’s Eve, a wedding), etc, then that is binge-drinking.

    So, what’s this about skipping breakfast and the late dinner? We are hypothesizing here, but in all likelihood it has to do with being rushed and frazzled and lacking energy in the morning—which again, makes you more likely to fall over and break something.

    Similarly, that about regular exercise yielding a meager 1% lower risk… Actually, taking into account the confidence interval, an argument could be made for 0%. However, that 0% change to risk isn’t because exercise doesn’t make a difference—it’s because (and partly depending on what kind of exercise it is), while exercise does typically make people more robust, you’re also more likely to fall over while playing tennis than you are to fall over while watching TV. So, looking at nearly a million people’s data, those two sides of exercise cancel each other out.

    In short: it’s not just about how strong your bones are or aren’t; it’s also about how likely you are to do something that can result in a fracture.

    Read in full: Late dinners and missed breakfasts tied to higher osteoporosis risk

    Related: Fall Special ← this is about how to not fall, and how to make it less likely you’ll be injured by a fall if you do

    Do you know the early symptoms of prostate cancer?

    No, you don’t. But don’t worry, neither does anyone else, because prostate cancer has no symptoms in its early stages.

    What is cause for concern, however, is that most people don’t know that (or at least: 80% of Americans polled didn’t know that), and thus that it needs to be diagnosed with a blood test.

    In the US, it’s recommended to get tested at age 50 (assuming you have a prostate to test), though earlier can be good especially if you have a family history of it, and/or otherwise are aware of a genetic risk factor (such from having done a health genomics test which revealed it).

    Since prostate cancer typically progresses very slowly, it’s considered very treatable if caught early.

    But that doesn’t mean “don’t worry”; it means “do catch it early”!

    Read in full: Most Americans unaware that early prostate cancer shows no symptoms

    Related: Prostate Health: What You Should Know ← this also covers the Prostate Screening Episwitch (PSE) test, which is 94% accurate, unlike the usual go-to, the Prostate-Specific Androgen (PSA) test, which is so inaccurate that even its original creator has called it “a profit-driven health disaster” that is “no better than a coin toss”.

    Depression, according to the brain cells

    Sometimes, arguments are made for depression being a purely psychological thing, and not physical. We reviewed such a book a while back ← it wasn’t good

    However, researchers (Dr. Anjali Chawla et al.) have identified two specific brain cell types altered in people with depression. Specifically, a subtype of excitatory neurons linked to mood and stress regulation, and a subtype of microglia that manage neuroinflammation.

    Most notably (and showing a clear long-term effect), many genes functioned differently in these cells in depressed people, indicating disruptions in mood regulation and inflammatory systems, respectively.

    Dr. Chawla and her team now plan to study more comprehensively how these cellular changes affect brain function, and explore treatment options with this new information in mind.

    Read in full: Research sheds new light on depression’s biological roots

    Related: The Brain As A Work-In-Progress

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Knee Pain Relief In Just Two Minutes

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    It’s not “two minutes and fixed forever”, but it is “two minutes for relief, and repeat daily”.

    Dr. Jason Won shows us how:

    You will need a towel

    Now, with your towel at the ready…

    • Quad ladders: this one’s a towel-supported quad-activation drill to improve your knee extension. Sit with a towel under your knee, bend the opposite leg, and place your hands behind you. Pull your toes towards your nose, press your knee into the towel, and lift your heel while gradually increasing, then decreasing, your contraction effort. This restores activation through your quadriceps to ease knee discomfort.
    • Knee flexion mobilization: this one’s a towel-assisted hinge movement to improve your knee bending. Kneel and pack a towel firmly into the back of your knee, then lean forwards so it stays in place hands-free. Guide your knee forwards over your toes so the towel gently gaps the joint, improving comfort and bending range for daily tasks like going downstairs or squatting.

    For more on all of this plus visual demonstrations, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    For a much deeper understanding of treating knee pain, here’s a great book that we reviewed a little while back:

    Treat Your Own Knee – by Robin McKenzie ← he’s a physiotherapist and not a doctor, but with 40 years of practice to his name and 33 letters after his name (CNZM OBE FCSP (Hon) FNZSP (Hon) Dip MDT Dip MT), he seems to know his stuff. His work is very well-respected, and almost any English-speaking physiotherapist will have read his books.

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • The Living Kitchen – by Tamara Green and Sarah Grossman

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    For the most part, this is a very respectable book of recipes; plants-forward though not entirely plant-based (which from a cancer perspective is fine; poultry and fish are cancer-neutral, and fermented dairy may even be protective).

    They do focus on including a lot of phytonutrient-rich foods (mostly: colorful plants), which indeed have a lot of anticancer potency between them.

    It was an interesting choice to include some beef, since red meat is well-established as a carcinogen. The authors advise that it should be grass-fed, and this is a definite health improvement over the alternative, but still not great.

    In a similar vein they recommend “sustainably farmed fish”. Not a known carcinogen, by the way (though watch out for antibiotics which are very high in farmed fish), but do you see the problem? Paying attention to sustainability is great; truly laudable. However, it won’t actually make any difference to the health impact on the consumer. Farmed fish is full of antibiotics, whether deemed sustainable or not.

    The front cover shows a soup; the recipes in the book are a wide variety of different dishes, of which soups are just one category. There is a juices section, which not only was probably superfluous, but also is not amazing for the metabolism (and thus, not great in the context of cancer). On a more positive note though, the “mains” section is divided into “omnivore mains” and “vegetarian mains”, with equal attention given to both (20 pages each), so the recipes list isn’t entirely padded with juices and sauces and things (though yes, that also).

    Bottom line: from an anticancer perspective, this one’s a bit of a mixed bag, but mostly good ones.

    Click here to check out The Living Kitchen, and add to your culinary repertoire!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: