The Brain As A Work-In-Progress

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

And The Brain Goes Marching On!

In Tuesday’s newsletter, we asked you “when does the human brain stop developing?” and got the above-depicted, below-described, set of responses:

  • About 64% of people said “Never”
  • About 16% of people said “25 years”
  • About 9% of people said “65 years”
  • About 5% of people said “13 years”
  • About 3% of people said “18 years”
  • About 3% of people said “45 years”

Some thoughts, before we get into the science:

An alternative wording for the original question was “when does the human brain finish developing”; the meaning is the same but the feeling is slightly different:

  • “When does the human brain stop developing?” focuses attention on the idea of cessation, and will skew responses to later ages
  • When does the human brain finish developing?” focuses on attention on a kind of “is it done yet?” and will skew responses to earlier ages

Ultimately, since we had to chose one word or another, we picked the shortest one, but it would have been interesting if we could have done an A/B test, and asked half one way, and half the other way!

Why we picked those ages

We picked those ages as poll options for reasons people might be drawn to them:

  • 13 years: in English-speaking cultures, an important milestone of entering adolescence (note that the concept of a “teenager” is not precisely universal as most languages do not have “-teen” numbers in the same way; the concept of “adolescent” may thus be tied to other milestones)
  • 18 years: age of legal majority in N. America and many other places
  • 25 years: age popularly believed to be when the brain is finished developing, due to a study that we’ll talk about shortly (we guess that’s why there’s a spike in our results for this, too!)
  • 45 years: age where many midlife hormonal changes occur, and many professionals are considered to have peaked in competence and start looking towards retirement
  • 65 years: age considered “senior” in much of N. America and many other places, as well as the cut-off and/or starting point for a lot of medical research

Notice, therefore, how a lot of things are coming from places they really shouldn’t. For example, because there are many studies saying “n% of people over 65 get Alzheimer’s” or “n% of people over 65 get age-related cognitive decline”, etc, 65 becomes the age where we start expecting this—because of an arbitrary human choice of where to draw the cut-off for the study enrollment!

Similarly, we may look at common ages of legal majority, or retirement pensions, and assume “well it must be for a good reason”, and dear reader, those reasons are more often economically motivated than they are biologically reasoned.

So, what does the science say?

Our brains are never finished developing: True or False?

True! If we define “finished developing” as “we cease doing neurogenesis and neuroplasticity is no longer in effect”.

Glossary:

  • Neurogenesis: the process of creating new brain cells
  • Neuroplasticity: the process of the brain adapting to changes by essentially rebuilding itself to suit our perceived current needs

We say “perceived” because sometimes neuroplasticity can do very unhelpful things to us (e.g: psychological trauma, or even just bad habits), but on a biological level, it is always doing its best to serve our overall success as an organism.

For a long time it was thought that we don’t do neurogenesis at all as adults, but this was found to be untrue:

How To Grow New Brain Cells (At Any Age)

Summary of conclusions of the above: we’re all growing new brain cells at every age, even if we be in our 80s and with Alzheimer’s disease, but there are things we can do to enhance our neurogenic potential along the way.

Neuroplasticity will always be somewhat enhanced by neurogenesis (after all, new neurons get given jobs to do), and we reviewed a great book about the marvels of neuroplasticity including in older age:

The Brain’s Way of Healing: Remarkable Discoveries and Recoveries from the Frontiers of Neuroplasticity – by Dr. Norman Doidge

Our brains are still developing up to the age of 25: True or False?

True! And then it keeps on developing after that, too. Now this is abundantly obvious considering what we just talked about, but see what a difference the phrasing makes? Now it makes it sound like it stops at 25, which this statement doesn’t claim at all—it only speaks for the time up to that age.

A lot of the popular press about “the brain isn’t fully mature until the age of 25” stems from a 2006 study that found:

❝For instance, frontal gray matter volume peaks at about age 11.0 years in girls and 12.1 years in boys, whereas temporal gray matter volume peaks at about age at 16.7 years in girls and 16.2 years in boys. The dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, important for controlling impulses, is among the latest brain regions to mature without reaching adult dimensions until the early 20s.❞

~ Dr. Jay Giedd

Source: Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Adolescent Brain

There are several things to note here:

  • The above statement is talking about the physical size of the brain growing
  • Nowhere does he say “and stops developing at 25”

However… The study only looked at brains up to the age of 25. After that, they stopped looking, because the study was about “the adolescent brain” so there has to be a cut-off somewhere, and that was the cut-off they chose.

This is the equivalent of saying “it didn’t stop raining until four o’clock” when the reality is that four o’clock is simply when you gave up on checking.

The study didn’t misrepresent this, by the way, but the popular press did!

Another 2012 study looked at various metrics of brain development, and found:

  • Synapse overproduction into the teens
  • Cortex pruning into the late 20s
  • Prefrontal pruning into middle age at least (they stopped looking)
  • Myelination beyond middle age (they stopped looking)

Source: Experience and the developing prefrontal cortexcheck out figure 1, and make sure you’re looking at the human data not the rat data

So how’s the most recent research looking?

Here’s a 2022 study that looked at 123,984 brain scans spanning the age range from mid-gestation to 100 postnatal years, and as you can see from its own figure 1… Most (if not all) brain-things keep growing for life, even though most slow down at some point, they don’t stop:

Brain charts for the human lifespancheck out figure 1; don’t get too excited about the ventricular volume column as that is basically “brain that isn’t being a brain”. Do get excited about the rest, though!

Want to know how not to get caught out by science being misrepresented by the popular press? Check out:

How Science News Outlets Can Lie To You (Yes, Even If They Cite Studies!)

Take care!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • How Aging Changes At 44 And Again At 60 (And What To Do About It)

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    As it turns out, aging is not linear. Or rather: chronological aging may be, but biological aging isn’t, and there are parts of our life where it kicks into a different gear. This study looked at 108 people (65 of whom women) between the ages of 25 and 75, as part of a longitudinal cohort study, tracked for around 2–8 years (imprecise as not all follow-up durations were the same). They took frequent blood and urine samples, and tested them for thousands of different molecules and analyzing changes in gene expression, proteomic, blood biomarkers, and more. All things that are indicators of various kinds of health/disease, and which might seem more simple but it isn’t: aging.

    Here’s what they found:

    Landmark waypoints

    At 44, significant changes occur in the metabolism, including notably the metabolism of carbs, caffeine, and alcohol. A large portion of this may be hormone related, as that’s a time of change not just for those undergoing the menopause, but also the andropause (not entirely analogous to the menopause, but it does usually entail a significant reduction in sex hormone production; in this case, testosterone).

    However, the study authors also hypothesize that lifestyle factors may be relevant, as one’s 40s are often a stressful time, and an increase in alcohol consumption often occurs around the same time as one’s ability to metabolize it drops, resulting in further dysfunctional alcohol metabolism.

    At 60, carb metabolism slows again, with big changes in glucose metabolism specifically, as well as an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and a decline in kidney function. In case that wasn’t enough: also an increase free radical pathology, meaning a greatly increased risk of cancer. Immune function drops too.

    What to do about this: the recommendation is of course to be proactive, and look after various aspects of your health before it becomes readily apparent that you need to. For example, good advice for anyone approaching 44 might be to quit alcohol, go easy on caffeine, and eat a diet that is conducive to good glucose metabolism. Similarly, good advice for anyone approaching 60 might be to do the same, and also pay close attention to keeping your kidneys healthy. Getting regular tests done is also key, including optional extras that your doctor might not suggest but you should ask for, such as blood urea nitrogen levels (biomarkers of kidney function). The more we look after each part of our body, the more they can look after us in turn, and the fewer/smaller problems we’ll have down the line.

    If you, dear reader, are approaching the age 44 or 60… Be neither despondent nor complacent. We must avoid falling into the dual traps of “Well, that’s it, bad health is around the corner, nothing I can do about it; that’s nature”, vs “I’ll be fine, statistics are for other people, and don’t apply to me”.

    Those are averages, and we do not have to be average. Every population has statistical outliers. But it would be hubris to think none of this will apply to us and we can just carry on regardless. So, for those of us who are approaching one of those two ages… It’s time to saddle up, knuckle down, and do our best!

    For more on all of this, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like to read:

    Also, if you’d like to read the actual paper by Dr. Xiaotao Shen et al., here it is:

    Nonlinear dynamics of multi-omics profiles during human aging ← honestly, it’s a lot clearer and more informative than the video, and also obviously discusses things in a lot more detail than we have room to here

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Medicinal cannabis concerns include psychosis and child poisonings. We’re not the only ones worried

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    The ABC this week revealed more than 600 side effects have been reported in three years to the medicines regulator after Australians took unapproved medicinal cannabis.

    After a Freedom of Information request, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) told the ABC there had been reports of 615 side effects (known officially as adverse events) in three years to June 2025. These included more than 50 reports of psychosis, and 14 of suicidal thoughts and behaviour.

    Most people don’t report adverse events to the TGA, so these numbers are likely a gross underestimate.

    Earlier this year, we published research charting the rise in calls to Australia’s largest poisons information centre about cannabis poisoning in the years after medicinal cannabis was legalised. This included a rise in accidental poisoning in children.

    Here’s what we know about the risks linked to these unapproved products. https://www.youtube.com/embed/bPYkKmxZz78?wmode=transparent&start=0

    LordHenriVoton/Getty

    Why medicinal cannabis is unique

    All medicines come with a risk of adverse events. Cannabis medicines are no different.

    What is unique is that the vast majority of medicinal cannabis use in Australia involves unapproved products. These are ones the TGA has not assessed for quality, safety or effectiveness – but are still legally available.

    More than 1,000 unapproved medicinal cannabis products are available in Australia. People often take these for conditions where we have no strong evidence they work.

    This is in contrast to the two “approved” medicinal cannabis products, whose manufacturers or suppliers have to provide such evidence.

    The rise of medicinal cannabis

    Medicinal cannabis was legalised in Australia in 2016. But use really took off in 2021, when the TGA changed how people could access the unapproved products.

    Use in young men has been increasing the fastest. Generally, about one-third of use is for anxiety.

    This is despite TGA guidance stating medicinal cannabis containing THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) is generally not appropriate for patients who “have a previous psychotic or concurrent active mood or anxiety disorder”.

    What are the risks?

    Concerns about cannabis (both recreational and medicinal) and mental illness are not new. And liberalisation of cannabis policy worldwide is renewing these concerns.

    For instance, a large Canadian study found schizophrenia associated with cannabis use almost tripled following cannabis legalisation reforms.

    Cases of first-time psychosis associated with medicinal cannabis have also been reported in Australia.

    There have been large increases in emergency department presentations for anxiety disorder involving cannabis in Canada. However, it is unclear whether this reflects more people using cannabis to manage anxiety, or whether cannabis use played a role in developing anxiety disorders. And not all of these presentations involved medicinal cannabis.

    The potential for drug interactions with medicinal cannabis is often under-appreciated. For example, one common component, cannabidiol, interacts with a range of commonly used medicines. These include epilepsy medicines, antidepressants, opioids and blood thinners.

    How about in Australia?

    Reports of adverse events after taking a medicine have their limitations. Just because someone reports an adverse event this doesn’t necessarily mean the medicine caused it.

    Existing reporting mechanisms are also not designed to monitor broader drug-related harms. These include illicit use, misuse and accidental child poisonings.

    But other datasets can fill these gaps. For example, earlier this year we published a paper about trends in calls about cannabis (medicinal and recreational) to Australia’s largest poisons centre.

    We showed calls about cannabis poisoning have been increasing. Poisonings after taking concentrated products (for instance, cannabis oils) and edibles have become much more common.

    Unintentional poisonings have increased the most rapidly. This category includes dosing errors from medicinal cannabis, unwanted side effects, and accidental exposures in children.

    This risk to children is often ignored in conversations about cannabis safety. Children exposed to cannabis can end up in a coma or having seizures, and often need intensive care.

    Confectionary and foods containing cannabis pose an unacceptable risk to children. They are tasty, look like regular foods, and often contain high concentrations of cannabis. These have been implicated in rapidly rising numbers of poisonings in children in many countries, especially since cannabis has become more widely available.

    Calls for more oversight

    The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency has put practitioners on notice over questionable prescribing of medicinal cannabis.

    There has been a surge in “single-purpose dispensaries” whose whole business model relies on supplying medicinal cannabis via telehealth. Some consultations last mere seconds.

    Prescribing data reveals eight practitioners wrote more than 10,000 medicinal cannabis scripts in a six-month period.

    Best practice would involve new cannabis medicines being prescribed only by a person’s usual GP or specialist. This would typically require considerable time to advise on risks and benefits, and assess for drug interactions, or contraindications (where use is advised against), such as if someone has a history of psychiatric illness or substance use.

    The TGA is currently consulting on whether the current regulatory processes around access to unapproved medicinal cannabis products is appropriate. This review may signal future changes to this blockbuster industry.

    What are some practical things I can do?

    For now, anyone considering medicinal cannabis should talk to their regular GP or specialist. This should involve a thorough assessment, including considering your medical history and current medications.

    Ask about the risks and benefits of medicinal cannabis, and whether there is evidence it works for your condition.

    If you are prescribed medicinal cannabis, keep it out of reach and out of sight of young children.

    If this article has raised issues for you, or if you’re concerned about someone you know, call Lifeline on 13 11 14.

    Rose Cairns, Senior Lecturer in Pharmacy, NHMRC Emerging Leadership Fellow, University of Sydney and Nicholas Buckley, Professor of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Sydney

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Share This Post

  • Purpose – by Gina Bianchini

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    To address the elephant in the room, this is not a rehash of Rick Warren’s best-selling “The Purpose-Driven Life”. Instead, this book is (in this reviewer’s opinion) a lot better. It’s a lot more comprehensive, and it doesn’t assume that what’s most important to the author will be what’s most important to you.

    What’s it about, then? It’s about giving your passion (whatever it may be) the tools to have an enduring impact on the world. It recommends doing this by leveraging a technology that would once have been considered magic: social media.

    Far from “grow your brand” business books, this one looks at what really matters the most to you. Nobody will look back on your life and say “what a profitable second quarter that was in such-a-year”. But if you do your thing well, people will look back and say:

    • “he was a pillar of the community”
    • “she raised that community around her”
    • “they did so much for us”
    • “finding my place in that community changed my life”
    • …and so forth. Isn’t that something worth doing?

    Bianchini takes the position of both “idealistic dreamer” and “realistic worker”.

    Further, she blends the two beautifully, to give practical step-by-step instructions on how to give life to the community that you build.

    Check Out This Amazing Book On Amazon Today!

    Share This Post

  • Asparagus vs Sweetcorn – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing asparagus to sweetcorn, we picked the asparagus.

    Why?

    In terms of macros, sweetcorn starts off strong with slightly more protein and notably more carbs for the same fiber, while still keeping glycemic index low, so we say this first round is a marginal win for corn.

    In the category of vitamins, asparagus has a lot more of vitamins A (yes, really, 4x more!), B2, B7, B9, E, and K (138x the amount for this one), while sweetcorn has more of vitamins B2, B5, and C, giving asparagus an overwhelming win here.

    For anyone wondering “why are we so surprised about the vitamin A?”, it’s because vitamin A makes things yellow, and corn is yellow while asparagus is green. But, there are more factors that affect the color of each plant, that’s all.

    Looking at minerals, asparagus has more calcium, copper, iron, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while corn has more magnesium, phosphorus, and potassium, yielding a compelling 5:3 win to asparagus (especially with asparagus having 12x the calcium; do not underestimate green things as a source of calcium; where do you think cows get theirs from?).

    In other considerations, asparagus has a higher polyphenol content (with quercetin scoring notably), while sweetcorn is high in carotenoids such as lutein (whence the yellow color, by the way). So, we’ll call it a tie in this round.

    Adding up the sections makes for an overall win for asparagus on tie-breaks (both plants won two sections each, but asparagus had the greater margins of difference by far), but by all means enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • More Reasons To Enjoy Watermelon

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Watermelon is generally thought of for what it most superficially is: a refreshing, juicy, sweet summer fruit.

    Now, its water content alone is actually highly beneficial in several ways, but research has highlighted more benefits than just that!

    First let’s quickly touch on those “several ways”:

    For how it goes beyond these benefits, though, let’s get to…

    Worth its weight

    Examining data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), researchers (Dr. Kristin Fulgoni et al.) found that people who enjoy watermelon in their diet tend to have higher overall diet quality and higher intake of fiber, magnesium, potassium, vitamin A, vitamin C, lycopene, and carotenoids.

    You can read about it here: Watermelon Intake Is Associated with Increased Nutrient Intake and Higher Diet Quality in Adults and Children, NHANES

    But that only shows the association, not that the watermelon brought all of that (although it does bring all those nutrients, but cannot be given the credit for the entire overall higher diet quality). So, what of watermelon’s proven benefits?

    Another plucky band of researchers (Dr. Mônica Volino-Souza et al.) did a review of vascular health evidence reports that show how watermelon and its compounds, especially l-citrulline, support endothelial function and nitric oxide* production.

    *For understanding why this is important, we recommend: The Nitric Oxide (NO) Solution – by Dr. Nathan Bryan & Janet Zand

    The reviewed clinical and experimental evidence also shows improvements in vascular function measures, including blood vessel dilation and circulation-related markers.

    There were other indicators of even more extra benefits too, such as maintaining vascular function during hyperglycemia, but the evidence was at best preliminary from that particular study (remember, this paper was a review of studies, so this was just one study of many in the paper):

    ❝We acknowledge that while the sample size was small (18 healthy young men and women) and more research is needed, this study adds to the current body of evidence supporting regular intake of watermelon for cardio-metabolic health.❞

    You can read this paper in full, here: Current Evidence of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Ingestion on Vascular Health: A Food Science and Technology Perspective

    You may be wondering whether someone will kindly do both sets of science together, and the answer is yes, and for that we must look to Dr. Vania Paschoalin et al., whose narrative review focuses on watermelon’s nutritional composition, emphasizing its high water content, lycopene, vitamin C, and l-citrulline as key bioactive components.

    They also discuss how l-citrulline and l-arginine contribute to nitric oxide production, which—as we’ve noted—is important for vascular relaxation and cardiovascular health.

    One last thing this paper gets into is watermelon’s additional cardioprotective effects through antioxidant activity, as well as the improved vascular function that we talked about.

    You can read this paper in full for free, here: Watermelon Nutritional Composition with a Focus on L-Citrulline and Its Cardioprotective Health Effects—A Narrative Review

    Want to learn more?

    Check out:

    Lycopene’s Benefits For The Gut, Heart, Brain, & More ← tomatoes are famous for their lycopene content, but watermelon has more!

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Do CBD Gummies Work?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!

    Have a question or a request? You can always hit “reply” to any of our emails, or use the feedback widget at the bottom!

    In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!

    As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!

    So, no question/request too big or small

    ❝I take CBD gummies. I don’t know if they are worth buying. Can you find a study on the effectiveness of gummies❞

    If you take them, and you’re not sure whether they’re worth it, then it sounds like you’re not getting any observable benefit from them?

    If so, that would seem to answer your question, since presumably the reason that you are taking them is for relaxation and/or pain relief, so if you’re not getting the results you want, then no, they are not worth it.

    However! CBD gummies are an incredibly diverse and not-well-studied product, so far, given the relative novelty of their legality. By diverse we mean, they’re not well-standardized.

    In other words: the CBD gummies you get could be completely unlike CBD gummies from a different source.

    CBD itself (i.e. in forms other than just gummies, and mostly as oil) has been studied somewhat better, and we did a main feature on it here:

    CBD Oil’s Many Benefits

    And while we’re at it:

    Cannabis Myths vs Reality ← This one is about cannabis products in general, and includes discussion of THC content and effects, which might not be so relevant to you, but may to some readers.

    Companies selling CBD and CBD gummies may make bold claims that are not yet backed by science, so if you are buying them for those reasons, you might want to be aware:

    Selling cannabidiol products in Canada: a framing analysis of advertising claims by online retailers

    One thing that we would add is that even though CBD is generally recognized as safe, it is possible to overdose on CBD gummies, so do watch your limits:

    A Case of Toxicity from Cannabidiol Gummy Ingestion

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: