Edamame vs Soybeans – Which is Healthier?

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

Our Verdict

When comparing edamame to soybeans, we picked the soybeans.

Why?

You may be thinking: aren’t edamame soybeans? And yes, yes they are. But just like our many instances of pitting Brassica oleracea vs Brassica oleracea (one species, many cultivars e.g. broccoli, cauliflower, kale, cabbage, Brussels sprouts, etc), there are still differences. In this case, edamame and soybeans aren’t even different cultivars, what are conventionally called edamame are just the young beans of the plant, while what are conventionally called soybeans are the mature beans of the plant.

The main nutritional difference is: as they get older, they lose vitamins and gain minerals. More on that later. But first, “main difference” isn’t “only difference”, so…

In terms of macros, edamame have more carbs, while soybeans have a little more fiber and a lot more protein. An easy win for the mature soybeans.

In the category of vitamins, edamame have more of vitamins A, B1, B3, B5, B9, C, E, K, and choline, while soybeans have more of vitamins B2 and B6. A clear win for edamame, this time.

When it comes to minerals, the nutritional tables are turned, and edamame have more manganese and zinc, while soybeans have more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, and selenium. An easy win for soybeans.

Adding up the sections makes for a two-to-one victory for soybeans, but by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!

Want to learn more?

You might like to read:

What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?

Enjoy!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • NAD⁺ vs Long COVID!

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Before we get to talking about long COVID, a word on nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (or NAD+ to its friends) itself.

    It’s most well-known in the context of healthy aging, and that’s because:

    • NAD+ levels decline with age
    • The aforementioned decline is a causal factor in aging
    • Boosting NAD+ levels can, thus, slow aging

    Learn more: Therapeutic Potential of NAD-Boosting Molecules: The In Vivo Evidence

    There are actually also other NAD-boosting molecules besides NAD itself and its precursors. For example, the liver will not produce NADᐩ unless it has aminocarboxymuconate-semialdehyde decarboxylase (or “ACMSD”, to its friends), which limits the production of NADᐩ. Why, you ask? The theory is that it is a kind of evolutionary conservativism, much like not lighting a fire without the ability to put it out. In any case, taking ACMSD-blockers will thus result in an increased endogenous production of NADᐩ.

    You can read about this here: De novo NAD+ synthesis enhances mitochondrial function and improves health

    For these reasons, NAD+ is one of Dr. Greger’s Anti-Aging Eight ← we wrote about NAD+ here

    But what about NAD+ vs long COVID?

    The latest science

    Researchers (Dr. Edmarie Guzmán-Vélez et al.) investigated how boosting NAD⁺ with nicotinamide riboside (NR) can ease long-COVID symptoms such as brain fog, fatigue, executive dysfunction, and sleep problems.

    How they tested it:

    • They gave one group 2,000 mg/day NR for 20 weeks
    • They gave the other group a placebo for 10 weeks before switching to NR for the next 10 weeks.
    • They measured NAD⁺ levels and tested fatigue, executive function, sleep, and mood at baseline, week 10, and week 20.

    As for how that went:

    ❝In post-hoc exploratory analysis, examining within-group changes during 5 and 10 weeks of NR intake by grouping all participants during the first 10 weeks of the NR phase, there were significant differences from baseline after 10 weeks of NR in executive functioning, fatigue severity, sleep quality, and symptoms of depression❞

    (specifically: the “significant differences” were significant improvements)

    Read the paper in full: Effects of nicotinamide riboside on NAD+ levels, cognition, and symptom recovery in long-COVID: a randomized controlled trial

    If you’d like to try more things like this, then consider: 12 Most Powerful Supplements and Foods to Increase Energy & Slow Down Aging

    And definitely check out: What Can Be Done About Long COVID?

    Want to try some?

    We don’t sell it, but here for your convenience is an example product on Amazon 😎

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • What Your Heart Health Means For Fracture Risk

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    No, not your risk of a broken heart, but more about its association with bone health and a 93% increased risk of osteoporosis incident fractures:

    When your calcium’s in entirely the wrong place

    Consider the following:

    • You want plenty of calcium in your bones, because that’s one of the (several!) important ingredients for making bones strong.
    • You do not want plenty of calcium lining your arteries, because that’s one of the (several!) important ingredients of atherosclerotic plaque.

    So, should you get more calcium or less? The crux lies in how your body directs it!

    We talk about one of the critical factors in the “learn more” section below (most people don’t know that vitamin K2 is essential for this, and many people have a dietary vitamin K deficiency, because it’s not a vitamin most people think about much.).

    Other vitamins are important too, and most people know that vitamin D is a relevant one, but watch out:

    Hormones are another thing that’s absolutely critical. For women, estrogen (specifically, estradiol) and progesterone are essential for healthy bone turnover. For men, testosterone does the job, but for menopausal women, it usually becomes necessary to supplement with HRT.

    For more on that, see:

    So, what does heart health have to do with this?

    For a start, there’s a clear relationship between “calcium levels in arteries” and “calcium levels in bones”, and the simplest version is “what gets stuck in the arteries doesn’t make it into the bones”.

    So, cardiovascular health becomes critical for bone health.

    All so recently (paper published last week, at the time of writing) researchers (Dr. Rafeka Hossain et al.) found that higher cardiovascular risk (measured using the PREVENT risk calculator that we talked about here: What The New Cholesterol Guidelines Mean For You) was linked to higher risks of major osteoporotic and hip fractures in postmenopausal women.

    And not a small difference, either: of the 21,300 participants, women in the high CVD risk group had a 93% higher risk of hip fracture compared with low-risk women!

    And yes, there was a dose-response effect: fracture risk increased commensurately from borderline to intermediate to high cardiovascular risk.

    There are some factors where it’s not that one thing causes the other, but rather they’re both caused by the same thing, e.g. postmenopausal hormonal changes, especially declining estrogen, contribute to both cardiovascular risk and bone loss simultaneously.

    There are also some that are more causal in nature, e.g. shared biological pathways passing on chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, impaired calcium regulation, and even reduced blood flow from atherosclerosis itself.

    You can read Dr. Hossain’s paper here: The association between 10-year cardiovascular risk and fracture incidence in postmenopausal women: a prospective analysis from the Women’s Health Initiative

    Want to learn more?

    You might like this book we reviewed a while back:

    Vitamin K2 And The Calcium Paradox – by Kate Rhéaume-Bleue ← you may be wondering whether this is somehow 288 pages to say “take vitamin K2”. And, it somewhat is, but there are a lot of details when it comes to things that have historically raised or lowered the amount of vitamin K2 in our diet, what can be done about it in dietary terms if preferring to go all-natural (hint: nattō is an excellent option, but far from the only one), and what other effects vitamin K2 (or its deficiency) can have on us, in many of the body’s systems, far beyond just bone health (and including things as varied as fertility and avoidance of Alzheimer’s).

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Bamboo Shoots vs Beetroot – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing bamboo shoots to beetroot, we picked the bamboo.

    Why?

    It was close!

    In terms of macros, bamboo has more protein while beetroot has more fiber and carbs; we’re calling this first round a tie.

    In the category of vitamins, bamboo has more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, and E, while beetroot has more of vitamins A, B9, and C, yielding a 7:3 win to bamboo here.

    Looking at minerals, bamboo has more copper, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while beetroot has more iron and magnesium, making this round a 5:2 win for bamboo.

    In other considerations, beetroot is higher in polyphenols and nitrates, and so wins a round finally.

    Adding up the sections, however, makes for an overall win for bamboo—do still enjoy either or both though, as diversity is best!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • Mung Beans vs Soybeans – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing mung beans to soybeans, we picked the soy.

    Why?

    Mung beans are great, but honestly, it’s not close:

    In terms of macros, soy has more than 2x the protein (of which, it’s also a complete protein, containing significant amounts of all essential amino acids) while mung beans have more than 2x the carbs. In their defense, mung beans also have very slightly more fiber, but the carb:fiber ratio is such that soybeans have the lower GI by far.

    When it comes to vitamins, mung beans have more of vitamins A, B3, B5, and, B9, while soybeans have more of vitamins B2, B6, C, E, and K, making for a moderate win for soybeans, especially as that vitamin K is more than 7x as much as mung beans have.

    In the category of minerals, soy wins even more convincingly; soybeans have more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc. On the other hand, mung beans have more sodium.

    Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for soy, but by all means enjoy either or both, as diversity is good!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    Why You Can’t Skimp On Amino Acids

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Stop The World…

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Some news highlights from this week:

    “US vs Them”?

    With the US now set to lose its WHO membership, what does that mean for Americans? For most, the consequences will be indirect:

    • the nation’s scientists and institutions will be somewhat “left out in the cold” when it comes to international scientific collaboration in the field of health
    • the US will no longer enjoy a position of influence and power within the WHO, which organization’s reports and position statements have a lot of sway over the world’s health practices

    Are there any benefits (of leaving the WHO) for Americans? Yes, there is one: the US will no longer be paying into the WHO’s budget, which means:

    • the US will save the 0.006% of the Federal budget that it was paying into the WHO annually
    • for the average American’s monthly budget, that means (if the saving is passed on) you’ll have an extra dime

    However, since US scientific institutions will still need access to international data, likely that access will need to be paid separately, at a higher rate than US membership in WHO cost.

    In short: it seems likely to go the way that Brexit did: “saving” on membership fees and then paying more for access to less.

    Why is the US leaving again? The stated reasons were mainly twofold:

    1. the cost of US membership (the US’s contribution constituted 15% of the the overall WHO budget)
    2. holding the US’s disproportionately high COVID death rate (especially compared to countries such as China) to be a case of WHO mismanagement

    Read in full: What losing WHO membership means for the U.S.

    Related: What Would a Second Trump Presidency Look Like for Health Care? ← this was a speculative post by KFF Health News, last year

    Halt, You’re Under A Breast

    More seriously, this is about halting the metastasis of cancerous tumors in the breast. It is reasonable to expect the same principle and thus treatment may apply to other cancers too, but this is where the research is at for now (breast cancer research gets a lot of funding).

    And, what principle and treatment is this, you ask? It’s about the foxglove-derived drug digoxin, and how it stops cancerous cells from forming clusters, and even actively dissolves clusters that have already formed. No clusters means no new tumors, which means no metastasis. No metastasis, in turn, means the cancer becomes much more treatable because it’s no longer a game of whack-a-mole; instead of spreading to other places, it’s a much more manageable case of “here’s the tumor, now let’s kill it with something”.

    Note: yes, that does mean the tumor still needs killing by some other means—digoxin won’t do that, it “just” stops it from spreading while treatment is undertaken.

    Read in full: Proof-of-concept study dissolves clusters of breast cancer cells to prevent metastases

    Related: The Hormone Therapy That Reduces Breast Cancer Risk & More

    Force Of Habit

    “It takes 21 days to make a habit”, says popular lore. Popular is not, however, evidence-based:

    ❝This systematic review of 20 studies involving 2601 participants challenges the prevailing notion of rapid habit formation, revealing that health-related habits typically require 2–5 months to develop, with substantial individual variability ranging from 4 to 335 days. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant improvements in habit scores across various health behaviours, with key determinants including morning practices, personal choice, and behavioural characteristics

    So, this is not a lottery, “maybe it will take until Tuesday, maybe it will take nearly a year”, so much as “there are important factors that seriously change how long a habit takes to become engrained, and here is what those factors are”.

    Read in full: Study reveals healthy habits take longer than 21 days to set in

    Related: How To Really Pick Up (And Keep!) Those Habits

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Why do some of us vividly remember dreams, and others say they don’t dream?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Some mornings, you wake up and the dream is right there. Clear and vivid. You might still feel the emotion in your chest, and it can take a few minutes to remember where you are and what was real.

    Other mornings, you open your eyes and there is nothing. Just a quiet sense of having slept.

    You might know people who think they do not dream. However, the reality is we all do. Sometimes we have many in one night.

    What varies is whether people remember their dreams and how often they remember them.

    Dmitriy Ganin/Pexels

    Dream recall myth vs reality

    During the night, we cycle through periods of light sleep, deep sleep and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep. A full cycle takes about 90 minutes.

    People generally spend more time in deep sleep in the first half of the night and more time in REM sleep in the second half.

    The main function of deep sleep is restorative: to replenish energy, repair our bodies and help store memories.

    REM sleep is important for memory consolidation and emotional processing. Later in the night, REM sleep becomes longer. This is the stage most closely linked to vivid, emotional dreaming.

    If you wake up during or just after REM sleep, you are much more likely to remember a dream. If you wake from deep sleep, you probably will not, even though you were dreaming earlier. It isn’t a sign something is wrong; it’s simply how the sleeping brain works.

    Another myth is dreams only happen in REM sleep. While REM dreams tend to be more intense and story-like, dreaming can happen in other stages, too; they are just often quieter and harder to recall.

    So if you wake up some mornings with a clear recollection of your dream, and other mornings with nothing at all, that is completely normal. It doesn’t mean you didn’t dream. It just means you woke up at a different point in your sleep cycle.

    Why do some people remember their dreams more often?

    Several factors affect whether you recall dreams.

    As you get older, your capacity to recall dreams decreases. Some studies suggest women are more likely to remember dreams than men. Some medications, such as antidepressants and sedatives, can affect your dream recall.

    Timing plays a big role. We spend more time in REM sleep later in the night, so dreams that happen closer to morning are easier to remember. Waking up briefly during the night offers a chance to remember dreams before they fade. That’s why parents of young children and light sleepers, who are more likely to wake up from REM sleep, often report remembering more dreams.

    How you wake up also matters. If someone jolts you awake, the dream can vanish in an instant. But if you are woken gently, someone softly calling your name, there is a better chance the dream lingers long enough for you to remember.

    Some people are naturally “high recallers” and are just better at capturing their dreams before they fade. And therefore, they consistently remember dreams.

    Why do some dreams feel intense?

    Dreams can sometimes feel highly emotional, dramatic or unusually vivid. This is largely because REM sleep, the stage most associated with dreaming, involves increased activation of regions of the brain that control our emotions, such as the amygdala and limbic system.

    This occurs alongside relatively reduced activity in parts of the prefrontal cortex that regulate logic and emotional control.

    Stress, life changes or heightened emotions can make dreams feel more intense. Dreams often reflect elements of real-life experiences as the brain tries to process events from the day and consolidate them into long-term memory.

    In most cases, having intense dreams is entirely normal and part of healthy emotional processing.

    So is dreaming a reflection of good sleep?

    Remembering your dreams does not automatically mean you had poor sleep, and forgetting them does not mean your sleep was perfect.

    Rather than using dream recall as an indicator of sleep quality, it is more helpful to focus on how you feel during the day. Indicators such as feeling rested on waking and daytime energy provide a more meaningful indicator of your sleep health.

    For most people, differences in dream recall and dream intensity are normal and shouldn’t cause concern. Dream frequency varies widely among people and across lifespans.

    However, it may be helpful to seek advice from a health professional if:

    • you experience persistent daytime exhaustion despite adequate time in bed
    • nightmares are frequent, highly distressing or interfere with your mood and functioning
    • sleep is regularly disrupted by awakenings, panic or prolonged difficulty returning to sleep.

    If you feel rested, functional and emotionally stable during the day, occasional vivid dreams or changes in recall are completely fine and simply part of how healthy sleep unfolds.

    Yaqoot Fatima, Professor of Sleep Health, University of the Sunshine Coast; Danielle Wilson, Research Fellow and Sleep Scientist at the Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, and Nisreen Aouira, Research Program Manager, Let’s Yarn About Sleep, Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: