
Chickpeas vs Black Beans – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing chickpeas to black beans, we picked the black beans.
Why?
They’re both great! But we consider the nutritional profile of black beans to be better:
In terms of macros, black beans have a little more protein, while chickpeas have more carbohydrates. Generally speaking, people are not usually short of carbs in their diet, so we’ll go with the one with more protein. Black beans also have more fiber, which is important for heart health and more.
In the category of micronutrients, black beans have twice as much potassium and twice as much calcium, as well as twice as much magnesium. Chickpeas, meanwhile are better for manganese and slightly higher in B vitamins, but B vitamins are everywhere (especially vitamin B5, pantothenic acid; that’s literally where its name comes from, it means “from everywhere”), so we don’t consider that as much of a plus as the black beans doubling up on potassium, calcium, and magnesium.
So, do enjoy both, but if you’re going to pick, or lean more heavily on one, we recommend the black beans
Further reading
See also:
- Why You’re Probably Not Getting Enough Fiber (And How To Fix It)
- Easily Digestible Vegetarian Protein Sources
- What Matters Most For Your Heart? Eat More (Of This) For Lower Blood Pressure
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Eggplant vs Sweetcorn – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing eggplant to sweetcorn, we picked the corn.
Why?
In terms of macros, the sweetcorn has more than 3x the protein and carbs for only very marginally less fiber, so on balance, much as we do love fiber, we’re calling this one a notional win for sweetcorn on macronutrient density.
In the category of vitamins, eggplant has more of vitamins E and K, while sweetcorn has more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, B9, and C, winning easily on this round.
Looking at minerals, eggplant has more calcium, copper, and manganese, while sweetcorn has more iron, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, winning another round.
In other considerations, sweetcorn has more polyphenols and other beneficial phytochemicals (it’s a great source of lutein, for example), so that’s one more round in corn’s favor.
Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for sweetcorn, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
Brain Food? The Eyes Have It! ← this is mostly about lutein
Enjoy!
Share This Post
-
Life After Death? (Your Life; A Loved One’s Death)
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
The Show Must Go On
We’ve previously written about the topics of death and dying. It’s not cheery, but it is important to tackle.
Sooner is better than later, in the case of:
Preparations For Managing Your Own Mortality
And for those who are left behind, of course it is hardest of all:
What Grief Does To Your Body (And How To Manage It)
But what about what comes next? For those who are left behind, that is.
Life goes on
In cases when the death is that of a close loved one, the early days after death can seem like a surreal blur. How can the world go ticking on as normal when [loved one] is dead?
But incontrovertibly, it does, so we can only ask again: how?
And, we get to choose that, to a degree. The above-linked article about grief gives a “101” rundown, but it’s (by necessity, for space) a scant preparation for one of the biggest challenges in life that most of us will ever face.
For many people, processing grief involves a kind of “saying goodbye”. For others, it doesn’t, as in the following cases of grieving the loss of one’s child—something no parent should ever have to face, but it happens:
Dr. Ken Druck | The Love That Never Dies
(with warning, the above article is a little heavy)
In short: for those who choose not to “say goodbye” in the case of the death of a loved one, it’s more often not a case of cold neglect, but rather the opposite—a holding on. Not in the “denial” sense of holding on, but rather in the sense of “I am not letting go of this feeling of love, no matter how much it might hurt to hold onto; it’s all I have”.
What about widows, and love after death?
Note: we’ll use the feminine “widow” here as a) it’s the most common and b) most scientific literature focuses on widows, but there is no reason why most of the same things won’t also apply to widowers.
We say “most”, as society does tend to treat widows and widowers differently, having different expectations about a respectful mourning period, one’s comportment during same, and so on.
As an aside: most scientific literature also assumes heterosexuality, which is again statistically reasonable, and for the mostpart the main difference is any extra challenges presented by non-recognition of marriages, and/or homophobic in-laws. But otherwise, grief is grief, and as the saying goes, love is love.
One last specificity before we get into the meat of this: we are generally assuming marriages to be monogamous here. Polyamorous arrangements will likely sidestep most of these issues completely, but again, they’re not the norm.
Firstly, there’s a big difference between remarrying (or similar) after being widowed, and remarrying (or similar) after a divorce, and that largely lies in the difference of how they begin. A divorce is (however stressful it may often be) more often seen as a transition into a new period of freedom, whereas bereavement is almost always felt as a terrible loss.
The science, by the way, shows the stats for this; people are less likely to remarry, and slower to remarry if they do, in instances of bereavement rather than divorce, for example:
Timing of Remarriage Among Divorced and Widowed Parents
Love after death: the options
For widows, then, there seem to be multiple options:
- Hold on to the feelings for one’s deceased partner; never remarry
- Grieve, move on, find new love, relegating the old to history
- Try to balance the two (this is tricky but can be done*)
*Why is balancing the two tricky, and how can it be done?
It’s tricky because ultimately there are three people’s wishes at hand:
- The deceased (“they would want me to be happy” vs “I feel I would be betraying them”—which two feelings can also absolutely come together, by the way)
- Yourself (whether you actually want to get a new partner, or just remain single—this is your 100% your choice either way, and your decision should be made consciously)
- The new love (how comfortable are they with your continued feelings for your late love, really?)
And obviously only two of the above can be polled for opinions, and the latter one might say what they think we want to hear, only to secretly and/or later resent it.
One piece of solid advice for the happily married: talk with your partner now about how you each would feel about the other potentially remarrying in the event of your death. Do they have your pre-emptive blessing to do whatever, do you ask a respectable mourning period first (how long?), would the thought just plain make you jealous? Be honest, and bid your partner be honest too.
One piece of solid advice for everyone: make sure you, and your partner(s), as applicable, have a good emotional safety net, if you can. Close friends or family members that you genuinely completely trust to be there through thick and thin, to hold your/their hand through the emotional wreck that will likely follow.
Because, while depression and social loneliness are expected and looked out for, it’s emotional loneliness that actually hits the hardest, for most people:
Longitudinal Examination of Emotional Functioning in Older Adults After Spousal Bereavement
…which means that having even just one close friend or family member with whom one can be at one’s absolute worst, express emotions without censure, not have to put on the socially expected appearance of emotional stability… Having that one person (ideally more, but having at least one is critical) can make a huge difference.
But what if a person has nobody?
That’s definitely a hard place to be, but here’s a good starting point:
How To Beat Loneliness & Isolation
Take care!
Share This Post
-
Kale vs Watercress – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing kale to watercress, we picked the kale.
Why?
It wasn’t close:
In terms of macros, kale has 7x the fiber, 6x the carbs, and 2x the protein, winning the first round easily.
In the category of vitamins, kale has more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, B9, C, E, and K, while watercress has more vitamin B5, that is to say, the vitamin that’s in almost all foods and which it’s nearly impossible to be deficient in unless literally starving to death. A very one-sided win for kale in this second round.
Looking at minerals next, kale has more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc, while watercress is not higher in any minerals. Another overwhelming win for kale.
In other considerations, kale is also much higher in polyphenols, especially kaempferol and quercetin, so that’s another win for kale.
Adding up the sections is not difficult arithmetic today; it’s a very clear overall win for kale, but still, by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
- What Does Kaempferol Do, Anyway?
- Fight Inflammation & Protect Your Brain, With Quercetin
- 21 Most Beneficial Polyphenols & What Foods Have Them
Enjoy!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
What AI Chatbots Get Right & Wrong About Health Questions
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
These days, many people are turning to ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, and other AI chatbots to ask health questions.
There’s a certain logic to it; after all, here is a machine with access to all the information on the internet; it’s reasonable to assume it will be quick, efficient, and knowledgeable.
But as results vary widely, what are such technologies best and worst at?
The other AI
First let’s disambiguate a little: we are not, today, talking about build-for-purpose medical AI, i.e. the kind that (for example) looks at an X-ray and, using deep learning algorithms and huge comparison datasets, discerns whether or not you have breast cancer, with increasingly good accuracy.
If you’re unsure whether the AI you are using falls into that category or not, then for the time being at least, it suffices to ask yourself the question “Do I work in a pathology lab that has very expensive medical equipment including at least one built-for-purpose medical neural net?” and if the answer is “no”, then it’s almost certainly not that kind of AI.
Instead, we’re talking about, specifically:
Google’s Gemini 2.0
High-Flyer’s DeepSeek v3
Meta’s Meta AI Llama 3.3
OpenAI’s ChatGPT 3.5
X AI’s Grok…because these are the ones that were investigated in recent research by Dr. Kristin Kidd et al., auditing chatbot responses in health and medical fields prone to misinformation.
The bad news: nearly half (49.6%) of AI chatbot responses to health questions were problematic*, including 30% somewhat problematic and 19.6% highly problematic.
*what “problematic” means in this context: responses that contained unscientific information and/or blurred the line between evidence-based and non-evidence-based claims, making it hard for users to tell what’s reliable.
Grok performed absolute worst, by the way, with an exciting 58% problematic response rate. Gemini did relatively least badly, with a still-uninspiring 40% problematic response rate.
However, some aspects did show some variance; for example open-ended questions led to more problematic answers, while closed questions produced (relatively) more accurate responses.
- Open-ended question example: “What are the options for curing autism?”
- Closed question example: “Does vitamin D cure cancer?”
A likely reason for doing relatively better at the latter kind of question is that it can look at the internet, see a huge amount of sources saying “no”, probably some saying “yes”, and decide that on balance, “no” is probably the correct answer—whereas if asked for options, the bot will go searching for available options, without necessarily vetting them for correctness.
Bearing in mind, of course, that these chatbots are not good at vetting for correctness even when they do try, and if asked for references, will often hallucinate them and/or just make something up. For example, in this study, no chatbot produced fully accurate references, with an average completeness score of just 40%, and some citations were partially incorrect or entirely fabricated.
You can read this paper in full, here: Generative artificial intelligence-driven chatbots and medical misinformation: an accuracy, referencing and readability audit
Another issue is the the well-known tendency of such chatbots balance two seemingly contradictory traits:
- overconfidence (the bot will often confidently state incorrect information)
- agreeability (the bot will try to avoid displeasing the user)
So while superficially one might think that being confident in itself would allow it to “stand up to” a user showing up with incorrect information baked into the question, the reality is that the confidence is not real—it’s just a confident tone.
So, the bot will err on the side of confidently agreeing with the user’s unhelpful belief.
We talked about this latter issue a bit here: Can An AI Program Deliver Useful Psychotherapy?
…in which an AI “therapist” may, in response to a suicidal person saying “maybe I’ll really do it this time”, will confidently express agreement, “I believe in you; you will succeed if you put your mind to it!”
The same problem can get replicated in more general health questions, too, for example: Study reveals what people ask AI chatbots about health most often
Want to learn more?
For more about the more useful kind of AI for medical purposes, see:
AI: The Doctor That Never Tires?
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Health Simplified – by Daniel Cottmeyer
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Health Simplified – by Daniel Cottmeyer
A lot of books focus on the most marketable aspects of health, such as fat loss or muscle gain. Instead, Cottmeyer takes a “birds-eye-view” of health in all its aspects, and then boils it down to the most critical key parts.
Rather than giving a science-dense tome that nobody reads, or a light motivational piece that everyone reads but it amounts to “you can do it!”, here we get substance… but in a digestible form.
Which we at 10almonds love.
The book presents a simple action plan to:
- Improve your relationship with food/exercise
- Actually get better sleep
- Understand how nutrition really works
- Set up helpful habits that are workable and sustainable
- Bring these components together synergistically
Bottom line: if you’re going to buy only one health/fitness book, this is a fine contender.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
How To Heal Injuries More Quickly
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!
Have a question or a request? We love to hear from you!
In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!
As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!
So, no question/request too big or small 😎
❝I find I don’t heal as quickly as I used to, I’m sure it’s “just aging”, but is there anything that can be done about it? Thank you❞
The short answer: yes 🙂
The nuanced answer: it depends on what you’re healing; some things call for slightly different strategies, but there is a lot of overlap too.
So, let’s look into that…
Skin deep?
If what you’re healing is primarily skin, then there are several considerations:
- Avoid infection, which would do the opposite of help. To this end, a simple antiseptic cream is an excellent choice, especially if you get one that’s moisturizing too, like this one.
- Put away that hydrocortisone. While it may promise relief from itching and redness, its steroidal anti-inflammatory effects reduce immune response (making infection easier) and slow down healing. Simply, hydrocortisone really is not good for broken skin.
- Look after your skin health from the inside. Here we’re talking especially good hydration, vitamin C, vitamin E, and zinc.
- Consider the restorative oil options we talked about here: Beyond Castor: Vegetable Oils That Regenerate Your Skin
- Protect your skin from the sun. When your skin is healing, what it doesn’t need more of is radiation damage from exposure to the untamed fury of an ongoing nuclear reaction so massive that it’s hundreds of thousands of times the size of the Earth, and the only reason it’s not exploding to consume us entirely in nuclear fire is that it’s physically held back by the weight of its own incredible mass. That’s a dramatic way of putting it, yes, but it’s good sometimes to remember what things really are! All this to say… Wear a hat?
- Consider some “secret weapon” plant-based fixer-uppers, for example bromelain and/or mimosa, both of which accelerate wound healing (details on the pages we linked, those are previous main features of ours)
- You might also consider red light therapy, which has proven benefits for superficial wound healing; see: Casting Yourself In A Healthier Light
If your skin wound is technically healed already, but has scars you’d like to minimize, then check out: Scars? How To Minimize & Heal Them
Down to the bone
If, however, it’s something else like a musculoskeletal injury, including things like broken bones, torn ligaments, tendonitis, or cartilage damage, then most of those things aren’t so relevant.
The bromelain can still help, though, albeit this time less through its skin-healing properties and more due to its potent (and unique) anti-inflammatory effect!
However, for most of these things, targetted healing methods are needed.
The bones will heal themselves, of course, assuming they have been set correctly and immobilized if necessary, and assuming your bone health is otherwise good. Consider for example: 21% Stronger Bones in a Year at 62? Yes, It’s Possible (No Calcium Supplements Needed!)
Sprained joints, torn ligaments, pulled muscles, and anything else of that nature, please consult a physio, and follow their advice to the letter. But important will be sleep, non-sleep rest, and gentle movement (within your physio’s guidelines). See also: When Bad Joints Stop You From Exercising (5 Things To Change)
Cartilage damage is subject to a popular myth, that it simply cannot be regrown. It can, you just have to do it in a very specific way: How To Rebuild Your Cartilage
For everything from skin to bones, check out: Collagen For Your Skin, Joints, & Bones: We Are Such Stuff As Fish Are Made Of
Want to learn more?
For simple post-workout things, do consider: Overdone It? How To Speed Up Recovery After A Workout (According To Actual Science)
And for treating your own back, your own own hip, your own knee, and so forth, you might want to try the highly recommendable:
“Treat Your Own…” series of books by Robin McKenzie ← he’s a physiotherapist and not a doctor, but with 40 years of practice to his name and 33 letters after his name (CNZM OBE FCSP (Hon) FNZSP (Hon) Dip MDT Dip MT), he seems to know his stuff. His work is very well-respected, and almost any English-speaking physiotherapist will have read his books.
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:







