Ideal Blood Pressure Numbers Explained

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!

Have a question or a request? You can always hit “reply” to any of our emails, or use the feedback widget at the bottom!

In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!

As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!

So, no question/request too big or small

❝Maybe I missed it but the study on blood pressure did it say what the 2 numbers should read ideally?❞

We linked it at the top of the article rather than including it inline, as we were short on space (and there was a chart rather than a “these two numbers” quick answer), but we have a little more space today, so:

CategorySystolic (mm Hg)Diastolic (mm Hg)
Normal< 120AND< 80
Elevated120 – 129AND< 80
Stage 1 – High Blood Pressure130 – 139OR80 – 89
Stage 2 – High Blood Pressure140 or higherOR90 or higher
Hypertensive CrisisAbove 180AND/ORAbove 120

To oversimplify for a “these two numbers” answer, under 120/80 is generally considered good, unless it is under 90/60, in which case that becomes hypotension.

Hypotension, the blood pressure being too low, means your organs may not get enough oxygen and if they don’t, they will start shutting down.

To give you an idea how serious this, this is the closed-circuit equivalent of the hypovolemic shock that occurs when someone is bleeding out onto the floor. Technically, bleeding to death also results in low blood pressure, of course, hence the similarity.

So: just a little under 120/80 is great.

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Recommended

    • The Sweet Truth About Glycine
      Dr. DiNicolantonio’s research on collagen and glycine reveals the importance of copper, vitamins A and C, and glycine for optimal collagen production and joint health.

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

    • Coconut vs Avocado – Which is Healthier?

      10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

      Our Verdict

      When comparing coconut to avocado, we picked the avocado.

      Why?

      In terms of macros, avocado is lower in carbs and also in net carbscoconut’s a little higher in fiber, but not enough to make up for the difference in carbs nor, when it comes to glycemic index and insulin index, the impact of coconut’s much higher fat content on insulin responses too. On which note, while coconut’s fats are broadly considered healthy (its impressive saturated fat content is formed of medium-chain triglycerides which, in moderation, are heart-healthy), avocado’s fats are even healthier, being mostly monounsaturated fat with some polyunsaturated (and about 15x less saturated fat). All in all, a fair win for avocado on the macros front, but coconut isn’t bad in moderation.

      When it comes to vitamins, avocados are higher in vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B9, C, E, K, and choline. Most of those differences are by very large margins. Coconuts are not higher in any vitamins. A huge, easy, “perfect score” win for avocados.

      In the category of minerals, however, it’s coconut’s turn to sweep with more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, zinc, and selenium—though the margins are mostly not nearly as impressive as avocado’s vitamin margins. Speaking of avocados, they do have more potassium than coconuts do, but the margin isn’t very large. A compelling win for coconut’s mineral content.

      Adding up the sections, we get to a very credible win for avocados, but coconuts are also very respectable. So, as ever, enjoy both (although we do recommend exercising moderation in the case of coconuts, mainly because of the saturated fat content), and if you’re choosing between them for some purpose, then avocado will generally be the best option.

      Want to learn more?

      You might like to read:

      Take care!

      Share This Post

    • 5 Ways To Beat Afternoon Energy Slumps

      10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

      This is Nisha Vora, of Rainbow Plant Life fame. After graduating from Harvard Law School, she realized she hated being a lawyer, and pivoted completely to become what she now is 12 years later, a chef and health coach.

      Here are her tips for boosting energy through the day:

      Caffeine timing

      If you don’t do caffeine at all, no need to change that, but if you do, Vora advises that midday is the best time for it, with a very good rationale:

      • of course it should not be too late in the day, because the elimination half-life of caffeine (4–8 hours to eliminate just half of the caffeine, depending on genes, call it 6 hours as an average though honestly for most people it will either be 4 or 8, not 6) is such that it can easily interfere with sleep for most people
      • because caffeine is an adenosine blocker, not an adenosine inhibitor, taking caffeine in the morning means either there’s no adenosine to block, or it’ll just “save” that adenosine for later, i.e. when the caffeine is eliminated, then the adenosine will kick in, meaning that your morning sleepiness has now been deferred to the afternoon, rather than eliminated.

      Another reminder that caffeine is the “payday loan” of energy. So, midday it is. No morning sleepiness to defer, and yet also not so late as to interfere with sleep.

      See also: Calculate (And Enjoy) The Perfect Night’s Sleep

      Simplify what can be simplified

      This one’s not from a physiological basis, but rather, that a lot of the time most of us have much of our energy being taken by constant task-switching (what gets called multitasking, but as our brain is a single processor, it really means switching rapidly between different kinds of cognition, which is not efficient). In order to avoid that energy drain, try to streamline things and make a particular effort to not only single-task, but to do so without distractions.

      Counterpoint: if you have unmedicated ADHD, then chances are you’ll do better with a single small distraction chosen by you, than trying to go without distractions, because your brain will find distractions anyway, so you might as well choose one (for many people it is background music, or a podcast or TV show that one doesn’t may attention to but it’s there) as a matter of harm reduction, and that way you’ll do better at focusing on your primary task than if your brain were reaching out for every and any possible distraction.

      Manage your blood sugars

      In particular, she advocates for avoiding sugary breakfasts, opting instead for protein, fat, and fiber-rich options. For more in this regard, see:

      10 Ways To Balance Your Blood Sugars

      Walk after meals

      You don’t have to don hiking boots and “I am just going outside and may be some time“; rather, even a 2–5 minute walk after a meal helps regulate digestion and glucose levels, avoiding postprandial energy slumps.

      So,

      • if you have a treadmill, after eating is a great time to use it for a few minutes
      • if you have stairs, now’s a great time to go up and down them a few times

      One last technique for when everything else fails

      We’ll quote her directly on this one:

      ❝Despite my best efforts, soemtimes I just have one of those days. Maybe I didn’t sleep well or I’m distracted by my never ending thoughts. If I need to be productive or energized on those days, I will do something that I absolutely hate:

      I will take a cold shower.

      And I hate it because I’m already always cold all the time, so why would I want to get a cold shower?

      Well, it’s because cold water immersion has been shown to dramatically boost your dopamine levels, which gives you more energy and motivation.

      In the moment though, it’s mostly painful and I hate everything and everyone around me.

      But I know that if I can suffer through two minutes of a cold shower, I will feel so refreshed.❞

      There are more benefits than just that, though, see:

      A Cold Shower A Day Keeps The Doctor Away?

      Want more from Nisha Vora?

      We reviewed one of her books a while back:

      The Vegan Instant Pot Cookbook – by Nisha Vora

      Enjoy!

      Share This Post

    • Healing Your Gut: Anastasia’s Journey and Tips

      10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

      Anastasia Gurova shares her inspiring journey from chronic gut issues to vibrant health.

      A Personal Journey to Gut Health

      In the below video, Anastasia shares her long struggle with gut problems, including SIBO, IBS, and gastritis. She talks about ending up in the hospital with severe bloating, only to find that a range of medical approaches didn’t provide her with any lasting relief. This led her to explore the importance of the microbiome and its crucial role in gut health, which is what we’ll be focusing on in this overview.

      Key Insights and Tips

      The most valuable parts of Anastasia’s story for 10almonds readers are, in our opinion, the solutions she discovered to her gut issues. You’ll have to watch her video to discover all of them, but here are some of our favorites:

      • Reintroduce Whole Grains and Legumes: Despite the popularity of grain-free diets, Anastasia found significant improvements in her gut health by adding whole grains like quinoa, oats, and buckwheat back into her diet. These foods provide essential fibers that feed beneficial gut bacteria.
      • Soaking and Fermenting Foods: To make grains and legumes more digestible, Anastasia recommends soaking them overnight. This is similar to the common technique people use on oats. She also includes fermented foods like sauerkraut, kimchi, and yogurt in her diet, which introduce beneficial bacteria to the gut.
      • Resistant Starches: Foods like cooked and cooled rice, potatoes, and green bananas contain resistant starches that promote healthy gut bacteria. Anastasia emphasizes incorporating these into meals to support gut health.
      • Mindful Eating: Anastasia found that taking time to chew food thoroughly and savor each bite helped improve her digestion. She avoids distractions like TV while eating and pays attention to the textures and flavors of her meals.
      • Avoid Overly Restrictive Diets: Anastasia warns against overly restrictive diets like keto and strict SIBO diets that cut out all carbs and fiber. These can worsen gut health by starving beneficial bacteria.

      That’s Only The Beginning

      Anastasia’s video goes far beyond what we’ve covered in this short introduction; she provides a detailed look at the steps she took, from dietary changes to lifestyle adjustments, and offers tips that anyone can apply. Plus, she explains the science behind these changes, which, of course, we love.

      Enjoy the video! (It would be remiss for us to not bring up our general intro to gut health, or our more specific article on the gut-brain connection)

      Good luck on your gut-health journey!

      Share This Post

    Related Posts

      • Beat Sugar Addiction Now! – by Dr. Jacob Teitelbaum & Chrystle Fiedler

        10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

        Sugar isn’t often thought of as an addiction in the same category as alcohol or nicotine, but it’s actually very similar in some ways…

        A bold claim, but: in each case, it has to do with dopamine responses to something that has:

        • an adverse effect on our health,
        • a quickly developed tolerance to same,
        • and unpleasant withdrawal symptoms when quitting.

        However, not all sugar addictions are created equal, and Dr. Teitelbaum lays four different types of sugar addiction out for us:

        1. Most related to “I need to perform and I need to perform now”
        2. Most related to “I just need something to get me through one more stressful day, again, just like every day before it”
        3. Most related to “ate too much sugar because of the above, and now a gut overgrowth of C. albicans is at the wheel”
        4. Most related to “ate too much sugar because of the above, and now insulin resistance is a problem that perpetuates itself too”

        Of course, these may overlap, and indeed, they tend to stack cumulatively as time goes by.

        However, Dr. Teitelbaum notes that as readers we may recognize ourselves as being at a particular point in the above, and there are different advices for each of them.

        You thought it was just going to be about going cold turkey? Nope!

        Instead, a multi-vector approach is recommended, including adjustments to sleep, nutrition, immune health, hormonal health, and more.

        In short: if you’ve been trying to to kick the “White Death” habit as Gloria Swanson called it (sugar, that is, not the WW2 Finnish sniper of the same name—we can’t help you with that one), then this book is really much more helpful than others that take the “well, just don’t eat it, then” approach!

        Pick up your copy of Beat Sugar Addiction Now from Amazon, and start your journey!

        Don’t Forget…

        Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

        Learn to Age Gracefully

        Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

      • Relationships: When To Stick It Out & When To Call It Quits

        10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

        Like A Ship Loves An Anchor?

        Today’s article may seem a little bit of a downer to start with, but don’t worry, it picks up again too. Simply put, we’ve written before about many of the good parts of relationships, e.g:

        Only One Kind Of Relationship Promotes Longevity This Much!

        …but what if that’s not what we have?

        Note: if you have a very happy, secure, fulfilling, joyous relationship, then, great! Or if you’re single and happy, then, also great! Hopefully you will still find today’s feature of use if you find yourself advising a friend or family member one day. So without further ado, let’s get to it…

        You may be familiar with the “sunk cost fallacy”; if not: it’s what happens when a person or group has already invested into a given thing, such that even though the thing is not going at all the way they hoped, they now want to continue trying to make that thing work, lest their previous investment be lost. But the truth is: if it’s not going to work, then the initial investment is already lost, and pouring out extra won’t help—it’ll just lose more.

        That “investment” in a given thing could be money, time, energy, or (often the case) a combination of the above.

        In the field of romance, the “sunk cost fallacy” keeps a lot of bad relationships going for longer than perhaps they should, and looking back (perhaps after a short adjustment period), the newly-single person says “why did I let that go on?” and vows to not make the same mistake again.

        But that prompts the question: how can we know when it’s right to “keep working on it, because relationships do involve work”, as perfectly reasonable relationship advice often goes, and when it’s right to call it quits?

        Should I stay or should I go?

        Some questions for you (or perhaps a friend you might find yourself advising) to consider:

        • What qualities do you consider the most important for a partner to have—and does your partner have them?
        • If you described the worst of your relationship to a close friend, would that friend feel bad for you?
        • Do you miss your partner when they’re away, or are you glad of the break? When they return, are they still glad to see you?
        • If you weren’t already in this relationship, would you seek to enter it now? (This takes away sunk cost and allows a more neutral assessment)
        • Do you feel completely safe with your partner (emotionally as well as physically), or must you tread carefully to avoid conflict?
        • If your partner decided tomorrow that they didn’t want to be with you anymore and left, would that be just a heartbreak, or an exciting beginning of a new chapter in your life?
        • What things would you generally consider dealbreakers in a relationship—and has your partner done any of them?

        The last one can be surprising, by the way. We often see or hear of other people’s adverse relationship situations and think “I would never allow…” yet when we are in a relationship and in love, there’s a good chance that we might indeed allow—or rather, excuse, overlook, and forgive.

        And, patience and forgiveness certainly aren’t inherently bad traits to have—it’s just good to deploy them consciously, and not merely be a doormat.

        Either way, reflect (or advise your friend/family member to reflect, as applicable) on the “score” from the above questions.

        • If the score is good, then maybe it really is just a rough patch, and the tools we link at the top and bottom of this article might help.
        • If the score is bad, the relationship is bad, and no amount of historic love or miles clocked up together will change that. Sometimes it’s not even anyone’s fault; sometimes a relationship just ran its course, and now it’s time to accept that and turn to a new chapter.

        “At my age…”

        As we get older, it’s easy for that sunk cost fallacy to loom large. Inertia is heavy, the mutual entanglement of lives is far-reaching, and we might not feel we have the same energy for dating that we did when we were younger.

        And there may sometimes be a statistical argument for “sticking it out” at least for a while, depending on where we are in the relationship, per this study (with 165,039 participants aged 20–76), which found:

        ❝Results on mean levels indicated that relationship satisfaction decreased from age 20 to 40, reached a low point at age 40, then increased until age 65, and plateaued in late adulthood.

        As regards the metric of relationship duration, relationship satisfaction decreased during the first 10 years of the relationship, reached a low point at 10 years, increased until 20 years, and then decreased again.❞

        ~ Dr. Janina Bühler et al.

        Source: Development of Relationship Satisfaction Across the Life Span: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

        And yet, when it comes to prospects for a new relationship…

        • If our remaining life is growing shorter, then it’s definitely too short to spend in an unhappy relationship
        • Maybe we really won’t find romance again… And maybe that’s ok, if w’re comfortable making our peace with that and finding joy in the rest of life (this widowed writer (hi, it’s me) plans to remain single now by preference, and her life is very full of purpose and beauty and joy and yes, even love—for family, friends, etc, plus the memory of my wonderful late beloved)
        • Nevertheless, the simple fact is: many people do find what they go on to describe as their best relationship yet, late in life ← this study is with a small sample size, but in this case, even anecdotal evidence seems sufficient to make the claim reasonable; probably you personally know someone who has done so. If they can, so can you, if you so wish.
        • Adding on to that last point… Later life relationships can also offer numerous significant advantages unique to such (albeit some different challenges too—but with the right person, those challenges are just a fun thing to tackle together). See for example:

        An exploratory investigation into dating among later‐life women

        And about those later-life relationships that do work? They look like this:

        “We’ve Got This”: Middle-Aged and Older (ages 40–87) Couples’ Satisfying Relationships and We-Talk Promote Better Physiological, Relational, and Emotional Responses to Conflict

        this one looks like the title says it all, but it really doesn’t, and it’s very much worth at least reading the abstract, if not the entire paper—because it talks a lot about the characteristics that make for happy or unhappy relationships, and the effect that those things have on people. It really is very good, and quite an easy read.

        See again: Healthy Relationship, Healthy Life

        Take care!

        Don’t Forget…

        Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

        Learn to Age Gracefully

        Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

      • Ice Baths: To Dip Or Not To Dip?

        10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

        Many Are Cold, But Few Are Frozen

        We asked you for your (health-related) view of ice baths, and got the above-depicted, below-described, set of responses:

        • About 31% said “ice baths are great for the health; we should take them”
        • About 29% said “ice baths’ risks outweigh their few benefits”
        • About 26% said “ice baths’ benefits outweigh their few risks”
        • About 14% said “ice baths are dangerous and can kill you; best avoided”

        So what does the science say?

        Freezing water is very dangerous: True or False?

        True! Water close to freezing point is indeed very dangerous, and can most certainly kill you.

        Fun fact, though: many such people are still saveable with timely medical intervention, in part because the same hypothermia that is killing them also slows down the process* of death

        Source (and science) for both parts of that:

        Cold water immersion: sudden death and prolonged survival

        *and biologically speaking, death is a process, not an event, by the way. But we don’t have room for that today!

        (unless you die in some sudden violent way, such as a powerful explosion that destroys your brain instantly; then it’s an event)

        Ice baths are thus also very dangerous: True or False?

        False! Assuming that they are undertaken responsibly and you have no chronic diseases that make it more dangerous for you.

        What does “undertaken responsibly” mean?

        Firstly, the temperature should not be near freezing. It should be 10–15℃, which for Americans is 50–59℉.

        You can get a bath thermometer to check this, by the way. Here’s an example product on Amazon.

        Secondly, your ice bath should last no more than 10–15 minutes. This is not a place to go to sleep.

        What chronic diseases would make it dangerous?

        Do check with your doctor if you have any doubts, as no list we make can be exhaustive and we don’t know your personal medical history, but the main culprits are:

        • Cardiovascular disease
        • Hypertension
        • Diabetes (any type)

        The first two are for heart attack risk; the latter is because diabetes can affect core temperature regulation.

        Ice baths are good for the heart: True or False?

        True or False depending on how they’re done, and your health before starting.

        For most people, undertaking ice baths responsibly, repeated ice bath use causes the cardiovascular system to adapt to better maintain homeostasis when subjected to thermal shock (i.e. sudden rapid changes in temperature).

        For example: Respiratory and cardiovascular responses to cold stress following repeated cold water immersion

        And because that was a small study, here’s a big research review with a lot of data; just scroll to where it has the heading“Specific thermoregulative adaptations to regular exposure to cold air and/or cold water exposure“ for many examples and much discussion:

        Health effects of voluntary exposure to cold water: a continuing subject of debate

        Ice baths are good against inflammation: True or False?

        True! Here’s one example:

        Winter-swimming as a building-up body resistance factor inducing adaptive changes in the oxidant/antioxidant status

        Uric acid and glutathione levels (important markers of chronic inflammation) are also significantly affected:

        Uric acid and glutathione levels during short-term whole body cold exposure

        Want to know more?

        That’s all we have room for today, but check out our previous “Expert Insights” main feature looking at Wim Hof’s work in cryotherapy:

        A Cold Shower A Day Keeps The Doctor Away?

        Enjoy!

        Don’t Forget…

        Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

        Learn to Age Gracefully

        Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: