Taking The Gamble Out Of Antidepressants

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

…and other items from this week’s health news:

Melancholy, blood, and signs

Sounds like it could be a headline for our Halloween edition, but no!

The problem: as it stands, major depressive disorder often requires a prolonged trial-and-error process with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and potentially other kinds of antidepressants, meaning many patients spend many weeks or months on medications that don’t improve their symptoms.

The solution: researchers (Dr. Eleni Tzavara et al.) have found that a blood-based circular RNA marker known to its friends as “CDR1as” can predict how people with major depressive disorder respond to sertraline (most doctor’s go-to first-try antidepressant, despite it having a famously high hit to miss ratio).

  • How it works: CDR1as is an RNA enriched in the brain that is stable in blood, crosses the blood–brain barrier, and is sensitive to synaptic activity and neuronal receptor signaling.
  • What they did: Dr. Tzavara and her team measured baseline CDR1as levels in whole blood from two independent cohorts in the EMBARC and ANTARES studies before treatment with sertraline, and compared future responders with non-responders.
  • What they found: baseline CDR1as levels differed between people who later responded to sertraline and those who didn’t, and changes in CDR1as after treatment were linked to long-term remission. Further, CDR1as predicted response and remission with SSRI treatment, but not with placebo or bupropion, suggesting the marker may be specific to serotonin-based therapies.

So, this may mean a lot of people will no longer have to suffer for longer while potentially getting adverse side effects for a medication that won’t work for them specifically!

Read in full: A blood marker could predict how people respond to antidepressants

Related: Antidepressants: Personalization Is Key!

Soon, more American women will have cardiovascular disease than not

A newly-released statement from the American Heart Association warns that by 2050, nearly 60% of women in the US are projected to have high blood pressure, more than 60% obesity, and over 25% diabetes, all key contributors to heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke.

Not only that, but it isn’t just tied to the nature of an aging population (as the US population is), but rather, nearly one in three women aged 22–44 are expected to have some form of CVD, diabetes in this group is projected to rise from 6% to nearly 16%, and more than one third are expected to have high blood pressure.

❝One in every three women will die from cardiovascular disease—maybe it’s your grandmother, or your mother or your daughter❞

~ Dr. Stacey E. Rosen, President of the American Heart Association & Executive Director of the Katz Institute for Women’s Health

Read in full: American Heart Association warns 60% of US women will have cardiovascular disease by 2050

Related: Heart Health vs Systemic Stress

“Not addicted, but”

In the category of “I could quit anytime” beliefs, you would think that something that results in episodes of abdominal pain paired with screaming and vomiting would be something quickly desisted. Of course, we might still choose to take it if it were somehow necessary for life, or perhaps if it bestowed us with particularly impressive superpowers.

But for a mostly recreational drug whose main medical uses are primarily against pain and against anxiety, those benefits seem moot when the result is pain and screaming and vomiting.

But according to research, analyzing 188 million US emergency visits found Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome cases rose from 4.4 per 100,000 visits in 2016 to 33.1 per 100,000 in just 4 years.

The reason for the rise: while cause and effect hasn’t been proven, scientists believe it is due to the much higher potency of THC available these days, compared to the much lower-strength cannabis products available previously.

The cure is simple: stop taking cannabis.

The outcome, however? Well, mostly people don’t do that.

Read in full: Screaming, vomiting, and daily weed: The rise of “scromiting” among chronic cannabis users

Related: How Much THC Is Safe?

Take care!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • ‘I went out and I had a cry’: what aged-care staff say about their grief when residents die

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    As our population ages, we’re living longer and dying older. End-of-life care is therefore an increasingly important part of aged care. In Australia, around 50% of people aged over 85 die in an aged care home.

    But what does this mean for those who work in aged care? Research suggests aged-care staff experience a unique type of grief when residents die. However, their grief often goes unrecognised, and they may be left with insufficient support.

    Maskot/Getty Images

    Forming relationships over time

    Aged-care staff don’t just do tasks such as helping with showering or delivering meals, but engage actively and connect with residents.

    In our own research we’ve spoken with aged-care staff who care for older people both in aged-care facilities and in their own homes.

    Aged-care staff are aware many of those they look after will die, and that they have a role in supporting older people as they come to the end of their life. In their caring role, they will often form meaningful and rewarding relationships with the older people in their care.

    As a result, when the older person dies, this can be a source of profound loss for aged-care workers. As one told us:

    I know I cry over some of them that die […] You spend time with them and you love them.

    Some aged-care workers we interviewed talked about being present with the older person, talking to them or holding their hands as they died. Others spoke of how they shed tears for the person who had died, but that the tears were also for their loss, because they have known the older person and been involved in their life.

    I think what made it worse was when her breathing got very shallow, and I knew she was coming to the end. I did go out. I told her I was going out for a minute. I went out and I had a cry because I wish that I could have saved her, but I knew that I couldn’t.

    Sometimes aged-care staff indicated there wasn’t an opportunity for them to say goodbye or be acknowledged as someone who had suffered a loss, even if they had been providing care to the person for a number of months or years. One aged-care worker noted:

    If people die in hospital, that’s another grief. Because they don’t get to say goodbye. Often the hospital won’t tell you.

    Aged-care staff often must also support families and loved ones as they come to terms with the death of a parent, relative or friend. This can add to the to the emotional toll for staff who may be experiencing their own feelings of grief.

    Cumulative grief

    Repeated experiences of death can lead to cumulative grief and emotional strain. While staff saw meaning and value in their work, they also found regular exposure to death challenging.

    One staff member told us that with time and seeing multiple deaths, you can “feel a little robotic. Because you’ve had to become that way to manage”.

    Organisational issues such as staff shortages or high workloads can also exacerbate these feelings of burnout and dissatisfaction. Staff highlighted the need for support in coping.

    Sometimes all you want to do is talk. You don’t need someone to solve anything for you. You just want to be heard.

    Supporting aged-care staff to manage their grief

    Aged-care organisations must take steps to support the wellbeing of their workforce, including acknowledging the grief many feel when older people die.

    Following the death of an older person, offering support to staff who have worked closely with that person and acknowledging the emotional bonds that existed are powerful ways of recognising and validating staff grief. Simply asking the staff member how they are going or giving them the chance to take some time to process that the person has died is a good place to start.

    Workplaces should also encourage self-care more broadly, promoting activities such as taking scheduled breaks, connecting with colleagues, and prioritising time for relaxation and physical activities. Staff value workplaces that encourage, normalise, and support their self-care practices.

    We also need to look at how we can normalise the ability to talk about death and dying within our families and communities. A reluctance to recognise death as part of life can add to the emotional load staff carry, especially if families see dying as a failure of care.

    Conversely, aged-care staff have consistently told us how meaningful it is to receive positive feedback and acknowledgement from families. As one worker recalled:

    We had a death over the weekend. A really long-term resident here. And the daughter drove in especially this morning to tell me what fantastic care she had. That makes me feel better, that what we’re doing is right.

    As members of families and communities, we need to recognise aged-care workers are uniquely vulnerable to feelings of grief and loss, often having built relationships with those in their care over months or years. Supporting the wellbeing of this important workforce supports them to continue to care for us and our loved ones as we age and come to the end of our lives.

    Jennifer Tieman, Matthew Flinders Professor and Director of the Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, Flinders University and Priyanka Vandersman, Senior Research Fellow, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Share This Post

  • Apple vs Blackberries – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing apple to blackberries, we picked the blackberries.

    Why?

    It wasn’t close today:

    In terms of macros, apples have slightly more carbs while blackberries have 2x the fiber, so that’s an easy win for blackberries in this category.

    In the category of vitamins, apples have slightly more vitamin B6, while blackberries have considerably more of vitamins A, B1, B3, B5, B7, B9, C, E, and K, winning easily again.

    Looking at minerals, apples are not higher in any minerals, while blackberries have a lot more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, sweeping a third category.

    Lastly, blackberries also have much more abundant polyphenols, so that’s another point in their favor.

    Adding up the sections makes for an overwhelming overall win for blackberries, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    Are You Getting The Right Kinds Of Flavonoids?

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • Dyslexia Test

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    (and it’s mostly not about reading/writing!)

    More than just shuffled letters

    This video provides a self-test based on the Bangor Dyslexia Test (BDT). The BDT is 94% accurate in identifying dyslexia, and it includes 9 parts, with a mix of questions and tasks. Answering “yes” or struggling with tasks indicates possible dyslexia. Collecting 4+ indicators suggests dyslexia, but of course is not a replacement for official diagnosis.

    It’s best to watch the video if you can, but here’s what to expect:

    1. Left-Right confusion: point your left hand to your right/left shoulder.
    2. Family history: any family members with dyslexia or struggles with reading/writing?
    3. Repeating numbers (order): repeat a given sequence of numbers in order.
    4. Letter confusion (e.g. b/d): do you confuse letters like “b” and “d” beyond age 8?
    5. Times tables: recite the 6, 7, and 8 times tables.
    6. Word manipulation: replace the letters in a word to create a new word, e.g. change “slide” (s ⇾ g) to “glide.”
    7. Repeating numbers (reversed): repeat a given sequence of numbers in reverse order.
    8. Months in reverse: recite the months of the year in reverse order.
    9. Subtraction: do you struggle with subtraction, e.g. 44-9 or 55-12?

    Writer’s anecdote: I am not dyslexic, and/but I have an impressive level of dyscalculia (the purely numerical equivalent), to the point I’ll sometimes use a calculator to do single-digit calculations, and I am so bad at calculating ages or other differences between dates (I will have to count on my fingers or else run the severe risk of out-by-one errors). I have also been known to make mistakes counting down from 10, which really ruins dramatic tension.

    In contrast, the left-right thing is interesting, because when I was first learning Arabic, I had no trouble reading/writing right-to-left, but I initially struggled so much to remember which way the “backspace” key would take me (in Arabic the backspace key backspaces to the right, despite still pointing to the left).

    Anyway, for the test itself, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like to read:

    Reading, Better (Reading As A Cognitive Exercise)

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Chili Hot-Bedded Salmon

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    This one can be made in less time than it takes to order and receive a Chinese take-out! The principle is simple: it’s a bed of greens giving pride of place to a salmon fillet in a deliciously spicy marinade. So healthwise, we have greens-and-beans, healthy protein and fats, and tasty polyphenols. Experientially, we have food that tastes a lot more decadent than it is!

    You will need

    • 4 salmon fillets (if vegan, substitute firm tofu; see also how to make this no-salmon salmon)
    • 2 bok choy, washed and stems trimmed
    • 7 oz green beans, trimmed
    • 4 oz sugar snap peas
    • 4 spring onions, sliced
    • 2 tbsp chili oil*
    • 1 tbsp soy sauce
    • 1 tsp garlic paste
    • 1 tsp ginger paste
    • 1 tsp black pepper

    *this can be purchased as-is, but if you want to make your own in advance, simply take extra virgin olive oil and infuse it with [finely chopped, red] chili. This is a really good thing to do for commonly-used flavored oils, by the way—chili oil and garlic oil are must-haves in this writer’s opinion; basil oil, sage oil, and rosemary oil, are all excellent things to make and have in, too. Just know, infusing is not quick, so it’s good to do these in batch and make plenty well before you need it. For now, if you don’t have any homemade already, then store-bought is fine 🙂

    Method

    (we suggest you read everything at least once before doing anything)

    1) Preheat the oven to 360℉/180℃/gas mark 6

    2) Lay out 4 large squares of foil, and put the bok choy, green beans, and sugar snap peas in a little pile in the middle of each one. Put a salmon fillet on top of each (if it has skin, score the skin first, so that juices will be able to penetrate, and put it skin-side down), and then top with the spring onions.

    3) Mix the rest of the ingredients in a small bowl, and then spoon this marinade evenly over each of the fillets (alternatively, if you have occasion to marinade the fillets in advance and let them sit in the marinade in the fridge for some hours before, do so, in which case this step will already be done now, because past-you did it. Yay for past-you!)

    4) Fold up the edges of the foil, making each one an enclosed parcel, gently sealed at the top by folding it over. Put them on a baking tray and bake for about 20 minutes.

    5) Serve! If you’d like some carbs with it, we recommend our tasty versatile rice recipe.

    Enjoy!

    Want to learn more?

    For those interested in some of the science of what we have going on today:

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • A Tale Of Two Cinnamons

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Cinnamon’s Health Benefits (But Watch Out!)

    Cinnamon is enjoyed for its sweet and punchy flavor. It also has important health properties!

    Let’s take a look at the science…

    A Tale Of Two Cinnamons

    In your local supermarket, there is likely “cinnamon” and if you’re lucky, also “sweet cinnamon”. The difference between these is critical to understand before we continue:

    “Cinnamon” = Cinnamomum cassia or Cinnamomum aromaticum. This is cheapest and most readily available. It has a relatively high cinnamaldehyde content, and a high coumarin content.

    “Sweet cinnamon” Cinnamomum verum or Cinnamomum zeylanicum. It has a lower cinnamaldehyde content, and/but a much lower (almost undetectable) coumarin content.

    You may be wondering: what’s with the “or” in both of those cases? Each simply has two botanical names in use. It’s inconvenient and confusing, but that’s how it is.

    Great! What’s cinnamaldehyde and what’s coumarin?

    Cinnamaldehyde is what gives cinnamon its “spice” aspect; it’s strong and fragrant. It also gives cinnamon most of its health benefits.

    As a quick aside: it’s also used as the flavoring element in cinnamon flavored vapes, and in that form, it can cause health problems. So do eat it, but we recommend not to vape it.

    Coumarin is toxic in large quantities.

    The recommended safe amount is 0.1mg/kg, so you could easily go over this with a couple of teaspoons of cassia cinnamon:

    Toxicology and risk assessment of coumarin: focus on human data

    …while in Sweet/True/Ceylon cinnamon, those levels are almost undetectable:

    Medicinal properties of ‘true’ cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum): a systematic review

    If you have a cinnamon sensitivity, it is likely, but not necessarily, tied to the coumarin content rather than the cinnamaldehyde content.

    Summary of this section before moving on:

    “Cinnamon”, or cassia cinnamon, has about 50% stronger health benefits than “Sweet Cinnamon”, also called Ceylon cinnamon.

    “Cinnamon”, or cassia cinnamon, has about 250% stronger health risks than “Sweet Cinnamon”, also called Ceylon cinnamon.

    The mathematics here is quite simple; sweet cinnamon is the preferred way to go.

    The Health Benefits

    We spent a lot of time/space today looking at the differences. We think this was not only worth it, but necessary. However, that leaves us with less time/space for discussing the actual benefits. We’ll summarize, with links to supporting science:

    “Those three things that almost always go together”:

    Heart and blood benefits:

    Neuroprotective benefits:

    The science does need more testing in these latter two, though.

    Where to get it?

    You may be able to find sweet cinnamon in your local supermarket, or if you prefer capsule form, here’s an example product on Amazon

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Arugula vs Dandelion Greens – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing arugula to dandelion greens, we picked the dandelion greens.

    Why?

    Will anything unseat dandelions from their place as the queen of the greens? Not today, that’s for sure:

    In terms of macros, dandelion greens have more than 2x the fiber, which is significant, as well as more carbs and protein, making it the more nutritionally-dense choice all around macros-wise, though really, it’s the fiber that wins it for them here.

    In the category of vitamins, arugula has more of vitamins B5 and B9, while dandelion greens have more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B6, B7, C, E, K, and choline, all by generous margins too. An easy win for dandelion greens in this round.

    When it comes to minerals, arugula has more magnesium and zinc, while dandelions have more calcium, copper, iron, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and selenium. Another win for dandelion greens.

    One more category, polyphenols. We’d be here until next week if we listed all the polyphenols that dandelion greens have, but suffice it to say, dandelion greens have a total of 385.55mg/100g polyphenols, while arugula has a total of 0.10mg/100g polyphenols. Easy arithmetic today: dandelions have more than 3855.5x the polyphenol content that garden cress does.

    So, “eat leafy greens” is great advice, but they are definitely not all created equal!

    Let us take this moment to exhort: if you have any space at home where you can grow dandelions, grow them! They’re great for pollinators, too 🐝💕

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: