
News of a ‘giant’ baby boy is all over TikTok. Here’s what women really need to know
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Baby boy Cassian is an internet sensation. He was born earlier this year in the United States weighing 5.8 kilograms. But after his mum and the hospital shared the news recently, it wasn’t long before headlines about the “giant” baby spread around the world. These included:
‘Are you OK’?: Woman breaks record with giant newborn baby
Record-breaking baby tips the scales at almost double the average size of a newborn
While baby Cassian was born heavier than average, he’s not unique. There have been other examples in the news of babies born heavier. That includes a baby boy born in Brazil in 2023 who weighed 7.3kg.
These stories might make women all over the world cross their legs. But how common are big babies, and does their birth always lead to complications?
What are big babies?
Macrosomia describes babies born over 4kg or 4.5kg, depending on the definition.
A big baby can also be defined as having a birth weight over the 90th percentile at a particular gestational age. In other words, more than 90% of babies have a lower birth weight at this particular stage of the pregnancy. The term “large for gestational age” is probably a more accurate term as the weeks of gestation is used alongside the weight.
There has been little change overall in the percentage of large babies in the past decade in Australia. While stories of such births hit the media, their proportion hovers around 9–10% of births.
What are the problems for big babies and their mums?
We don’t know the specific circumstances of Cassian’s birth, his health or that of his mother. And we don’t know whether common reasons for larger babies are relevant in this situation.
But, generally speaking, birth complications can be higher for mothers and babies when the baby is big, especially if more than 4.5kg. This is certainly not always the case, however.
There is an increased need for interventions during the birth, such as forceps or vacuum delivery, or a caesarean section the bigger the baby is. Having these interventions can impact a women’s recovery after the birth, and options for the next birth.
For the baby there are higher risks of the shoulders getting stuck in the birth canal during the birth (known as shoulder dystocia).
Midwives and obstetricians also may need to make extra manoeuvres for the baby to be safely delivered. For instance, they may need to try and bring down one shoulder if it’s stuck behind the mother’s pubic bone.
These manoeuvres can damage the baby or lead to oxygen restrictions, with the baby needing to be resuscitated. However, these complications are rare and can occur when a big baby was not expected.
What leads to a big baby?
Big babies are most often healthy babies, and there are a number of reasons for them.
Genetic factors mean babies are always big in some families.
Babies that go over their due dates tend to be a bit bigger as they have more time to grow inside their mothers.
Having diabetes, especially if this is poorly controlled, can lead to larger babies. This is because the mother’s higher blood sugar leads to the baby receiving more energy than it needs, so it stores this extra energy as fat.
Babies of mothers with diabetes diagnosed for the first time in pregnancy (gestational diabetes) are at increased risk of being obese and developing diabetes in the future.
Mothers who are larger before pregnancy, or when pregnant, may also be more likely to have big babies. This is mostly due to the increased likelihood of developing diabetes in pregnancy, and perhaps poorer nutrition choices.
Can you predict a big baby?
Estimations of babies’ weights before they are born are imprecise. That’s why so many women are told they are going to have a big baby and don’t, and others are surprised by a big baby when it arrives.
Midwives and obstetricians routinely feel a woman’s growing uterus when they provide antenatal check-ups. They are looking at the position the baby is lying in the uterus as well as where the top of the uterus is compared to the woman’s belly button. This gives an idea of whether the baby is growing as you would expect at that time.
They also measure from the top of a woman’s belly to the top of her pubic bone with a tape measure. The weeks of pregnancy usually correspond to the measurement within a couple of centimetres.
For example, at 36 weeks of pregnancy the tape measurement would be somewhere between 34cm and 38cm. If there is more or less than a 3cm difference between the measurement and the numbers of weeks of pregnancy then an ultrasound would be offered to look at how the baby’s growing and to estimate the size.
But ultrasounds are poor predictors of actual birth weight. The Big Baby Trial was published earlier this year. It randomised nearly 3,000 women in the United Kingdom to being induced at 39 weeks if suspected to be having a big baby (according to an ultrasound) or waiting for labour to start.
There was little difference in birth weight or poor outcomes, such as shoulder dystocia for the baby, leading to the trial being stopped early. Around 60% of babies screened as being big babies were not actually big at birth, showing the inaccuracy of ultrasounds in predicting birth weight.
What can women do?
The best health advice for women is to try to be a healthy weight (under a BMI of 30) before getting pregnant.
Eat a balanced diet and limit your intake of foods and drinks high in saturated fats and sugar. Try not to put too much weight on during pregnancy and exercise regularly. Talk to your midwife or obstetrician for advice and support about this.
If you have diabetes, or if this has been diagnosed during the pregnancy, close monitoring of your blood sugar and baby’s growth is important.
Hannah Dahlen, Professor of Midwifery, Associate Dean Research and HDR, Midwifery Discipline Leader, Western Sydney University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Why You Feel Like You Have To Pee Again Right After You Just Went
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Dr. Amy Konvalin talks us through breaking the pattern:
When nature calls… Repeatedly
Fun fact: feeling like you need to pee again right after standing up is often more a matter of bladder sensation, pelvic floor tension, positioning, and learned bathroom habits, rather than necessarily incomplete emptying.
Notably, repeatedly sitting back down “just in case” can accidentally train your brain and bladder into expecting a second round, reinforcing the pattern over time.
So, what to do instead?
- Before: sit down, take three slow deep belly breaths in through your nose, then exhale fully, to help relax your nervous system and pelvic floor before starting.
- During: consciously relax your pelvic floor instead of rushing or straining.
- After: once you feel done, take one more deep breath, exhale, and check once, dry and stand up, resisting any urge to return.
- After after: distract yourself and move on with your day to help break the automatic “go twice” pattern.
Safety note, though: persistent urinary urgency, frequent urination, pain, burning, blood in your urine, prolapse symptoms, recurrent infections, or trouble emptying should all be checked out by an medical professional, as many causes—including UTIs, overactive bladder, pelvic floor dysfunction, or prostate/bladder issues and even cancer—can overlap.
For more on all of this and for some mysterious reason absolutely no visual demonstrations for this one, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
Take care!
Share This Post
-
Norepinephrine vs Alzheimer’s Disease
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Norepinephrine (or noradrenaline, in the rest of the world outside of the US), is a hormone and neurotransmitter generally associated with stress, fight-or-flight responses, and hypertension.
Like any of our hormones, it has its place, and we wouldn’t do well without it (same deal for cortisol, which has a very bad reputation, but again, we do need it or else we would not, for example, wake up in the morning).
When it comes to neurochemistry, a shortage of norepinephrine can result in lethargic listlessness, which is why some antidepressants work on the noradrenergic* system (as opposed to the more common SSRIs, which work on the serotonergic system), to boost flagging norepinephrine levels and perk us** up.
*Yes, it’s called that even in the US where the hormone/neurotransmitter itself is called norepinephrine rather than noradrenaline.
**this article brought to you by the power of this writer taking mirtazapine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressant, that thus increases the amount of available norepinephrine in her brain.
So… How does it protect against Alzheimer’s disease?
Dialing down the brain’s immune system
Because of the blood-brain barrier, there are many things that happen either only inside of, or only outside of, our brain—which because of the unique nature of the brain’s anatomy, means that we often have a specialized system doing the same job inside the brain as a different system does outside of the brain, but in a different way.
See for example how the glymphatic system (a portmanteau of glial cells and lymphatic system) in the brain does approximately the same job as the lymphatic system does in the rest of the body:
How To Clean Your Brain (Glymphatic Health Primer) ← this helps protect us against Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and other neurodegenerative conditions
And those glial cells? Some of them do the job otherwise done by parts of our immune system that can’t operate inside our brain.
Specifically, microglia do approximately the same job inside our brain as macrophages do outside of it: “eating” things that shouldn’t be there—ranging from actual invading pathogens, to bits of debris that are also in the way.
That our brain has an immune response is, generally speaking, a good thing. But much like the immune system in the rest of our body, things can get out of hand.
As with how chronic inflammation (and/or autoimmune disorders) causes problems in the rest of the body, neuroinflammation can cause problems in the brain—not least of all: it can lead to Alzheimer’s.
The microglia are involved in the cleanup of the β-amyloid proteins that can otherwise build up into harmful plaque resulting in neuronal damage and with it, neurodegeneration), so calming them down a bit means they can do their actual assigned job better for longer.
Dr. Ania Majewska et al. did a study into how norepinephrine’s inhibitory effect via β2 adrenergic receptors (β2AR) in microglia has an anti-inflammatory effect, and found that it has potential as an Alzheimer’s preventative.
In their words, “β2AR manipulations can alter disease pathology”, which is a great example of how carefully scientists say things, but the series of declarations adds up to the same; we’ll quote some points directly from the paper’s abstract:
- NE inhibits surveillance activity of microglia, the brain’s resident immune cells, via their β2 adrenergic receptors (β2ARs)
- Microglial β2AR signaling is an important modulator of amyloid pathology.
- Endogenous β2AR signaling degenerates as a function of amyloid pathology and aging.
- In AD, microglia downregulate β2AR expression early and progressively.
- β2AR manipulations can alter disease pathology.
- Importantly, dampening microglial β2AR signaling worsened plaque load and the associated neuritic damage, while stimulating microglial β2AR signaling attenuated amyloid pathology.
- Our results suggest that microglial β2AR could be explored as a potential therapeutic target to modify AD pathology.
Translating from sciencese (if you’ll pardon that we’ll still use some big words, but only ones we’ve already explained):
Norepinephrine activates certain receptors in microglia, and those receptors tell the microglia to “keep calm & carry on”. In the case of Alzheimer’s disease, those receptors stop working correctly, leading to increased neuroinflammation. Thus, stimulating those receptors with norepinephrine reduces neuroinflammation, allowing the microglia to calmly carry on with their actual job of getting rid of the amyloid that leads to Alzheimer’s disease.
You can read the paper itself here:
Want to learn more?
Check out:
- An Accessible New Development Against Alzheimer’s (Dopamine vs Alzheimer’s)
- How To Reduce Your Alzheimer’s Risk
- Take Care Of Your Lymphatic System To Beat Cognitive Decline
- What’s Your Vascular Dementia Risk?
- Alzheimer’s Causative Factors To Avoid
Take care!
Share This Post
-
Banana Bread vs Bagel – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing banana bread to bagel, we picked the bagel.
Why?
Unlike most of the items we compare in this section, which are often “single ingredient” or at least highly standardized, today’s choices are rather dependent on recipe. Certainly, your banana bread and your bagels may not be the same as your neighbor’s. Nevertheless, to compare averages, we’ve gone with the FDA’s Food Central Database for reference values, using the most default average recipes available. Likely you could make either or both of them a little healthier, but as it is, this is how we’ve gone about making it a fair comparison. With that in mind…
In terms of macros, bagels have more than 2x the protein and about 4x the fiber, while banana bread has slightly higher carbs and about 7x more fat. You may be wondering: are the fats healthy? And the answer is, it could be better, could be worse. The FDA recipe went with margarine rather than butter, which lowered the saturated fat to being only ¼ of the total fat (it would have been higher, had they used butter) whereas bagels have no saturated fat at all—which characteristic is quite integral to bagels, unless you make egg bagels, which is rather a different beast. All in all, the macros category is a clear win for bagels, especially when we consider the carb to fiber ratio.
In the category of vitamins, bagels have on average more vitamin B1, B3, B5, and B9, while banana bread has on average more of vitamins A and C. A modest win for bagels.
When it comes to minerals, bagels are the more nutrient dense with more copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while banana bread is not higher in any minerals. An obvious and easy win for bagels.
Closing thoughts: while the micronutrient profile quite possibly differs wildly from one baker to another, something that will probably stay more or less the same regardless is the carb to fiber ratio, and protein to fat. As a result, we’d weight the macros category as the more universally relevant. Bagels won in all categories today, as it happened, but it’s fairly safe to say that, on average, a baker who makes bagels and banana bread with the same levels of conscientiousness for health (or lack thereof) will tend to make bagels that are healthier than banana bread, based on the carb to fiber ratio, and the protein to fat ratio.
Enjoy!
Want to learn more?
You might like to read:
- Should You Go Light Or Heavy On Carbs?
- Why You’re Probably Not Getting Enough Fiber (And How To Fix It)
- Wholewheat Bread vs Seeded White – Which is Healthier?
Take care!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Mineral-Rich Mung Bean Pancakes
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Mung beans are rich in an assortment of minerals, especially iron, copper, phosphorus, and magnesium. They’re also full of protein and fiber! What better way to make pancakes healthy?
You will need
- ½ cup dried green mung beans
- ½ cup chopped fresh parsley
- ½ cup chopped fresh dill
- ¼ cup uncooked wholegrain rice
- ¼ cup nutritional yeast
- 1 tsp MSG, or 2 tsp low-sodium salt
- 2 green onions, finely sliced
- 1 tbsp extra virgin olive oil
Method
(we suggest you read everything at least once before doing anything)
1) Soak the mung beans and rice together overnight.
2) Drain and rinse, and blend them in a blender with ¼ cup of water, to the consistency of regular pancake batter, adding more water (sparingly) if necessary.
3) Transfer to a bowl and add the rest of the ingredients except for the olive oil, which latter you can now heat in a skillet over a medium-high heat.
4) Add a few spoonfuls of batter to the pan, depending on how big you want the pancakes to be. Cook on both sides until you get a golden-brown crust, and repeat for the rest of the pancakes.
5) Serve! As these are savory pancakes, you might consider serving them with a little salad—tomatoes, olives, and cucumbers go especially well.
Enjoy!
Want to learn more?
For those interested in some of the science of what we have going on today:
- Why You’re Probably Not Getting Enough Fiber (And How To Fix It)
- What’s The Deal With MSG?
- All About Olive Oils: Is “Extra Virgin” Worth It?
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
What is creatine? What does the science say about its claims to build muscle and boost brain health?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
If you’ve walked down the wellness aisle at your local supermarket recently, or scrolled the latest wellness trends on social media, you’ve likely heard about creatine.
Creatine is a compound our body naturally makes to deliver energy to our muscles during exercise. Most (95%) is stored in muscle, with small amounts stored in the brain.
We use about 1–3 grams of creatine a day. Our body makes around half of this and we get the rest from protein-rich foods, such as meat and fish.
Creatine supplements come as powders, tablets and other forms, with doses ranging from 3–5g a day, to up to 20g. It’s difficult to get these levels from diet alone: you would need to eat about 1kg of meat to get 5g of creatine.
But can consuming greater levels of creatine help you build muscle, improve athletic performance or boost brain health, as social media influencers claim?
Athletic performance
Creatine increases the rate at which the body re-synthesises a molecule called adenosine triphosphate, or ATP, which provides us with energy. When we use ATP for energy, it’s broken down to another molecule, adenosine diphosphate, or ADP.
To be used as ATP again, ADP needs phosphate. This is where creatine helps. Creatine enters cells and adds the phosphate which was lost. The newly formed creatine phopshate then helps to very quickly re-synthesise ADP back to ATP.
Other energy systems we have to create ATP are comparatively slower.
Because of this quick action, creatine helps with short bursts of activities such as jumping and lifting weights.
This has an indirect effect on muscle-building and sports performance by allowing increased training that leads to improved strength, speed and power.
The evidence shows creatine is an effective nutritional supplement for athletes who want to improve physical performance and function in response to their training.
And you don’t have to be an elite athlete: gym-goers and weekend warriors can get similar benefits.
What about muscle and bone health in older adults?
Most of the research on creatine outside of athletes has been in older adults. This is due to its ability to indirectly help with muscle gain and reduce sarcopeania (age-related muscle wasting).
There is good evidence that creatine supplements (5–20g per day) can improve muscle mass and strength when combined with resistance training in older people.
A review of the research, which included 22 studies in people aged 57–70, found it improved muscle mass by 1.4kg and resulted in a small increase in strength.
Another review of 12 studies considered older adults taking 3–20 grams of creatine supplements a day. It found combining creatine with resistance training 2–3 times per week resulted in more muscle and strength gains compared to resistance training alone.
When it comes to bone health and improving bone density, the evidence is not clear. Some studies show benefits, while others don’t. An overall analysis of five studies found there was no effect.
However, there is some evidence that creatine improves older people’s ability to go from sitting to standing, which is a good predictor of falls.
What about cognition?
Another review looked at the impact on cognitive function across 16 studies. Participants were aged 20 to 77 years and were either healthy or had conditions such as fibromyalgia, mild cognitive impairment associated with Parkinson’s disease, and schizophrenia.
The reviewers found creatine supplementation (5–20g a day) had positive effects on memory, attention time and information processing speed. The benefits were greater in people with disease, those aged between 18 and 60, and among women.
Another review of eight studies also showed creatine improved memory in healthy people, with greater improvements in older adults aged 66 to 76. The effect was similar between those who took high (20g) and low doses (3g).
An earlier review showed similar improvements with memory and reasoning among healthy people who consumed 5-20g of creatine for between five days and six weeks.
What about for other adults?
A 2021 review of creatine across the lifespan indicates creatine maybe useful for pre- and post-menopausal women to improve strength and brain function, and reduce mental fatigue.
For adults aged over 60, supplementation may provide some benefits for cognitive and muscle mass, particularly if you’re physically active.
But there isn’t an evidence base to support its general use across the younger population, beyond athletic performance.
What are the risks?
Creatine is generally considered to be safe. Some users report side effects, mostly related to gastrointestinal problems such as nausea and stomach upset. Some people also experience headaches and muscle cramps when they change the amount or frequency.
Creatine may lead to temporary water gain, seen with a small increase in weight. But this subsides after a few days of supplementation.
The evidence is not clear yet for creatine supplementation for certain people, including those who are pregnant, breastfeeding, have kidney disease or liver disease, or who have psychiatric disorders.
As with any supplement, and in particular if you have underlying health conditions, talk to your doctor if you’re considering taking creatine.
What should you look out for?
Creatine as a supplement is synthetically made from sarcosine and cyanamide (no, it’s not related to cyanide). There are different forms of creatine supplements, but the research uses a type called creatine monohydrate.
There is no difference between brands that manufacture creatine monohydrate and you don’t need to buy it with added ingredients.
If you do want to try creatine, monitor your use over 4–8 weeks to see if you notice an improvement. And if you don’t, you might want to save your money.
Evangeline Mantzioris, Program Director of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Accredited Practising Dietitian, University of South Australia
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Why Fibromyalgia Is Not An Acceptable Diagnosis
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Dr. Efrat Lamandre makes the case that fibromyalgia is less of a useful diagnosis and more of a rubber stamp, much like the role historically often fulfilled by “heart failure” as an official cause of death (because certainly, that heart sure did stop beating). It’s a way of answering the question without answering the question.
…and what to look for instead
Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic pain, tenderness, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and other symptoms. It’s often considered an “invisible” illness, because it’s the kind that’s easy to dismiss if you’re not the one carrying it. A broken leg, one can point at and see it’s broken; a respiratory infection, one can see its effects and even test for presence of the pathogen and/or its antigens. But fibromyalgia? “It hurts and I’m tired” doesn’t quite cut it.
Much like “heart failure” as a cause of death when nothing else is implicated, fibromyalgia is a diagnosis that gets applied when known causes of chronic pain have been ruled out.
Dr. Lamandre advocates for functional medicine and seeking the underlying causes of the symptoms, rather than the industry standard approach, which is to just manage the symptoms themselves with medications (of course, managing the symptoms with medications has its place; there is no need to suffer needlessly if pain relief can be used; it’s just not a sufficient response).
She notes that potential triggers for fibromyalgia include microbiome imbalances, food sensitivities, thyroid issues, nutrient deficiencies, adrenal fatigue, mitochondrial dysfunction, mold toxicity, Lyme disease, and more. Is this really just one illness? Maybe, but quite possibly not.
In short… If you are given a diagnosis of fibromyalgia, she advises that you insist doctors keep on looking, because that’s not an answer.
For more on all of this, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like to read:
- Managing Chronic Pain (Realistically!)
- How To Eat To Beat Chronic Fatigue ← yes, including how to do so when you are chronically fatigued. In other words, this isn’t just dietary advice, but rather practical advice too
- When Painkillers Aren’t Helping, These Things Might
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:








