Glycine: The Cheapest Anti-Aging Supplement That Actually Works

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

Dr. Leonid Kim explains glycine’s role in anti-aging:

The essential non-essential

Glycine is a “non-essential” amino acid (i.e., our body is able to synthesize it, so we don’t die quickly and horribly if it’s not in our diet, which is what happens if “essential” amino acids are missing) that’s nonetheless essential (in the sense of being necessary) for many things including collagen formation, liver support, neurotransmitter regulation, and glutathione production, which latter protects your cells from oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage—in other words, aging.

A quick side-note about glutathione: glutathione is made from glutamate, cysteine, and glycine; glycine and cysteine are often rate-limiting, so low levels of either can reduce your antioxidant capacity

And a side-side-note about cysteine: cysteine is unstable and often in short supply during stress or illness; n-acetylceysteine (NAC) delivers usable cysteine, allowing glycine to complete glutathione synthesis—this is why the combined approach (glyNAC) is sometimes preferred.

That said, glycine alone is typically enough for healthy younger people using it mainly for sleep, while glyNAC may be more appropriate if you have insulin resistance, diabetes, fatty liver, PCOS, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, chronic inflammation, or an autoimmune condition.

As for what to expect:

  • Metabolic and anti-inflammatory actions: evidence suggests glycine can help with inflammation and can even become conditionally essential during metabolic disease in particular, illness in general, and/or chronic inflammation. Glycine levels also tend to be lower in people with insulin resistance or other metabolic syndrome considerations, so may benefit extra from supplementing in those cases, too.
  • Sleep effects: glycine before bed can improve sleep quality by helping you fall asleep more quickly, cooling your core temperature, calming orexin (wakefulness) receptor neurons, regulating serotonin, and supporting full muscle relaxation during REM sleep, for greater restfulness.

As for dosing if doing it one way or the other:

  • Dosing for glycine: the most studied dose is 3 g taken 30–60 minutes before sleep; it tastes sweet, dissolves easily in water, and is generally well tolerated; very high doses used in schizophrenia studies (40–90 g per day) looked tolerable short-term but aren’t advisable due to unclear long-term safety and possible neurobehavioral or cardiovascular concerns.
  • Dosing for glyNAC: published human studies typically use 100 mg/kg glycine + 100 mg/kg NAC per day (about 7 g of each for a 70-kg person), usually split into two doses; many people start around 3 g per day and increase slowly.

For more on all of this, enjoy:

Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

Want to learn more?

You might also like:

Take care!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • How misinformation about fentanyl exposure threatens to undermine overdose response

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Fentanyl, the deadly synthetic opioid driving the nation’s high drug overdose rates, is also caught up in another increasingly serious problem: misinformation.

    False and misleading narratives on social media, in news reports, and even in popular television dramas suggesting people can overdose from touching fentanyl—rather than ingesting it—are now informing policy and spending decisions.

    In an episode of the CBS cop drama “Blue Bloods,” for instance, Detective Maria Baez becomes comatose after accidentally touching powdered fentanyl. In another drama, “S.W.A.T.,” Sgt. Daniel “Hondo” Harrelson warns his co-workers: “You touch the pure stuff without wearing gloves, say good night.”

    While fentanyl-related deaths have drastically risen over the past decade, no evidence suggests any resulted from incidentally touching or inhaling it, and little to no evidence that any resulted from consuming it in marijuana products. (Recent data indicates that fentanyl-related deaths have begun to drop.)

    There is also almost no evidence that law enforcement personnel are at heightened risk of accidental overdoses due to such exposures. Still, there is a steady stream of reports—which generally turn out to be false—of officers allegedly becoming ill after handling fentanyl.

    “It’s only in the TV dramas” where that happens, said Brandon del Pozo, a retired Burlington, Vermont, police chief who researches policing and public health policies and practices at Brown University.

    In fact, fentanyl overdoses are commonly caused by ingesting the drug illicitly as a pill or powder. And most accidental exposures occur when people who use drugs, even those who do not use opioids, unknowingly consume fentanyl because it is so often used to “cut” street drugs such as heroin and cocaine.

    Despite what scientific evidence suggests about fentanyl and its risks, misinformation can persist in public discourse and among first responders on the front lines of the crisis. Daniel Meloy, a senior community engagement specialist at the drug recovery organizations Operation 2 Save Lives and QRT National, said he thinks of misinformation as “more of an unknown than it is an anxiety or a fear.”

    “We’re experiencing it often before the information” can be understood and shared by public health and addiction medicine practitioners, Meloy said.

    Some state and local governments are investing money from their share of the billions in opioid settlement funds in efforts to protect first responders from purported risks perpetuated through fentanyl misinformation.

    In 2022 and 2023, 19 cities, towns, and counties across eight states used settlement funds to purchase drug detection devices for law enforcement agencies, spending just over $1 million altogether. Two mass spectrometers were purchased for at least $136,000 for the Greeley, Colorado, police department, “to protect those who are tasked with handling those substances.”

    Del Pozo, the retired police chief, said fentanyl is present in most illicit opioids found at the scene of an arrest. But that “doesn’t mean you need to spend a lot of money on fentanyl detection for officer safety,” he said. If that spending decision is motivated by officer safety concerns, then it’s “misspent money,” del Pozo said.

    Fentanyl misinformation is affecting policy in other ways, too.

    Florida, for instance, has on the books a law that makes it a second-degree felony to cause an overdose or bodily injury to a first responder through this kind of secondhand fentanyl exposure. Similar legislation has been considered by states such as Tennessee and West Virginia, the latter stipulating a penalty of 15 years to life imprisonment if the exposure results in death.

    Public health advocates worry these laws will make people shy away from seeking help for people who are overdosing.

    “A lot of people leave overdose scenes because they don’t want to interact with police,” said Erin Russell, a principal with Health Management Associates, a health care industry research and consulting firm. Florida does include a caveat in its statute that any person “acting in good faith” to seek medical assistance for someone they believe to be overdosing “may not” be arrested, charged, or prosecuted.

    And even when public policy is crafted to protect first responders as well as regular people, misinformation can undermine a program’s messaging.

    Take Mississippi’s One Pill Can Kill initiative. Led by the state attorney general, Lynn Fitch, the initiative aims to provide resources and education to Mississippi residents about fentanyl and its risks. While it promotes the availability and use of harm reduction tools, such as naloxone and fentanyl test strips, Fitch has also propped up misinformation.

    At the 2024 Mississippi Coalition of Bail Sureties conference, Fitch said, “If you figure out that pill’s got fentanyl, you better be ready to dispose of it, because you can get it through your fingers,” based on the repeatedly debunked belief that a person can overdose by simply touching fentanyl.

    Officers on the ground, meanwhile, sometimes are warned to proceed with caution in providing lifesaving interventions at overdose scenes because of these alleged accidental exposure risks. This caution is often evidenced in a push to provide first responders with masks and other personal protective equipment. Fitch told the crowd at the conference: “You can’t just go out and give CPR like you did before.” However, as with other secondhand exposures, the risk for a fentanyl overdose from applying mouth-to-mouth is negligible, with no clinical evidence to suggest it has occurred.

    Her comments underscore growing concerns, often not supported by science, that officers and first responders increasingly face exposure risks during overdose responses. Her office did not respond to questions about these comments.

    Health care experts say they are not against providing first responders with protective equipment, but that fentanyl misinformation is clouding policy and risks delaying critical interventions such as CPR and rescue breathing.

    “People are afraid to do rescue breathing because they’re like, ‘Well, what if there’s fentanyl in the person’s mouth,’” Russell said. Hesitating for even a moment because of fentanyl misinformation could delay a technique that “is incredibly important in an overdose response.”

    This article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons licenseKFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

    This article first appeared on Public Good News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    Share This Post

  • Milk Thistle For The Brain, Bones, & More

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    “Thistle Do Nicely”

    Milk thistle is a popular supplement; it comes from the milk thistle plant (Silybum marianum), commonly just called thistles. There are other kinds of thistle too, but these are one of the most common.

    So, what does it do?

    Liver health

    Milk thistle enjoys popular use to support liver health; the liver is a remarkably self-regenerative organ if given the chance, but sometimes it can use a helping hand.

    See for example: How To Undo Liver Damage

    As for milk thistle’s beneficence, it is very well established:

    Brain health

    For this one the science is less well-established, as studies so far have been on non-human animals, or have been in vitro studies.

    Nevertheless, the results so far are promising, and the mechanism of action seems to be a combination of reducing oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, as well as suppressing amyloid β-protein (Aβ) fibril formation, in other words, reducing amyloid plaques.

    General overview: A Mini Review on the Chemistry and Neuroprotective Effects of Silymarin

    All about the plaques, but these are non-human animal studies:

    Against diabetes

    Milk thistle improves insulin sensitivity, and reduces fasting blood sugar levels and HbA1c levels. The research so far is mostly in type 2 diabetes, however (at least, so far as we could find). For example:

    Silymarin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Studies we could find for T1D were very far from translatable to human usefulness, for example, “we poisoned these rats with streptozotocin then gave them megadoses of silymarin (10–15 times the dose usually recommended for humans) and found very small benefits to the lenses of their eyes” (source).

    Against osteoporosis

    In this case, milk thistle’s estrogenic effects may be of merit to those at risk of menopause-induced osteoporosis:

    Antiosteoclastic activity of milk thistle extract after ovariectomy to suppress estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis

    If you’d like a quick primer about such things as what antiosteoclastic activity is, here’s a quick recap:

    Which Osteoporosis Medication, If Any, Is Right For You?

    Is it safe?

    It is “Generally Recognized As Safe”, and even when taken at high doses for long periods, side effects are very rare.

    Contraindications include if you’re pregnant, nursing, or allergic.

    Potential reasons for caution (but not necessarily contraindication) include if you’re diabetic (its blood-sugar lowering effects will decrease the risk of hyperglycemia while increasing the risk of hypoglycemia), or have a condition that could be exacerbated by its estrogenic effects—including if you are on HRT, because it’s an estrogen receptor agonist in some ways (for example those bone benefits we mentioned before) but an estrogen antagonist in others (for example, in the uterus, if you have one, or in nearby flat muscles, if you don’t).

    As ever, speak with your doctor/pharmacist to be sure.

    Want to try it?

    We don’t sell it, but here for your convenience is an example product on Amazon

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • Can Reflexology Shoes Improve Your Focus?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!

    Have a question or a request? We love to hear from you!

    In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!

    No question/request too big or small 😎

    ❝What about shoes with insoles for reflexology, like the new ones with neuroscience claims. Are they legit?❞

    First, a disclaimer-laden answer: probably by “legit” you mean “do they work to improve brain function?”, but it’s hard to uncouple “legit” from “legitimate” in the litigious sense. So, we will say, we are but a humble health science publication, and cannot comment on the legality of any company’s products or claims.

    We can comment on more concrete scientific questions though, such as: does the evidence support claims that such shoes improve brain function?

    In which case, the answer is: no

    What you have to bear in mind is how a lot of companies will make claims that are technically true (for legal reasons) but functionally meaningless (in any practical sense that most readers would read it).

    For example, let’s look at one such example that’s been making headlines lately, perhaps it’s even what you saw. It’s Nike’s new “neuroscience-based footwear”, which they describe with such statements as:

    Nike is launching a new type of shoe designed to help athletes lock in their mindset pre- and post-competition.

    The Mind 001 and Mind 002 are the first neuroscience-based footwear from Nike that tap into the mind-body connection by activating sensory receptors in the feet.

    Nike is introducing its first neuroscience-based footwear: two mind-altering silhouettes designed to help athletes lock in their mindset before and after competition. Scientifically shown to activate key sensory areas of the brain via underfoot stimulation, the Nike Mind 001 mule and Mind 002 sneaker deepen an athlete’s awareness, helping ground them in their bodies and bring them back to the present moment.

    Source: Nike Debuts its First Neuroscience-Based Footwear to Help Athletes Feel Calm, Focused and Present

    These sound like strong claims, but let’s break it down a little:

    designed to help athletes lock in their mindset pre- and post-competition

    When this writer was small, she designed a pair of shoes to help her walk on water (there were shoe-sized pieces of wood attached under them, on the basis that wood floats).

    Were they designed to help our intrepid writer to walk on water? Yes, they were. That was literally what they were designed to do.

    Did they actually enable her to walk on water? No, they did not.

    So, always watch out for such phrases as “designed to”, “intended to”, “aimed at helping”, and so forth.

    Now, as for…

    Scientifically shown to activate key sensory areas of the brain via underfoot stimulation

    That’s a fair claim! But it’s also not what it might seem like. The reality is, anything that you can experience will activate key sensory areas in the brain. If it didn’t, then you wouldn’t experience it, because how could you, if it didn’t activate the relevant sensory areas in your brain?

    And so on, with various other true claims.

    Can they help anything?

    Yes! Shoes are very relevant things for our health.

    For example, shoes with “zero-drop”, i.e. with no incline/decline, and the inside sole of the foot is parallel to the floor (so, not like the featured image for this article, which are by no means high heels, but you can see the heel is raised more than the toes, and there’s a gradient between the two, as is common in most “flat” shoes that aren’t really flat), support good foot health for most people, and foot health is indeed the foundation of a lot of other good health, much like if your car tires are bad, the rest of your car won’t stay in good condition for long.

    We wrote about the zero-drop issue here: Steps For Keeping Your Feet A Healthy Foundation

    …which is consistent with such science as: Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners

    However, some other things are less evidence-based, for example:

    Are Grounding Mats Grounded In Good Science?

    …and:

    Reflexology: What The Science Says

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like:

    The Foot Book – by Dr. Todd Brennan & Dr. Leslie Johnston

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Rethinking ADHD Treatment: The Power Of Non-Stimulant Medication

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    It doesn’t have to be stimulants or nothing; there are other options:

    More than just a matter of dopamine

    The problem is that stimulants like Adderall, Vyvanse, Ritalin, and Focalin are effective for attention and motivation (by increasing dopamine levels in the brain), but they don’t directly fix other aspects of executive dysfunction.

    This is compounded by the fact that difficulties with planning, organization, emotional control, and “set shifting”—the ability to switch tasks and return smoothly. Interruptions (like a “quick call”) can derail productivity for hours in people with ADHD who struggle with this skill.

    Stimulants can’t help with this, because although they improve focus and motivation, they don’t do help flexibility. They can even worsen set shifting—hyperfocus may make it harder to mentally switch gears, and interruptions can cause focus to shift to the derailment instead of the intended task.

    You may have heard stories of people with ADHD who took their meds to focus on an important task, got distracted before the meds kicked in, and now they will be spending the next four hours intently focused on reorganizing their wardrobe. This kind of thing happens a lot and is a well-known problem for people on ADHD meds.

    Current non-stimulant medication options include:

    • Clonidine (Kapvay) and guanfacine (Intuniv): approved for children/adolescents; help with impulsivity; sometimes used alongside stimulants.
    • Atomoxetine (Strattera): first non-stimulant ADHD medication (approved 2002) for both adults and children; modest results and slower onset (up to a month).
    • Viloxazine (Qelbree): newest option (approved 2021); works faster—about a week in children, two weeks in adults.

    How Qelbree works: like Strattera, it’s a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, increasing norepinephrine in the prefrontal cortex and secondarily boosting dopamine and serotonin—in other words, neurotransmitters tied to focus, motivation, and emotional regulation.

    Relevant research cited in the video:

    • In a 2023 study, Qelbree outperformed Strattera and worked more quickly.
    • 85% of patients who used Qelbree alongside a stimulant were later able to stop the stimulant after stabilization.
    • A separate study in children showed Qelbree significantly improved executive function deficits—suggesting probable benefits for adults as well, as there is no obvious reason why age should be a factor in this case.

    Some practical notes:

    • Qelbree must be taken daily (not as-needed like stimulants).
    • It’s still brand-only and may require prior insurance authorization.
    • Some insurers require trying Strattera first before approving Qelbree.

    For more on all of this, plus sources for the science, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like:

    Get Past Executive Dysfunction

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Stop Pain Spreading

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Put Your Back Into It (Or Don’t)!

    We’ve written before about Managing Chronic Pain (Realistically!), and today we’re going to tackle a particular aspect of chronic pain management.

    • It’s a thing where the advice is going to be “don’t do this”
    • And if you have chronic pain, you will probably respond “yep, I do that”

    However, it’s definitely a case of “when knowing isn’t the problem”, or at the very least, it’s not the whole problem.

    Stop overcompensating and address the thing directly

    We all do it, whether in chronic pain, or just a transient injury. But we all need to do less of it, because it causes a lot of harm.

    Example: you have pain in your right knee, so you sit, stand, walk slightly differently to try to ease that pain. It works, albeit marginally, at least for a while, but now you also have pain in your left hip and your lumbar vertebrae, because of how you leaned a certain way. You adjust how you sit, stand, walk, to try to ease both sets of pain, and before you know it, now your neck also hurts, you have a headache, and you’re sure your digestion isn’t doing what it should and you feel dizzy when you stand. The process continues, and before long, what started off as a pain in one knee has now turned your whole body into a twisted aching wreck.

    What has happened: the overcompensation due to the original pain has unduly stressed a connected part of the body, which we then overcompensate for somewhere else, bringing down the whole body like a set of dominoes.

    For more on this: Understanding How Pain Can Spread

    “Ok, but how? I can’t walk normally on that knee!”

    We’re keeping the knee as an example here, but please bear in mind it could be any chronic pain and resultant disability.

    Note: if you found the word “disability” offputting, please remember: if it adversely affects your abilities, it is a disability. Disabilities are not something that only happen to other people! They will happen to most of us at some point!

    Ask yourself: what can you do, and what can’t you do?

    For example:

    • maybe you can walk, but not normally
    • maybe you can walk normally, but not without great pain
    • maybe you can walk normally, but not at your usual walking pace

    First challenge: accept your limitations. If you can’t walk at your usual walking pace without great pain and/or throwing your posture to the dogs, then walk more slowly. To Hell with societal expectations that it shouldn’t take so long to walk from A to B. Take the time you need.

    Second challenge: accept help. It doesn’t have to be help from another person (although it could be). It might be accepting the help of a cane, or maybe even a wheelchair for “flare-up” days. Society, especially American society which is built on ideas of self-sufficiency, has framed a lot of such options as “giving up”, but if they help you get about your day while minimizing doing further harm to your body, then they can be good and even health-preserving things. Same goes for painkillers if they help you from doing more harm to your body by balling up tension in a part of your body in a way that ends up spreading out and laying ruin to your whole body.

    Speaking of which:

    How Much Does It Hurt? Get The Right Help For Your Pain

    After which, you might want to check out:

    The 7 Approaches To Pain Management

    and

    Science-Based Alternative Pain Relief

    Third challenge: deserves its own section, so…

    Do what you can

    If you have chronic pain (or any chronic illness, really), you are probably fed up of hearing how this latest diet will fix you, or yoga will fix you, and so on. But, while these things may not be miracle cures…

    • A generally better diet really will lessen symptoms and avoid flare-ups (a low-inflammation diet is a great start for lessening the symptoms of a lot of chronic illnesses)
    • Doing what exercise you can, being mindful of your limitations yes but still keeping moving as much as possible, will also prevent (or at least slow) deterioration. Consider consulting a physiotherapist for guidance (a doctor will more likely just say “rest, take it easy”, whereas a physiotherapist will be able to give more practical advice).
    • Getting good sleep may be a nightmare in the case of chronic pain (or other chronic illnesses! Here’s to those late night hyperglycemia incidents for Type 1 Diabetics that then need monitoring for the next few hours while taking insulin and hoping it goes back down) but whatever you can do to prioritize it, do it.

    Want to read more?

    We reviewed a little while ago a great book about this; the title sounds like a lot of woo, but we promise the content is extremely well-referenced science:

    The Pain Relief Secret: How to Retrain Your Nervous System, Heal Your Body, and Overcome Chronic Pain – by Sarah Warren

    …and if your issue is back pain specifically, we highly recommend:

    Healing Back Pain: The Mind-Body Connection – by Dr. John Sarno

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • What Macronutrient Balance Is Right For You?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!

    Have a question or a request? We love to hear from you!

    In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!

    As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!

    So, no question/request too big or small 😎

    ❝I want to learn more about macros. Can you cover that topic?❞

    That’s a little broader than we usually go for, given the amount of space we have, but let’s give it a go!

    Macronutrients, or “macros”, are the nutrients that we typically measure in grams rather than milligrams or micrograms, and are:

    In terms of how much we need of each, you can read more in the above-linked articles, but:

    • General scientific consensus is we need plenty of fiber (30 or 40g per day is good) and water (highly dependent on climate and activity), and there’s a clear minimum requisite for protein (usually put at around 1g of protein per day per 1kg of body weight).
    • There is vigorous debate in the general health community about what the best ratio of carbs to fat is.

    The reality is that humans are quite an adaptable species, and while we absolutely do need at least some of both (carbohydrates and fats), we can play around with the ratios quite a bit, provided we don’t get too extreme about it.

    While some influence is social and often centered around weight loss (see for example keto which seeks to minimize carbs, and volumetrics, which seeks maximise volume-to-calorie ratio, which de facto tends to minimize fats), some of what drives us to lean one way or the other will be genetics, too—dependent on what our ancestors ate more or less of.

    Writer’s example: my ancestors could not grow much grain (or crops in general) where they were, so they got more energy from such foods as whale and seal fat (with protein coming more from reindeer). Now, biology is not destiny, and I personally enjoy a vegan diet complete with a lot of lentils and beans, but my genes are probably why I am driven to get a lot of my daily calories from fat (of which, a lot of fatty nuts (don’t tell almonds, but I prefer walnuts and cashews) and healthy oils such as olive oil, avocado oil, and coconut oil).

    However! About that adaptability. Provided we make changes slowly, we can usually adjust our diet to whatever we want it to be, including whether we get our energy more from carbs or fats. The reason we need to make changes slowly is because our gut needs time to adjust. For example, if your vegan writer here were to eat her ancestrally-favored foods now, I’d be very ill, because my gut microbiome has no idea what to do with animal products anymore, no matter what genes I have. In contrast, if an enthusiastic enjoyer of a meat-heavy diet were to switch to my fiber-rich diet overnight, they’d be very ill.

    So: follow your natural inclinations, make any desired changes slowly, and if in doubt, it’s hard to go wrong with enjoying carbs and fats in moderation.

    Learn more: Intuitive Eating Might Not Be What You Think

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: