
Will knee injections help your osteoarthritis? Here’s what the evidence says
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Knee osteoarthritis is a complex disease that affects the whole joint, including bone, cartilage, ligaments and muscles. Osteoarthritis is a common cause of pain and movement difficulty, affecting 8.3% of people in Australia.
When pain persists, many people look for quick, convenient options, such as injections. Clinics offer several types of knee injections, including:
- corticosteroids
- hyaluronic acid
- platelet-rich plasma
- stem cells.
Some are heavily marketed with promises to “repair” or “regenerate” the joint. But what does the evidence actually say about these claims, or the ability of knee injections to reduce pain and improve mobility?
Corticosteroid injections
Corticosteroids are anti-inflammatory medications that can reduce pain and swelling in the joint.
They are conditionally recommended in guidelines because they can be helpful for short-term relief, particularly during a flare-up.
However, a 2024 systematic review found meaningful benefits only in the first few weeks. They lose their effectiveness after about six weeks.
There are also some concerns about repeated use. One trial found corticosteroid injections every three months over two years did not improve pain, and were associated with greater cartilage loss than a placebo.
For this reason, guidelines recommend using corticosteroid injections cautiously for short-term relief rather than ongoing treatment.
Hyaluronic acid injections
Hyaluronic acid is a substance naturally found in joint fluid. These injections aim to improve “lubrication” or “shock absorption” within the joint.
While this may sound promising, a large systematic review found the benefits are small and unlikely to be meaningful. There was also a higher risk of serious adverse events compared to placebo.
Because of this, guidelines do not recommend these injections for knee osteoarthritis.
Platelet-rich plasma injections
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections use a person’s own blood, which is processed to concentrate platelets and then injected into the joint.
As platelets contain growth factors, chemicals that help signal the body to heal tissue, the idea is they may help repair the joint.
These injections are widely marketed but expensive: typically A$300–$900 per injection, or up to $2,700 for a course of three injections.
It’s generally considered safe, with the main risks being those of any joint injection, such as infection.
Some systematic reviews report benefits, but findings vary considerably, with other reviews finding weak effects when compared to placebo. Some larger, rigorous trials show little or no benefit. So the overall picture is mixed.
A key problem is lack of standardisation, with different clinics using different concentrations and methods. This makes it hard to know what works for pain and mobility. However there is no good evidence platelet-rich plasma injections repairs or regrows joint cartilage.
Current guidelines do not recommend platelet-rich plasma injections, though this may change with more high-quality research.
Stem cell injections
Stem cells are often promoted as a way to regenerate damaged tissue. They can be taken from a person’s own body, or prepared from donor cells in a laboratory. But despite the hype, the evidence is still very limited.
A recent Cochrane review found stem cell injections may provide small improvements in pain and function. But the results were uncertain and from low-quality evidence.
There is also a small risk of adverse events, including infection.
So far, no published studies have evaluated whether they repair cartilage or change osteoarthritis progression.
Guidelines currently recommend against their use due to limited evidence, high costs (often $5,000 or more per injection), and regulatory concerns about how they are made and prepared, and how they are marketed to patients.
More high-quality research is underway, including a clinical trial in Australia measuring whether they can slow osteoarthritis progression.
Why isn’t the evidence clearer?
Many studies are small or low quality.
Placebo effects are also particularly large with injections, meaning studies without placebo controls may overestimate the benefits.
For platelet-rich plasma injections and stem cells, variable methods used across clinics further complicates interpretation.
So what can I try for my knee osteoarthritis?
Treatments that are recommended include:
- any type of exercise
- weight loss, if appropriate
- over-the-counter medications, such as short-term use of anti-inflammatories.
These approaches are backed by high-quality evidence, are generally safe, and are less expensive than injections.
What if I want to try an injection?
If other recommended treatments haven’t helped and you decide to try an injection without a strong evidence base, such as platelet-rich plasma injections, there are a few things worth keeping in mind.
First, weigh up the costs, risks and benefits. All injections carry a small risk of joint infection, so it’s not completely risk-free.
It’s also worth knowing it’s unclear exactly how these injections work.
Some of the benefits you may experience could be related to placebo effects rather than the injection itself.
If you do go ahead, any reduction in pain should become apparent within six weeks, or sooner with corticosteroids.
Bottom line
Most injections offer limited or uncertain long-term benefit for knee osteoarthritis. Despite the marketing, there is no good evidence any injection can repair the joint.
A corticosteroid injection can be a reasonable short-term option during a bad pain flare. There may be some evidence to support platelet-rich plasma injections, but preparations aren’t standardised. Hyaluronic acid and stem cell injections are not currently recommended.
Before paying for any injection, consider what the evidence says and whether your time and money might be better spent on options such as exercise and weight loss, which have higher-quality evidence and additional health benefits beyond the knee.
Belinda Lawford, Senior Research Fellow in Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne; Kim Bennell, Professor of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, and Travis Haber, Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
The Real Magic Number For Daily Fruit/Veg
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
What’s the magic number when it comes to daily fruit/veg? Is it the famous 5-a-day? Is it 7, as championed in Japan? More?
In fact, the most important number is…
Drumroll please…
One.
Specifically, “one additional fruit/veg per day”.
More specifically: setting a goal of “one additional fruit/veg per day” resulted (when put to the test in studies) in a greater overall consumption of fruit and vegetables, than goals that seemed larger, such as “5 per day”.
The studies
Researchers Dr. Katherine Appleton and Dr. Zara Borgonha did a series of studies, and discovered the following:
- Study 1 found a “sweet spot”—moderate effort led to the biggest gains in intake of fruits and vegetables; extreme effort was less effective.
- Study 2 showed greater improvements with “Eat 1 more…” goals compared to “Eat this many” goals.
- Study 3 found that goal-promoting posters increased fruit and vegetable sales in university cafeterias by about 10%, but the effect was short-lived and unaffected by achievability or relevance.
So, for our purposes here at 10almonds, the first two studies are of the most relevance, unless you want to put up a goal-promoting poster on your fridge and enjoy a short-lived boost to fruit and veg purchases in your shopping.
You can read about the studies themselves, here:”
That “or perceived to be easier” is interesting, too, because in fact, eating 5 fruit/veg per day is really not a lot. If you’re vegan, that’s probably covered by breakfast. For others, hopefully it’s covered by the end of lunchtime. But really, if you are at all health conscious and do not have a conflicting chronic health condition that makes eating fruit and veg more troublesome (such as IBS, which is generally predicted by a diet low in fiber, considered to be a risk factor for developing it, later makes consuming a lot of fiber-rich foods more of a challenge), then for most people, eating a meagre 5 fruit/veg per day is not a lot.
And yet, if you hadn’t been counting (like many of the students who were participants in the study), it’d probably seem like you have to go out of your way to get them, and count them up over the course of the day.
In contrast, “just one more”? Well, that’s just one more. That’s easy, that’s “I added a handful of dried fruit to my breakfast”.
And of course, the best thing about “one more” is that it will continue to be “one more”, and unlike “5 a day” which will rapidly max out at the humble total of five, “one more” will continue to include one more fruit/veg until one is eating a deliciously varied diet of many plants.
Some other magic numbers you should know
While we’re talking fruit and veg and magic numbers…
The recommended amount of fiber per day is 25–40g, depending on advisory body (different organizations give different numbers), and yet, the average American gets only 16g per day.
So: Level-Up Your Fiber Intake! (Without Difficulty Or Discomfort)
Further, it is recommended (as a result of a truly huge study into gut health) to consume 30 different kinds of plants per week.
That might sound like a lot, but it’s very achievable; check out this book we reviewed previously:
How to Eat 30 Plants a Week – by Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall
Enjoy!
Share This Post
-
Medications That Shouldn’t Be Taken Long-term (With Natural Alternatives)
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Dr. Leonid Kim helps us avoid hurting our organs and more:
Swaps to consider
Body
- PPIs (usually prescribed for heartburn): drugs like omeprazole and esomeprazole reduce stomach acid but long-term use is associated with kidney injury, magnesium deficiency (on which note, do be aware of: How’s Your Magnesium Depletion Score?), and a 65% increased odds of vitamin B12 deficiency after 2 or more years. If you are going to supplement B12, by the way, that’s a good idea for a lot of people, but do avoid making a common mistake that many make in this regard: Which B Vitamins? It Makes A Difference ← in short, the most common vitamer of B12, cyanocobalamin, isn’t that effective, and you might want to spring for methylcobalamin, hydroxycobalamin, and/or adenosylcobalamin, all three of which are active vitamers of B12 that the body can use much more efficiently. You may be wondering why, then, cyanocobalamin is the most common: simple, it’s cheaper to produce!
- Heartburn alternatives: reduce visceral fat to lower stomach pressure, practice diaphragmatic breathing to strengthen the lower esophageal sphincter, and improve gastric emptying with walking after meals, and ginger tea. See also: Acid Reflux After Meals? Here’s How To Stop It Naturally
- Z-drugs (sleep medications): drugs like zolpidem act on the GABA system to induce sleep but can lead to dependence within weeks, and are linked to complex sleep behaviors like sleepwalking, cooking, or driving while asleep. Needless to say, those things are not good for the health.
- Sleep alternatives: maintain consistent sleep and wake times and get morning light exposure within 30 minutes of waking to regulate your circadian rhythm. If you do want something to take, though, swing by: Safe Effective Sleep Aids For Seniors
- Anticholinergics: drugs like diphenhydramine, oxybutynin, and amitriptyline are used for allergies, bladder issues, sleep, and depression and are associated with a 46% increased risk of dementia after 3 or more months of use, with risk increasing alongside cumulative exposure.
- Anticholinergic alternatives: switch to second-generation antihistamines when appropriate (see: Antihistamines’ Generation Gap) and use bladder training and pelvic floor muscle training, which can reduce incontinence episodes by 60 to 80% in women. You might also want to take note of: Foods Linked To Urinary Incontinence In Middle-Age (& Foods That Avert It)
- Gabapentin: originally approved for seizures and postherpetic nerve pain but widely used for other conditions, with long-term use associated with cognitive slowing (we wrote about that here: The Painkiller That Increases Cognitive Impairment Risk By 85%), dizziness, impaired balance, and physical dependence.
- Neuropathy alternatives: address underlying causes like blood sugar control, improve insulin resistance with diet and exercise, and correct vitamin deficiencies to reduce nerve damage and pain (learn more: Peripheral Neuropathy: How To Avoid It, Manage It, Treat It).
For less on all of this, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
Are You Taking PIMs? Getting Off The Overmedication Train ← “PIMs” stands for “potentially inappropriate medications”, be they prescribed in error, or to treat a side effect of some other medication, or to treat something that has now long-since passed.
Also, for that matter:
Before You Reach For That Tylenol… ← Tylenol (paracetamol/acetaminophen) is intended for occasional use only, and can cause severe problems if used chronically (not to mention death, if overused)
And while we’re doing painkillers, you might also want to check out:
The Commonly-Prescribed Painkiller That Barely Works (And Is Dangerous)
Take care!
Share This Post
- PPIs (usually prescribed for heartburn): drugs like omeprazole and esomeprazole reduce stomach acid but long-term use is associated with kidney injury, magnesium deficiency (on which note, do be aware of: How’s Your Magnesium Depletion Score?), and a 65% increased odds of vitamin B12 deficiency after 2 or more years. If you are going to supplement B12, by the way, that’s a good idea for a lot of people, but do avoid making a common mistake that many make in this regard: Which B Vitamins? It Makes A Difference ← in short, the most common vitamer of B12, cyanocobalamin, isn’t that effective, and you might want to spring for methylcobalamin, hydroxycobalamin, and/or adenosylcobalamin, all three of which are active vitamers of B12 that the body can use much more efficiently. You may be wondering why, then, cyanocobalamin is the most common: simple, it’s cheaper to produce!
-
Gooseberries vs Orange – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing gooseberries to oranges, we picked the gooseberries.
Why?
Both are great! But…
In terms of macros, gooseberries have about 2x the fiber for about the same carbs and (in both cases, negligible) protein, winning in this category.
In the category of vitamins, gooseberries have more of vitamins A, B3, B5, B6, and E, while oranges have more of vitamins B1, B2, B9, and C, yielding a marginal 5:4 win to gooseberries.
Looking at minerals, gooseberries have more copper, iron, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while oranges have more calcium, thus a compelling 7:1 win for gooseberries here.
Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for gooseberries, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?
Enjoy!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Functional Exercise For Seniors – by James Atkinson
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
A lot of exercises books are tailored to 20-year-old athletes training for their first Tough Mudder. Others, that the only thing standing between us and a perfect Retroflex Countersupine Divine Pretzel position is a professionally-lit Instagrammable photo.
This one’s not like that.
But! Nor does it think being over a certain age is a reason to not have genuinely robust health, of the kind that may make some younger people envious. So, it lays out, in progressive format, guidelines for exercises targeted at everything we need to build and maintain as we get older.
The writing style is clear, and the illustrations too (the cover art is the same style as the illustrations inside).
Bottom line: if you’re looking for a workout guide that understands you are nearer 80 than 18, and/but also doesn’t assume your age limits your exercise potential to “wrist exercises in chair”, then this book is a fine pick.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
How pregnant women are tested for gestational diabetes is changing. Here’s what this means for you
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
How Australian pregnant women are tested for gestational diabetes is set to change, with new national guidelines released today.
Changes are expected to lead to fewer diagnoses in women at lower risk, reducing the burden of extra monitoring and intervention. Meanwhile the changes focus care and support towards women and babies who will benefit most.
These latest recommendations form the first update in screening for gestational diabetes in more than a decade, and potentially affect more than 280,000 pregnant women a year across Australia.
The new guidelines, which we have been involved in writing, are released today by the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society and published in the Medical Journal of Australia.
What is gestational diabetes? Why do we test for it?
Gestational diabetes (also known as gestational diabetes mellitus) is one of the most common medical complications of pregnancy. It affects nearly one in five pregnancies in Australia.
It is defined by abnormally high levels of glucose (sugar) in the blood that are first picked up during pregnancy.
Most of the time gestational diabetes goes away after the birth. But women with gestational diabetes are at least seven times more likely to develop type 2 diabetes later in life.
In Australia, routine screening for gestational diabetes is recommended for all pregnant women. This will continue.
That’s because treatment reduces the risk of poorer pregnancy outcomes. This includes babies being born very large – a condition called macrosomia – which can lead to difficult births, and a caesarean. Treatment also reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia, when women have high blood pressure and protein in their urine, and other serious pregnancy complications.
Screening for gestational diabetes is also an opportunity to identify women who may benefit from diabetes prevention programs and ways to support their long-term health, including support with nutrition and physical activity.
Why is testing changing?
Most women benefit from detection and treatment. However, for some women, a diagnosis can have negative impacts. This often relates to how care is delivered.
Women have described feeling shame and stigma after the diagnosis. Others report challenges accessing the care and support they need during pregnancy. This may include access to specialist doctors, allied health professionals and clinics. Some women have restricted their diet in an unhealthy way, without appropriate supervision by a health professional. Some have had to change their preferred maternity care provider or location of birth because their pregnancy is now considered higher risk.
So we must diagnose the condition in women when the benefits outweigh the potential costs.
Which pregnant women need a blood test and when? And when are other types of testing warranted? Elizaveta Galitckaia/Shutterstock When are blood sugar levels too high?
Diagnosing gestational diabetes is based on having blood glucose levels above a certain threshold.
However, there is no clear level above which the risk of complications starts to increase. And determining the best thresholds to identify who does, and who does not, have gestational diabetes has been subject to much research and debate.
Globally, screening approaches and diagnostic criteria vary substantially. There are differences in who is recommended to be screened, when in pregnancy screening should occur, which tests should be used, and what the diagnostic glucose levels should be.
So, what changes?
The new recommendations are the result of reviewing up-to-date evidence with input from a wide range of professional and consumer groups.
Screening will continue
All pregnant women who don’t already have a diagnosis of pre-pregnancy diabetes, or gestational diabetes, will still be recommended screening at between 24 and 28 weeks’ gestation. They’ll still have an oral glucose tolerance test, a measure of how the body processes sugar. The test involves fasting overnight, and having a blood test in the morning before drinking a sugary drink. Then there are two more blood tests over two hours. However, fewer women will have this test twice in their pregnancy.
Changes mean more targeted care
The following changes mean health services should be able to reorient resources to ensure women have access to the care they need to support healthier pregnancies, including early support for women who need it most:
- women with risk factors of existing, undiagnosed diabetes (such as a higher body-mass index or BMI, or a previous large baby) will be screened in the first trimester, with a single, non-fasting blood test (known as HbA1c)
- fewer women will have an oral glucose tolerance test early in the pregnancy, ideally between ten and 14 weeks gestation. This early testing will be reserved for women with specific risk factors, such as gestational diabetes in a previous pregnancy, or a high level on the HbA1c test
- women will only be diagnosed if their blood glucose level is above new, higher cut-off points for the oral glucose tolerance test, for tests conducted early or later in the pregnancy.
Which tests do I need?
These changes will be implemented over coming months. So women are encouraged to speak to their maternity care provider about how the changes apply to them.
Alexis Shub, Obstetrician & Maternal Fetal Medicine specialist, The University of Melbourne; Matthew Hare, Senior Research Fellow & Endocrinologist, Menzies School of Health Research, and Susan de Jersey, Associate Professor, Advanced Dietitian and Credentialled Diabetes Educator., The University of Queensland
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
3 Ways To Increase Your Push-Ups (In Just 30-Days!)
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Cori Lefkowitz, of “Strong at Every Age”, shows us how:
Pushing it up
A lot of people who struggle with push-ups will do make-it-easier modifications; doing them one one’s knees is a popular one, for example. However, more reps of a modified push-up only makes you stronger at that modification, not at the full push-up.
So, how to get around this problem?
Three ways:
- Cluster sets: do 3–5 rounds at the start of your workout; set a target of 6–10 total reps per round, and do 1–3 reps of the hardest variation you can, resting 15–30 seconds between mini-sets until the round is complete (rest for at least a minute between rounds).
- Slow eccentric push-ups: for 3–5 seconds, focus only on lowering yourself down, then reset at the top. This lets you train harder variations and build control even if you can’t push back up yet.
- Push-up holds: hold the push-up at weak points (e.g. bottom, halfway, or top—whatever it is for you) to build slow-twitch tension and improve your form (so that you no longer find yourself wobbly). This helps develop mind–muscle connection, which in turn helps pretty much all other parts of this endeavor.
For an extra upwards push, you can combine these three ways with incline push-ups. As a very strong general rule, it’s almost always better to push towards harder variations rather than higher reps of the same easier version.
Why “almost always”? Well, if you’re doing some push-up challenge and specifically want to do very many reps for the sake of it, then building rep count will be what you want. But for anything that’s not “high reps for the sake high reps”, the above method will stand you in better stead.
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:








