Stretching Scientifically – by Thomas Kurz

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

People stretching incorrectly can, even if they don’t injure themselves, lose countless hours for negligible flexibility gains, and put the failure down to their body rather than the method. You can have better.

This book’s all about what works, and not only that, but what works with specific goals in mind, beyond the generic “do the splits” and “touch your toes” etc, which are laudable goals but quite basic. A lot of the further goals he has in mind have to do not just with flexibility, but also functional dynamic strength and mobility, because it’s of less versatile use to have the flexibility only to get folded like laundry and not actually actively do the things you want to.

He does also cover “regardless of age”, so no more worrying that you should have been trained for the ballet when you were eight and now all is lost. It isn’t.

As for the writing style… The author, a physical fitness and rehabilitation coach and writer, wrote this book while at the Academy of Physical Education in Warsaw during the Soviet period, and it shows. It is very much straight-to-the-point, no nonsense, no waffle. Everything is direct and comes with a list of research citations and clear instructions.

Bottom line: if you’ve been trying to improve your flexibility and not succeeding, let this old Soviet instructor have a go.

Click here to check out Stretching Scientifically, and stretch scientifically!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

  • How to donate your poo to science or medicine
    When most people think about donating body parts to science or medicine, they might think of life-saving donations of organs, tissues or blood. But you can also donate your poo. The idea is to use it for poo transplants, otherwise known as faecal microbiota transplantation. That’s when poo products made from healthy donor poo are…

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Aspirin, CVD Risk, & Potential Counter-Risks

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Aspirin Pros & Cons

    In Tuesday’s newsletter, we asked your health-related opinion of aspirin, and got the above-depicted, below-described set of responses:

    • About 42% said “Most people can benefit from low-dose daily use to lower CVD risk”
    • About 31% said “It’s safe for occasional use as a mild analgesic, but that’s all”
    • About 28% said “We should avoid aspirin; it can cause liver and/or kidney damage”

    So, what does the science say?

    Most people can benefit from low-dose daily aspirin use to lower the risk of cardiovascular disease: True or False?

    True or False depending on what we mean by “benefit from”. You see, it works by inhibiting platelet function, which means it simultaneously:

    • decreases the risk of atherothrombosis
    • increases the risk of bleeding, especially in the gastrointestinal tract

    When it comes to balancing these things and deciding whether the benefit merits the risk, you might be asking yourself: “which am I most likely to die from?” and the answer is: neither

    While aspirin is associated with a significant improvement in cardiovascular disease outcomes in total, it is not significantly associated with reductions in cardiovascular disease mortality or all-cause mortality.

    In other words: speaking in statistical generalizations of course, it may improve your recovery from minor cardiac events but is unlikely to help against fatal ones

    The current prevailing professional (amongst cardiologists) consensus is that it may be recommended for secondary prevention of ASCVD (i.e. if you have a history of CVD), but not for primary prevention (i.e. if you have no history of CVD). Note: this means personal history, not family history.

    In the words of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology:

    ❝Low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg orally daily) might be considered for the primary prevention of ASCVD among select adults 40 to 70 years of age who are at higher ASCVD risk but not at increased bleeding risk (S4.6-1–S4.6-8).

    Low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg orally daily) should not be administered on a routine basis for the primary prevention of ASCVD among adults >70 years of age (S4.6-9).

    Low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg orally daily) should not be administered for the primary prevention of ASCVD among adults of any age who are at increased risk of bleeding (S4.6-10).❞

    ~ Dr. Donna Arnett et al. (those section references are where you can find this information in the document)

    Read in full: Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology

    Or if you’d prefer a more pop-science presentation:

    Many older adults still use aspirin for CVD prevention, contrary to clinical guidance

    Aspirin can cause liver and/or kidney damage: True or False?

    True, but that doesn’t mean we must necessarily abstain, so much as exercise caution.

    Aspirin is (at recommended doses) not usually hepatotoxic (toxic to the liver), but there is a strong association between aspirin use in children and the development of Reye’s syndrome, a disease involving encephalopathy and a fatty liver. For this reason, most places have an official recommendation that aspirin not be used by children (cut-off age varies from place to place, for example 12 in the US and 16 in the UK, but the key idea is: it’s potentially dangerous for those who are not fully grown).

    Aspirin is well-established as nephrotoxic (toxic to the kidneys), however, the toxicity is sufficiently low that this is not expected to be a problem to otherwise healthy adults taking it at no more than the recommended dose.

    For numbers, symptoms, and treatment, see this very clear and helpful resource:

    An evidence based flowchart to guide the management of acute salicylate (aspirin) overdose

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Black Beans vs Soy Beans – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing black beans to soy beans, we picked the soy.

    Why?

    Quite some heavyweights competing here today, as both have been the winners of other comparisons!

    Comparing these two’s macros first, black beans have 3x the carbs and slightly more fiber, while soy has more than 2x the protein. We’ll call this a win for soy.

    As a tangential note, it’s worth remembering also that soy is a complete protein (contains a full set of the amino acids we need), whereas black beans… Well, technically they are too, but in practicality, they only have much smaller amounts of some amino acids.

    In terms of vitamins, black beans have more of vitamins B1, B3, B5, B9, and E, while soy beans have more of vitamins A, B2, B6, C, K, and choline. A marginal win for soy here.

    In the category of minerals, however, it isn’t close: black beans are not higher in any minerals, while soy beans are higher in calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc. An overwhelming win for soy.

    It should be noted, however, that black beans are still very good for minerals! They just look bad when standing next to soy, that’s all.

    So, enjoy either or both, but for nutritional density, soy wins the day.

    Want to learn more?

    You might like to read:

    Plant vs Animal Protein: Head to Head

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • How Do DNA Repair Enzymes Actually Help?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Dr. Andrea Suarez explains:

    Are They Worth It?

    DNA repair enzymes are what they sound like: enzymes that repair damage to DNA.

    They’re derived from bacteria and plants and can function in human cells to fix UV- and oxidation-induced DNA damage.

    How they get where they need to be: the enzymes are encapsulated in liposomes, which mimic cell membranes and allow penetration through the stratum corneum. Once inside keratinocytes, the liposomes dissolve and release the enzymes that then reach the nucleus to repair the DNA.

    Does it work? The evidence is strong for some claims, not so much for others:

    • Sunscreen plus DNA repair enzymes reduced markers of DNA damage and precancerous actinic keratoses more than sunscreen alone.
    • Evidence for reducing wrinkles, reducing hyperpigmentation, or improving elasticity is limited and not yet convincing.

    Is it safe? Human and animal studies—including in people with xeroderma pigmentosum—show excellent safety, even with long-term use. Rare issues include mild irritation or burning if you get it in your eyes, so maybe don’t put it there.

    In few words: while it’s not yet a scientifically sound choice for beauty considerations, it does augment the protective power of sunscreen, on a cellular level, reducing sun-induced DNA damage that not only ages your skin, but also could turn cancerous if left unchecked.

    For more on all of this, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to try some?

    We don’t sell it, but here for your convenience is an example product on Amazon 😎

    Be warned, it is pricier than it looks!

    Share This Post

  • The Teenage Brain – by Dr. Frances Jensen

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We realize that we probably have more grandparents of teenagers than parents of teenagers here, but most of us have at least some teenage relative(s). Which makes this book interesting.

    There are a lot of myths about the teenage brain, and a lot of popular assumptions that usually have some basis in fact but are often misleading.

    Dr. Jensen gives us a strong foundational grounding in the neurophysiology of adolescence, from the obvious-but-often-unclear (such as the role of hormones) to less-known things like the teenage brain’s general lack of myelination. Not just “heightened neuroplasticity” but, if you imagine the brain as an electrical machine, then think of myelin as the insulation between the wires. Little wonder some wires may get crossed sometimes!

    She also talks about such things as the teenage circadian rhythm’s innate differences, the impact of success and failure on the brain, and harder topics such as addiction—and the adolescent cortisol functions that can lead to teenagers needing to seek something to relax in the first place.

    In criticism, we can only say that sometimes the author makes sweeping generalizations without acknowledging such, but that doesn’t detract from what she has to say on the topic of neurophysiology.

    Bottom line: if there’s a teenager in your life whose behavior and/or moods are sometimes baffling to you, and whose mysteries you’d like to unravel, this is a great book.

    Click here to check out the Teenage Brain, and better understand those around you!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • TED-x | Sugar Is Not A Treat

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Dr. Jody Stanislaw offers a reframe:

    Not so sweet

    The pancreas isn’t an organ that most people think about a lot, but it regulates blood sugar levels by releasing insulin as needed. Overworking the beta cells in the pancreas that do this, can lead to their burnout, which contributes to prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.

    If, like Dr. Stanislaw, you already have Type 1 Diabetes (an autoimmune condition usually diagnosed in early childhood and unrelated to what one has or hasn’t been eating), then your pancreas is already not doing much, or rather, it’s too busy fighting itself to actually do its job. This means that taking exogenous insulin (i.e., from the pharmacy rather than from your dysfunctional pancreas) will be necessary for survival. Most people with T1D will have an insulin pump if possible, to provide insulin as needed. Others will rely on injections.

    So, does that mean that T1D is a free pass on the diabetes-related health risks of sugar, since after all, you already have diabetes anyway?

    Nope, no such luck. Because in the case of T1D, if you then get insulin resistance on top of the fact you don’t make your own insulin, then the insulin that you are taking will stop working, and ultimately you will die. So, that’s pretty important to avoid!

    Thus, Dr. Stanislaw has strong opinions on diet in this regard, and she recommends her own protocol regardless of whether you are diabetic or not:

    • Avoid refined carbs (e.g. bread, pasta, or foods with added sugars).
    • Start the day with protein-rich foods for balanced blood sugar.
    • Drink water to curb sugar cravings caused by dehydration.
    • Use low-carb substitutes (e.g. cauliflower pizza crust, zucchini noodles, etc).

    While Dr. Stanislaw does recommend an 80:20 approach to eating in general (80% healthy foods, 20% indulgences), she does strongly suggest not putting sugar even into the “indulgences” 20%, because a) a diet of 20% sugar is not at all good, and b) the dangers of sugar consumption are particularly high, so it is better reframed not as a treat to be enjoyed, but rather as a threat to be avoided.

    For more on all of this, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like to read:

    5 Steps To Quit Sugar Easily

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • If you get lost in the bush, can you really survive by drinking your own pee?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    TV adventurer Bear Grylls has built a global reputation through his often unconventional and sometimes extreme survival feats to stay hydrated.

    He has squeezed moisture from elephant dung, sipped the contents of camel intestines, downed yak eyeball juice and, perhaps most famously, drank his own urine.

    If you’ve seen Grylls gulp down a mouthful of his own urine on camera, you might conclude it’s a legitimate survival hack. After all, Grylls used to be in the SAS.

    In one episode, he tells viewers urinating on the ground would be wasting fluids, drinking your own urine is “safe”, and grimaces while taking a warm, salty mouthful.

    Let’s see if this is fact or fiction. https://www.youtube.com/embed/4U_xmfSwYSw?wmode=transparent&start=0 Was Bear Grylls right? Can you really rehydrate by drinking your own pee?

    Brook Attakorn/Getty

    Your urine is like a bin

    Fluids make up about 60% of your body’s total weight. To maintain the correct balance of substances in this internal environment, your kidneys will continuously filter about 180 litres of blood fluid (plasma) every day.

    Thankfully, we don’t pee out 180L of urine, because our kidneys “throw back” or reabsorb about 99% of what they filter back into the bloodstream.

    The best way to imagine this process is by picturing a messy garage. If you tried to pick through the chaos and remove only the unwanted items, you’d be there all day. A more efficient method is to empty everything onto the driveway, keep what matters, toss the rest. Your kidneys use the same strategy.

    They ignore the large cells and proteins, and filter the plasma portion of blood, which essentially empties the entire garage. They then selectively return the useful substances back to the bloodstream. What’s left behind becomes urine, the physiological bin.

    Its final contents depend on a few factors, including your hydration status, metabolic activity and recent diet (including medications and supplements).

    Typically, urine is about 95% water. The rest is:

    • urea (about 2%, a byproduct of breaking down protein, which we’ll come back to shortly)
    • creatinine (about 0.1%, a by-product of muscle metabolism)
    • salts and proteins.

    So does urine hydrate you? Is it safe?

    The answer … yes and no. The answer isn’t always clear-cut because, as we saw above, what’s in your urine depends on what was in the garage.

    If you are well hydrated and healthy, your urine will likely appear clear to straw-coloured, meaning it is mostly water (but will still contain urea, salts and other waste products). A drink of this “first pass” urine will indeed provide you with some degree of hydration.

    But in a Grylls-type survival setting, you’d be losing water from your body via other means. For instance you’d lose about 450 millilitres a day via skin sweating and about 300mL a day via water vapour in your breath. If you were in a hot, humid environment, these volumes would increase significantly.

    As a result, your kidneys would need to work harder to hold onto precious water and keep it in your blood. This will further concentrate the waste products, and what ends up in the bin will be pretty toxic to your body.

    So by drinking urine in a survival setting, you’d be consuming higher concentrations of waste products, including urea, that your body explicitly intended to remove.

    By drinking urine with higher concentrations of waste products (and/or if your kidneys are impaired), urea and other metabolic waste products can accumulate in your body. This can become toxic to cells, particularly those in the nervous system.

    This can lead to symptoms such as vomiting, muscle cramps, itching and changes in consciousness. Without treatment, this toxic state (known as uraemia) can be life-threatening.

    Is your urine sterile?

    Toxins aren’t the only issue.

    While urine leaving the kidneys is likely sterile, the rest of the urinary tract (bladder and urethra) isn’t. Our bodies are full of resident bacteria that maintain our health and support daily functions – when they stay in their usual place.

    So when urine passes through the bladder and urethra, it can collect these bacteria. If you drink that urine, you are re-introducing those bacteria into parts of the body where they don’t belong – mainly the gastrointestinal tract.

    In healthy conditions, stomach acid often kills many of these bacteria. But in a survival situation where dehydration, heat stress or poor nutrition can compromise the gut lining, the risk of those bacteria crossing into the bloodstream increases. This can set the stage for life-threatening infections.

    That’s the last thing you need while lost in the bush.

    In a nutshell

    Please don’t rely on drinking your own urine if you’re lost in the bush. It’s basically the equivalent of drinking from the bin.

    Matthew Barton, Senior Lecturer, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University and Michael Todorovic, Associate Professor of Medicine, Bond University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: