Pomegranate vs Strawberry – Which is Healthier?

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

Our Verdict

When comparing pomegranate to strawberries, we picked the pomegranate.

Why?

Both are good, but…

In terms of macros, pomegranate has more fiber, carbs, and protein, making it the winner in this category.

In the category of vitamins, pomegranate has more of vitamins B1, B2, B5, B6, B7, B9, E, and K, while strawberries have more of vitamins A, B3, and C, giving pomegranates an 8:3 victory here.

Looking at minerals, pomegranate has more copper, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while strawberries have more calcium, iron, and manganese, meaning pomegranates lead 5:3 in this round.

In other considerations, both have plenty of polyphenols, though pomegranate peel specifically has some extra beneficial properties (since the peel is quite tough as-is, it can be steeped for tea, or else dried and ground to a powder for use as a supplement), making this round either a tie or a win for pomegranates, depending on whether or not we count the peel-only benefits.

Either way, adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for pomegranates, but by all means enjoy either or both, as diversity is good!

Want to learn more?

You might like:

Pomegranate’s Health Gifts Are Mostly In Its Peel

Enjoy!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

  • Biological Aging & The Octo Tool!
    Biological aging is multifaceted, and we’re demystifying its complexities. Learn how eight health metrics can predict aging-related outcomes with remarkable accuracy.

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Treat Your Own Hip – by Robin McKenzie

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We previously reviewed another book by this author in this series, “Treat Your Own Knee”, and today it’s the same deal, but for the hip.

    A quick note about the author first: a physiotherapist and not a doctor, but with over 40 years of practice to his name and 33 letters after his name (CNZM OBE FCSP (Hon) FNZSP (Hon) Dip MDT Dip MT), he seems to know his stuff.

    He takes the reader through first diagnosing the nature of the pain (and how to rule out, for example, a back problem manifesting as hip pain, rather than a hip problem per se—and points to his own “Treat Your Own Back” manual if it turns out that that’s your problem instead), and then treating it. A bold claim, the kind that many people’s lawyers don’t let them make, but once again, this guy is pretty much the expert when it comes to this. Ask any other physiotherapist, and they probably have several of his books on their shelf.

    The treatments recommend are tailored to the results of various diagnostic flowcharts; essentially troubleshooting your hip. However, they mainly consist of exercises (perhaps the greatest value of the book), and lifestyle adjustments (these ones, 10almonds readers probably know already, but a reminder never hurts).

    The explanations are thorough while still being comprehensible, and there is zero sensationalization or fluff. It is straight to the point, and clearly illustrated too with diagrams and photographs.

    Bottom line: if you’re looking for a “one-stop shop” for diagnosing and treating your bad hip, then this is it.

    Click here to check out Treat Your Own Hip, and indeed Treat Your Own Hip!

    PS: if you have musculoskeletal problems elsewhere in your body, you might want to check out the rest of his body parts series (neck, back, shoulder, wrist, knee, ankle) for the one that’s tailored to your specific problem.

    Share This Post

  • What Causes Yeast Infections, & How To Get Rid Of Them?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Dr. Liesbeth Demuyser explains:

    The fungus among us

    The vaginal microbiome is host to countless microorganisms, with Lactobacilli being especially prevalent, which is good because they produce acid that lowers pH and prevents infections.

    Candida yeasts (so, fungus) are normally present in small quantities, and/but kept in check by the immune system and competing microbes like the aforementioned Lactobacilli.

    If the vaginal microbiome is disrupted, then C. albicans (the most commonly bothersome form of Candida) will shift into disease-causing forms, multiply, form hyphae, secrete enzymes that damage epithelial tissue, and trigger immune responses that cause itching, burning, swelling, redness, and thicker white discharge.

    Things that can cause/promote this: antibiotics reduce protective Lactobacilli, lowered immunity allows overgrowth, hormonal changes and diet alter balance, semen raises pH, tight/wet clothing retains moisture, and soaps damage the protective mucus and physically wash out bacteria that should be there (while leaving the Candida relatively unbothered).

    Avoiding problems: when it comes to hygiene down there, generally speaking “less is more”. Let the vagina do its thing without interference, and wash the vulva gently without special chemicals (including: without greenwashed chemicals that the “special cleansing crystals” or something, but in fact throw the pH way out (because they are salts, and bases) and kill a lot of bacteria that should be there (while, once again, leaving the Candida relatively unbothered).

    Treating problems: most infections are mild, clear by themselves within two weeks if left alone, and/or respond well to antifungal medications; probiotics can help but are very hit-and-miss.

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like:

    Vaginal Probiotics: What Does The Science Say?

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Water’s Counterintuitive Properties

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!

    Have a question or a request? We love to hear from you!

    In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!

    As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!

    So, no question/request too big or small

    ❝Why are we told to drink more water for everything, even if sometimes it seems like the last thing we need? Bloated? Drink water. Diarrhea? Drink water. Nose running like a tap? Drink water❞

    While water will not fix every ill, it can fix a lot, or at least stop it from being worse!

    Our bodies are famously over 60% water (exact figure will depend on how well-hydrated you are, obviously, as well as your body composition in terms of muscle and fat). Our cells (which are mostly full of mostly water) need replacing all the time, and almost everything that needs transporting almost anywhere is taken there by blood (which is also mostly water). And if we need something moving out of the body? Water is usually going to be a large part of how it gets ejected.

    In the cases of the examples you gave…

    • Bloating: bloating is often a matter of water retention, which often happens as a result of having too much salt, and/or sometimes too much fat. So the body’s homeostatic system (the system that tries to maintain all kinds of equilibrium, keeping salt balance, temperature, pH, and many other things in their respective “Goldilocks zones”) tries to add more water to where it’s needed to balance out the salt etc.
      • Consequently, drinking more water means the body will note “ok, balance restored, no need to keep retaining water there, excess salts being safely removed using all this lovely water”.
    • Diarrhea: this is usually a case of a bacterial infection, though there can be other causes. Whether for that reason or another, the body has decided that it needs to give your gut an absolute wash-out, and it can only do that from the inside—so it uses as much of the body’s water as it needs to do that.
      • Consequently, drinking more water means that you are replenishing the water that the body has already 100% committed to using. If you don’t drink water, you’ll still have diarrhea, you’ll just start to get dangerously dehydrated.
    • Runny nose: this is usually a case of either fighting a genuine infection, or else fighting something mistaken for a pathogen (e.g. pollen, or some other allergen). The mucus is an important part of the body’s defense: it traps the microbes (be they bacteria, virus, whatever) and water-slides them out of the body.
      • Consequently, drinking more water means the body can keep the water-slide going. Otherwise, you’ll just get gradually more dehydrated (because as with diarrhea, your body will prioritize this function over maintaining water reserves—water reserves are there to be used if necessary, is the body’s philosophy) and if the well runs dry, you’ll just be dehydrated and have a higher pathogen-count still in your body.

    Some previous 10almonds articles that might interest you:

    Would you like this section to be bigger? If so, send us more questions!

    Share This Post

  • Healthy Eating, With Rural Food Availabilities

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!

    Have a question or a request? We love to hear from you!

    In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!

    No question/request too big or small 😎

    ❝Informtation about healthy food that doesn’t need obscure ingredients, things we can’t get in rural areas❞

    Great suggestion, as we do have many readers who (like yourself, presumably) live in such places!

    Generally speaking, what we try to do is give the most universally applicable health information possible, and trust people to apply that in the context of what’s available to them.

    One of the reasons it’s hard to tailor dietary information to exclude “obscure” ingredients is that “obscure” is relative and subjective. Sometimes, one reader’s “what is this weird food I’ve never heard of?” is another reader’s everpresent staple!

    So, while we can’t whip up a menu based on the products available in your local store without having an inventory of your local store, what we can do is offer some guiding principles:

    Do what you can

    It’s tempting to be sad that certain things aren’t locally available. This writer has a friend who often sends recipes that call for locally unavailable specific Middle Eastern and/or Surinamese* ingredients, and yes, it’s unfortunate.

    *Which this writing software thinks is so obscure it did not even recognize the word “Surinamese” and highlighted it as a spelling mistake.

    However, it’s best to focus on what is available, and work with that where possible.

    Substitute or skip?

    Sometimes, if you can’t get something fresh, canned or frozen or dried is fine. Sometimes it isn’t (in culinary terms, anyway; it’s almost always fine in nutrition terms, unless it’s lettuce or something in which case yes, only fresh will do).

    Experiment, find out what works and what doesn’t. In the worst case scenario, you’ll have a disappointing meal once and not repeat that one.

    Sometimes, the “inferior” choices work better! See for example: Super-Nutritious Shchi ← in this one, those dried herbs? They work better than fresh. The fresh herbs would give it a slightly sweeter taste that’s not appropriate here. And guess what, the Russian peasants who invented this dish did not have fresh rosemary and thyme (which grow nicely in a Mediterranean climate, and not so well in Siberia, say). Those tomatoes? We use fresh in the recipe there and it’s fine, but actually canned cherry tomatoes work great too.

    On which note…

    People think of “canned foods” as meaning “processed foods” and therefore bad. But the reality is it’s all dependent on what’s in the can (check the ingredients!). And as for nutrients?

    Many canned fruits and vegetables contain more nutrients than fresh ones! This is because the way they’ve been stored preserves them better. For example:

    • Canned tomatoes contain more bioavailable lycopene than fresh
    • Canned spinach contains more bioavailable carotene than fresh
    • Canned corn contains more bioavailable lutein than fresh
    • The list goes on, but you get the idea!

    Learn more: Nutrient Retention During Canned Food Production

    Count the plant types

    Getting at least 30 different types of plant in your diet each week is associated with much better health outcomes than not doing that.

    It is not, in fact, a number out of a hat. It’s from a big (n=11,336) study into what things affect the gut microbiome for better or for worse. It was an observational population study, championing “citizen science” in which volunteers tracked various things and collected and sent in various samples for analysis.

    The most significant finding of this study was that those who consumed more than 30 different kinds of plants per week, had a much better gut microbiome than those who consumed fewer than 10 different kinds of plants per week (there is a bell curve at play, and it gets steep around 10 and 30):

    American Gut: an Open Platform for Citizen Science Microbiome Research

    You can read more about it, here: What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?

    Does it sound hard to get in 30 different plants, without good local availability?

    In this writer’s pantry alone (so, only shelf-stable goods), there are (by coincidence, literally just counted them now) precisely 30 different kinds of plants, mostly in the form of various canned, jarred/fermented, or dried goods.

    And that’s without counting herbs and spices (which would add another 21 to the tally).

    Now, your local availability will differ from this writer’s, but we’re willing to bet that your local stores have a lot of different canned, jarred/fermented, or dried goods.

    It’s easy to forget a lot of them are plants, if you’re only thinking of greenery and such. For example, nuts are plants! Canned beans/pulses are plants! Lentils are plants! Grains are plants! And so forth.

    Minimize the bad

    We generally advocate for focusing on adding healthy things more than eliminating unhealthy things, and we stand by that as a generally more useful principle, and certainly one that’s a lot easier to act on (and after all, dietary information is only useful if you actually implement it).

    That said, there’s a strong case to be made for skipping alcohol, reducing sugar and salt, things like that. And those tweaks are usually things that one can do almost anywhere.

    Keep your menu fresh, even if the ingredients aren’t

    Variety’s important psychologically, not just nutritionally, and at the end of the day you’ll probably only do what doesn’t feel like a terrible chore.

    So, with that in mind…

    Sick of eating the same things? 5 ways to boost your nutrition and keep meals interesting and healthy

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • How Not To Die – by Dr. Michael Greger

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We previously reviewed this book some years ago, but we’re revisiting it now because:

    1. It really is a book that should be in every healthspan-enjoyer’s collection
    2. Our book reviews back then were not as comprehensive as now (though we still generally try to fit into the “it takes about one minute to read this review” idea, sometimes we’ll spend a little extra time).

    Dr. Greger (of “Dr. Greger’s Daily Dozen” fame) outlines for us in cold hard facts and stats what’s most likely to be our cause of death. While this is not a cheery premise for a book, he then sets out to work back from there—what could have prevented those specific things?

    Thus, while the book doesn’t confer immortality (the title is not “how to not die”, after all), it does teach us how not to die—i.e, from heart disease, lung diseases, brain diseases, digestive cancers, infections, diabetes, high blood pressure, liver disease, blood cancers, kidney disease, breast cancer, suicidal depression, prostate cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and even iatrogenic causes.

    This it does with a lot of solid science, explained for the layperson, and/but without holding back when it comes to big words, and a lot of them, at that. If you want to add in daily exercises, just lifting the book could be a start; weighing in at 678 pages, it’s an information-dense tome that’s more likely to be sifted through than read cover-to-cover.

    The style is thus dense science somewhat editorialized for lay readability, and well-evidenced with around 3,000 citations. That’s not a typo; there are 178 pages of bibliography at the back with about 15–20 scientific references per page.

    In terms of practical use, he does also devote chapters to that, it’s not just all textbook. Indeed, he discusses the reasonings behind the items, portion sizes, and quantities of his “daily dozen” foods, so that the reader will understand how much bang-for-buck they deliver, and then it’ll seem a lot less like an arbitrary list, and more likely to be adopted and maintained.

    Bottom line: if you care about not getting life-threatening illnesses (which at the end of the day, come to most people at some point), then this book is a must-read.

    Click here to check out How Not To Die, and live well!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Lychees vs Kumquats – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing lychees to kumquats, we picked the kumquats.

    Why?

    In terms of macros, everything is comparable except for fiber, of which kumquats have 5–6x as much fiber, which means a very significant win for kumquats in this category.

    When it comes to vitamins, lychees have slightly more of vitamins B3, B6, C, and K, while kumquats have a lot more of vitamins A and B1, and moderately more vitamins B2, B9, E, and choline. A fair win for kumquats here.

    In the category of minerals, lychees have a little more copper, phosphorus, and selenium, while kumquats have 11x as much calcium, as well as a 2–3x more iron, magnesium, manganese and zinc. An easy win for kumquats.

    Both fruits have great phenolic profiles, being both rich in antioxidants.

    All in all, enjoy both, but if you’re going to pick one, kumquats easily win the day!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like to read:

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: