
Mythbusting The Big O
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
“Early To Bed…”
In yesterday’s newsletter, we asked you for your (health-related) views on orgasms.
But what does the science say?
Orgasms are essential to good health: True or False?
False, in the most literal sense. One certainly won’t die without them. Anorgasmia (the inability to orgasm) is a condition that affects many postmenopausal women, some younger women, and some men. And importantly, it isn’t fatal—just generally considered unfortunate:
Anorgasmia Might Explain Why You’re Not Orgasming When You Want To
That article focuses on women; here’s a paper focusing on men:
Orgasms are good for the health, but marginally: True or False?
True! They have a wide array of benefits, depending on various factors (including, of course, one’s own sex). That said, the benefits are so marginal that we don’t have a flock of studies to cite, and are reduced to pop-science sources that verbally cite studies that are, alas, nowhere to be found, for example:
- For women: 9 Orgasm Benefits That Might Surprise You
- For men: 9 Ways Orgasms May Benefit Your Health
Doubtlessly the studies do exist, but are sparse enough that finding them is a nightmare as the keywords for them will bring up a lot of studies about orgasms and health that aren’t answering the above question (usually: health’s affect on orgasms, rather than the other way around).
There is some good science for post-menopausal women, though! Here it is:
Misconceptions About Sexual Health in Older Women
(if you have the time to read this, this also covers many very avoidable things that can disrupt sexual function, in ways that people will errantly chalk up to old age, not knowing that they are missing out needlessly)
Orgasms are good or bad, depending on being male or female: True or False
False, broadly. The health benefits are extant and marginal for almost everyone, as indicated above.
What’s that “almost” about, then?
There are a very few* people (usually men) for whom it doesn’t go well. In such cases, they have a chronic and lifelong problem whereby orgasm is followed by 2–7 days of flu-like and allergic symptoms. Little is known about it, but it appears to be some sort of autoimmune disorder.
Read more: Post-orgasmic illness syndrome: history and current perspectives
*It’s hard to say for sure how few though, as it is surely under-reported and thus under-diagnosed; likely even misdiagnosed if the patient doesn’t realize that orgasms are the trigger for such episodes, and the doctor doesn’t think to ask. Instead, they will be busy trying to eliminate foods from the diet, things like that, while missing this cause.
Orgasms are better avoided for optimal health: True or False?
Aside from the above, False. There is a common myth for men of health benefits of “semen retention”, but it is not based in science, just tradition. You can read a little about it here:
The short version is: do it if you want; don’t if you don’t; the body will compensate either way so it won’t make a meaningful difference to anything for most people, healthwise.
Small counterpoint: while withholding orgasm (and ejaculation) is not harmful to health, what does physiologically need draining sometimes is prostate fluid. But that can also be achieved mechanically through prostate milking, or left to fend for itself (as it will in nocturnal emissions, popularly called wet dreams). However, if you have problems with an enlarged prostate, it may not be a bad idea to take matters into your own hands, so to speak. As ever, do check with your doctor if you have (or think you may have) a condition that might affect this.
One final word…
We’re done with mythbusting for today, but we wanted to share this study that we came across (so to speak) while researching, as it’s very interesting:
On which note: if you haven’t already, consider getting a “magic wand” style vibe; you can thank us later (this writer’s opinion: everyone should have one!).
Top tip: do get the kind that plugs into the wall, not rechargeable. The plug-into-the-wall kind are more powerful, and last much longer (both “in the moment”, and in terms of how long the device itself lasts).
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
How to test for STIs at home
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
What you need to know
- Anyone can contract an STI through sexual activity involving the mouth, genitals, or anus. Regular testing is important since many STIs can be treated with medication, but untreated STIs can lead to serious complications.
- The Food and Drug Administration has approved at-home STI tests for HIV, syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis, and HPV.
- You can get at-home STI test kits online and at some pharmacies, health clinics, and health departments depending on where you live. Most test providers will get you your results within a week.
This year, federal budget cuts are forcing many Planned Parenthood health centers to close. As some communities lose access to local sexual health services, at-home testing for STIs makes getting a diagnosis more accessible, which supports treatment and limits infection spread.
Read on to learn how to test for STIs at home, what to do if you get a positive test result, and more.
What are STIs?
STIs—sometimes called sexually transmitted diseases or STDs—are infections that anyone can contract through sexual activity involving the mouth, genitals, or anus. They can be caused by bacteria, viruses, or parasites.
Some common STI symptoms include:
- Bumps, sores, or warts on or near the genitals, mouth, or anus.
- Swelling, pain, or itching on or near the genitals.
- Painful or frequent urination.
- Genital discharge, bleeding, or odor.
Many STIs are easily treated with medication. However, if left untreated or unmanaged, some can cause long-term and even deadly complications.
Some STIs won’t cause symptoms, but they can lead to complications later on.
Which STIs can I test for at home?
Many at-home STI tests are available, and while experts believe that most tests provide accurate results, only a few are approved by the FDA.
The FDA has approved at-home tests for syphilis and for HIV that anyone can use. An FDA-approved, at-home vaginal swab for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis is also available. Currently, any California resident with a cervix between ages 25 and 65 can also test for HPV (human papillomavirus) at home using the FDA-approved Teal Wand, which is expected to be available nationwide next year.
Who should consider at-home STI tests?
Testing for STIs at home may be right for you if you are unable to go to a doctor’s office or health clinic that offers sexual health services or if you feel more comfortable testing yourself in a private space.
Even if you take an at-home test, you may need to schedule an appointment with a health care provider for treatment and prevention recommendations.
At-home STI tests are “a great way to expand our reach of sexual health services to patient populations that have a hard time getting to sexual clinical services, but they don’t stand alone,” said Dr. Robert A. Pitts, an infectious disease specialist at NYU Langone Health, in an April New York Times article.
Free or low-cost STI tests are still available through local community health centers and public health clinics. Find a location near you through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s GetTested site.
How do I test for STIs at home, and when will I get my results?
At-home STI testing typically involves collecting a sample of a bodily fluid and mailing it to a lab. Your test instructions may direct you to urinate in a sealable cup, prick your finger to get a drop of blood, or swab your mouth, genitals, or anus.
Most test kits include a prepaid envelope addressed to a lab so that you can mail in your samples.
Check with your test kit provider to find out when you can expect your results. Most kits provide results through an online portal within a week. However, if you’re using an at-home rapid HIV test, you’ll see your result in about 20 minutes.
Where can I get at-home STI tests?
You can purchase at-home STI tests without a prescription at some pharmacies. Many are also available online.
You may also be able to pick up at-home test kits from your local health clinic or health department.
How much do at-home STI tests cost?
Without insurance, the price of at-home STI test kits can range from $10 to $250. Health clinics may provide free or low-cost kits for low-income individuals.
Some health insurance plans cover at-home STIs tests. Contact your insurance to learn more.
Together TakeMeHome offers free at-home HIV test kits via mail for anyone 17 and older living in the U.S., including Puerto Rico. Some state-specific programs also offer free at-home STI tests.
What should I do if I get a positive test result?
If you receive a positive test result, see a health care provider right away for treatment. Remember that it can take days or even months for some STIs to show up on a test, so even if your tests are negative, retesting regularly is recommended, even if you don’t have new sexual partners.
Talk to your health care provider for more information and to find out how often you should test for STIs.
This article first appeared on Public Good News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Share This Post
-
Healthy Mind In A Healthy Body
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
The 8-minute piece of music “Weightless” by Marconi was created scientifically to lower the heart rate and relax the listener. How did they do it? You can read the British Academy of Sound Therapy’s explanation of the methodology here, but important results of the study were:
- “Weightless” was able to induce greater relaxation levels than a massage (increase of 6%).
- “Weightless” also induced an 11% increase in relaxation over all other relaxing music tracks in the study.
- “Weightless” was also subjectively rated as more relaxing than any other music by all the participants.
Try it for yourself!
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Isn’t that better? Whenever you’re ready, read on…
Today we’re going to share a technique for dealing with difficult emotions. The technique is used in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and it’s called RAIN:
- Recognizing: ask yourself “what is it that I’m feeling?”, and put a name to it. It could be anger, despair, fear, frustration, anxiety, overwhelm etc.
- Accepting: “OK, so, I’m feeling ________”. There’s no point in denying it, or being defensive about it, these things won’t help you. For now, just accept it.
- Investigating: “Why am I feeling ________?” Maybe there is an obvious reason, maybe you need to dig for a reason—or dig deeper for the real reason. Most bad feelings are driven by some sort of fear or insecurity, so that can be a good avenue for examination. Important: your feelings may be rational or irrational. That’s fine. This is a time for investigating, not judging.
- Non-Identification: not making whatever it is you’re feeling into a part of you. Once you get too attached to “I am jealous”, “I am angry”, “I am sad” etc, it can be difficult to manage something that has become a part of your personality; you’ll defend your jealousy, anger, sadness etc rather than tackle it.
As a CBT tool, this is something you can do for yourself at any time. It won’t magically solve your problems, but it can stop you from spiralling into a state of crisis, and get you back on a more useful track.
As a DBT tool, to give this its full strength, ideally now you will communicate what you’re feeling, to somebody you trust, perhaps a partner or friend, for instance.
Humans are fundamentally social creatures, and we achieve our greatest strengths when we support each other—and that also means sometimes seeking and accepting support!
Do you have a good technique you’d like to share? Reply to this email and let us know!
Share This Post
-
The Fat That Fuels Alzheimer’s Disease
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
This is not about trans fats, or super-processed hydrogenated vegetable oils, or butter.
Although, you might want to check out: Can Saturated Fats Be Healthy? and, for that matter, A Word About Trans-Fatty Acids (TFAs) ← when you click this one, you’ll need to scroll down slightly for the bit about trans fats.
No, it’s about adipose tissue.
The Adipose-Brain Crosstalk
Body fat is blamed for many things, often unfairly.
By this we mean: there are many adverse health conditions that are associated with being in the “obese” category of a BMI scale, but this is very misleading if we don’t look at the actual causes at hand. It would be like saying that since black people die in the US at a higher rate than white people do, blackness itself is to blame, instead of looking at the systemic issues at hand, ranging from higher association with poverty due to generational disprivilege, to receiving lower quality medical care. We wrote previously about Fat’s Real Barriers To Health, shining a similar light on the actual problems at hand, often including such things as:
- medication dosages being tailored to thin people rather than calculated on a per-kg basis and guess what, now it doesn’t work and you might die
- surgeons being untrained and/or unwilling to operate on people unless they lose weight first (often resulting in a denial of essential surgery)
- hospital equipment that was built with smaller sizes in mind, ranging from blood pressure cuffs to MRI machines, resulting again in skipped (or substandard) medical care
You can read more about this kind of thing in: Shedding Some Obesity Myths
So, all that shows how in many cases, fat isn’t the real problem; it’s just a bodily attribute that people either see and decide to hand it problems, or else simply do not care enough to address a need going unmet.
However, this today is not one of those instances.
Researchers (Dr. Li Yang et al.) used a combination of human patient fat samples, mouse models, and lab tests of amyloid clumping, to discover that fat tissue releases extracellular vesicles that can cross the blood–brain barrier and accelerate amyloid-β plaque buildup, a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease.
Furthermore, the more adipose (fat) tissue you have, the worse this seems to be.
Limitation: the researchers did not distinguish between different types of adipose tissue. We may hypothesize that white adipose tissue will be the worst, yellow adipose tissue not so bad, and we wouldn’t be surprised if brown adipose tissue turned out to be protective. For why we make that latter prediction, see: The BAT-pause! ← the title here refers to the production of highly beneficial brown adipose tissue (BAT) slowing down during the menopause, if we’re not careful—but there are things we can do to convert white adipose tissue to yellow and brown.
You can read the paper in full, here: Decoding adipose–brain crosstalk: Distinct lipid cargo in human adipose-derived extracellular vesicles modulates amyloid aggregation in Alzheimer’s disease
Before you decide on your next weight-loss plan, though, please be aware that over the age of 65, a BMI in the “overweight” category is protective against all-cause mortality
Thus, a potentially sensible plan if you’re already in a weight range you’re happy with (and an adiposity range you’re happy with, for that matter, since of course weight can come from more things than just fat, e.g. water weight, muscle mass), is to use what we talked about in the “BAT-pause” article linked above, to convert adipose tissue into its healthiest form. However, as a caveat, that’s just us doing a 2+2=4 on the evidence, and not a matter of interventional RCTs having been done to confirm the hypothesis. We’d love to see such studies, though, and will definitely keep an eye out for them!
Want to nourish your brain without fueling Alzheimer’s?
Check out:
A New Contender For “Best Diet For Heart & Brain” In Aging
Enjoy!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Heart attack or panic attack? Why young men are calling ambulances for unmanaged anxiety
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Anxiety affects one in five Australian men at some point in their lives. But the condition remains highly stigmatised, misunderstood and under-diagnosed.
Men are around half as likely to be diagnosed with an anxiety disorder compared to women. Some feel pressure to be fearless and hide their emotions. Others simply don’t understand or have the language to describe anxiety symptoms.
This has serious consequences. Our latest research shows young men are turning to ambulance services when their symptoms become overwhelming – some even think they’re having a heart attack.
So why do so many men wait until they need to call emergency services, rather than seek support earlier from a GP or psychologist? And what prompts them to call? We reviewed the paramedic notes of 694 men aged 15 to 25 years in Victoria, Australia, to find out.
PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock Young men haven’t seen others asking for help
Boys are raised to value courage, strength and self-assurance, and to suppress vulnerability.
When parents encourage boys to “face their fears”, rather than offering emotional comfort and tenderness, anxiety gets positioned in conflict with masculinity. This leads to a disjuncture between the support young men are met with (and come to expect) from others, and the support they may want or need.
This also means boys grow up believing their male role models – dads, brothers, grandads, coaches – don’t get anxious, deterring boys and men from seeking help. As a result, anxiety goes undiagnosed and opportunities for early intervention are missed.
Recently, we have seen positive shifts challenging restrictive masculine stereotypes. This has improved awareness surrounding men’s depression – opening up conversations, normalising help-seeking and leading to the development of men’s mental health programs and resources.
However, men’s anxiety remains in the shadows. When anxiety is talked about, it’s not with the same weight or concern as depression. This is despite men’s anxiety having harmful health impacts including turning to alcohol and drugs to cope, and increasing the risk of male suicide.
What does anxiety look like?
When men are encouraged to talk about anxiety, they describe various challenges including repetitive worries, feeling out-of-control and intense physical symptoms. This includes a high heart rate, shortness of breath, body pains, tremors and headaches.
Jack Steele, a prominent Australian personality and one half of the Inspired Unemployed, opened up about his anxiety difficulties on The Imperfects Podcast last year saying:
I didn’t know what anxiety was. I thought I was the opposite of anxiety.
The way I explain it, it’s like […] your whole body just shuts down. My throat starts closing up and my whole body just goes numb. […] It feels like you’re just so alone. You feel like no-one can help you.
You genuinely think the world’s ending – like there’s no out.
These physical symptoms are common in men but can be frequently dismissed rather than recognised as anxiety. Our research has found that, when left unaddressed, these symptoms typically worsen and arise in more and more contexts.
Why do anxious men call ambulances?
Our new study investigated the consequences of men’s anxiety going unaddressed.
First, we used data from the National Ambulance Surveillance System to identify and describe the types of anxiety young men experience. We then looked at the characteristics and contexts of young men’s anxiety presentations to ambulance services.
Overwhelmed and lacking support, many young men turn to ambulances in crisis. Anxiety now accounts for 10% of male ambulance attendances for mental health concerns, surpassing depression and psychosis.
One in ten ambulance callouts for mental illness among men is for anxiety. Benjamin Crone/Shutterstock While every presentation is different, our study identified three common presentations among young men:
1. Sudden onset of intense bodily symptoms resembling life-threatening physical health conditions such as heart attacks.
Twenty-two-year-old Joshua, for example, whose case files we reviewed as part of our study, was on a tram home from work when he experienced sudden numbness in his hands and feet. A bystander saw he was having muscle spasms in his hands. Joshua was alert but extremely anxious and asked the bystander for help.
2. Severe anxiety triggered or worsened by substance use.
Adam, a 21-year-old man, consumed a substantial amount of diazepam (Valium) while driving home, after having an anxiety attack at work. Adam reached out to paramedics because he was concerned his anxiety symptoms hadn’t dissipated, and was worried he may have taken too much diazepam.
3. Mental health deterioration with self-harm or suicidal thoughts, often tied to situational stressors such as unstable housing, unemployment, financial difficulties and relationship strain.
Leo, aged 25, had been increasingly anxious for the past three days. Leo’s parents called an ambulance after he told them he wanted to kill himself. Leo told paramedics on arrival that he still felt suicidal and had been getting worse over the past three months.
Directing resources where they’re needed
Young men’s anxiety presentations are time- and resource-intensive for paramedics, many of whom feel poorly equipped to respond effectively. After ruling out physical causes, paramedic support is typically limited to reassurance and breathing techniques.
Most young men are then instructed to follow up with GPs, psychologists or other health professionals in the general community.
But taking that next step involves overcoming the stigma associated with help-seeking, the shame of having called an ambulance and deep tensions between anxiety and what it means to be a man.
This means many young men slip through the cracks. And without ongoing mental health support, they face high risks of presenting again to emergency services with increasingly severe mental health symptoms.
To address this, we need to:
- ramp up conversations about men’s anxiety and take their experiences seriously
- develop an awareness campaign about men’s anxiety. Awareness campaigns have successfully dismantled stigma and shed light on men’s depression and suicide
- improve diagnosis of men’s anxiety disorders by up-skilling and training clinicians to detect anxiety and the unique and distinct constellations of symptoms in men
- create accessible pathways to early support through digital psychological education resources, focused on improving awareness and literacy surrounding men’s anxiety experiences.
If this article has raised issues for you, or if you’re concerned about someone you know, call Lifeline on 13 11 14.
Krista Fisher, Research Fellow, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne; Dan Lubman, Executive Clinical Director, Turning Point & Director of Monash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University; Simon Rice, Associate Professor & Clinical Psychologist, Mental Health in Elite Sports, The University of Melbourne, and Zac Seidler, Associate Professor, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Trout vs Haddock – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing trout to haddock, we picked the trout.
Why?
It wasn’t close.
In terms of macros, trout has more protein and more fat, although the fat is mostly healthy (some saturated though, and trout does have more cholesterol). This category could be a win for either, depending on your priorities. But…
When it comes to vitamins, trout has a lot more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12, C, D, and E, while haddock is not higher in any vitamins.
In the category of minerals, trout has more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, potassium, and zinc, while haddock has slightly more selenium. Given that a 10oz portion of trout already contains 153% of the RDA of selenium, however, the same size portion of haddock having 173% of the RDA isn’t really a plus for haddock (especially as selenium can cause problems if we get too much). Oh, and haddock is also higher in sodium, but in industrialized countries, most people most of the time need less of that, not more.
On balance, the overwhelming nutritional density of trout wins the day.
Want to learn more?
You might like to read:
Farmed Fish vs Wild Caught: It Makes Quite A Difference!
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Cancer patients from migrant backgrounds have a 1 in 3 chance of something going wrong in their care
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
More than 7 million people in Australia were born overseas. Some 5.8 million people report speaking a language other than English at home.
But how well are we looking after culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) Australians?
In countries around the world, evidence suggests people from CALD backgrounds are at increased risk of harm as a result of the health care they receive when compared to the general population. Common problems include a higher risk of contracting a hospital-acquired infection or medication errors.
People receiving cancer care are at particularly high risk of harm associated with their health care.
In a recent study, we found CALD cancer patients in Australia had roughly a one-in-three risk of something going wrong during their cancer care. This is unacceptably high.
SeventyFour/Shutterstock We reviewed medical records
We worked with four cancer services (two in New South Wales and two in Victoria) that provide care to high proportions of people from CALD backgrounds. These four cancer services offer a combination of care to patients in hospitals, clinics and in their homes.
We analysed de-identified medical records of people from CALD backgrounds who received care at any of the four cancer services during 2018. To identify CALD patients, we used information from their medical records including “country of birth”, “preferred language”, “language spoken at home” and “interpreter required”.
We reviewed a total of 628 medical records of CALD cancer patients. We found roughly one in three medical records (212 out of 628) had at least one patient safety event recorded. We defined a patient safety event as any event that could have or did result in harm to the patient as a result of the health care they receive. We also found 44 patient records had three or more safety events recorded over a 12-month period.
Medication-related safety events were common, such as the wrong medication type or dose being given to a patient. Sometimes the patients themselves took the wrong type or dose of a medication or stopped medication all together. We also observed a variety of other patient safety events such as falls, pressure ulcers and infections after surgery.
The number of incidents could even be higher than what we observed. We know from other research that not all patient safety events are documented.
Our research looked at patient safety incidents among CALD patients at four Australian cancer services in 2018. Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock We didn’t have a control group, which is the main limitation of our study. In other words, we didn’t examine medical records of patients from non-CALD backgrounds to compare how common patient safety events were between groups.
But looking at other data suggests the rate of incidents is much higher in CALD patients.
Studies over many years indicate around one in ten patients admitted to hospital experience a safety event.
One study from Norway found cancer patients have a 39% greater risk of experiencing adverse events in hospital when compared to other patients (24.2% compared to 17.4%).
Why is the risk of incidents so high for CALD patients?
We identified miscommunication as a key factor that put cancer patients from CALD backgrounds at risk.
For example, we observed from one patient’s notes that the patient didn’t take their medication because they were confused by the instructions given by different clinicians. This confusion might have stemmed from language barriers or health literacy issues.
In some medical records, we also saw interpreter requirements were unmet. For example, at the time of admission, assessment for language needs noted an interpreter was not required. However, later notes mentioned the patient had poor English or needed an interpreter.
Also, with the limited availability of interpreters, they’re often reserved for specialist appointments, and not used for “routine” tasks, such as during chemotherapy treatment. This may result in side effects from cancer medications not being properly identified and responded to, potentially leading to patient harm.
Risks may increase if a patient needs an interpreter but doesn’t have one. THICHA SATAPITANON/Shutterstock What can we do to improve things?
To make care safer, patients, their families and the clinicians who care for them should come together so that any solutions developed are practical, relevant, and informed by their combined experiences.
As an example, we developed a tool with consumers from CALD backgrounds and their clinicians that seeks to ensure that when patient medications are changed, there is common understanding between the clinician and the patient of their medication and care instructions. This includes recognising the side effects of the medications and who to contact if they have concerns.
This tool uses images and simple language to support common understanding of medication and care instructions. It takes into account specific cultural expectations and is available in different languages. It’s currently being evaluated in two cancer clinics.
To make cancer care safer for patients from CALD backgrounds, health systems and services will need to support and invest in strategies that are specifically targeted towards people from these backgrounds. This will ensure more equitable health solutions that improve the health of all Australians.
Ashfaq Chauhan, Research Fellow, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University; Melvin Chin, Senior Lecturer, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney; Meron Pitcher, Honorary, Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, and Reema Harrison, Professor, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:












