
Fat’s Real Barriers To Health
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Fat Justice In Healthcare

This is Aubrey Gordon, an author, podcaster, and fat justice activist. What does that mean?
When it comes to healthcare, we previously covered some ideas very similar to her work, such as how…
There’s a lot of discrimination in healthcare settings
In this case, it often happens that a thin person goes in with a medical problem and gets treated for that, while a fat person can go in with the same medical problem and be told “you should try losing some weight”.
Top tip if this happens to you… Ask: “what would you advise/prescribe to a thin person with my same symptoms?”
Other things may be more systemic, for example:
When a thin person goes to get their blood pressure taken, and that goes smoothly, while a fat person goes to get their blood pressure taken, and there’s not a blood pressure cuff to fit them, is the problem the size of the person or the size of the cuff? It all depends on perspective, in a world built around thin people.
That’s a trivial-seeming example, but the same principle has far-reaching (and harmful) implications in healthcare in general, e.g:
- Surgeons being untrained (and/or unwilling) to operate on fat people
- Getting a one-size-fits-all dose that was calculated using average weight, and now doesn’t work
- MRI machines are famously claustrophobia-inducing for thin people; now try not fitting in it in the first place
…and so forth. So oftentimes, obesity will be correlated with a poor healthcare outcome, where the problem is not actually the obesity itself, but rather the system having been set up with thin people in mind.
It would be like saying “Having O- blood type results in higher risks when receiving blood transfusions”, while omitting to add “…because we didn’t stock O- blood”.
Read more on this topic: Shedding Some Obesity Myths
Does she have practical advice about this?
If she could have you understand one thing, it would be:
You deserve better.
Or if you are not fat: your fat friends deserve better.
How this becomes useful is: do not accept being treated as the problem!
Demand better!
If you meekly accept that you “just need to lose weight” and that thus you are the problem, you take away any responsibility from your healthcare provider(s) to actually do their jobs and provide healthcare.
See also Gordon’s book, which we’ve reviewed:
“You Just Need to Lose Weight”: And 19 Other Myths About Fat People – by Aubrey Gordon
Are you saying fat people don’t need to lose weight?
That’s a little like asking “would you say office workers don’t need to exercise more?”; there are implicit assumptions built into the question that are going unaddressed.
Rather: some people might benefit healthwise from losing weight, some might not.
In fact, over the age of 65, being what is nominally considered “overweight” reduces all-cause mortality risk.
For details of that and more, see: When BMI Doesn’t Measure Up
But what if I do want/need to lose weight?
Gordon’s not interested in helping with that, but we at 10almonds are, so…
Check out: Lose Weight, But Healthily
Where can I find more from Aubrey Gordon?
You might enjoy her blog:
Aubrey Gordon | Your Fat Friend
Or her other book:
What We Don’t Talk About When We Talk About Fat – by Aubrey Gordon
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Natural Alternatives for Depression Treatment
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Questions and Answers at 10almonds
Have a question or a request? You can always hit “reply” to any of our emails, or use the feedback widget at the bottom!
This newsletter has been growing a lot lately, and so have the questions/requests, and we love that! In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!
As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!
So, no question/request too big or small
Natural alternatives to medication for depression?
Great question! We did a mean feature a while back, but we definitely have much more to say! We’ll do another main feature soon, but in the meantime, here’s what we previously wrote:
See: The Mental Health First-Aid That You’ll Hopefully Never Need
^This covers not just the obvious, but also why the most common advice is not helpful, and practical tips to actually make manageable steps back to wellness, on days when “literally just survive the day” is one’s default goal.
Share This Post
-
Apples vs Bananas – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing apples to bananas, we picked the bananas.
Why?
Both apples and bananas contain lots of vitamins, but bananas contain far more of Vitamins A, B, and C.
Apples beat bananas only for vitamins E and K.
This may seem like “well that’s 2 vs 3; that’s pretty close” until one remembers that vitamin B is actually eight vitamins in a trenchcoat. Bananas have more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, and B9.
If you’re wondering about the other numbers: neither fruit contains vitamins B7 (biotin) or B12 (cobalamins of various kinds). Vitamins B4, B8, B10, and B11 do not exist as such (due to changes in how vitamins are classified).
Both apples and bananas contain lots of minerals, but bananas contain far more of iron, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, zinc, copper, manganese, and selenium.
Apples beat bananas only for calcium (and then, only very marginally)
Both apples and bananas have plenty of fiber.
Apples have marginally less sugar, but given the fiber content, this is pretty much moot when it comes to health considerations, and apples are higher in fructose in any case.
In short, both are wonderful fruits (and we encourage you to enjoy both!), and/but bananas beat apples healthwise in almost all measures.
PS: top tip if you find it challenging to get bananas at the right level of ripeness for eating… Try sun-dried! Not those hard chip kinds (those are mechanically and/or chemically dried, and usually have added sugar and preservatives), but sun-dried.
Here’s an example product on Amazon
Warning: since there aren’t many sun-dried bananas available on Amazon, double-check you haven’t been redirected to mechanically/chemically dried ones, as Amazon will try that sometimes!
Share This Post
-
How To Get Rid Of A Sebaceous Cyst
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Any pimple-poppers in the house? If so, we’re going to have to ask you to desist if you want to de-cyst!
Dr. Andrea Suarez explains:
If you want it to not come back…
First let’s examine what it actually is: these are cysts formed from the pore (but not the sebaceous gland, despite the misleading term “sebaceous cyst”, to which many medical professionals have objected but it is still the term in widest use in English); they’re sacs lined with epidermis (skin) that fill with keratin (not sebum).
Not to be mistaken for:
- pilar (trichilemmal) cysts: usually on the scalp (but can also occur where there is facial hair), no central pore, firmer
- acne pseudocysts: occur with other acne lesions, not in isolation, and don’t have a central pore
- lipomas: rubbery, fatty lumps with no pore or keratin inside
Back to epidermal, “sebaceous” cysts: they’re often painless and medically harmless, but if ruptured (especially by squeezing), they invariably become inflamed, painful, and vulnerable to infection.
They can go away by themselves, but most people don’t love the appearance, and often they grow larger with time, which can be a reason you might want to take action.
The bad news: the only effective treatment is surgical excision, including complete removal of the cyst sac; if any of the wall is left, the cyst can return. That’s why you shouldn’t try to do it at home.
Another thing to be aware of is that excision is easier and leaves a smaller scar if done before rupture; ruptured cysts create more scar tissue, making surgery harder and scarring worse.
For more on all of this, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
Why Do We Have Pores, And Could We Not?
Take care!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
The Aesthetic Brain – by Dr. Anjan Chatterjee
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Dr. Anjan Chatterjee (not to be mistaken for Dr. Rangan Chatterjee, whose books we have also sometimes reviewed before) is a neurologist.
A lot about aesthetics is easy enough to understand. We like physical features in humans that suggest a healthy mate, and we like lush and/or colorful plants that reassure us that we will have plenty to eat.
But what about a beautiful building, or a charcoal drawing of some captivatingly eldritch horror? And what, neurologically speaking, is the difference between a bowl of fruit and a painting of a bowl of fruit? And what, if anything, does appreciation of such do for us?
In this very readable pop-science book, we learn about these things and many more, from the perspective of an experienced neurologist who explains things simply but with plenty of science.
Bottom line: if you’d like to understand how and why your brain does more things than just process tasks necessary for survival, this book will give you plenty of insight.
Click here to check out The Aesthetic Brain, and learn more about yours!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
HRT & Your Heart
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!
Have a question or a request? We love to hear from you!
In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!
As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!
So, no question/request too big or small
❝So the reason that someone on estrogen has a slightly higher chance of a heart attack is…what? Is it just because there’s a higher body fat?❞
There shouldn’t be higher chance of a heart attack once everything’s been taken into account, and indeed estrogen has some cardioprotective benefits, along with competing properties, e.g:
❝The cardiovascular effects of estrogen require a careful balancing act between possible advantages, such as enhanced lipid profiles and vascular function, and possible concerns, like increased thrombotic risk.
Estrogen has cardioprotective properties in premenopausal women❞
Source: The Relationship Between Myocardial Infarction and Estrogen Use: A Literature Review
The risks and benefits of HRT are numerous, and/but a lot of the risks are associated only with animal-derived HRT rather bioidentitical, so you might want to check out our previous article:
HRT: A Tale Of Two Approaches (Bioidentical vs Animal)
Would you like this section to be bigger? If so, send us more questions!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Yes, you can be intolerant to fruit and veg
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
For most people, eating a wide variety of fruit and vegetables is the cornerstone of a healthy diet.
But for people with hereditary fructose intolerance, even a couple of bites of juicy watermelon or some sun-dried tomatoes in a salad can cause serious health problems.
This rare condition isn’t a food allergy or sensitivity.
But it can lead to serious health problems if not identified and correctly managed.
Any Lane/Pexels What is hereditary fructose intolerance?
Hereditary fructose intolerance is a rare genetic condition that affects how the body manages the sugar fructose.
Fructose isn’t just in fruit. It’s in honey, some vegetables, sweetened drinks, and many packaged foods, such as cakes, cookies, sauces and some breads. Fructose can also be added during the processing of some meats (deli meats and sausages) and dairy products (chocolate milk).
Sucrose (table sugar) and sorbitol (a sugar substitute often in chewing gum, toothpaste and medications) also contain fructose or are converted into fructose during digestion. This means people with hereditary fructose intolerance are also intolerant to these sugars.
People with the condition don’t have the key enzyme aldolase B needed to break down fructose.
This means fructose builds up in the liver, kidneys and intestines. This excess fructose can cause serious health problems, such as seizures, coma and, in some cases, death from liver and kidney failure.
How common is it?
Hereditary fructose intolerance is passed down to a person when both their parents carry the gene. It is considered a rare condition that affects about one in 10,000 people.
It usually becomes noticeable when babies begin eating solid foods including fruit, vegetables or sweetened baby foods that contain fructose.
In adults, hereditary fructose intolerance can be missed or misdiagnosed as other conditions such as glycogen storage disease, an eating disorder or recurrent hepatitis.
Because of this overlap in symptoms, hereditary fructose intolerance in adults can remain undetected for years.
How is it different to a food allergy or sensitivity?
Hereditary fructose intolerance is markedly different to a food allergy. A food allergy involves the immune system reacting to a food – for example, cow’s milk protein – as if it’s harmful to the body. This can cause symptoms such as hives and welts, swelling of the mouth or trouble breathing.
Hereditary fructose intolerance is also different to a food sensitivity, such as lactose intolerance or non-coeliac gluten sensitivity. This doesn’t involve the immune system but can still cause discomfort such as bloating, altered bowel habits or stomach pain.
Hereditary fructose intolerance is a genetic condition that causes a food intolerance and is not immune-related.
The condition is also different to fructose malabsorption (which, confusingly has previously been referred to as “dietary fructose intolerance” informally). This is a milder digestive condition where the small intestine doesn’t absorb fructose well, and causes symptoms such as stomach pain, bloating and gas.
How do you know if you have it?
In babies and young children, symptoms may include vomiting, unusual sleepiness or irritability, food refusal and failure to gain weight.
Some children instinctively avoid sweet foods, which may mask the condition until later in childhood or adulthood.
In adults, symptoms can include chronic stomach pain, fatigue and unexplained low blood glucose (sugar) levels. Doctors may notice subtle clues such as a swollen liver, abnormal liver tests or signs of fatty liver disease.
Confirming the condition requires genetic testing or a specialised glucose (sugar) tolerance test. But for many, diagnosis only comes after years of confusion, frustration, and dietary trial and error.
How is it managed?
There’s no cure for hereditary fructose intolerance. But it can be managed by strictly avoiding fructose, sucrose and sorbitol. Reading labels becomes essential for daily life, as even sauces, medications and toothpaste can contain these sugars.
People with the condition need to watch the following:
- fruits: avoid all fruits, juices, canned fruit and other fruit products
- cereals/grains: avoid cereals with added sugars, honey, molasses, dried fruit or sweet flavourings. Pasta, rice and other plain grains such as quinoa or buckwheat are generally safe but avoid flavoured or pre-made varieties
- vegetables: most vegetables are fine, except sweeter ones such as peas, corn, beetroot, onions, pumpkin, sweet potatoes, carrots and zucchini
- breads: only those made without added sugars or sweeteners are OK.
- desserts and dairy: avoid sweetened desserts or flavoured yogurts (natural yogurts are usually fine). Be wary of plant-based milks, such as almond milks, which often have added sugars
- protein: non-sweetened or flavoured red meat, chicken, turkey, fish, beans and lentils, eggs, tofu and tempeh are usually safe. But avoid processed meats, such as sausages/deli meats, or marinated meats
- other foods: be cautious with sauces, dressings and condiments as they many contain hidden sugars or sorbitol. Choose homemade versions using safe ingredients.
Awareness matters
If someone avoids certain foods or if they unwell after eating fruit, don’t assume they’re fussy or dieting – they might have hereditary fructose intolerance.
Greater awareness of this rare condition could mean earlier diagnosis and better support for those affected.
For parents, noticing a child’s sudden or strong aversion to sweets, repeated vomiting or slow growth can be an important clue.
And for doctors, considering hereditary fructose intolerance as a possible cause of unexplained digestive problems, low blood glucose or liver changes could make a life-changing difference.
More information about hereditary fructose intolerance is available, including recipes, tips on how to read food labels, and support.
Lauren Ball, Professor of Community Health and Wellbeing, The University of Queensland; Emily Burch, Accredited Practising Dietitian and Lecturer, Southern Cross University, and Mackenzie Derry, Nutritionist, Dietitian & PhD Candidate, The University of Queensland
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:








