
Moringa Oleifera Against CVD, Diabetes, Alzheimer’s & Arsenic?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
The Healthiest Drumstick
Moringa oleifera is a tree, whose leaves and pods have medicinal properties (as well as simply being very high in nutrients). It’s also called the drumstick tree in English, but equally often it’s referred to simply as Moringa. It has enjoyed use in traditional medicine for thousands of years, and its many benefits have caught scientists’ attention more recently. For an overview before we begin, see:
Now, let’s break it down…
Anti-inflammatory
It is full of antioxidants, which we’ll come to shortly, and they have abundant anti-inflammatory effects. Research into these so far has mostly beennon-human animal studies or else in vitro, hence the guarded “potential” for now:
Potential anti-inflammatory phenolic glycosides from the medicinal plant Moringa oleifera fruits
Speaking of potential though, it has been found to also reduce neuroinflammation specifically, which is good, because not every anti-inflammatory agent does that:
Antioxidant
It was hard to find studies that talked about its antioxidant powers that didn’t also add “and this, and this, and this” because of all its knock-on benefits, for example:
❝The results indicate that this plant possesses antioxidant, hypolipidaemic and antiatherosclerotic activities and has therapeutic potential for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.
These effects were at degrees comparable to those of simvastatin.❞
~ Dr. Pilaipark Chumark et al.
Likely a lot of its benefits in these regards come from the plant’s very high quercetin content, because quercetin does that too:
Quercetin reduces blood pressure in hypertensive subjects
For more about quercetin, you might like our previous main feature:
Fight Inflammation & Protect Your Brain, With Quercetin
Antidiabetic
It also has been found to lower fasting blood sugar levels by 13.5%:
Anti-arsenic?
We put a question mark there, because studies into this have only been done with non-human animals such as mice and rats so far, largely because there are not many human volunteers willing to sign up for arsenic poisoning (and no ethics board would pass it anyway).
However, as arsenic contamination in some foods (such as rice) is a big concern, this is very promising. Here are some example studies, with mice and rats respectively:
- Protective effects of Moringa oleifera Lam. leaves against arsenic-induced toxicity in mice
- Therapeutic effects of Moringa oleifera on arsenic-induced toxicity in rats
Is it safe?
A popular food product through parts of Africa and (especially) South & West Asia, it has a very good safety profile. Generally the only health-related criticism of it is that it contains some anti-nutrients (that hinder bioavailability of its nutrients), but the nutrients outweigh the antinutrients sufficiently to render this a trifling trivium.
In short: as ever, do check with your doctor/pharmacist to be sure, but in general terms, this is about as safe as most vegan whole foods; it just happens to also be something of a superfood, which puts it into the “nutraceutical” category. See also:
Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Moringa oleifera
Want to try some?
We don’t sell it, but here for your convenience is an example product on Amazon 😎
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Hantavirus Skin Signs, Symptoms, & More
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Did you know it does these things?
When the virus is cruising, your skin may be bruising
First, what it is, besides “that virus on the news”: it’s a relatively rare group of rodent-borne RNA viruses spread mainly through inhaling aerosolized particles from infected rodent urine, droppings, or saliva, with different strains causing either hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS), which primarily affects the lungs, or hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS), which primarily affects kidneys and blood vessels.
Most infections occur when dried rodent waste is disturbed during cleaning in enclosed spaces such as barns, sheds, cabins, attics, or garages, causing contaminated dust to become airborne and inhaled, and rodent bites, scratches, contaminated food, or direct handling of nesting materials can also transmit infection.
As such, farmers, campers, construction workers, and people cleaning buildings where many rodents live—especially in rural or western US regions—face the greatest exposure risk.
Notably, hantavirus doesn’t spread easily like COVID or flu, and public health authorities continue to consider general public risk very low (at time of writing).
All that said, it’s good to know things, so:
- HPS can rapidly worsen into cough, shortness of breath, low oxygen, shock, and respiratory failure, where facial redness, petechiae, bruising, pale skin, sweating abnormalities, red eyes, or bluish-gray skin from oxygen deprivation can signal severe systemic illness.
- HFRS can cause facial flushing, petechiae (tiny red or purple bleeding spots), purpura, bruising, bleeding gums, nosebleeds, kidney problems, and widespread internal bleeding.
While infection risk is low, mortality can be around 40%, and there’s no specific antiviral cure, so treatment focuses on supportive care such as oxygen, ICU monitoring, mechanical ventilation, ECMO for lung failure, or dialysis for kidney failure.
For more on all of this plus visual illustrations, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
Take care!
Share This Post
-
Should I test for flu at home if I have the sniffles?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
You are “coming down with something”. Maybe you have a scratchy throat and body aches. You have an old, combination flu/COVID rapid antigen test in the cupboard.
Should you use it to see if you have the flu? Will it detect the “super-K” flu you’ve heard about? Or is it worth seeing a doctor for a test instead?
Here’s what to know about testing for flu at home.
Polina Tankilevitch/Pexels Remind me, how do we test for flu?
There are two main ways to test for flu.
The reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test is known as RT-PCR or, more commonly, just PCR. This is what your GP orders after taking a swab of your nose and back of the throat. This test detects viral genetic material.
But rapid antigen tests or RATs are the type you do at home. These detect particular viral proteins (antigens) in your saliva or nasal secretions.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration lists RATs currently approved in Australia to detect respiratory viruses.
You can check your test against the list. This includes tests that detect various combinations of influenza (types A and B), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus (listed as ADV) and COVID.
Which test is best?
Both types of tests have their pros and cons. So here are some things to consider.
Speed
RATs are quick and you can do them at home. Once the sample is in the device, you will generally have your result in 15–20 minutes. You won’t need to make and attend a GP appointment. An at-home test means you are also not inflicting your germs on the GP, staff or other patients in the waiting room.
A PCR test takes longer. First you have to wait for a GP appointment. Then, you may have to wait several days for the results.
Cost
The cost of both tests can differ. A combination flu/COVID RAT can cost a few dollars, less per test if you buy in packs of five or more.
You would not usually be charged for a PCR test in Australia. However, if your doctor does not bulk bill, you will have to pay an out-of-pocket fee for the medical appointment itself.
Accuracy and the super-K variant
PCR tests are more accurate than RATs, and can detect a viral infection when your viral load (the amount of virus present) is much lower that what a RAT can detect. This is because the PCR process copies a section of the viral genome many times to make it more easily detectable.
So a negative RAT is no guarantee you don’t have the flu. If your symptoms continue and you are concerned, a PCR will provide a more accurate answer.
But can RATs detect new variants of the flu virus? Fortunately, RATs detect “highly conserved” proteins. These are proteins that tend to be stable between different variants. A new variant should not interfere with the sensitivity of the RAT – its ability to correctly detect the flu.
So it’s likely that a flu RAT can detect the new H3N2 subclade K influenza variant, dubbed “super-K”, although no data have been published on this yet.
What if I’m at high risk?
People 65 or older, young children, pregnant women, and people taking immunosuppressive medications (such as, transplant recipients, or those having chemotherapy for cancer) are at greater risk of having more serious illness if they catch the flu.
In these higher-stakes situations, it might be better to see a GP as they can prescribe anti-flu drugs as a precaution.
These drugs may reduce the severity and duration of illness, and the risk of complications and hospitalisation associated with the flu.
If you decide to see your GP, let the surgery know you have symptoms. You may need to do an online consultation or wear a mask in the waiting room.
Are old RATs OK?
Before using a RAT that has been sitting in your cupboard, ensure it is within its use-by date and has been stored appropriately. If you have refrigerated the test, leave it at room temperature for about 30 minutes before using, otherwise it won’t work properly.
I’ve written previously about other do’s and don’ts of using RATs, including how to avoid sampling snot and how best to dispose of the test.
To detect flu it’s best to test within three to four days of symptoms starting. At this point the viral load will be highest and the test will be most accurate.
In a nutshell
If you have symptoms of a respiratory illness, and you want to see what you have, using a RAT is a good idea. That’s as long as the test has not expired, has been stored correctly and you are not in a high-risk group.
If it’s likely flu could be more serious for you (or someone you may be in contact with), a GP appointment may allow you to access anti-viral medications to reduce your risk of severe illness, and a PCR test would offer a more accurate diagnosis.
Thea van de Mortel, Professor Emerita, Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Share This Post
-
Darwin’s Bed Rest: Worthwhile Idea?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!
Have a question or a request? You can always hit “reply” to any of our emails, or use the feedback widget at the bottom!
In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!
As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!
So, no question/request too big or small
❝I recall that Charles Darwin (of Evolution fame) used to spend a day a month in bed in order to maintain his physical and psychological equilibrium. Do you see merit in the idea?❞
Well, it certainly sounds wonderful! Granted, it may depend on what you do in bed :p
Descartes did a lot of his work from bed (and also a surprising amount of it while hiding in an oven, but that’s another story), which was probably not so good for the health.
As for Darwin, his health was terrible in quite a lot of ways, so he may not be a great model.
However! Certainly taking a break is well-established as an important and healthful practice:
How To Rest More Efficiently (Yes, Really)
❝I don’t like to admit it but I am getting old. Recently, I had my first “fall” (ominous word!) I was walking across some wet decking and, before I knew what had happened, my feet were shooting forwards, and I crashed to the ground. Luckily I wasn’t seriously damaged. But I was wondering whether you can give us some advice about how best to fall. Maybe there are some good videos on the subject? I would like to be able to practice falling so that it doesn’t come as such a shock when it happens!❞
This writer has totally done the same! You might like our recent main feature on the topic:
…if you’ll pardon the pun
Enjoy!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Okra vs Asparagus – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing okra to asparagus, we picked the okra.
Why?
Both are great! But…
In terms of macros, okra has more fiber and carbs, making it the more nutrient dense option, for a similar glycemic index.
In the category of vitamins, okra has more of vitamins B1, B3, B6, B9, and C, while asparagus has more of vitamins B2, B5, E, K, and choline, making for a 5:5 tie, with similar margins of difference too. Thus, definitely a tie on vitamins.
When it comes to minerals, okra has more calcium, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc, while asparagus has more copper, iron, and selenium. An easy 6:3 win for okra.
Both of these on-the-cusp-of-being-pungent vegetables have beneficial antioxidant polyphenols (especially various forms of quercetin), but okra has more.
Adding up the sections makes for an overall win for okra, but by all means enjoy either both; diversity is good!
Want to learn more?
You might like to read:
Enjoy Bitter/Astringent/Pungent Foods For Your Heart & Brain
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Probiotics & Gas/Bloating
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!
Have a question or a request? We love to hear from you!
In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!
As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!
So, no question/request too big or small 😎
❝I read about probiotics and got myself some from amazon but having started them, now I have a lot of gas, is this normal?❞
As Tom Jones would say: it’s not unusual.
However, it’s also not necessary, and it is easy enough to get past!
And probiotics certainly have their place; see: How Much Difference Do Probiotic Supplements Make, Really?
What’s going on with your gas is…
We interrupt this article to bring back attention to our regular legal/medical disclaimer; please do remember that we can only speak in general health terms, cannot diagnose you, nor make any firm assurances about your health, nor prescribe treatment. What we can do is share information that we hope is educational, and if it helps you, so much the better. Always speak to your own doctor if you have concerns about your health.
Now, back to the article,,,
What’s going on with your gas is most probably what happens for a lot of people: you’ve just put a lot of bacteria into your gut, and congratulations, they survived (which is definitely not a given, more on that later, but their survival is what you wanted), and they are now thriving sufficiently that the output of their respiratory processes is tangible to you—in the form of abdominal bloating/gas.
Because your gut is a semi-closed system (literally there’s an opening at both ends, but it’s mostly quite self-contained in terms of its ecosystem, unless you have leaky gut syndrome, which is Very Bad™), this will generally fix itself within a few days at most—perhaps it even has by the time you’re reading this.
How does it fix itself you wonder? Because there’s only enough resources to sustain so many bacteria, what happens when we take a probiotic supplement (or food) is initially an overload of more bacteria than the gut can support (because unless you recently took antibiotics, the gut is pretty much always running at maximum capacity, because the bacteria there have no evolutionary reason to leave room for newcomers; they just multiply as best they can until the resources run out), and then the excess (i.e., those that are in excess of how many your gut can support) will die, and then the numbers will be back to normal.
Note: the numbers will be back to normal. However, that doesn’t mean the probiotics did nothing—what you’ve done is add diversity, and specifically, you’ve made it so that percentage-wise, you now have slightly more “good” bacteria in the balance than you did previously.
So, unless there are factors out of the ordinary: this is all usually self-correcting quite quickly.
Tips to make things go as smoothly as possible
Firstly, pay attention to recommended doses. If you take one, and think “that was delicious; I’ll have six more” then the initial effect will be a lot more than six times stronger, because of the nature of how bacteria multiply (i.e. exponentially) within minutes of reaching your gut.
Again, this will normally self-correct, but there’s no reason to cause yourself discomfort unnecessarily.
Secondly, if you take probiotics and do not get even a little gas or abdominal bloating even just a little bit, even just briefly… Then probably one of two things happened:
- The probiotics were dead on arrival (i.e. the supplement was a dud, or a “live culture” product in fact died before it got to you)
- The probiotics were fine, but your gut wasn’t prepared for them, and they died upon arrival
The latter happens a lot, especially if the current gut health is not good. What your probiotics need to survive (and bear in mind, because of their life cycle, they need this in minutes of arrival, which is their multiply-or-die-out window), is:
- Fiber, especially insoluble fiber
- In a place they can get at it (i.e. it was the most recent thing you ate, and is not several feet further down your intestines)
- Not too crowded with competitors (i.e. you just ate it, not last night)
Thus, it can be best to take probiotics on a mostly-empty stomach after enjoying a fibrous snack.
See also: What Do The Different Kinds Of Fiber Do? 30 Foods That Rank Highest
And for that matter: Stop Sabotaging Your Gut ← this covers some common probiotics mistakes/problems
If you’d rather take them on an entirely empty stomach, look for probiotic supplements that come with their own prebiotic fiber (usually inulin); these are often marketed as “symbiotics”.
We don’t sell them, but here’s an example product on Amazon for your convenience 😎
Another thing to bear in mind is that there is (unless your case is unusual) no reason to take the same kind of probiotic for more than one course (i.e. one container of however many servings it has). This is because one of two things will be the case:
- The probiotic worked, in which case, you now have thriving colonies of the bacterial species that that supplement provided
- The probiotic didn’t work, in which case, why buy that one again?
So, if supplementing with probiotics, it can be good to do so with new brand each time, with a gap in between each for your gut to get used to the new order of things.
Finally, if you’re making any drastic dietary change, likely this will result in similar gut disturbances.
In particular, if you are moving away from foods that feed C. albicans (the bad fungus that puts holes in your gut), then it will object strongly, cause you to crave sugar/flour/alcohol/etc, give you mood swings, and generally remind you that it has its roots firmly embedded in your nervous system. If that happens, don’t listen to it; it’s just its death throes and it’ll quieten down soon.
You can read more about that here:
Making Friends With Your Gut (You Can Thank Us Later)
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Wholewheat Bread vs Seeded White – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing wholewheat bread to seeded bread, we picked the wholewheat.
Why?
First, we will acknowledge that this is a false dichotomy; it is possible to have seeded wholewheat bread. However, it is very common to have wholewheat bread that isn’t seeded, and white bread that is seeded. So, it’s important to be able to decide which is the healthier option, since very often, this false dichotomy is what’s on offer.
We will also advise checking labels (or the baker, if getting from a bakery) to ensure that visibly brown bread is actually wholewheat, and not just dyed brown with caramel coloring or such (yes, that is a thing that some companies do).
Now, as for why we chose the wholewheat over the seeded white…
In terms of macronutrients, wholewheat bread has (on average; individual breads may vary of course) has 2x the protein and a lot more fiber.
Those seeds in seeded bread? They just aren’t enough to make a big impact on the overall nutritional value of the bread in those regards. Per slice, you are getting, what, 10 seeds maybe? This is not a meaningful dietary source of much.
Seeded bread does have proportionally more healthy fats, but the doses are still so low as to make it not worth the while; it just looks like a lot of expressed as a percentage of comparison, because of the wholewheat bread has trace amounts, and the seeded bread has several times those trace amounts, it’s still a tiny amount. So, we’d recommend looking to other sources for those healthy fats.
Maybe dip your bread, of whatever kind, into extra virgin olive oil, for example.
Wholewheat bread of course also has a lower glycemic index. Those seeds in seeded white bread don’t really slow it down at all, because they’re not digested until later.
Want to learn more?
You might like to read:
- Carb-Strong or Carb-Wrong?
- Level-Up Your Fiber Intake! (Without Difficulty Or Discomfort)
- Gluten: What’s The Truth?
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:








