Plant vs Animal Protein

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

Plant vs Animal Protein: Head to Head

Some people will obviously have strong ideological opinions here—for vegetarians and vegans, it’s no question, and for meat-eaters, it’s easy to be reactive to that and double-down on the bacon. But, we’re a health science newsletter, so we’ll be sticking to the science.

Which is better, healthwise?

First, it depends on how you go about it. Consider these options:

  • A piece of salmon
  • A steak
  • A hot dog
  • A hot dog, but plant-based
  • Textured soy protein (no additives)
  • Edamame (young soy) beans

Three animal-based protein sources, three plant-based. We could render the competition simple (but very unfair) by pitting the hotdog against the edamame beans, or the plant-based hot dog against the piece of salmon. So let’s kick this off by saying:

  • There are good and bad animal-based protein sources
  • There are good and bad plant-based protein sources

Whatever you choose, keep that in mind while you do. Less processed is better in either case. And if you do go for red meat, less is better, period.

Picking the healthiest from each, how do the nutritional profiles look?

They look good in both cases! One factor of importance is that in either case, our bodies will reduce the proteins we consume to their constituent amino acids, and then rebuild them into the specific proteins we actually need. Our bodies will do that regardless of the source, because we are neither a salmon nor a soybean, for example.

We need 20 specific amino acids, for our bodies to make the proteins we will use in our bodies. Of these, 9 are considered “essential”, meaning we cannot synthesize them and must get them from our diet,

Animal protein sources contain all 9 of those (just like we do). Plant based sources often don’t, individually, but by eating soy for example (which does contain them all) and/or getting multiple sources of protein from different plants, the 9 can be covered quite easily with little thought, just by having a varied diet.

Meats are #1!

  • They’re number 1 for nutritional density
  • They’re number 1 for health risks, too

So while plant-based diet adherents may need to consume more varied things to get all the nutrients necessary, meat-eaters won’t have that problem.

Meat-eaters will instead have a different problem, of more diet-related health risks, e.g.

  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Metabolic disorders
  • Cancers

So again, if eating (especially processed and/or red) meat, moderation is good. The Mediterranean Diet that we so often recommend, by default contains small amounts of lean animal protein.

Which is better for building muscle?

Assuming a broadly healthy balanced diet, and getting sufficient protein from your chosen source, they’re pretty equal:

(both studies showed that both dietary approaches yielded results that showed no difference in muscle synthesis between the two)

The bottom line is…

Healthwise, what’s more important than whether you get your protein from animals or plants is that you eat foods that aren’t processed, and are varied.

And if you want to do a suped-up Mediterranean Diet with less red meat, you might want to try:

A Pesco-Mediterranean Diet With Intermittent Fasting: JACC Review Topic of the Week

^This is from a review in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, and in few words, they recommend it very highly

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • What people with autism want you to know

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Since taking office, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made several false and misleading claims about autism. In a press conference on April 16, Kennedy said that “autism destroys families” and that children with autism “will never pay taxes, they’ll never hold a job, they’ll never play baseball, they’ll never write a poem, they’ll never go on a date.” 

    Kennedy has a history of making false claims, including the myth that vaccines are linked to autism. He also falsely claimed that autism is an “epidemic” caused by environmental toxins. Autism spectrum disorder is a brain development condition (not a disease) that affects how people socialize and communicate. It also impacts everyone differently.

    Leading organizations like The Autism Society of America say that Kennedy’s statements are harmful and stigmatizing to autistic people. To understand this further, Public Good News spoke to four people with autism about their experience and their thoughts on misconceptions about it. Here’s what they said. 

    [Editor’s note: The contents of these interviews have been edited for length and clarity.]

    McCabe (he/they) is a policy manager for the Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network, a grassroots organization of self-advocates who are autistic and gender diverse.

    I have both [attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder] and autism, which is a fairly common comorbidity. I have sensory issues: Loud noises will send me into a tailspin. 

    One of the earliest signs, when I was a very young toddler, was that if my parents tried to take me to a mall, I would have a total meltdown. It’s that echoey, loud. I do so much better if I’ve got my headphones.

    I was assigned female at birth, and like many other people assigned female at birth, my symptoms were different; they weren’t as overt for either diagnosis. I had another very common backstory where I had a whole bunch of mental health misdiagnoses. Until early adulthood, I was diagnosed as bipolar, as having absence seizures when I was instead having shutdowns. I had depression and anxiety, and it took until I was actually in law school as an older adult, after being out living on my own in the world for over a decade, to go, “Wait a second: None of this is working! Like, if it’s just anxiety that’s making it hard for me to socialize with people, then why is the anxiety medication doing nothing?” And I got some helpful diagnoses.

    It was such a relief. Being overwhelmed in the mall, I finally felt like it was okay to wear my headphones when I got into a loud, echoey space, which is not how it should be. That’s a permission I had to give myself because I had been socialized to mask so hard. 

    And I wish that wasn’t my story. I wish that was no one’s story. I wish that everyone was able to just reach for accommodations without feeling any judgment. And actually, that’s something that some of Secretary Kennedy’s statements have not been helping with lately.

    Part of the reason why the misinformation about vaccines is so harmful, aside from the fact that it’s just completely scientifically unsound, is that it paints an autism diagnosis as something so horrible that you would rather risk your child’s life than risk them having autism. 

    That devalues autistic lives. I’m not less of a person because of my autism diagnosis.

    Measuring a person’s value by their ability to contribute through taxes or sports or poetry or art—none of that is relevant. That is also devaluing human life. 

    Humans are worth their life, even if they’re not ever able to do anything, and so acting as though it is a tragedy to not be able to do something like date or have a job, it’s just devaluing, and not just to autistic people, but to anybody. 

    There are many people who don’t do any number of those things, and their lives are not tragedies, and they’re not destroying their families.

    There’s been such a focus on trying to find a cure or trying to find the cause. When you’re so focused on the biological or genetic aspect, and all the grant money is going to that, everything else gets pushed aside. 

    But as an autistic person, I’m not interested in what causes autism. If someone wants to study that, that’s cool, but I’d much rather they spend time studying best ways to train someone in the use of alternative and augmentative communication, because even though that is a lifeline for so many autistic people, most of the studies done on that have nothing to do with autism. 

    We’re not looking into things to help with sensory overwhelm or just even looking into what is the return on investment for various services and supports.

    Gardiner (he/him) is a Black, queer, and disabled community organizer and the director of policy and advocacy at the Autistic People of Color Fund, which provides microgrants to autistic people of color.

    I was diagnosed when I was around 3, back in the late 1980s, early ’90s, which is unusual for someone my age. Most people in this age bracket don’t get diagnosed until later. 

    But I was diagnosed, and so I went through special ed. And some of it was good, some of it was bad. I had applied behavior analysis (ABA), [but] a lot of it is designed to focus on making the kid look less autistic, as opposed to actually just helping people out with quality of life concerns. 

    I did get accommodations for low-noise classrooms and things like that, and I kind of grew up with a lot of shame around being autistic because my parents were super ableist and a lot of other things. I dealt with ableism at school, along with racism, and it was really hard for me to kind of make my way through school because of the bigotry, because of the ignorance, because of the lack of supports that actually matched my needs. 

    There was a strong focus on making me look less autistic, as opposed to dealing with the stuff that actually affected me, like being overloaded, being overwhelmed, being bullied by classmates, dealing with racism. 

    And I dealt with a lot of disproportionate discipline. I would get in-school suspensions because I was stressed out and having meltdowns after being bullied by kids in the sixth grade. And instead of dealing with the bullies, my teacher would send me to the office and/or have me suspended. 

    School exclusions like that are very common for disabled students of color like me. And I feel like this kind of exclusionary policy, this idea that autistic students don’t have anything to contribute, [focuses] on looking less autistic [as] opposed to improving people’s quality of life. 

    There are so many misconceptions, and it makes it harder for us to be heard. It makes it more difficult for us to get services. 

    There’s such an array of skills and abilities that people have that it’s presumptuous to assume that everyone has the same capabilities, regardless of where they lie on the spectrum. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fell into this trap of treating autism as though it’s monolithic when he said that autistic people would never be able to pay taxes or play baseball or do anything like what non-autistic people do.

    He’s not concerned about quality of life. He’s concerned about causes and the puzzle of being autistic as opposed to actually improving our quality of life and finding [out] about what happens to autistic adults. 

    I’d like to see more focus on finding accommodations that make life easier. So, for example, being able to step out if things get too noisy or finding ways to learn how to cope with social difficulties without telling people to stop flapping their hands. 

    And [support to] help them find jobs that work for them, help them find life-skill techniques that work for them, help them find communities that work for them, as opposed to just trying to mold someone into looking as though they’re not autistic.

    Get people home- and community-based services, get people comprehensive supports, get people into employment, get people into higher education, get people good mental health care. Get people food and shelter and housing. Don’t just focus on making people look less autistic. Try to improve our lives, or work with us to improve our lives.

    Risa (she/they) is not using her real name because of her employer’s policies. She’s a researcher, content creator, speaker, and trainer. 

    I was misdiagnosed with bipolar disorder as a teenager, and that’s an experience that, unfortunately, is more common among autistic women and those in other marginalized genders by society. I eventually got diagnosed as being autistic in my late 20s. 

    Once I got diagnosed and I started embracing my autistic identity, I started slowly thriving. For instance, I used to get [into] an existential crisis writing an email, and now I’m an international keynote speaker and researcher.

    I also received ABA as an adult, and my ABA therapists did agree with me that ABA may not be needed for many autistic people if society was more accepting with more support. That’s partly why these misconceptions are so devastating. 

    Some of the misconceptions that I came across before were that, if I was able to self-advocate or have friends, that I couldn’t be autistic. And I do feel like those were things that were used to justify not diagnosing me with being autistic sooner. 

    Every autistic person is unique, but I do think that there’s a lot of stereotypes. People often assume that someone with high support needs can’t have a rich or meaningful quality life. 

    I believe we need to look at ways to add more supports into society and more access to services. And also, when we’re talking about, like, the employment rate, it’s not acknowledging that for some autistic people, some of the barriers to employment have more to do with biases and the hiring process. And also, that we’re underrepresented in higher education, which is also bigger for employment.

    I’m concerned that, when we focus on autism and make certain assumptions, we’re not looking at what we can do as a society to include people more.

    Autistic lives are not tragic: We’re complex, we’re all different, we are worthy, and we deserve support and understanding.

    Javier (she/her) is a Latina mother and wife who works at an elementary school. 

    I always knew I was different, but I couldn’t pinpoint how, and I did not get diagnosed until I was an adult. 

    As a child, I was a late talker. Loud noises would overwhelm me, and if I got too hungry, I would get really hangry (more than what was normal for a kid), and I was terrified of thunderstorms, even up until late elementary school. 

    I flew under the radar. One teacher noticed I had issues, but no one else was concerned about my social issues because I was quiet and I wasn’t causing any trouble. But it’s really hard because then you get mental health issues because you don’t know why you’re different, and you get depressed and anxious. 

    Some people just say, “Oh, you don’t seem autistic,” but that’s because I’ve had to mask and work really hard to appear as neurotypical as possible. I hate having to do that. 

    But if I want to get a job in this society, I need to mask and hide some of my autistic traits. I can’t be, like, visibly stimming, or, sometimes, I might rock back and forth to calm myself down. I know I can’t do that in public because then people think that’s weird.

    And, as far as [Kennedy’s recent claims], autism is a spectrum, and so there are some people who will go on and get married or pay taxes and all these things. But also, on the other end, there are people who won’t. And the people who can’t do those things, their life is just as valuable as mine. 

    Just because I got married, I have a job, I pay taxes, I have a kid, it does not automatically mean my life is worth more. All our lives are worth the same, all our lives have meaning. It just looks different.

    This article first appeared on Public Good News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

    Share This Post

  • Accidentally Overweight – by Dr. Libby Weaver

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    This book’s main premise is that for most people who become overweight especially in midlife or later, if there wasn’t an obvious lifestyle change to precipitate this (e.g. started living on fast food for some reason), then in most cases, what’s needed is not drastic action, so much as some metabolic tweaks to correct things that have gone off-piste a little in our physiology.

    The book covers nine factors that make an impact, and how each can be managed. They are:

    1. Insulin
    2. Stress hormones
    3. Calories
    4. Thyroid function
    5. Nervous system
    6. Emotions
    7. Sex hormones
    8. Liver function
    9. Gut bacteria

    Some will be obvious, but as Dr. Weaver explains, are relative trivial compared to the others; “calories” in one such example of this “yes, it’s a factor, but very overrated” category.

    Others are things that most people don’t think too much about, like liver function. And yet, it is indeed very much critical, and a major player in metabolism and adiposity.

    The style is on the very light end of pop-science, but she does bring her professional knowledge to bear on topic (her doctorate is a PhD in biochemistry, so a lot of explanations come from that angle).

    Bottom line: if you’ve found yourself “accidentally overweight”, and would like to tip the scales back in the other direction without doing anything extreme, then this book provides the tweaks that no amount of cardio or restrictive dieting will.

    Click here to check out Accidentally Overweight, and re-adjust it back the other way!

    Share This Post

  • Pneumonia: Prevention Is Better Than Cure

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Pneumonia: What We Can & Can’t Do About It

    Pneumonia is a significant killer of persons over the age of 65, with the risk increasing with age after that, rising very sharply around the age of 85:

    QuickStats: Death Rates from Influenza and Pneumonia Among Persons Aged ≥65 Years, by Sex and Age Group

    While pneumonia is treatable, especially in young healthy adults, the risks get more severe in the older age brackets, and it’s often the case that someone goes into hospital with one thing, then develops pneumonia, which the person was already not in good physical shape to fight, because of whatever hospitalized them in the first place:

    American Lung Association | Pneumonia Treatment and Recovery

    Other risk factors besides age

    There are a lot of things that can increase our risk factor for pneumonia; they mainly fall into the following categories:

    • Autoimmune diseases
    • Other diseases of the immune system (e.g. HIV)
    • Medication-mediated immunosuppression (e.g. after an organ transplant)
    • Chronic lung diseases (e.g. asthma, COPD, Long Covid, emphysema, etc)
    • Other serious health conditions ← we know this one’s broad, but it encompasses such things as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer

    See also:

    Why Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Is More Likely Than You Think

    Things we can do about it

    When it comes to risks, we can’t do much about our age and some of the other above factors, but there are other things we can do to reduce our risk, including:

    • Get vaccinated against pneumonia if you are over 65 and/or have one of the aforementioned risk factors. This is not perfect (it only reduces the risk for certain kinds of infection) and may not be advisable for everyone (like most vaccines, it can put the body through its paces a bit after taking it), so speak with your own doctor about this, of course.
    • Avoid contagion. While pneumonia itself is not spread person-to-person, it is caused by bacteria or viruses (there are numerous kinds) that are opportunistic and often become a secondary infection when the immune system is already busy with the first one. So, if possible avoid being in confined spaces with many people, and do wash your hands regularly (as a lot of germs are transferred that way and can get into the respiratory tract because you touched your face or such).
    • If you have a cold, or flu, or other respiratory infection, take it seriously, rest well, drink fluids, get good immune-boosting nutrients. There’s no such thing as “just a cold”; not anymore.
    • Look after your general health too—health doesn’t exist in a vacuum, and nor does disease. Every part of us affects every other part of us, so anything that can be in good order, you want to be in good order.

    This last one, by the way? It’s an important reminder that while some diseases (such as some of the respiratory infections that can precede pneumonia) are seasonal, good health isn’t.

    We need to take care of our health as best we can every day along the way, because we never know when something could change.

    Want to do more?

    Check out: Seven Things To Do For Good Lung Health!

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • 4 Critical Things Female Runners Should Know

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    When it comes to keeping up performance in the face of menopause, Shona Hendricks has advice:

    Don’t let menopause run you down

    1. Prioritize recovery! Overtraining without adequate recovery just leads to decreased performance in the long term, and remember, you may not recover as quickly as you used to. If you’re still achey from your previous run, give it another day, or at least make it a lighter run.
    2. Slow down in easy and long runs! This isn’t “taking the easy way out”; it will improve your overall performance, reducing muscle damage, allowing for quicker recovery and ultimately better fitness gains.
    3. Focus on nutrition! And that means carbs too. A lot of people fighting menopausal weight gain reduce their intake of food, but without sufficient energy availability, you will not be able to run well. In particular, carbohydrates are vital for energy. Consume them sensibly and with fiber and proteins and fats rather than alone, but do consume them.
    4. Incorporate strength training! Your run is not “leg day” by itself. Furthermore, do whole-body strength training, to prevent injuries and improve overall performance. A strong core is particularly important.

    For more on each of these (and some bonus comments about mobility training for runners), enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like to read:

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Beet The Odds – by Dr. Nathan Bryan & Carolyn Pierini

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    By the same first-listed author as the book we recently reviewed about nitric oxide, this time he’s teamed up with a clinician specialized in the biochemistry of human nutrigenomics, this time to extol the virtues of beets—and we do say “beets”, since while the root (thus, beetroot) is the most-discussed part of the plant, the leaves and stalks have benefits too.

    We learn a lot about its effects on the heart and blood, and its antioxidant properties, as well as the unique properties associated with betalain and especially betanin. Lastly, unsurprisingly from this author, we also hear about beets’ benefits in the category of improving nitric oxide levels (as the plant is a good source of nitrates, which the body can use to make that).

    The style is is quite bold and colorful; there’s little hard science here, and we are not treated to sources for claims as we go along. It’s also worth noting that this book is a scant 56 pages, so, a lot more than we can fit in an article here (such as our own Beetroot For More Than Just Your Blood Pressure), but still a little lighter than we’re used to.

    There is an ad for Dr. Bryan’s beetroot powder supplements at the end.

    Bottom line: beets are great (unless you are avoiding oxalates, in which case, maybe skip them as they’re quite high in those, but for most people without kidney problems this is a non-issue), and this short, light, enthusiastic book does a fair job of explaining how they’re great.

    Click here to check out Beet The Odds, and beet the odds!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • We talk a lot about being ‘resilient’. But what does it actually mean?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    In a world with political polarisation, war, extreme weather events and increasing costs of living, we need to be able to cope as individuals and communities.

    Our capacity to cope with very real stressors in our lives – our resilience – can determine whether we thrive, just survive, or are deprived of a reasonable quality of life.

    Kinga Howard/Unsplash

    Stress vs resilience

    Resilience means having the ability to cope with, and rebound from, life’s challenges and still achieve our goals.

    Stress isn’t something to be avoided. We need to feel some stress to achieve our best. Exposure to manageable levels of stress and adversity develops our coping skills and resilience.

    But if we feel too much stress, we can flounder or become overwhelmed.

    The ability to re-activate ourselves when we feel down, fatigued or disengaged helps to optimise our focus and motivation. Sportspeople, for example, might listen to high intensity music just before a competition to increase their energy levels.

    Conversely, the ability to dampen down emotional intensity can make use feel less stressed or anxious. Exercising, listening to relaxing music, or patting a much-loved pet can prevent high arousal from interfering with completing a task.

    Effective emotion regulation is crucial for adapting to life’s ups and downs, and keeping us on a relatively even keel.

    How does resilience develop?

    Resilience emerges from interactions between personal and environmental factors.

    In addition to emotion regulation skills, personal factors that can bolster resilience include academic achievement, developing a range of skills and abilities (such as sport and music) and problem-solving skills. Many of these skills can be fostered in childhood. And if one area of life isn’t going well, we can still experience confidence, joy and meaning in others.

    Boy looks at phone while listening to music
    Sometimes we need to increase our energy levels, other times we need to lower anxiety. Ilias Chebbi/Unsplash

    People who reflect on traumatic experience and develop new positive meanings about themselves (getting through it means I’m strong!) and life (a greater appreciation) can also have higher levels of resilience.

    Genetic factors and temperament also play an important role. Some of us are born with nervous systems that respond with more anxiety than others in novel, uncertain, or potentially threatening situations. And some of us are more likely to avoid rather than approach these situations. These traits tend to be associated with lower levels of resilience. But we can all learn skills to build our resilience.

    Environmental factors that promote resilience include:

    • a nurturing home environment
    • supportive family and peer relationships
    • cultural identity, belonging and rituals
    • modelling from others overcoming hardship
    • community cohesion
    • government policies that provide social safety nets, strong education, anti-discrimination and inclusion
    • investment in facilities, spaces, services and networks that support the quality of life and wellbeing of communities.

    Can resilience be taught?

    Many factors associated with resilience are modifiable, so it stands to reason that interventions that aim to bolster them should be helpful.

    There is evidence that interventions that promote optimism, flexibility, active coping and social support-seeking can have small yet meaningful positive effects on resilience and emotional wellbeing in children and adults.

    However, school-based programs give us reason to be cautious.

    A trial across 84 schools in the United Kingdom evaluated the effectiveness of school-based mindfulness programs. More than 3,500 students aged between 11 and 13 years received ten lessons of mindfulness and a similar number did not.

    There was no evidence that mindfulness had any benefit on risk for depression, social, emotional and behavioural functioning, or wellbeing after one year. Teaching school children mindfulness at scale did not appear to bolster resilience.

    In fact, there was some evidence it did harm – and it was most harmful for students at the highest risk of depression. The intervention was not deemed to be effective or cost-effective and was not recommended by the authors.

    In another recent trial, researchers found an emotion regulation intervention with Year 8 and 9 school children was unhelpful and even harmful, although children who engaged in more home practice tended to do better.

    Girls walk across a plaza
    The evidence doesn’t support school-based resilience programs. Mitchell Luo/Unsplash

    These interventions may have failed for a number of reasons. The content may not have been delivered in a way that was sufficiently engaging, comprehensive, age-appropriate, frequent, individually tailored, or relevant to the school context. Teachers may also not be sufficiently trained in delivering these interventions for them to be effective. And students didn’t co-design the interventions.

    Regardless of the reasons, these findings suggest we need to be cautious when delivering universal interventions to all children. It may be more helpful to wait until there are early signs of excessive stress and intervening in an individualised way.

    What does this mean for resilience-building?

    Parents and schools have a role in providing children with the sense of security that gives them confidence to explore their environments and make mistakes in age-appropriate ways, and providing support when needed.

    Parents and teachers can encourage children to try to solve problems themselves before getting involved. Problem-solving attempts should be celebrated even more than success.

    Schools need to allocate their scarce resources to children most in need of practical and emotional support in non-stigmatising ways, rather than universal approaches. Most children will develop resilience without intervention programs.

    To promote resilience, schools can foster positive peer relationships, cultural identity and involvement in creative, sporting and academic pursuits. They can also highlight others’ recovery and resilience stories to demonstrate how growth can occur from adversity.

    More broadly in the community, people can work on developing their own emotion regulation skills to bolster their confidence in their ability to manage adversity.

    Think about how you can:

    • approach challenges in constructive ways
    • actively problem-solve rather than avoid challenges
    • genuinely accept failure as part of being human
    • establish healthy boundaries
    • align your behaviour with your values
    • receive social and professional support when needed.

    This will help you navigate the ebbs and flows of life in ways that support recovery and growth.

    Peter McEvoy, Professor of Clinical Psychology, Curtin University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: