Guava vs Pineapple – Which is Healthier?

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

Our Verdict

When comparing guava to pineapple, we picked the guava.

Why?

Pineapple is great, but guava just beats it in most ways:

In terms of macros, guava has nearly 4x the fiber and nearly 5x the protein, for the same carbs, giving it the notably lower glycemic index. An easy win for guava in this category.

In the category of vitamins, guava has a lot more of vitamins A, B2, B3, B5, B9, C, E, K, and choline, while pineapple has marginally more vitamin B1. Another clear win for guava.

When it comes to minerals, guava has more calcium, copper, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while pineapple has more iron and manganese. One more win for guava.

One big thing in pineapple’s favor is that it contains bromelain, which is an enzyme* found in pineapple (and only in pineapple), that has many very healthful properties, some of them unique to bromelain (and thus: unique to pineapple)

*actually a combination of enzymes, but most often referred to collectively in the singular. But when you do see it referred to as “they”, that’s what that means.

However cool that is, we think it unfair to weight it against guava winning in every other category, so we still say guava gets the overall win.

Of course, enjoy either or both; diversity is good!

Want to learn more?

You might like:

Let’s Get Fruity: Bromelain vs Inflammation & Much More

Enjoy!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Lyme Disease At-A-Glance

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    It’s Q&A Day at 10almonds!

    Have a question or a request? You can always hit “reply” to any of our emails, or use the feedback widget at the bottom!

    In cases where we’ve already covered something, we might link to what we wrote before, but will always be happy to revisit any of our topics again in the future too—there’s always more to say!

    As ever: if the question/request can be answered briefly, we’ll do it here in our Q&A Thursday edition. If not, we’ll make a main feature of it shortly afterwards!

    So, no question/request too big or small

    ❝Good info as always…was wondering if you have any recommendations for fighting Lyme disease naturally along wDr advice? Dr’s aren’t real keen on alternatives so always interested. Thanks❞

    That depends on whether we’re looking at prevention or cure!

    Prevention:

    • Try not to get bitten by Lyme-disease-carrying ticks. Boots and long socks are your friends. As are long-gauntletted gloves for gardening.
    • If you are in a high-risk area and/or engage in high-risk activities, check your body daily.
      • This is because it usually takes 36–48 hours of being attached for a tick to cause an infection
      • Obviously best if you can get a partner or close friend to help you with this, unless you have mastered some advanced pretzel positions of yoga.
    • Contrary to many folk remedies, the safest way to remove a tick is with tweezers (carefully!).
    • If you find and remove a tick, or otherwise suspect you have developed symptoms, go to your doctor immediately (not next week; today; time really counts for this).

    Cure:

    • No. Sorry. Regretfully, antibiotics are the only known effective treatment.

    However! As with almost any kind of recovery, getting good rest, including good quality sleep, will hasten things. Also sensible is reducing stress if possible, and anything that could worsen inflammation.

    Read: Beyond Supplements: The Real Immune-Boosters!

    Share This Post

  • What’s the difference between burnout and depression?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    If your summer holiday already feels like a distant memory, you’re not alone. Burnout – a state of emotional, physical and mental exhaustion following prolonged stress – has been described in workplaces since a 5th century monastery in Egypt.

    Burnout and depression can look similar and are relatively common conditions. It’s estimated that 30% of the Australian workforce is feeling some level of burnout, while almost 20% of Australians are diagnosed with depression at some point in their lives.

    So what’s the difference between burnout and depression?

    Burnout is marked by helplessness and depression by hopelessness. They can have different causes and should also be managed differently.

    Yuri A/Shutterstock

    What is burnout?

    The World Health Organization defines burnout as an “occupational phenomenon” resulting from excessively demanding workload pressures. While it is typically associated with the workplace, carers of children or elderly parents with demanding needs are also at risk.

    Our research created a set of burnout symptoms we captured in the Sydney Burnout Measure to assist self-diagnosis and clinicians undertaking assessments. They include:

    • exhaustion as the primary symptom
    • brain fog (poor concentration and memory)
    • difficulty finding pleasure in anything
    • social withdrawal
    • an unsettled mood (feeling anxious and irritable)
    • impaired work performance (this may be result of other symptoms such as fatigue).

    People can develop a “burning out” phase after intense work demands over only a week or two. A “burnout” stage usually follows years of unrelenting work pressure.

    What is depression?

    A depressive episode involves a drop in self-worth, increase in self-criticism and feelings of wanting to give up. Not everyone with these symptoms will have clinical depression, which requires a diagnosis and has an additional set of symptoms.

    Clinically diagnosed depression can vary by mood, how long it lasts and whether it comes back. There are two types of clinical depression:

    1. melancholic depression has genetic causes, with episodes largely coming “out of the blue”
    2. non-melancholic depression is caused by environmental factors, often triggered by significant life events which cause a drop in self-worth.

    When we created our burnout measure, we compared burnout symptoms with these two types of depression.

    Burnout shares some features with melancholic depression, but they tend to be general symptoms, such as feeling a loss of pleasure, energy and concentration skills.

    We found there were more similarities between burnout and non-melancholic (environmental) depression. This included a lack of motivation and difficulties sleeping or being cheered up, perhaps reflecting the fact both have environmental causes.

    Looking for the root cause

    The differences between burnout and depression become clearer when we look at why they happen.

    Personality comes into play. Our work suggests a trait like perfectionism puts people at a much higher risk of burnout. But they may be less likely to become depressed as they tend to avoid stressful events and keep things under control.

    A mother feeling overwhelmed with a toddler.
    Excessive workloads can contribute to burnout. tartanparty/Shutterstock

    Those with burnout generally feel overwhelmed by demands or deadlines they can’t meet, creating a sense of helplessness.

    On the other hand, those with depression report lowered self-esteem. So rather than helpless they feel that they and their future is hopeless.

    However it is not uncommon for someone to experience both burnout and depression at once. For example, a boss may place excessive work demands on an employee, putting them at risk of burnout. At the same time, the employer may also humiliate that employee and contribute to an episode of non-melancholic depression.

    What can you do?

    A principal strategy in managing burnout is identifying the contributing stressors. For many people, this is the workplace. Taking a break, even a short one, or scheduling some time off can help.

    Australians now have the right to disconnect, meaning they don’t have to answer work phone calls or emails after hours. Setting boundaries can help separate home and work life.

    Burnout can be also be caused by compromised work roles, work insecurity or inequity. More broadly, a dictatorial organisational structure can make employees feel devalued. In the workplace, environmental factors, such as excessive noise, can be a contributor. Addressing these factors can help prevent burnout.

    As for managing symptoms, the monks had the right idea. Strenuous exercise, meditation and mindfulness are effective ways to deal with everyday stress.

    Woman running with dog in a park.
    Regular exercise can help manage symptoms of burnout. alexei_tm/Shutterstock

    Deeper contributing factors, including traits such as perfectionism, should be managed by a skilled clinical psychologist.

    For melancholic depression, clinicians will often recommend antidepressant medication.

    For non-melancholic depression, clinicians will help address and manage triggers that are the root cause. Others will benefit from antidepressants or formal psychotherapy.

    While misdiagnosis between depression and burnout can occur, burnout can mimic other medical conditions such as anemia or hypothyroidism.

    For the right diagnosis, it’s best to speak to your doctor or clinician who should seek to obtain a sense of “the whole picture”. Only then, once a burnout diagnosis has been affirmed and other possible causes ruled out, should effective support strategies be put in place.

    If this article has raised issues for you, or if you’re concerned about someone you know, call Lifeline on 13 11 14.

    Correction: This article originally stated that depression is marked by helplessness and burnout by hopelessness, when in fact it is vice versa. This has been amended.

    Gordon Parker, Scientia Professor of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Share This Post

  • The Surprising Supplement (Not A Vitamin/Mineral!) That Makes The COVID Vaccine Work Better

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Vaccines are great! They’re not a panacea and they absolutely have their limitations, but they also save many millions of lives per year, so that’s a big win.

    However, those limitations do mean that whenever we can find a way to make them work better, it’s very positive news.

    And that’s what we have for you today:

    Spermidine to the rescue!

    We’ve written about polyamines before, and their role in healthy longevity, for example: Spermidine For Longevity

    And, for that matter: Spermine vs Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s! ← note that spermine is not the same thing as spermidine, but they are related, being both polyamines with overlapping roles

    Firstly, we need to understand what polyamines do in healthy cells: polyamines act as “geroprotectors” by stimulating autophagy*, the cellular recycling process, primarily through activation of a specific protein (known to its friends by the snappy name of “eIF5A1”), which supports mitochondrial function and healthy aging.

    *We wrote about this here: Fisetin: The Anti-Aging Assassin ← so-called because it works by killing the aging cells that need to die sooner rather than later if aging is not to be exacerbated by copying their mistakes forwards (fisetin is not a polyamine, but the principle is the same, making the afore-linked article a good explainer).

    More recently, researchers (Dr. Ghada Alsaleh et al., whence our featured image for this article today) conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial involving 40 healthy adults aged 65 or older to test whether 6mg of daily spermidine for 13 weeks after their latest vaccine dose could improve immune responses.

    The results, in few words: spermidine supplementation significantly improved several measures of vaccine-induced immunity, including:

    • Greater neutralizing antibody activity against multiple viral variants
    • Higher levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG antibodies
    • Stronger memory B-cell recall responses

    As for how it achieved this, lab analyses showed that spermidine:

    • Increased autophagic activity in B-cells, helping remove damaged cellular components
    • Reduced markers of immune cell senescence, including elevated p16, mTOR signaling, and DNA damage (γ-H2AX)
    • Increased expression of genes involved in autophagy and the transcription factor TFEB

    In other words: aging of the immune system (immunosenescence) reduces the effectiveness of vaccines in some older adults by impairing B-cell and T-cell function, increasing DNA damage, reducing autophagy (the cell’s recycling system), and promoting cellular senescence—and spermidine does the opposites of most of these things!

    That said, it’s worth noting that it’s early days, research-wise;

    ❝This study was designed as a pilot trial and involved a relatively small number of participants. Larger studies will be needed to determine whether spermidine can consistently improve vaccine responses and whether similar effects are seen with other vaccines, such as those used against seasonal influenza.❞

    ~ Dr. Katja Simon, co-author

    You can read the paper itself, here: Spermidine Mitigates Immune Cell Senescence and Boosts Vaccine Responses in Healthy Older Adults—A Pilot Study

    Want to try some?

    We don’t sell it, but here for your convenience is an example product on Amazon 😎

    Want to learn more?

    Check out:

    How To Triple Your Chances Of Getting The “Razorblade Throat” COVID Variant Or Long COVID

    And if for any reason the above is not actually a goal you have, then you might also consider:

    Why Some People Get Sick More (And How To Not Be One Of Them)

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Measles cases are surging globally. Should children be vaccinated earlier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Measles has been rising globally in recent years. There were an estimated 10.3 million cases worldwide in 2023, a 20% increase from 2022.

    Outbreaks are being reported all over the world including in the United States, Europe and the Western Pacific region (which includes Australia). For example, Vietnam has reportedly seen thousands of cases in 2024 and 2025.

    In Australia, 77 cases of measles have been recorded in the first five months of 2025, compared with 57 cases in all of 2024.

    Measles cases in Australia are almost all related to international travel. They occur in travellers returning from overseas, or are contracted locally after mixing with an infected traveller or their contacts.

    Measles most commonly affects children and is preventable with vaccination, given in Australia in two doses at 12 and 18 months old. But in light of current outbreaks globally, is there a case for reviewing the timing of measles vaccinations?

    EyeEm Mobile GmbH/Getty Images

    Some measles basics

    Measles is caused by a virus belonging to the genus Morbillivirus. Symptoms include a fever, cough, runny nose and a rash. While it presents as a mild illness in most cases, measles can lead to severe disease requiring hospitalisation, and even death. Large outbreaks can overwhelm health systems.

    Measles can have serious health consequences, such as in the brain and the immune system, years after the infection.

    Measles spreads from person to person via small respiratory droplets that can remain suspended in the air for two hours. It’s highly contagious – one person with measles can spread the infection to 12–18 people who aren’t immune.

    Because measles is so infectious, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends two-dose vaccination coverage above 95% to stop the spread and achieve “herd immunity”.

    Low and declining vaccine coverage, especially since the COVID pandemic, is driving global outbreaks.

    When are children vaccinated against measles?

    Newborn babies are generally protected against measles thanks to maternal antibodies. Maternal antibodies get passed from the mother to the baby via the placenta and in breast milk, and provide protection against infections including measles.

    The WHO advises everyone should receive two doses of measles vaccination. In places where there’s a lot of measles circulating, children are generally recommended to have the first dose at around nine months old. This is because it’s expected maternal antibodies would have declined significantly in most infants by that age, leaving them vulnerable to infection.

    If maternal measles antibodies are still present, the vaccine is less likely to produce an immune response.

    Research has also shown a measles vaccine given at less than 8.5 months of age can result in an antibody response which declines more quickly. This might be due to interference with maternal antibodies, but researchers are still trying to understand the reasons for this.

    A second dose of the vaccine is usually given 6–9 months later. A second dose is important because about 10–15% of children don’t develop antibodies after the first vaccine.

    In settings where measles transmission is under better control, a first dose is recommended at 12 months of age. Vaccination at 12 months compared with nine months is considered to generate a stronger, longer-lasting immune response.

    In Australia, children are routinely given the measles-mumps- rubella (MMR) vaccine at 12 months and the measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV, with “varicella” being chickenpox) vaccine at 18 months.

    Babies at higher risk of catching the disease can also be given an additional early dose. In Australia, this is recommended for infants as young as six months when there’s an outbreak or if they’re travelling overseas to a high-risk setting.

    A new study looking at measles antibodies in babies

    A recent review looked at measles antibody data from babies under nine months old living in low- and middle-income countries. The review combined the results from 20 studies, including more than 8,000 babies. The researchers found that while 81% of newborns had maternal antibodies to measles, only 30% of babies aged four months had maternal antibodies.

    This study suggests maternal antibodies to measles decline much earlier than previously thought. It raises the question of whether the first dose of measles vaccine is given too late to maximise infants’ protection, especially when there’s a lot of measles around.

    Should we bring the measles vaccine forward in Australia?

    All of the data in this study comes from low- and middle-income countries, and might not reflect the situation in Australia where we have much higher vaccine coverage for measles, and very few cases.

    Australia’s coverage for two doses of the MMR vaccine at age two is above 92%.

    Although this is lower than the optimal 95%, the overall risk of measles surging in Australia is relatively low.

    Nonetheless, there may be a case for broadening the age at which an early extra dose of the measles vaccine can be given to children at higher risk. In New Zealand, infants as young as four months can receive a measles vaccine before travelling to an endemic country.

    But the current routine immunisation schedule in Australia is unlikely to change.

    Adding an extra dose to the schedule would be costly and logistically difficult. Lowering the age for the first dose may have some advantages in certain settings, and doesn’t pose any safety concerns, but further evidence would be required to support this change. In particular, research is needed to ensure it wouldn’t negatively affect the longer-term protection that vaccination offers from measles.

    Making sure you’re protected

    In the meantime, ensuring high levels of measles vaccine coverage with two doses is a global priority.

    People born after 1966 are recommended to have two doses of measles vaccine. This is because those born before the mid-1960s likely caught measles as children (when the vaccine was not yet available) and would therefore have natural immunity.

    If you’re unsure about your vaccination status, you can check this through the Australian Immunisation Register. If you don’t have a documented record, ask your doctor for advice.

    Catch-up vaccination is available under the National Immunisation Program.

    Meru Sheel, Associate Professor, Infectious Diseases, Immunisation and Emergencies (IDIE) Group, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney and Anita Heywood, Associate Professor, School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • The Alcohol Experiment – by Annie Grace

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We previously reviewed this author’s “This Naked Mind”, which explored the psychological and sociological aspects of alcohol addiction, or rather, how such factors funnel us to drinking in the first place.

    This time, it’s more about the practical side of things, though there’s plenty of science here too; it just not the emphasis. Instead, the focus is on understanding what has been going wrong, and fixing it, with tools that are presented one at a time and added to the reader’s toolbox as we go.

    You may be wondering: does this mean you need to be committed to stopping drinking? And the answer is no, except for these 30 days. It’s written for people who are of two minds about alcohol; who want to drink less but also feel deprived or upset if you abstain, or people who drink mostly out of habit or boredom, or to self-medicate against stress, for example.

    For those who like to be guided through things step-by-step, that’s what the author offers here, with a chapter and journal prompt for each day of the 30-day challenge.

    Bottom line: if the above describes you or a loved one, then this book can help.

    Click here to check out The Alcohol Experiment, and find your way forwards!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Asparagus vs Carrots – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing asparagus to carrots, we picked the asparagus.

    Why?

    In terms of macros, they’re fairly comparable: asparagus has more protein (but the numbers are small), while carrots have very slightly more fiber, and somewhat more carbs, but again, it’s not much. The glycemic indices also being comparable, we’re calling this round a tie, but feel free to swing it one way or the other if you have strong subjective feelings about those small macro differences.

    When it comes to vitamins, asparagus has more of vitamins B1, B2, B7, B9, E, K, and choline, while carrots have more of vitamins A and B6. While carrots are admittedly one of the best sources of vitamin A in existence, there is only so far that can take a vegetable, and we say asparagus wins on strength of numbers (and by large margins on each of those vitamins, too).

    In the category of minerals, asparagus has more copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, selenium, and zinc, while carrots have more calcium and potassium. Another win for asparagus.

    Looking at polyphenols, asparagus has a greater total mass of polyphenols (mostly quercetin), while carrots have more diversity, but mostly tiny numbers. We’d call this a win for asparagus, but an argument could be made for a tie in this category.

    Adding up the sections makes for an overall win for asparagus, but by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    Fight Inflammation & Protect Your Brain, With Quercetin

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: