
Artichoke vs Broccoli – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing artichoke to broccoli, we picked the artichoke.
Why?
Both have their strengths, and it was close! But…
In terms of macros, artichoke has about 2x the fiber (which is lots, because broccoli is already good for this) and more protein, for only slightly more carbs, making it the nutrient dense choice in all respects, and especially in the case of fiber.
In the category of vitamins, artichoke has more of vitamins B3, B9, and choline, while broccoli has more of vitamins A, B2, B5, B6, C, E, and K, thus winning this round.
When it comes to minerals, artichoke has more copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc, while broccoli has more calcium and selenium, handing artichoke the win again here.
Looking at polyphenols, both have an abundance; artichoke has more by total mass (in terms of mg/100g) and is especially rich in luteolin and phenolic acids, but broccoli has some that artichoke doesn’t have (such as quercetin and kaempferol). We could reasonably call this a tie or a win for artichoke on strength of numbers; either way, it doesn’t change the end result:
Adding up the sections makes for an overall win for artichoke, but of course, by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
5 Exercises You Shouldn’t Do With Osteoporosis
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Can you guess what they are?
Hold up a little…
Per Dr. Lisa Moore, anyone with osteoporosis or osteopenia should avoid movements that stress the spine in risky ways, for example:
- Sit-ups: avoid because they round your spine into flexion, increasing pressure on your vertebrae
- Crunches: avoid all variations (floor, ball, side) because repeated spinal rounding raises fracture risk
- Forceful pelvic tilts: avoid aggressive ab squeezing that flattens your lower back, as it mimics spinal flexion under load
- Russian twists: avoid because rapid, weighted rotation adds excessive torque to your spine
- Forward folds: avoid repeated spinal rounding in yoga or Pilates, including seated forward bends and lateral bending
- Jefferson curls: avoid because loaded spinal flexion (rolling down and up with weight) places high stress on weakened vertebrae
Instead, she recommends to focus on isometric exercises such as planks, using forearm, full, side, or hover planks to train your core without spinal movement.
The general idea is to brace your core with a neutral pelvis instead of moving your spine. And when it comes to hip-hinging, she recommends to bend forwards from your hips with a long spine, rather than rounding your back.
Indeed, in the video she cites a study that found the following correlations:
- Flexion exercises: 89% fracture rate
- Combined flexion/extension: 53% fracture rate
- Extension exercises: 16% fracture rate
- No exercise: 67% fracture rate
…which seems a fairly strong argument for extension exercises and not flexion exercises!
For more on all of this plus visual demonstrations, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
Osteoporosis & Exercises: Which To Do (And Which To Avoid) ← for our main feature on this topic
Take care!
Share This Post
-
Health Shots − by Toby Amidor
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
First a quick note on qualifications: while not a doctor, she’s a RD, CDN, FAND, and as such, this is a very nutrition-focused book.
As a general rule of thumb, juices are unhealthy because of being largely liquid sugar and no fiber, but in this case:
- even the juice-based tonics are very small portions, so even if some have a high glycemic index, they’ll still have a low glycemic load, which means that having one is unlikely to spike blood glucose and thus insulin
- many of the tonics have fiber in any case, due to how they are made.
The tonics are divided into sections per what one wants to focus on, e.g. anti-inflammatory, brain health, sleep, gut health, skin/nails/hair, etc.
That said, some of the recipes are a little optimistic about how much effect the dosage present will have. For example, we calculate an an average of 0.03mg of resveratrol in her grape-based shot boasting resveratrol benefits. For contrast, resveratrol supplements range from 500mg to 200mg. So, to get the equivalent of the least generous supplement, you’d need to drink 16,667 shots.
Bottom line: some of the the health claims in this book are overstated, but by and large, it’s hard to go wrong consuming more plants, and these “health shots” are not a bad way to get a good dose of phytonutrients without hitting glycemic problems.
Share This Post
-
Bamboo Shoots vs Celeriac – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing bamboo shoots to celeriac, we picked the bamboo.
Why?
In terms of macros, bamboo has more fiber and protein, while celeriac has more carbs; an easy first-round win for bamboo.
In the category of vitamins, bamboo has more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, E, and celeriac has more of vitamins B3, B5, B9, C, and K, for a 5:5 tie in this round.
Looking at minerals, bamboo has more copper, manganese, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while celeriac has more calcium, iron, magnesium, and phosphorus, giving bamboo a modest 5:4 win in this round.
Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for bamboo, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
Don’t Be Bamboozled By Bamboo! ← including how to eat bamboo, for those unfamiliar with such, as we have been asked about it 🙂
Enjoy!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Cut Back Pain Risk By 24% With This Norwegian Habit
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Back pain is quite a pain. However, a team of Norwegian researchers (Dr. Anne Nordstoga et al.) have investigated the effect of a popular Norwegian pastime:
Spasetur.
Or rusletur.
Or if you’re feeling extra casual about it, maybe slentrende rusler.
Or perhaps just simply vandring.
Or in plain English: walking!
Here be science
Lest that seem unduly built-up with dramatic tension for something so simple as walking, don’t worry, there is more to be said too, because the research shone light on what the most important aspect of walking is, when it comes not just to health in general, but also the reduction of back pain incidence specifically.
- Is it about distance?
- Time spent walking?
- Walking speed?
- Weight carried?
- Something else?
This study focused on amount and intensity, including taking both factors into account at once.
For example, perhaps one person walks quickly but for less time, while another takes longer to do the same walk. Whose walk was best for their back? The person who walked more briskly, or the one who walked for more time?
Dr. Nordstoga and her team found that walking more and at a higher average intensity both lowered the risk of developing chronic low back pain, but that the most impactful factor was time spent walking, even when adjustments were made for “metabolic equivalent time” (MET), i.e. taking into account that a person walking quickly enough to get attain a higher percentage of their maximum heartrate is doing the metabolic equivalent of walking for longer. Not even this could make walking more quickly compare positively to simply walking more.
Looking at data from 11,194 people participating in the Trøndelag Health Study, they found, category by category,
Walking volume: compared to people walking less than 78 minutes per day:
- 78–100 minutes daily: 13% lower risk
- 101–124 minutes daily: 23% lower risk
- 125+ minutes daily: 24% lower risk
Walking intensity: compared to people walking at less than 3.00 MET per minute (very easy pace):
- 3.00–3.11 MET/min: 15% lower risk
- 3.12–3.26 MET/min: 18% lower risk
- 3.27+ MET/min: 18% lower risk
Adjusted results: even when accounting for both volume and intensity together, walking volume remained strongly protective, while intensity mattered less
You can find the study itself, here: Volume and Intensity of Walking and Risk of Chronic Low Back Pain
You may be wondering: “I thought we were supposed to get 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week; who has time for 125+ minutes of walking per day?”
And the answer is: “moderate” exercise isn’t what’s being counted here, as (per the paper), what was counted was slow, moderate, or brisk walking. In other words, the “slow” counted too, and your accelerometer (i.e. the device measuring your walking habits) neither knows nor cares whether you were only walking around your house doing housework, it’ll add it to the total.
In summary: if you’d like to reduce your lower back pain risk by 24%, then not only should you get walking if you reasonably can, but also, when you do, it can be good to take your time strolling casually!
Want to learn more?
Some extra things you might want to bear in mind:
- How To Walk Away From Alzheimer’s
- Can “Light Activity” Really Help Against Osteoporosis?
- What Your Fitness Tracker Is Best & Worst At
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
What happens when I stop taking a drug like Ozempic or Mounjaro?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Hundreds of thousands of people worldwide are taking drugs like Ozempic to lose weight. But what do we actually know about them? This month, The Conversation’s experts explore their rise, impact and potential consequences.
Drugs like Ozempic are very effective at helping most people who take them lose weight. Semaglutide (sold as Wegovy and Ozempic) and tirzepatide (sold as Zepbound and Mounjaro) are the most well known in the class of drugs that mimic hormones to reduce feelings of hunger.
But does weight come back when you stop using it?
The short answer is yes. Stopping tirzepatide and semaglutide will result in weight regain in most people.
So are these medications simply another (expensive) form of yo-yo dieting? Let’s look at what the evidence shows so far.
It’s a long-term treatment, not a short course
If you have a bacterial infection, antibiotics will help your body fight off the germs causing your illness. You take the full course of medication, and the infection is gone.
For obesity, taking tirzepatide or semaglutide can help your body get rid of fat. However it doesn’t fix the reasons you gained weight in the first place because obesity is a chronic, complex condition. When you stop the medications, the weight returns.
Perhaps a more useful comparison is with high blood pressure, also known as hypertension. Treatment for hypertension is lifelong. It’s the same with obesity. Medications work, but only while you are taking them. (Though obesity is more complicated than hypertension, as many different factors both cause and perpetuate it.)
Obesity drugs only work while you’re taking them. KK Stock/Shutterstock Therefore, several concurrent approaches are needed; taking medication can be an important part of effective management but on its own, it’s often insufficient. And in an unwanted knock-on effect, stopping medication can undermine other strategies to lose weight, like eating less.
Why do people stop?
Research trials show anywhere from 6% to 13.5% of participants stop taking these drugs, primarily because of side effects.
But these studies don’t account for those forced to stop because of cost or widespread supply issues. We don’t know how many people have needed to stop this medication over the past few years for these reasons.
Understanding what stopping does to the body is therefore important.
So what happens when you stop?
When you stop using tirzepatide or semaglutide, it takes several days (or even a couple of weeks) to move out of your system. As it does, a number of things happen:
- you start feeling hungry again, because both your brain and your gut no longer have the medication working to make you feel full
When you stop taking it, you feel hungry again. Stock-Asso/Shutterstock - blood sugars increase, because the medication is no longer acting on the pancreas to help control this. If you have diabetes as well as obesity you may need to take other medications to keep these in an acceptable range. Whether you have diabetes or not, you may need to eat foods with a low glycemic index to stabilise your blood sugars
- over the longer term, most people experience a return to their previous blood pressure and cholesterol levels, as the weight comes back
- weight regain will mostly be in the form of fat, because it will be gained faster than skeletal muscle.
While you were on the medication, you will have lost proportionally less skeletal muscle than fat, muscle loss is inevitable when you lose weight, no matter whether you use medications or not. The problem is, when you stop the medication, your body preferentially puts on fat.
Is stopping and starting the medications a problem?
People whose weight fluctuates with tirzepatide or semaglutide may experience some of the downsides of yo-yo dieting.
When you keep going on and off diets, it’s like a rollercoaster ride for your body. Each time you regain weight, your body has to deal with spikes in blood pressure, heart rate, and how your body handles sugars and fats. This can stress your heart and overall cardiovascular system, as it has to respond to greater fluctuations than usual.
Interestingly, the risk to the body from weight fluctuations is greater for people who are not obese. This should be a caution to those who are not obese but still using tirzepatide or semaglutide to try to lose unwanted weight.
How can you avoid gaining weight when you stop?
Fear of regaining weight when stopping these medications is valid, and needs to be addressed directly. As obesity has many causes and perpetuating factors, many evidence-based approaches are needed to reduce weight regain. This might include:
- getting quality sleep
- exercising in a way that builds and maintains muscle. While on the medication, you will likely have lost muscle as well as fat, although this is not inevitable, especially if you exercise regularly while taking it
Prioritise building and maintaining muscle. EvMedvedeva/Shutterstock - addressing emotional and cultural aspects of life that contribute to over-eating and/or eating unhealthy foods, and how you view your body. Stigma and shame around body shape and size is not cured by taking this medication. Even if you have a healthy relationship with food, we live in a culture that is fat-phobic and discriminates against people in larger bodies
- eating in a healthy way, hopefully continuing with habits that were formed while on the medication. Eating meals that have high nutrition and fibre, for example, and lower overall portion sizes.
Many people will stop taking tirzepatide or semaglutide at some point, given it is expensive and in short supply. When you do, it is important to understand what will happen and what you can do to help avoid the consequences. Regular reviews with your GP are also important.
Read the other articles in The Conversation’s Ozempic series here.
Natasha Yates, General Practitioner, PhD Candidate, Bond University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Eat More, Live Well – by Dr. Megan Rossi
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Often, eating healthily can feel restrictive. Don’t eat this, skip that, eliminate the other. Where is the joy?
Dr. Megan Rossi brings a scientific angle on positive dieting, that is to say, looking at what to add, rather than what to subtract. Now, the idea isn’t to have sugar-laden chocolate cake with berries on top and call it a net positive because of the berries, though. Rather, Dr. Rossi lays out how to include as many diverse vegetables and fruits as possible, with tasty recipes so that we’re too busy with those to crave junk food.
Speaking of recipes, there are 80, and they are easy to follow. She describes them as “plant-based”, and by this what she really means is “plant-centric” or such; she does include the use of some animal products.
This is important to note, because general convention is to use “plant-based” to mean functionally vegan, but being about the food rather than the ideology; a relevant distinction in both society and science. In the case of this book, it’s neither, but it is very healthy.
Bottom line: if you’d like to introduce more healthy diversity to your diet, rather than eating the same three fruits and five vegetables, but you’re not sure how, this book will get you where you need to be.
Click here to check out Eat More, Live Well, and diversify your diet!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:










