Dr. Dean Ornish’s Program For Reversing Heart Disease – by Dr. Dean Ornish

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

We’ve previously reviewed Dr. Ornish’s “Undo It!” which is about reversing many kinds of chronic diseases (not all, alas, but quite a few) by undercutting their common etiologies, such as inflammation, insulin resistance, and so forth.

This book is entirely consistent with that one, but the focus here is (as the title says) specifically on reversing heart disease.

Of course, it does not require you to already have heart disease—if you do, well, getting onto this is better sooner than later. If you don’t, and are “merely” in a risk zone, or even just want to be proactive about your heart health, then this book will stand you in good stead.

The book covers all the lifestyle things you’d expect it to (especially diet, but also exercise, and not just “quit smoking” but also how, things like that), and possibly some things you might not expect (chapters on more psychological factors that have a big impact on heart health).

There are recipes (157 pages of them; they are plant-based and good) and there is a 21-day meal plan to get you going.

The style is a little dated (written in the 90s), but the content doesn’t suffer for it, having been updated over the years in any case.

Bottom line: if you want a holistic approach to taking care of your heart that’s not extreme and/but is very effective, then well, you’ve found it.

Click here to check out Dr. Dean Ornish’s Program For Reversing Heart Disease, and reverse heart disease!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Cooling Bulgarian Tarator

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    The “Bulgarian” qualifier is important here because the name “tarator” is used to refer to several different dishes from nearby-ish countries, and they aren’t the same. Today’s dish (a very healthy and deliciously cooling cucumber soup) isn’t well-known outside of Bulgaria, but it should be, and with your help we can share it around the world. It’s super-easy and takes only about 10 minutes to prepare:

    You will need

    • 1 large cucumber, cut into small (¼” x ¼”) cubes or small (1″ x ⅛”) batons (the size is important; any smaller and we lose texture; any larger and we lose the balance of the soup, and also make it very different to eat with a spoon)
    • 2 cups plain unsweetened yogurt (your preference what kind; live-cultured of some kind is best, and yes, vegan is fine too)
    • 1½ cup water, chilled but not icy (fridge-temperature is great)
    • ½ cup chopped walnuts (substitutions are not advised; omit if allergic)
    • ½ bulb garlic, minced
    • 3 tbsp fresh dill, chopped
    • 2 tbsp extra virgin olive oil
    • 1 tsp black pepper, coarse ground
    • ½ tsp MSG* or 1 tsp low-sodium salt

    Method

    (we suggest you read everything at least once before doing anything)

    1) Mix the cucumber, garlic, 2 tbsp of the dill, oil, MSG-or-salt and pepper in a big bowl

    2) Add the yogurt and mix it in too

    3) Add the cold water slowly and stir thoroughly; it may take a minute to achieve smooth consistency of the liquid—it should be creamy but thin, and definitely shouldn’t stand up by itself

    4) Top with the chopped nuts, and the other tbsp of dill as a garnish

    5) Serve immediately, or chill in the fridge until ready to serve. It’s perfect as a breakfast or a light lunch, by the way.

    Enjoy!

    Want to learn more?

    For those interested in some of the science of what we have going on today:

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Can You Pass This 60-Second Muscle Test? (Most Over-50s Fail)

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Will Harlow, the over-50s specialist physio, gives us a challenge:

    It’s time to get a grip

    Grip strength reflects overall muscle health and, per a large body of evidence, is linked in research to independence, functional ability, and lower mortality risk.

    Difficulty opening jars, dropping objects, or struggling with shopping can indicate declining grip and total-body strength, but there’s a more objective test than that:

    • 50% carry test: hold roughly 25% of your body weight in each hand (so, 50% in total) and walk for 60 seconds to assess whole-body and grip strength.
    • 50+ benchmark: aim to carry 50% of your body weight total for at least 30 seconds comfortably, and struggling early or failing due to grip is a fail for now.

    What to not do (because it’s a common mistake): isolated grip tools don’t rebuild meaningful strength, because the body functions as an integrated system. Guess what happens if you have a integrated system of which one part is well-trained? That’s right, it fails, because one part can’t do it by itself.

    To give a practical example: if you are just using squeezy grippers to train strength, any benefits you gain will vanish the instant you need to grip something at a different angle, or while rotating it in a certain way, or while slightly off-balance, or if it is a slightly different shape or weight distribution, or or or… You get the idea.

    So, for functional strength that covers most bases:

    1. Reverse curl and press: lift dumbbells with your palms down to shoulder height, press overhead, then return under control to strengthen your forearms and upper body together.
    2. Towel wringing: twist a rolled towel tightly and hold for 5 seconds in each direction to train your grip, wrists, and forearms in a functional pattern.
    3. Farmer’s walk: walk with moderately challenging weights (about 15% of your body weight per hand) for 20–60 seconds to build grip, posture, core stability, and full-body strength.

    As for how what to expect, consistent practice two or three times per week can noticeably improve strength and function within 6–8 weeks.

    For more on all of this plus visual demonstrations, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like:

    10 Tips To Build Muscle Without Weights

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Will knee injections help your osteoarthritis? Here’s what the evidence says

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Knee osteoarthritis is a complex disease that affects the whole joint, including bone, cartilage, ligaments and muscles. Osteoarthritis is a common cause of pain and movement difficulty, affecting 8.3% of people in Australia.

    When pain persists, many people look for quick, convenient options, such as injections. Clinics offer several types of knee injections, including:

    • corticosteroids
    • hyaluronic acid
    • platelet-rich plasma
    • stem cells.

    Some are heavily marketed with promises to “repair” or “regenerate” the joint. But what does the evidence actually say about these claims, or the ability of knee injections to reduce pain and improve mobility?

    Corticosteroid injections

    Corticosteroids are anti-inflammatory medications that can reduce pain and swelling in the joint.

    They are conditionally recommended in guidelines because they can be helpful for short-term relief, particularly during a flare-up.

    However, a 2024 systematic review found meaningful benefits only in the first few weeks. They lose their effectiveness after about six weeks.

    There are also some concerns about repeated use. One trial found corticosteroid injections every three months over two years did not improve pain, and were associated with greater cartilage loss than a placebo.

    For this reason, guidelines recommend using corticosteroid injections cautiously for short-term relief rather than ongoing treatment.

    Hyaluronic acid injections

    Hyaluronic acid is a substance naturally found in joint fluid. These injections aim to improve “lubrication” or “shock absorption” within the joint.

    While this may sound promising, a large systematic review found the benefits are small and unlikely to be meaningful. There was also a higher risk of serious adverse events compared to placebo.

    Because of this, guidelines do not recommend these injections for knee osteoarthritis.

    Platelet-rich plasma injections

    Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections use a person’s own blood, which is processed to concentrate platelets and then injected into the joint.

    As platelets contain growth factors, chemicals that help signal the body to heal tissue, the idea is they may help repair the joint.

    These injections are widely marketed but expensive: typically A$300–$900 per injection, or up to $2,700 for a course of three injections.

    It’s generally considered safe, with the main risks being those of any joint injection, such as infection.

    Some systematic reviews report benefits, but findings vary considerably, with other reviews finding weak effects when compared to placebo. Some larger, rigorous trials show little or no benefit. So the overall picture is mixed.

    A key problem is lack of standardisation, with different clinics using different concentrations and methods. This makes it hard to know what works for pain and mobility. However there is no good evidence platelet-rich plasma injections repairs or regrows joint cartilage.

    Current guidelines do not recommend platelet-rich plasma injections, though this may change with more high-quality research.

    Stem cell injections

    Stem cells are often promoted as a way to regenerate damaged tissue. They can be taken from a person’s own body, or prepared from donor cells in a laboratory. But despite the hype, the evidence is still very limited.

    A recent Cochrane review found stem cell injections may provide small improvements in pain and function. But the results were uncertain and from low-quality evidence.

    There is also a small risk of adverse events, including infection.

    So far, no published studies have evaluated whether they repair cartilage or change osteoarthritis progression.

    Guidelines currently recommend against their use due to limited evidence, high costs (often $5,000 or more per injection), and regulatory concerns about how they are made and prepared, and how they are marketed to patients.

    More high-quality research is underway, including a clinical trial in Australia measuring whether they can slow osteoarthritis progression.

    Why isn’t the evidence clearer?

    Many studies are small or low quality.

    Placebo effects are also particularly large with injections, meaning studies without placebo controls may overestimate the benefits.

    For platelet-rich plasma injections and stem cells, variable methods used across clinics further complicates interpretation.

    So what can I try for my knee osteoarthritis?

    Treatments that are recommended include:

    • any type of exercise
    • weight loss, if appropriate
    • over-the-counter medications, such as short-term use of anti-inflammatories.

    These approaches are backed by high-quality evidence, are generally safe, and are less expensive than injections.

    What if I want to try an injection?

    If other recommended treatments haven’t helped and you decide to try an injection without a strong evidence base, such as platelet-rich plasma injections, there are a few things worth keeping in mind.

    First, weigh up the costs, risks and benefits. All injections carry a small risk of joint infection, so it’s not completely risk-free.

    It’s also worth knowing it’s unclear exactly how these injections work.

    Some of the benefits you may experience could be related to placebo effects rather than the injection itself.

    If you do go ahead, any reduction in pain should become apparent within six weeks, or sooner with corticosteroids.

    Bottom line

    Most injections offer limited or uncertain long-term benefit for knee osteoarthritis. Despite the marketing, there is no good evidence any injection can repair the joint.

    A corticosteroid injection can be a reasonable short-term option during a bad pain flare. There may be some evidence to support platelet-rich plasma injections, but preparations aren’t standardised. Hyaluronic acid and stem cell injections are not currently recommended.

    Before paying for any injection, consider what the evidence says and whether your time and money might be better spent on options such as exercise and weight loss, which have higher-quality evidence and additional health benefits beyond the knee.

    Belinda Lawford, Senior Research Fellow in Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne; Kim Bennell, Professor of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, and Travis Haber, Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Share This Post

  • Bamboo Shoots vs Cucumber – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing bamboo shoots to cucumber, we picked the bamboo shoots.

    Why?

    This one’s quite clear-cut:

    In terms of macros, bamboo has more than 4x the fiber and more than 4x the protein, for slightly more carbs. A clear win for bamboo.

    In the category of vitamins, bamboo has more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B6, B9, B9, C, and E, while cucumber has more of vitamins A, B5, and K. Another easy win for bamboo.

    When it comes to minerals, bamboo has more copper, iron, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while cucumber has more magnesium. One more win for bamboo.

    Adding up the sections makes a clear overall win for bamboo, but by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Apricot vs Guava – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing apricot to guava, we picked the guava.

    Why?

    Both are great, but…

    In terms of macros, guava has nearly 3x the fiber, very slightly more carbs, and nearly 3x the protein, winning this round.

    In the category of vitamins, apricot has more of vitamins A, E, and K, while guava has more of vitamins B1, B3, B5, B6, B9, C, and choline, winning another round.

    Looking at minerals, apricot has more iron, while guava has more calcium, copper, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, selenium, and zinc, winning its third round in a row.

    In other considerations, apricot does have some cancer-fighting biochemical properties beyond what guava is known to have (which latter is just: fruit is general is healthy food that will help fight cancer), so that’s a point in apricot’s favor.

    Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for guava, but by all means do enjoy either or both; diversity is good!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    Top 8 Fruits That Prevent & Kill Cancer

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Technology: Good Or Bad For Brain Health In Later Life?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    The word “screentime” isn’t usually associated with anything positive. We all use apps to try to limit it, we all read articles telling us about how it hurts teenagers’ sleep and damages toddlers’ development.

    Now, it could be that the tech isn’t really to blame. This writer certainly remembers staying up late as a child without modern tech to blame! Perhaps you (dear reader) did the same.

    The case against tech

    There are several main potential problems:

    However! We can mitigate each of those:

    • Engage with our technology actively, and thus make it a cognitively stimulating activity; this means doing things that challenge us cognitively. It doesn’t have to mean hard stuff, but it does have to be the kind of thing we couldn’t do while half-asleep.
    • Consciously decide our technology’s access to us. For example, this writer has her phone silenced 100% of the time, and only allows a very few apps to give even silent notifications, and there are set hours when her phone goes completely untouched.
    • Decide what cognitive abilities we don’t care to maintain. You may be thinking “but surely, all our cognitive abilities are important!”, but… Are they? Is it truly critical for you to be able to do mental arithmetic rather than use a calculator? Do you really need to know how to spell “necessary eligibility embarrassment privilege”? Do you really need to know (by heart) your friend’s phone number? And, maybe you do! We all lead different lives, after all. But it may well be that there’s some merit to be found in picking your battles. This writer with dyscalculia (numerical equivalent of dyslexia) will use a calculator to do very simple calculations sometimes, for me it’s better to not waste my time expending a lot of mental energy on simple sums that I might still get wrong, and use that time and energy on more productive things. Perhaps you have a similar area of cognitive function that it makes sense for you to offload.

    The case for tech

    Much more research has been done into how technology use affects developing brains, than on how technology use affects aging brains.

    But “less” is not “none”, so…

    Our technology enables our connection to other people. It’s often viewed as the opposite, “people don’t know how to have a conversation these days; they’re all on their phones”, but before that it was radios, before that, newspapers/magazines; there’s always been something.

    But, phones were originally designed to connect humans to other humans, and that remains their principal function, in various ways.

    See also: Effectiveness of Technology Interventions in Addressing Social Isolation, Connectedness, and Loneliness in Older Adults: Systematic Umbrella Review

    And this is critical, because a lack of social connection is one of the highest predictors of cognitive decline:

    See for example: Late-life social activity and subsequent risk of dementia and mild cognitive impairment

    Plus, even on the less social side of things, technology can also help us to stay independent for longer:

    How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review

    …which again, beyond the obvious immediate health-related quality of life differences, has an impact on maintenance of cognitive functions.

    See further: A meta-analysis of technology use and cognitive aging

    Want to learn more?

    Check out:

    How To Make Social Media Work For Your Mental Health

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: