
A good death has a price – and a new study shows not everyone in palliative care can afford it
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
You would hope for your dying days to be full of calm and care. But our research with people who are dying shows this is far from the reality for many people.
Instead, financial stress plays a huge and increasing role in who can afford a “good death”.

What we did
In our recent study, we interviewed 18 people nearing the end of life in a palliative care unit, as well as six family members and carers, and 20 palliative care professionals.
We asked what it was like to be dying, to care for someone at the end of life, and to work in palliative care.
Palliative care is for people of any age who have a life-limiting illness. This means they have little or no prospect of a cure. So the goal is to prioritise comfort and living well as they approach the end of their life.
In Australia, palliative care is meant to be mainly free, with most costs covered by state and federal governments, as well as private health insurance.
But our research shows the patchwork of public and private funding means many people are confused and overwhelmed about how to pay for this essential care.
But first, how does palliative care work?
Palliative care can be provided at home or in hospital, a hospice or residential aged care.
Who pays for palliative care depends on where it’s being provided (for example, in the private or public hospital system) and whether the patient has private health insurance.
Australia’s health system is a complex hybrid of public funding, private insurance, charity and out-of-pocket payments.
For dying people and their families, navigating this system can be bewildering.
Previous research has explored how palliative care is funded in Australia. But until now we haven’t heard much directly from patients, carers and workers about how this affects them.
‘It’s expensive being ill’
Our research took place at a specialist palliative care unit in a major city hospital.
People working in the unit told us the activity-based funding model – where hospitals are paid for the number and mix of patients they treat – puts the focus on efficiency, rather than quality of care.
Patients spoke about not wanting to leave behind debt, while carers described confusing and stressful costs.
Patients and families told us they often enter palliative care confused by the patchwork of short-term subsidies, waiting lists for government support packages and gaps they must fill themselves.
For example, some people we interviewed said they had been paying out-of-pocket for medications and essential equipment such as oxygen, which they expected government supports to cover.
But securing government funding, such as the Support At Home program, End-of-Life Pathway or Carer Payment, can sometimes take months to organise.
And once secured, this funding is only available for fixed periods of time. This means patients who live longer than expected can be left without financial security.
Diane*, a community team nurse, told us:
We’ve had people who’ve been referred to us [for end-of-life care] and they were told six weeks [until death], and two years down the track they’ve done their superannuation, they’ve spent it all, […] they’ve got no money left and they’ve still got to pay electricity and things like that. […] And they go, ‘Well, what do I do now?’
Emily* told us her first worry when she got to the palliative care unit was not about dying, but whether the cost would impact her kids:
I didn’t want the children to be loaded with any more debt [because of] me. I would rather [die] on the bench in the park […] the last thing you want to leave them is debt.
Another participant, Kevin*, put it bluntly:
It’s expensive being ill.
Participants who were dying also described feeling pressure not to “outstay their welcome” in a palliative care unit because “the beds are needed” or “the insurance won’t keep paying”.
Alana*, who described herself as a “long-hauler” in the unit, said:
Let’s face it, it’s a business. And I know that. They’re not getting as much money from me as they would for patients coming in and out.
Patients were acutely aware that in the current health system, time is money.
The cost of visiting
For family and friends, their concerns were less about medical bills and more about the price of simply being present.
Jane*, whose elderly mother was dying in the unit, noted the prohibitive cost of parking on site:
They make you pay $20 a day. Your loved one’s dying. Really? […] I’m petrified when I stay overnight […] ‘when does [the parking] run out? I’d better go down and repay’.
Financial stress also impacted whether families could make funeral arrangements. A senior nurse, Patricia*, recounted:
They would say, ‘I don’t have a funeral director. I don’t think we are able to pay for the cost for the funeral. Can you arrange something?’
Death is an economic – not just medical – issue
Our research reveals how money, and worrying about it, can affect people’s experiences when nearing the end of life.
To ensure everyone can access a death free from financial stress, we first need to talk more openly about how money factors into dying.
More accessible government funding for palliative care patients and carers could help ensure everyone has an equal chance of a good end of life. This should be available for as long as people need, rather than on fixed terms.
*Names have been changed for privacy.
Henrietta Byrne, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, University of Sydney; Alex Broom, Professor of Sociology & Director, Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, University of Sydney, and Katherine Kenny, ARC DECRA Senior Research Fellow, Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, University of Sydney
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Beetroot vs Cucumber – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing beetroot to cucumber, we picked the beetroot.
Why?
While they’re both mostly-water vegetables that can go in salads, soups, and sauces, they have some notable differences:
In terms of macros, beetroot has nearly 3x the carbs and/but also nearly 6x the fiber, so we say beetroot wins this category.
On the vitamins front, beetroot has more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B6, B7, B9, C, and E, while cucumber has more of vitamins A, B5, and K. In short, a clear win for beetroot.
In the category of minerals, beetroot has more copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while cucumber is not richer in any minerals.
When it comes to beneficial phytochemicals, both have good things to offer, though we say beetroot has more. Notably, cucumber extract beats glucosamine and chondroitin for reducing joint inflammation, at 1/135th of the dose. On the other hand, beetroot’s phytochemical benefits are so numerous we’ll not list them here, and just recommend checking out the link below!
In short, a win in all categories for beetroot, but cucumbers are great too, so by all means enjoy either or both!
Want to learn more?
You might like to read:
Beetroot For More Than Just Your Blood Pressure
Enjoy!
Share This Post
-
Kidney Beans vs Chickpeas – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing kidney beans to chickpeas, we picked the chickpeas.
Why?
Both are great! But there’s a clear winner here today:
In terms of macros, chickpeas have more protein, carbs, and fiber, making them the more nutrient-dense option in this category.
In the category of vitamins, kidney beans have more of vitamins B1, B3, and K, while chickpeas have more of vitamins A, B2, B5, B6, B7, B9, C, E, and choline, taking the victory again here.
When it comes to minerals, it’s a similar story: kidney beans have more potassium, while chickpeas have more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, selenium, and zinc. Another easy win for chickpeas.
Adding up the three wins makes chickpeas the clear overall winner, but of course, as ever, enjoy either or both; diversity is good!
Want to learn more?
You might like to read:
What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?
Take care!
Share This Post
-
What Melatonin Does To Your DNA
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Spoiler: it’s good
What dreams may come, when we have shuffled off this deoxyribonucleic coil,
…must indeed give us pause!
Researchers (Dr. Umaimah Zanif et al.) did a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 40 night-shift workers tested whether taking 3mg of melatonin daily for 4 weeks before daytime sleep (because: night-shift workers) could improve the body’s ability to repair oxidative DNA damage.
Why Dr. Zanif and her team investigated melatonin: melatonin normally rises at night and helps regulate sleep and circadian rhythms, but overnight work suppresses melatonin production, which can reduce the body’s capacity to repair oxidative DNA damage, and could be one mechanism linking long-term night-shift work to a higher cancer risk.
Quick note about the participants: all workers had performed at least two consecutive night shifts per week for at least 6 months, with shifts lasting at least 7 hours, and none had sleep disorders or major chronic illnesses.
Of course, that’s not to say it’s only night workers who are affected—it’s relevant for anyone with disrupted sleep. But night workers make for a clear, consistent demographic in which to study these matters.
You may be wondering how DNA repair was measured: the team measured urinary 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), a marker of oxidative DNA damage repair capacity, with higher levels interpreted as greater DNA repair activity.
The results, in numbers:
- Main finding: during daytime sleep after night-shift work, the melatonin group showed approximately 1.8 times higher urinary 8-OH-dG levels than the placebo group, suggesting improved oxidative DNA repair capacity.
- Statistical analysis: the increase was described as borderline statistically significant, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.0 to 3.2 and a p-value of 0.06.
- One more thing: no significant difference between groups was observed during the subsequent overnight work period, suggesting the benefit occurred specifically during sleep rather than throughout the entire day.
In other words, restoring melatonin signaling can counter some of the biological stress caused by circadian disruption in general and night work as a top-tier example of that.
You can read the paper in full, here: Melatonin supplementation and oxidative DNA damage repair capacity among night shift workers: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
We’ve also written a bit about melatonin before, including:
Want more options?
Some sleep aids can help, but many are harmful and/or do not really work as such; here’s a rundown of examples of those: Safe Effective Sleep Aids For Seniors?
Want to learn more?
For a much more in-depth treatment of the topic of sleep in general, you might like this book that we reviewed a while back:
Why We Sleep – by Dr Matthew Walker
Basically, if you will read only one book on sleep, that’s the book.
Sweet dreams!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
The Surprising Supplement (Not A Vitamin/Mineral!) That Makes The COVID Vaccine Work Better
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Vaccines are great! They’re not a panacea and they absolutely have their limitations, but they also save many millions of lives per year, so that’s a big win.
However, those limitations do mean that whenever we can find a way to make them work better, it’s very positive news.
And that’s what we have for you today:
Spermidine to the rescue!
We’ve written about polyamines before, and their role in healthy longevity, for example: Spermidine For Longevity
And, for that matter: Spermine vs Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s! ← note that spermine is not the same thing as spermidine, but they are related, being both polyamines with overlapping roles
Firstly, we need to understand what polyamines do in healthy cells: polyamines act as “geroprotectors” by stimulating autophagy*, the cellular recycling process, primarily through activation of a specific protein (known to its friends by the snappy name of “eIF5A1”), which supports mitochondrial function and healthy aging.
*We wrote about this here: Fisetin: The Anti-Aging Assassin ← so-called because it works by killing the aging cells that need to die sooner rather than later if aging is not to be exacerbated by copying their mistakes forwards (fisetin is not a polyamine, but the principle is the same, making the afore-linked article a good explainer).
More recently, researchers (Dr. Ghada Alsaleh et al., whence our featured image for this article today) conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial involving 40 healthy adults aged 65 or older to test whether 6mg of daily spermidine for 13 weeks after their latest vaccine dose could improve immune responses.
The results, in few words: spermidine supplementation significantly improved several measures of vaccine-induced immunity, including:
- Greater neutralizing antibody activity against multiple viral variants
- Higher levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG antibodies
- Stronger memory B-cell recall responses
As for how it achieved this, lab analyses showed that spermidine:
- Increased autophagic activity in B-cells, helping remove damaged cellular components
- Reduced markers of immune cell senescence, including elevated p16, mTOR signaling, and DNA damage (γ-H2AX)
- Increased expression of genes involved in autophagy and the transcription factor TFEB
In other words: aging of the immune system (immunosenescence) reduces the effectiveness of vaccines in some older adults by impairing B-cell and T-cell function, increasing DNA damage, reducing autophagy (the cell’s recycling system), and promoting cellular senescence—and spermidine does the opposites of most of these things!
That said, it’s worth noting that it’s early days, research-wise;
❝This study was designed as a pilot trial and involved a relatively small number of participants. Larger studies will be needed to determine whether spermidine can consistently improve vaccine responses and whether similar effects are seen with other vaccines, such as those used against seasonal influenza.❞
~ Dr. Katja Simon, co-author
You can read the paper itself, here: Spermidine Mitigates Immune Cell Senescence and Boosts Vaccine Responses in Healthy Older Adults—A Pilot Study
Want to try some?
We don’t sell it, but here for your convenience is an example product on Amazon 😎
Want to learn more?
Check out:
How To Triple Your Chances Of Getting The “Razorblade Throat” COVID Variant Or Long COVID
And if for any reason the above is not actually a goal you have, then you might also consider:
Why Some People Get Sick More (And How To Not Be One Of Them)
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Skincare “Scams” That Are Actually Very Recommendable
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Dr. Andrea Suarez explains why some things got a bad reputation despite, actually, working if used correctly:
Looking past the surface
What Dr. Suarez wants us to know is that some products widely labelled as skincare “scams” can be genuinely useful when their biology, limits, and realistic outcomes are understood.
As for why they sometimes get labelled as scams, she blames overpromising marketing claims, misunderstood skin biology, and unrealistic expectations about speed and magnitude of results. Which is a pity, because bold hype can boost short-term sales (which is why it’s used), but often damages long-term trust once results fail to match the promises.
So, with that in mind:
- Collagen creams: no, collagen molecules do not penetrate to rebuild collagen, but they act as humectants that improve hydration, smoothness, plumpness, comfort, and symptoms such as dryness and tightness.
- Red and near-infrared light: photobiomodulation can improve mitochondrial activity, blood flow, and inflammation, leading to modest gains in fine lines, texture, collagen density, acne inflammation, and hair thickness with consistent use. However, at-home devices require ongoing use, and deliver gradual rather than dramatic changes.
- Retinoids : these are among the most studied dermatologic ingredients, retinoids improve collagen production, wrinkles, pigmentation, texture, and treat conditions such as acne and melasma. However, many people quit due to delayed results, irritation, dryness, and poor introduction strategies rather than any actual lack of efficacy.
- Niacinamide : evidence supports improvements in discoloration, moisturization, redness, oil control, and glycation-related yellowing. However, overuse and stacking across multiple products, especially at high percentages above the 2–5% studied range, are likely to drive irritation and backlash.
- Silicone tape: silicone scar sheets are evidence-based for improving raised scar thickness, texture, redness, and discomfort by reducing transepidermal water loss. However, facial taping does not replace neuromodulators or treat dynamic wrinkles, even though temporary softening from moisturization can occur.
Red flags to watch out for: instant or permanent claims without clear science for it, vague buzzwords like “medical grade” without context, and no discussion of limitations or who should avoid the product.
Green flags to watch out for: modest claims, emphasis on gradual improvement, clear limitations, and honest discussion of who benefits and who does not.
For more on all of this, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
The Evidence-Based Skincare That Beats Product-Specific Hype
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Our ‘food environments’ affect what we eat. Here’s how you can change yours to support healthier eating
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
In January, many people are setting new year’s resolutions around healthy eating. Achieving these is often challenging – it can be difficult to change our eating habits. But healthy diets can enhance physical and mental health, so improving what we eat is a worthwhile goal.
One reason it’s difficult to change our eating habits relates to our “food environments”. This term describes:
The collective physical, economic, policy and sociocultural surroundings, opportunities and conditions that influence people’s food and beverage choices and nutritional status.
Our current food environments are designed in ways that often make it easier to choose unhealthy foods than healthy ones. But it’s possible to change certain aspects of our personal food environments, making eating healthier a little easier.
Unhealthy food environments
It’s not difficult to find fast-food restaurants in Australian cities. Meanwhile, there are junk foods at supermarket checkouts, service stations and sporting venues. Takeaway and packaged foods and drinks routinely come in large portion sizes and are often considered tastier than healthy options.
Our food environments also provide us with various prompts to eat unhealthy foods via the media and advertising, alongside health and nutrition claims and appealing marketing images on food packaging.
At the supermarket, unhealthy foods are often promoted through prominent displays and price discounts.
We’re also exposed to various situations in our everyday lives that can make healthy eating challenging. For example, social occasions or work functions might see large amounts of unhealthy food on offer.
Not everyone is affected in the same way
People differ in the degree to which their food consumption is influenced by their food environments.
This can be due to biological factors (for example, genetics and hormones), psychological characteristics (such as decision making processes or personality traits) and prior experiences with food (for example, learned associations between foods and particular situations or emotions).
People who are more susceptible will likely eat more and eat more unhealthy foods than those who are more immune to the effects of food environments and situations.
Those who are more susceptible may pay greater attention to food cues such as advertisements and cooking smells, and feel a stronger desire to eat when exposed to these cues. Meanwhile, they may pay less attention to internal cues signalling hunger and fullness. These differences are due to a combination of biological and psychological characteristics.
These people might also be more likely to experience physiological reactions to food cues including changes in heart rate and increased salivation.
It’s common to eat junk food in front of the TV.
PR Image Factory/ShutterstockOther situational cues can also prompt eating for some people, depending on what they’ve learned about eating. Some of us tend to eat when we’re tired or in a bad mood, having learned over time eating provides comfort in these situations.
Other people will tend to eat in situations such as in the car during the commute home from work (possibly passing multiple fast-food outlets along the way), or at certain times of day such as after dinner, or when others around them are eating, having learned associations between these situations and eating.
Being in front of a TV or other screen can also prompt people to eat, eat unhealthy foods, or eat more than intended.
Making changes
While it’s not possible to change wider food environments or individual characteristics that affect susceptibility to food cues, you can try to tune into how and when you’re affected by food cues. Then you can restructure some aspects of your personal food environments, which can help if you’re working towards healthier eating goals.
Although both meals and snacks are important for overall diet quality, snacks are often unplanned, which means food environments and situations may have a greater impact on what we snack on.
Foods consumed as snacks are often sugary drinks, confectionery, chips and cakes. However, snacks can also be healthy (for example, fruits, nuts and seeds).
Try removing unhealthy foods, particularly packaged snacks, from the house, or not buying them in the first place. This means temptations are removed, which can be especially helpful for those who may be more susceptible to their food environment.
Planning social events around non-food activities can help reduce social influences on eating. For example, why not catch up with friends for a walk instead of lunch at a fast-food restaurant.
Creating certain rules and habits can reduce cues for eating. For example, not eating at your desk, in the car, or in front of the TV will, over time, lessen the effects of these situations as cues for eating.
You could also try keeping a food diary to identify what moods and emotions trigger eating. Once you’ve identified these triggers, develop a plan to help break these habits. Strategies may include doing another activity you enjoy such as going for a short walk or listening to music – anything that can help manage the mood or emotion where you would have typically reached for the fridge.
Write (and stick to) a grocery list and avoid shopping for food when hungry. Plan and prepare meals and snacks ahead of time so eating decisions are made in advance of situations where you might feel especially hungry or tired or be influenced by your food environment.
Georgie Russell, Senior Lecturer, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University and Rebecca Leech, NHMRC Emerging Leadership Fellow, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:








