
Black Beans vs White Beans – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing black beans to white beans, we picked the black.
Why?
Both are excellent and this one is very close!
In terms of macros, black beans have 25% more fiber, while white beans have (very slightly) more carbs and protein. However, the margin is greater on the fiber, and also we will generally prioritize fiber over protein, and carbs are rarely something most of us need to go out of our way to get more of, so we say this category is a win for black beans.
In the category of vitamins, black beans have more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, and B9, while white beans have more vitamin B6. The two beans are broadly equal on other vitamins. So, a clear win for black beans here.
When it comes to minerals, black beans have more phosphorus, while white beans have more calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, and zinc, so this round’s a win for white beans.
Adding up the sections makes for an overall win for black beans, but as we say, it’s close. So, by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
What Matters Most For Your Heart?
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Bamboo Shoots vs Celeriac – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing bamboo shoots to celeriac, we picked the bamboo.
Why?
In terms of macros, bamboo has more fiber and protein, while celeriac has more carbs; an easy first-round win for bamboo.
In the category of vitamins, bamboo has more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, E, and celeriac has more of vitamins B3, B5, B9, C, and K, for a 5:5 tie in this round.
Looking at minerals, bamboo has more copper, manganese, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while celeriac has more calcium, iron, magnesium, and phosphorus, giving bamboo a modest 5:4 win in this round.
Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for bamboo, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
Don’t Be Bamboozled By Bamboo! ← including how to eat bamboo, for those unfamiliar with such, as we have been asked about it 🙂
Enjoy!
Share This Post
-
Skincare Pairs Best Used Together
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
You’ve probably heard such advice as “don’t use retinol and vitamin C together”, but what of things that work better together than by themselves?
Dr. Andrea Suarez, dermatologist, advises:
Let’s get synergistic
This one’s actually a two-part video, so we’ll include the items from both. If you want to watch both videos, then we’ve linked the first one below, and it’ll offer you the second one after that.
Meanwhile, without further ado, the recommendations are:
- benzoyl peroxide + adapalene: robust pairing for acne; benzoyl peroxide reduces acne bacteria, inflammation, and clogged pores, while adapalene normalizes skin turnover and reduces inflammation; adapalene also helps fade post-acne dark marks. She advises to start with adapalene first, then add benzoyl peroxide 2.5% for better tolerance.
- azelaic acid + niacinamide: helpful for hyperpigmentation, redness, acne, and rosacea; azelaic acid blocks melanin production, reduces inflammation, and is pregnancy-safe; niacinamide reduces pigment transfer, calms redness, supports skin barrier, and decreases oil oxidation. Thus, together they target pigmentation and redness from multiple pathways.
- retinoid (adapalene, retinol, retinaldehyde) + ammonium lactate (≥12%): boosts collagen production, thickens skin, reduces wrinkles, and improves rough, sun-damaged skin; retinoids work on cell turnover and collagen, ammonium lactate improves epidermal and dermal thickness, exfoliates, and hydrates. These can be irritating, so she recommends to start with retinoid first before adding ammonium lactate.
- salicylic acid + sulfur: good for seborrheic dermatitis, oily skin, fungal acne (malassezia folliculitis), tinea versicolor, and psoriasis. Salicylic acid exfoliates and unclogs pores, sulfur is anti-inflammatory, antifungal, and mildly exfoliating. This pairing calms redness, scaling, bumps, and softens plaques in psoriasis.
- sunscreen + iron oxides (tinted sunscreen): protects against both UV and high-energy visible light; especially useful for evening out medium to deep skin tones that are especially prone to hyperpigmentation. Sunscreen blocks UV, while iron oxides help shield against visible light that worsens blotchy pigmentation.
- cysteamine + adapalene: for hyperpigmentation: cysteamine reduces melanin production; adapalene speeds up skin turnover, disperses pigment, and reduces inflammation. She recommends to use cysteamine in the morning (short-contact, rinse off), adapalene at night.
- zinc pyrithione + sulfur: for seborrheic dermatitis or fungal acne: zinc pyrithione lowers yeast on the skin; sulfur is anti-inflammatory, exfoliating, and antimicrobial. She advises to use zinc pyrithione cleansers or shampoos, then sulfur as a mask or leave-on. Both can be drying, so follow with moisturizer.
- hyaluronic acid + petroleum jelly: for lips: hyaluronic acid increases hydration, petroleum jelly locks it in and shields from irritants. Together, they plump, smooth, and heal cracked lips. Petroleum jelly alone helps, but the combo works better for instant softness.
- hyaluronic acid + retinol: for anti-aging and stretch marks: hyaluronic acid hydrates and reduces dryness from retinol. Retinol improves fine lines, texture, and discoloration. Many retinol products already include hyaluronic acid. This pairing also shows promise for stretch marks.
- licorice root + azelaic acid: for redness (post-inflammatory erythema): licorice root calms inflammation; azelaic acid reduces redness, acne, and hyperpigmentation. Available in both prescription and cosmetic strengths.
- ceramides + urea: for dry, rough skin: urea hydrates and gently exfoliates; ceramides restore and support the skin barrier. Great for body, face, hands, heels, and keratosis pilaris. Works even better under occlusion (e.g. topped off with petroleum jelly overnight after application).
Now, maybe you don’t use 22 items for your skincare, but this guide should at least enable you to get the most out of the ones you do use!
For more on all of this, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
Do You Know Which Supplements You Shouldn’t Take Together? (10 Pairs!)
Take care!
Share This Post
-
Blackberries vs Elderberries – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing blackberries to elderberries, we picked the elderberries.
Why?
It was super-close! But…
In terms of macros, blackberries technically have more protein, but the numbers are truly tiny, and let’s face it, nobody is eating blackberries for the protein. Meanwhile, elderberries have more fiber and carbs. We consider this a win for elderberries, based on total fiber and total macronutrients, but if you want to consider the carbs and fiber against each other, you might want to call this round a tie.
In the category of vitamins, blackberries have more of vitamins B5, B9, E, K, and choline, while elderberries have more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, and C. Thus, a tie here.
When it comes to minerals, blackberries have more copper, magnesium, manganese, and zinc, while elderberries have more calcium, iron, phosphorus, potassium, and selenium, adding up to marginal win for elderberries.
Looking at polyphenols, both are great but elderberries have more (mostly anthocyanins, whence the color, but also quercetin, and in both cases blackberries are good but elderberries have so much more).
Adding up the sections makes for an overall win for elderberries (grow them in your garden if you can, as stores don’t often sell elderberries), but by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
Herbs For Evidence-Based Health & Healing ← elderberry significantly hastens recovery from upper respiratory viral infections 😎
Enjoy!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
The Stress Solution – by Dr. Rangan Chatterjee
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
You may be wondering: is this a rehash of his bestselling and, if we’re honest, occasionally rehashed work, The Four Pillar Plan?
And the answer is: no, not this time!
This time, the four steps are a matter tending to our:
- Purpose
- Relationships
- Body
- Mind
As such, his usual Four Pillar Plan (eat, move, sleep, relax) is contained within the final two steps in this book (body and mind), plus each of those also has extra things this time, and the other two, purpose and relationships, are entirely new material.
Within each of his four steps, he gives 6 things to do to favor them, for a total of 24 things.
If you are living a stressed-out life, you may be wondering where you will find the time and energy to do 24 things, but in many cases they are things you are probably doing badly already and just need a little guidance on how to do better, and the others are things whereby if one makes time for them, somehow, anyhow, they will pay dividends in terms of the freed-up energy and capability that having done them will yield.
The style is Dr. Chatterjee’s trademarked personal-yet-professional, relaxed without shying away from heavy topics, and a focus on communication over technicality.
Bottom line: if you’d like to become a calmer, happier, healthier you, this book can help!
Click here to check out The Stress Solution, and solve your stress!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Their First Baby Came With Medical Debt. These Illinois Parents Won’t Have Another.
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
JACKSONVILLE, Ill. — Heather Crivilare was a month from her due date when she was rushed to an operating room for an emergency cesarean section.
The first-time mother, a high school teacher in rural Illinois, had developed high blood pressure, a sometimes life-threatening condition in pregnancy that prompted doctors to hospitalize her. Then Crivilare’s blood pressure spiked, and the baby’s heart rate dropped. “It was terrifying,” Crivilare said.
She gave birth to a healthy daughter. What followed, though, was another ordeal: thousands of dollars in medical debt that sent Crivilare and her husband scrambling for nearly a year to keep collectors at bay.
The Crivilares would eventually get on nine payment plans as they juggled close to $5,000 in bills.
“It really felt like a full-time job some days,” Crivilare recalled. “Getting the baby down to sleep and then getting on the phone. I’d set up one payment plan, and then a new bill would come that afternoon. And I’d have to set up another one.”
Crivilare’s pregnancy may have been more dramatic than most. But for millions of new parents, medical debt is now as much a hallmark of having children as long nights and dirty diapers.
About 12% of the 100 million U.S. adults with health care debt attribute at least some of it to pregnancy or childbirth, according to a KFF poll.
These people are more likely to report they’ve had to take on extra work, change their living situation, or make other sacrifices.
Overall, women between 18 and 35 who have had a baby in the past year and a half are twice as likely to have medical debt as women of the same age who haven’t given birth recently, other KFF research conducted for this project found.
“You feel bad for the patient because you know that they want the best for their pregnancy,” said Eilean Attwood, a Rhode Island OB-GYN who said she routinely sees pregnant women anxious about going into debt.
“So often, they may be coming to the office or the hospital with preexisting debt from school, from other financial pressures of starting adult life,” Attwood said. “They are having to make real choices, and what those real choices may entail can include the choice to not get certain services or medications or what may be needed for the care of themselves or their fetus.”
Best-Laid Plans
Crivilare and her husband, Andrew, also a teacher, anticipated some of the costs.
The young couple settled in Jacksonville, in part because the farming community less than two hours north of St. Louis was the kind of place two public school teachers could afford a house. They saved aggressively. They bought life insurance.
And before Crivilare got pregnant in 2021, they enrolled in the most robust health insurance plan they could, paying higher premiums to minimize their deductible and out-of-pocket costs.
Then, two months before their baby was due, Crivilare learned she had developed preeclampsia. Her pregnancy would no longer be routine. Crivilare was put on blood pressure medication, and doctors at the local hospital recommended bed rest at a larger medical center in Springfield, about 35 miles away.
“I remember thinking when they insisted that I ride an ambulance from Jacksonville to Springfield … ‘I’m never going to financially recover from this,’” she said. “‘But I want my baby to be OK.’”
For weeks, Crivilare remained in the hospital alone as covid protocols limited visitors. Meanwhile, doctors steadily upped her medications while monitoring the fetus. It was, she said, “the scariest month of my life.”
Fear turned to relief after her daughter, Rita, was born. The baby was small and had to spend nearly two weeks in the neonatal intensive care unit. But there were no complications. “We were incredibly lucky,” Crivilare said.
When she and Rita finally came home, a stack of medical bills awaited. One was already past due.
Crivilare rushed to set up payment plans with the hospitals in Jacksonville and Springfield, as well as the anesthesiologist, the surgeon, and the labs. Some providers demanded hundreds of dollars a month. Some settled for monthly payments of $20 or $25. Some pushed Crivilare to apply for new credit cards to pay the bills.
“It was a blur of just being on the phone constantly with all the different people collecting money,” she recalled. “That was a nightmare.”
Big Bills, Big Consequences
The Crivilares’ bills weren’t unusual. Parents with private health coverage now face on average more than $3,000 in medical bills related to a pregnancy and childbirth that aren’t covered by insurance, researchers at the University of Michigan found.
Out-of-pocket costs are even higher for families with a newborn who needs to stay in a neonatal ICU, averaging $5,000. And for 1 in 11 of these families, medical bills related to pregnancy and childbirth exceed $10,000, the researchers found.
“This forces very difficult trade-offs for families,” said Michelle Moniz, a University of Michigan OB-GYN who worked on the study. “Even though they have insurance, they still have these very high bills.”
Nationwide polls suggest millions of these families end up in debt, with sometimes devastating consequences.
About three-quarters of U.S. adults with debt related to pregnancy or childbirth have cut spending on food, clothing, or other essentials, KFF polling found.
About half have put off buying a home or delayed their own or their children’s education.
These burdens have spurred calls to limit what families must pay out-of-pocket for medical care related to pregnancy and childbirth.
In Massachusetts, state Sen. Cindy Friedman has proposed legislation to exempt all these bills from copays, deductibles, and other cost sharing. This would parallel federal rules that require health plans to cover recommended preventive services like annual physicals without cost sharing for patients. “We want … healthy children, and that starts with healthy mothers,” Friedman said. Massachusetts health insurers have warned the proposal will raise costs, but an independent state analysis estimated the bill would add only $1.24 to monthly insurance premiums.
Tough Lessons
For her part, Crivilare said she wishes new parents could catch their breath before paying down medical debt.
“No one is in the right frame of mind to deal with that when they have a new baby,” she said, noting that college graduates get such a break. “When I graduated with my college degree, it was like: ‘Hey, new adult, it’s going to take you six months to kind of figure out your life, so we’ll give you this six-month grace period before your student loans kick in and you can get a job.’”
Rita is now 2. The family scraped by on their payment plans, retiring the medical debt within a year, with help from Crivilare’s side job selling resources for teachers online.
But they are now back in debt, after Rita’s recurrent ear infections required surgery last year, leaving the family with thousands of dollars in new medical bills.
Crivilare said the stress has made her think twice about seeing a doctor, even for Rita. And, she added, she and her husband have decided their family is complete.
“It’s not for us to have another child,” she said. “I just hope that we can put some of these big bills behind us and give [Rita] the life that we want to give her.”
About This Project
“Diagnosis: Debt” is a reporting partnership between KFF Health News and NPR exploring the scale, impact, and causes of medical debt in America.
The series draws on original polling by KFF, court records, federal data on hospital finances, contracts obtained through public records requests, data on international health systems, and a yearlong investigation into the financial assistance and collection policies of more than 500 hospitals across the country.
Additional research was conducted by the Urban Institute, which analyzed credit bureau and other demographic data on poverty, race, and health status for KFF Health News to explore where medical debt is concentrated in the U.S. and what factors are associated with high debt levels.
The JPMorgan Chase Institute analyzed records from a sampling of Chase credit card holders to look at how customers’ balances may be affected by major medical expenses. And the CED Project, a Denver nonprofit, worked with KFF Health News on a survey of its clients to explore links between medical debt and housing instability.
KFF Health News journalists worked with KFF public opinion researchers to design and analyze the “KFF Health Care Debt Survey.” The survey was conducted Feb. 25 through March 20, 2022, online and via telephone, in English and Spanish, among a nationally representative sample of 2,375 U.S. adults, including 1,292 adults with current health care debt and 382 adults who had health care debt in the past five years. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the full sample and 3 percentage points for those with current debt. For results based on subgroups, the margin of sampling error may be higher.
Reporters from KFF Health News and NPR also conducted hundreds of interviews with patients across the country; spoke with physicians, health industry leaders, consumer advocates, debt lawyers, and researchers; and reviewed scores of studies and surveys about medical debt.
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.
Subscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Parents find Health Star Ratings confusing and unhelpful. We need a better food labelling system
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Food labels are intended to support healthy choices. But not all labelling schemes are equal.
Australia currently uses a voluntary Health Star Rating system. Food manufacturers can choose to add a star label to their packaging to indicate how it compares to other similar products. Or they can choose not to show a star rating on a product at all.
The Australian government is now considering making it mandatory.
But our new research on parenting and food in Australia found the Health Star Ratings are often confusing, misunderstood and have little credibility among shoppers.
If Health Stars are mandated, the system will also need a major overhaul to be trusted and useful for shoppers.
Gustavo Fring/Pexels How do Health Star Ratings work?
The government set up the front-of-pack Health Star Rating system in 2014 in collaboration with the food industry, public health and consumer groups.
Product ratings range from (bad) ½ to (good) 5 stars.
Calories, saturated fat, sugars and sodium decrease the rating. Fibre, protein, and the content of fruit, vegetables, nuts and legumes increase it.
The good and bad offset each other. This means companies can strategically formulate products to boost the rating and mask unhealthy ingredients.
Processing and additives – such as sweeteners, colouring, emulsifiers, preservatives and artificial flavourings – are not part of the calculation.
Previous research has found the ratings can incentivise ultra-processed foods over minimally and unprocessed foods, and misrepresent healthfulness. Some researchers have also suggested practical ways to modify the rating algorithm to account for processing.
The Health Star Rating’s own consumer research found 74% of consumers do not understand that the rating cannot be used to compare dissimilar products.
What parents told us
In our interviews with 34 parents in Australia, participants often described the Health Star Ratings as “misleading”, “not helpful” and “on the wrong product”. One participant called it the “fake health star rating”.
They gave many examples:
Like you might buy 100% orange juice or fruit juice and it might have only half a star health star rating, but then you can buy like a box of processed muesli bars and it will have five stars. – Mother of three high school aged children, urban WA
Coco Pops or Nutrigrain have three and a half star rating, and what exactly does that mean? – Mother of one primary school aged child, urban WA
Participants wondered if the Health Stars were something companies paid for, a “marketing thing”.
Positivity bias
Part of the problem with the Health Stars is the positivity bias of the symbol. As one participant put it, “All stars are good. Right?”
Another noted their children comment on the stars, saying “but look Mum, it’s five stars.”
However, parents were not convinced:
A lot of packaged stuff is rated as five stars. I’m like yeah, well, don’t know about that. It’s still packaged. – Mother of two primary school aged children, urban NSW
Participants thought discretionary foods should not have any stars. As one participant said:
The other day, we saw a mud cake and it has a two out of five star health rating. How can that be a two out of five star?… Like there should not even be a star available for this. – Mother of pre-school aged child, urban NSW
Burden on parents
Parents often disregarded the rating. For example:
This particular thing, you know, had all sorts of additives, had actually had a much higher rating than something that actually didn’t have any additives… what I ended up buying was rated slightly lower. – Mother of two primary school aged children, rural Victoria
Instead participants used ingredients lists, apps such as Yuka, and “hours of internet research” to guide healthier choices.
But there was a sense of frustration that the burden was on them. Participants said:
I feel like food labels are extremely deceptive and by producers, purposely confusing. – Mother of one primary school aged child, urban SA
It has to be government driven because companies won’t change unless they’re forced to by the government. – Father of two primary school aged children, urban Tasmania
We need a food labelling system that works
Still, the parents we spoke to think a front-of-pack system is valuable. As one participant explained:
I do think if I had a better system for that, that would get a lot of use. – Mother of two primary school aged children, urban NSW
Parents repeatedly stated a desire for transparency over food, for information they can trust and food policies that prioritise consumer health.
As one mother put it, the “multi-billion dollar” food industry will not do this on their own, and “that’s where the government needs to step in.”
If Health Stars are mandatory, how could labelling be overhauled?
Chile, Mexico, Brazil and other countries, including Canada from 2026, are now using “stop-sign” warnings to steer consumers away from the least healthy products. Large Black Octagons alert consumers to high sugar, sodium and saturated fats, and ultra-processing.
Starting in 2026, a new front-of-package symbol will be required on many Canadian foods and drinks that are high in saturated fat, sugars or salt. Canada.ca/en/health Evidence shows these warning labels have improved nutrition and public health in other countries and could be an option for Australia.
We need to mandate a fit-for-purpose food labelling system that supports healthy eating. Governments should centre the voices of consumers in these and other national food policies to ensure they work as intended.
Juliet Bennett, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Sydney; Alex Broom, Professor of Sociology & Director, Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, University of Sydney, and David Raubenheimer, Leonard P. Ullman Chair in Nutritional Ecology, Nutrition Theme Leader Charles Perkins Centre, Chair Sydney Food and Nutrition Network, University of Sydney
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:









