
Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers – by Dr. Robert M. Sapolsky
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
The book does kick off with a section that didn’t age well—he talks of the stress induced globally by the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918, and how that kind of thing just doesn’t happen any more. Today, we have much less existentially dangerous stressors!
However, the fact we went and had another pandemic really only adds weight to the general arguments of the book, rather than detracting.
We are consistently beset by “the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune” as Shakespeare would put it, and there’s a reason (or twenty) why many people go grocery-shopping with the cortisol levels of someone being hunted for sport.
So, why don’t zebras get ulcers, as they actually are hunted for food?
They don’t have rent to pay or a mortgage, they don’t have taxes, or traffic, or a broken washing machine, or a project due in the morning. Their problems come one at a time. They have a useful stress response to a stressful situation (say, being chased by lions), and when the danger is over, they go back to grazing. They have time to recover.
For us, we are (usually) not being chased by lions. But we have everything else, constantly, around the clock. So, how to fix that?
Dr. Sapolsky comprehensively describes our physiological responses to stress in quite different terms than many. By reframing stress responses as part of the homeostatic system—trying to get the body back into balance—we find a solution, or rather: ways to help our bodies recover.
The style is “pop-science” and is very accessible for the lay reader while still clearly coming from a top-level academic who is neck-deep in neuroendocrinological research. Best of both worlds!
Bottom line: if you try to take very day at a time, but sometimes several days gang up on you at once, and you’d like to learn more about what happens inside you as a result and how to fix that, this book is for you!
Click here to check out “Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers” and give yourself a break!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
What is hyaluronic acid – and is it OK for kids and teens to use this common skincare ingredient?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Earlier this month, Kmart pulled a “hyaluronic acid cleansing balm” from its shelves, after a teen who used the skincare product was hospitalised, reporting eye pain and blurred vision. It’s unclear what ingredient caused this reaction.
In a statement, Kmart said it was removing the product while conducting an investigation. The retailer also said:
We want to assure our customers that our cosmetics are designed to ensure that they comply with both Australian and European requirements on ingredients.
Hyaluronic acid – despite the name – is a gentle ingredient commonly used in skincare products.
But what does hyaluronic acid do to your skin as a skincare ingredient? And is it safe for tweens and teens?
Sabinayro/Shutterstock What is hyaluronic acid?
Hyaluronic acid is a glycosaminoglycan – a sugar-based molecule found naturally in the skin, eyes, joint fluid and connective tissue.
It plays a key role in hydrating the skin and tissues, lubricating our joints and supporting tissue repair.
Beyond cosmetics, hyaluronic acid is used in drug delivery, regenerative medicine, wound repair, and to treat conditions such as atherosclerosis (where the arterial walls harden and narrow) and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease).
It is also a key ingredient in many eye drops and contact lens care solutions.
How is it used in skincare?
While the word “acid” might suggest it is harsh and potentially damaging to the skin, hyaluronic acid is not used in its acidic form in skincare products. It is usually used in its salt form, sodium hyaluronate.
In skincare, active acids such as salicylic acid usually lower the skin’s pH and exfoliate it by breaking the bonds between dead skin cells.
Hyaluronic acid, in contrast, is used to hydrate the skin. It is a humectant, an ingredient that attracts and retains water molecules.
Hyaluronic acid has three qualities that make it suitable for skincare: it’s soluble (can be dissolved in water), biocompatible (meaning it’s not harmful to the body), and biodegradable (naturally breaks down into non-toxic, simpler substances).
It is usually safe and well-tolerated, meaning it has very few side effects.
In skincare products, hyaluronic is used in different forms. Smaller hyaluronic molecules can penetrate deeper into the skin and hydrate the lower levels. In products this is often advertised as “anti-ageing”, because it stimulates the production of collagen (a structural protein in the skin), and helps to improve elasticity and reduce the appearance of fine lines.
Larger hyaluronic acid molecules remain on the skin’s surface and have an immediate hydrating effect, preventing water evaporation from the skin.
Hyaluronic acid helps the skin attract and retain water molecules for hydration. Art_Photo/Shutterstock Any risks?
Hyaluronic acid is generally a safe ingredient, even for sensitive skin. But products advertised as “hyaluronic acid skincare” may contain other ingredients which can cause irritation.
In particular, fragrances, preservatives and surfactants (ingredients that produce foam and help wash away oil and dirt) may be safe for skin but burn or otherwise irritate the eyes.
This is because the cornea and conjuctiva (the thin membrane covering the eye) are much more sensitive than the skin.
How are skincare ingredients regulated?
Unlike medicines and products used for therapeutic reasons, which are regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), general cosmetic products do not require pre-market safety testing or approval.
Instead, companies need to register their business with the Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme and verify that their ingredients are not banned or restricted in Australia.
This creates a potential gap where defective products remain on the market, only to be recalled after adverse reactions occur.
Are these products appropriate for children?
Most scientific research on active ingredients – including hyaluronic acid – has been evaluated in older populations. This leaves a gap in understanding how they affect teen and preteen skin.
Many products are designed for ageing and/or specific skin types, and are largely unnecessary for children and younger people.
In some cases, they can potentially be harmful to their skin. For example, unless prescribed by a dermatologist, it’s advisable for young people to avoid retinoid products (containing retinol or retinal) as they can cause redness, peeling and drying.
Similarly, products with alpha hydroxy acids can cause irritation, itching, redness and may worsen acne in young skin.
So, what should younger people look for?
Preteens and teens should avoid products containing active ingredients such as retinol, vitamin C, alpha- and beta- hydroxy acids, and peptides, as well as those labelled with terms such as anti-ageing, wrinkle-reducing, brightening, or firming.
To keep skin clean and protected, teenagers can use a good cleanser, a simple moisturiser and a broad spectrum SPF 30 or 50 sunscreen.
It’s best to opt for gentle, fragrance-free cleansers and moisturisers suitable for all skin types. Consulting with a pharmacist can provide personalised recommendations based on individual skin needs.
Zoe Porter, Lecturer, Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Monash University and Laurence Orlando, Senior Lecturer, Product Formulation and Development, Analytical Methods, Monash University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Share This Post
-
Dandelion Greens vs Mustard Greens – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing dandelion greens to mustard greens, we picked the dandelions.
Why?
Despite our best efforts to find something to unseat dandelion greens from the “most nutritious greens” throne, they still come out on top:
In terms of macros, dandelion greens have more fiber, carbs, and protein, making them the most nutritionally dense option in this category.
In the category of vitamins, dandelion greens have more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B6, B7, B9, C, E, K, and choline, while mustard greens have more vitamin B5 (the vitamin that’s found in all foods). A very clear win for dandelion greens here.
Looking at minerals, dandelion greens have more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc, while mustard greens have (slightly) more selenium. Another easy win for dandelion greens.
When it comes to polyphenols, we weren’t able to get figures for mustard greens, but we know that dandelion greens have lots and have beaten every other kind of greenery we’ve pitted them against so far. Probably mustard greens are good for this too, but we can’t comment without data.
Adding up the sections (skipping over polyphenols, on account of the absence of data for mustard greens) makes for an overall strong win for dandelion greens, but by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?
Enjoy!
Share This Post
-
Brussels Sprouts vs Dandelion Greens – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing Brussels sprouts to dandelions, we picked the dandelions.
Why?
Both are great, and it’s such a strong pairing that we’re surprised we haven’t done this one before! But there is a winner, on balance:
In terms of macros, the sprouts have more fiber and protein, while the dandelions have more carbs, and/but all the numbers are quite close, so this is either a tie or the slenderest of nominal wins to dandelions.
In the category of vitamins, Brussels sprouts have more of vitamins B5, B9, and C, while dandelion greens have more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B6, B7, E, and K, winning easily by a large margin.
Looking at minerals, the sprouts have more selenium, while dandelions have more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, and potassium, winning convincingly again.
In other considerations, Brussels sprouts have sulforaphane while dandelion greens have more polyphenols, so this round’s either a tie or a nominal win to dandelions (because those are admittedly a lot of polyphenols).
Either way, adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for dandelion greens, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as Brussels sprouts are certainly a top-tier food too!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
- Broccoli Sprouts & Sulforaphane ← this is written about Broccoli, but all Brassica oleracea sprouts have this, and that includes Brussels sprouts
- How Dandelions Can Protect Your Brain
Enjoy!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Radiation-Eating, Mind Control, & Other Secret Superpowers Of Fungi
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Fungi are more closely related to animals than to plants, though in truth they are neither, and cannot be killed in a way that matters:
Decay exists as an extant form of life
The fungal kingdom ranges from athlete’s foot to mushrooms to the underground mycorrhizal network that allows trees to communicate with each other and share nutrients.
About that last one… Yes, really! Many plants depend on mycorrhizal fungi, which exchange soil nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen for carbon produced by plants, as ectomycorrhizal fungi surround roots, while arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi penetrate root cells to facilitate nutrient exchange. This symbiosis also means that when it comes to knowing* what’s happening, the fungus functions as though part of the plant, meaning that if more than one plant is connected to the same mycorrhizal network (as is almost always the case in the wild), then each plant has the same information as the entire network.
*Without getting too sidetracked, we’ll quickly mention that despite not having brains, yes, plants do process information, using various kinds of chemical signalling similar to animals’ use of hormones and pheromones, electrical signalling, and more. And yes, that includes sensory information, because plants are very receptive to light and dark, and thus can (to varying degrees) “see”. Perhaps the most clear example of this is Boquila trifoliolata, a plant known for mimicking the appearance of nearby plants. Researchers got curious (as researchers do), and placed one next to a plastic plant (so: no mycorrhizal or otherwise chemical signalling can be happening), and yes, it mimicked the leaf shape and color of the artificial plant that it evidently could indeed see. Fun stuff!
You can read more about that one here, if you’re interested: Boquila trifoliolata mimics leaves of an artificial plastic host plant
Now, back to fungi:
Fungi were once classified as plants because many grow from the soil on branching, root-like networks, but they differ fundamentally in biology, for example:
- Most people know that unlike plants, fungi don’t use sunlight for energy but instead decompose organic matter or obtain nutrients from living organisms.
- Most people don’t know that fungal cell walls are made of chitin (the same material found in the exoskeletons of insects, arachnids, and the like) rather than cellulose as in plants.
On which note, yes, many fungi produce compounds including antibiotics, toxins, and psychedelic chemicals to defend themselves, exploit other organisms, or manipulate their surroundings, including:
- Altering minds: mushrooms in the Psilocybe genus produce psilocybin, which binds to serotonin receptors and causes hallucinations in humans, though it likely evolved to discourage grazing by slugs and snails.
- Zombifying ants: many Cordyceps fungi infect ants, alter their nervous systems and muscles, compel them to climb to elevated locations, and then release millions of spores from their bodies.
- Eating radiation: some fungi thrive in harsh environments, including the radioactive ruins of Chernobyl nuclear power plant, where at least 37 fungal species have been identified, and studies aboard the International Space Station found that fungi such as Cryptococcus neoformans can convert absorbed gamma radiation into usable energy.
For more on all of this, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
The Magic Of Mushrooms: “The Longevity Vitamin” (That’s Not A Vitamin) ← about ergothioneine, of which mushrooms are an excellent source
What kind of mushrooms? All kinds, but please stick to non-poisonous ones!
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Celeriac vs Lettuce – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing celeriac to lettuce, we picked the lettuce.
Why?
In terms of macros, the celeriac has more fiber, carbs, and protein, making it the “more food per food” winning option in this category.
In the category of vitamins, celeriac has more of vitamins B3, B5, B6, and E, while lettuce has more of vitamins B1, B2, B9, and K, for a 4:4 tie here.
Looking at minerals, celeriac has more calcium, copper, magnesium phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while lettuce has more iron and manganese, yielding a 7:2 win to celeriac.
In other considerations, celeriac has slightly more polyphenols, not a huge amount, but enough for a slender nominal win in this round too.
Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for celeriac, but by all means enjoy either or both, as diversity is good!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
Why You’re Probably Not Getting Enough Fiber (And How To Fix It)
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Red Lentils vs Oats – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing red lentils to oats, we picked the oats.
Why?
In terms of macros, oats have more protein, carbs, fiber, and even a little fat—mostly healthy mono- and polyunsaturated fats, thus making them the more nutritionally dense. That said, red lentils have the lower glycemic index, (low GI compared to oats’ medium GI) which offsets that, so we’ll call this category a tie.
In the category of vitamins, red lentils have more of vitamins B6, B9, and choline, while oats have more of vitamins B1, B2, and B5. Another tie!
When it comes to minerals, however, we have a tiebreaker category: red lentils have more selenium, while oats have more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc. An easy win for oats this time!
So, thanks to the minerals, oats are the clear winner in total. But by all means, enjoy either or both; diversity is good!
Want to learn more?
You might like to read:
The Best Kind Of Fiber For Overall Health? ← it’s β-glucan, the kind find in oats!
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:









