Silica Gel: What If You Do Eat It?

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

The surprising science of the forbidden snack:

Extra dry

Firstly, let’s quickly cover what it actually is: silica gel is made from silicon dioxide (silica), a naturally occurring mineral found abundantly in the Earth’s crust. It starts as silica sand, which is processed and transformed into hard, porous beads.

Chemically, silica gel is the same as beach sand, but its microscopic network of pores gives it an enormous surface area and exceptional moisture-absorbing ability. Indeed, a single gram of silica gel has more than 700 square meters (7,500 square feet, for the non-metric preferrers) of internal surface area, allowing it to trap large amounts of moisture.

This moisture-trapping is an active process: the polar silicon dioxide molecules attract water vapor, which is pulled into the bead’s tiny pores through capillary condensation.

For this reason, silica gel helps keep foodstuffs and supplements dry, reduces odors in cat litter, protects museum artifacts from rust and mold, and is even used as aerogel to insulate spacecraft and collect comet dust.

Why packets say “Do Not Eat”: the warning is mainly because the packet is a choking hazard, not because standard silica gel is poisonous (except insofar as everything is poisonous at a certain dosage, even water or oxygen). But to be clear, silica gel is chemically inert, so your body does not break it down into toxic substances, and it usually passes through the digestive system unchanged.

That said, eating a large amount can still dry and irritate your digestive tract, but it’s nothing good hydration won’t fix, unless you really go to extremes.

One important exception: some silica gel contains cobalt chloride, a moisture indicator that changes color as the beads absorb water. Cobalt chloride is toxic, so don’t eat that.

We still don’t recommend eating any silica gel, but people consume much worse-for-the-health things every day.

Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

Want to learn more?

You might also like:

Things Many People Forget When It Comes To Hydration

Take care!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Stop Doing Sit-Ups After 60 (Do This Instead)

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Will Harlow, the over-50s specialist physio, shows us how:

    Deep core

    The main idea here is that sit-ups are a poor choice for people over 60 because they repeatedly flex your spine and mainly train the rectus abdominis, rather than the deeper muscles that stabilize and protect your spine.

    First, try some core activation: gently flatten your lower back towards the bed, then lightly draw your navel inwards to activate the deep core muscles before beginning the exercises.

    Now, the exercises, piece by piece:

    • Tabletops: lie on your back with your knees bent, activate your core, lift one leg to a tabletop position, lift the other leg to match, pause briefly, then lower one leg at a time, while maintaining core engagement and a stable spine throughout.
    • Core leg extensions: hold the tabletop position with your core activated, slowly extend one leg forwards, return it, then alternate sides while keeping your lower back pressed down.
    • Advanced tabletop leg raises: hold one leg in the tabletop position, straighten the other leg, then slowly lower and raise the straight leg while maintaining core activation and keeping your lower back in contact with the bed.

    For more on all of this plus visual demonstrations, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like:

    Hate Sit-Ups? Try This 10-Minute Standing Abs Routine!

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • 7 Principles of Becoming a Leader – by Riku Vuorenmaa

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We urge you to overlook the cliché cover art (we don’t know what they were thinking, going for the headless suited torso) because…

    This one could be the best investment you make in your career this year! You may be wondering what the titular 7 principles are. We won’t keep you guessing; they are:

    1. Professional development: personal excellence, productivity, and time management
    2. Leadership development: mindset and essential leadership skills
    3. Personal development: your motivation, character, and confidence as a leader
    4. Career management: plan your career, get promoted and paid well
    5. Social skills & networking: work and connect with the right people
    6. Business- & company-understanding: the big picture
    7. Commitment: make the decision and commit to becoming a great leader

    A lot of leadership books repeat the same old fluff that we’ve all read many times before… padded with a lot of lengthy personal anecdotes and generally editorializing fluff. Not so here!

    While yes, this book does also cover some foundational things first, it’d be remiss not to. It also covers a whole (much deeper) range of related skills, with down-to-earth, brass tacks advice on putting them into practice.

    This is the kind of book you will want to set as a recurring reminder in your phone, to re-read once a year, or whatever schedule seems sensible to you.

    There aren’t many books we’d put in that category!

    Pick Up Your Copy of the “7 Principles of Becoming a Leader” on Amazon Today!

    Share This Post

  • What Do PTSD, GABA & MAOI Antidepressants Have In Common?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Those are:

    • PTSD: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
    • GABA: Gamma-Amino Butyric Acid (a neurotransmitter)
    • MAOI: Mono-Amine Oxidase Inhibitor (a class of drug that, you guessed it, inhibits monoamine oxidase—and is mostly prescribed as antidepressants)

    Aside from being four-letter initialisms, what do they have in common?

    The answer is—to borrow from Lemony Snicket—a series of unfortunate events.

    Action, reaction

    The series of unfortunate events goes like this: trauma → PTSD → astrocyte dysregulation → increased MOAB → increased GABA → decreased forgetting of things we’d rather not keep remembering all the time.

    PTSD is, of course, Not Fun™. And, that’s where it starts. A traumatic experience leads to post-traumatic stress; this is not resolved (and quite possibly cannot be resolved, per se) and it persists, having enough of an effect on life to be called a disorder.

    In reality, of course, it seems to be a very normal response to such experiences, so calling it a disorder may be a misnomer, but that’s the convention.

    Recently, a team of researchers (Dr. Sujung Yoon et al.) investigated how this happens, physiologically, and how that physiological process might be interrupted.

    First, they used high-tech tools (single‑cell RNA sequencing and chromatin profiling) to examine postmortem brain tissue from people diagnosed with PTSD, focusing on cells in areas* involved in fear regulation and emotion, to see which genes were turned on or off, and in which specific cell types.

    What they found, in few words:

    Astrocytes (a kind of glial cell, a support cell in the brain) produce excess GABA in PTSD, which blocks the brain’s ability to extinguish fear memories. Further, the enzyme monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) is responsible for this build-up, meaning that MAOB inhibitors (a subcategory of MAOIs, which as a class can inhibit MAOA, MAOB, or both) could treat PTSD

    This next part has only been done in mice so far (there’s a process, working its way to live human trials), but they found that MAOI drug with the snappy name of KDS2010 (which is specifically an inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B) reversed PTSD-like symptoms in mice by lowering GABA, and restoring blood flow to where it was needed, thus enabling the then-natural process of fear memory deletion.

    Why this matters: these molecular findings give clinicians actionable targets—and can lead to a physiological treatment for what is currently treated as a purely psychological condition.

    You can read the paper in full, here: Astrocytic gamma-aminobutyric acid dysregulation as a therapeutic target for posttraumatic stress disorder ← it goes into more detail than we have here (obviously), including identifying some of trauma’s long-lasting epigenetic marks—changing how genes are regulated in different neuronal and non-neuronal (e.g. glial, like the astrocytes we talked about) cells. We’ll quickly mention, for example, that they identified specific genes (like ELFN1, MAD1L1, KCNIP4, SST, FKBP5) and regulatory variants whose activity shifts in PTSD, so those can become targets for treatment, too.

    Want a drug-free way while you wait?

    There are some options.

    Firstly, let’s mention that if your PTSD is C-PTSD, which is PTSD, But, Well…. Complex, then while that’s less well-understood in popular culture, it is actually easier to treat. We explain how, here: Undoing The Damage Of Life’s Hard Knocks ← which, really, is also a huge key to psychological resilience for everyday life.

    If it’s the more classic “there is a singular bad thing that you can easily be caused to remember by unwanted triggers associated with it, and you suffer as a result”, then many people find that this helps: Eye Movement Desensitization & Reprocessing (EMDR) ← keeps the memories, reduces the psychological impact (for those for whom it works).

    Then, if that doesn’t work, there is also this: The Dark Side Of Memory (And How To Stop Revisiting Those Memories) ← basically, doesn’t truly delete the memory, but rather removes the memory from easy access, making it nigh-impossible to remember unless given hyperspecific recall cues.

    Now, we mentioned in that article that it may not be appropriate for important memories (i.e. that you might need, and/or that form a core part of who you are that you don’t want to change). So, as ever, we recommend getting guidance from your local trustworthy mental health professional, of course. But it’s worth mentioning here, for your information.

    Writer’s note: when I wrote that last article about memory removal, I (for obvious reasons) forgot something, which I was given cause to remember this morning. Specifically: that while the above-mentioned memory-removal technique will make the memories very difficult to access by your conscious mind, your subconscious will have still free access to them. In this case, it means that, for example, you will still be able to have nightmares about The Bad Thing™, and if you do, you’ll then remember it when you wake up and thus functionally have full access to those memories again, as the nightmare basically dug it up and left it on your pillow for you to contemplate upon awakening.

    Take care!

    PS: hiding this in a postscript because it’s very much not a drug-free way… But interestingly (this writer has not tried this one personally, nor does she plan to, but it’s an option worth mentioning), THC gets prescribed for some sleep disorders, in cases where the initial sleep disruption was because of nightmares, as it will reduce those (along with any other dreams, as collateral damage): Clinical Management of Sleep and Sleep Disorders With Cannabis and Cannabinoids: Implications to Practicing Psychiatrists

    Share This Post

  • Two Patients Faced Chemo. The One Who Survived Demanded a Test To See if It Was Safe

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    JoEllen Zembruski-Ruple, while in the care of New York City’s renowned Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, swallowed the first three chemotherapy pills to treat her squamous cell carcinoma on Jan. 29, her family members said. They didn’t realize the drug could kill her.

    Six days later, Zembruski-Ruple went to Sloan Kettering’s urgent care department to treat sores in her mouth and swelling around her eyes. The hospital diagnosed oral yeast infection and sent her home, her sister and partner said. Two days later, they said, she returned in agony — with severe diarrhea and vomiting — and was admitted. “Enzyme deficiency,” Zembruski-Ruple texted a friend.

    The 65-year-old, a patient advocate who had worked for the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and other groups, would never go home.

    Covered in bruises and unable to swallow or talk, she eventually entered hospice care and died March 25 from the very drug that was supposed to extend her life, said her longtime partner, Richard Khavkine. Zembruski-Ruple was deficient in the enzyme that metabolizes capecitabine, the chemotherapy drug she took, said Khavkine and Susan Zembruski, one of her sisters. Zembruski-Ruple was among about 1,300 Americans each year who die from the toxic effects of that pill or its cousin, the IV drug fluorouracil known as 5-FU.

    Doctors can test for the deficiency — and then either switch drugs or lower the dosage if patients have a genetic variant that carries risk. The FDA approved an antidote in 2015, but it’s expensive and must be administered within four days of the first chemotherapy treatment.

    Newer cancer drugs sometimes include a companion diagnostic to determine whether a drug works with an individual patient’s genetics. But 5-FU went on the market in 1962 and sells for about $17 a dose; producers of its generic aren’t seeking approval for toxicity tests, which typically cost hundreds of dollars. Doctors have only gradually understood which gene variants are dangerous in which patients, and how to deal with them, said Alan Venook, a colorectal and liver cancer specialist at the University of California-San Francisco.

    By the time Zembruski-Ruple’s doctors told her she had the deficiency, she had been on the drug for eight days, said Khavkine, who watched over his partner with her sister throughout the seven-week ordeal.

    Khavkine said he “would have asked for the test” if he had known about it, but added “nobody told us about the possibility of this deficiency.” Zembruski-Ruple’s sister also said she wasn’t warned about the fatal risks of the chemo, or told about the test.

    “They never said why they didn’t test her,” Zembruski said. “If the test existed, they should have said there is a test. If they said, ‘Insurance won’t cover it,’ I would have said, ‘Here’s my credit card.’ We should have known about it.”

    Guidance Moves at a Glacial Pace

    Despite growing awareness of the deficiency, and an advocacy group made up of grieving friends and relatives who push for routine testing of all patients before they take the drug, the medical establishment has moved slowly.

    A panel of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, or NCCN — specialists from Sloan Kettering and other top research centers — until recently did not recommend testing, and the FDA does not require it.

    In response to a query from KFF Health News about its policy, Sloan Kettering spokesperson Courtney Nowak said the hospital treats patients “in accordance with NCCN guidelines.” She said the hospital would not discuss a patient’s care.

    On Jan. 24, the FDA issued a warning about the enzyme deficiency in which it urged health care providers to “inform patients prior to treatment” about the risks of taking 5-FU and capecitabine.

    On March 31 — six days after Zembruski-Ruple’s death — the network’s expert panel for most gastrointestinal cancers took a first step toward recommending testing for the deficiency.

    Worried that President Donald Trump’s FDA might do nothing, Venook said, the panel — whose guidance shapes the practices of oncologists and health insurers — recommended that doctors consider testing before dosing patients with 5-FU or capecitabine.

    However, its guidance stated that “no specific test is recommended at this time,” citing a lack of data to “inform dose adjustments.”

    Sloan Kettering “will consider this guidance in developing personalized treatment plans for each patient,” Nowak told KFF Health News.

    The new NCCN guidance was “not the blanket recommendation we were working toward, but it is a major step toward our ultimate goal,” said Kerin Milesky, a public health official in Brewster, Massachusetts, who’s part of an advocacy group for testing. Her husband, Larry, died two years ago at age 73 after a single treatment of capecitabine.

    European drug regulators began urging oncologists to test patients for deficiency in May 2020. Patients with potentially risky genetics are started on a half-dose of the cancer drug. If they suffer no major toxicity, the dose is increased.

    A Lifesaving Ultimatum?

    Emily Alimonti, a 42-year-old biotech salesperson in upstate New York, chose that path before starting capecitabine treatment in December. She said her doctors — including an oncologist at Sloan Kettering — told her they didn’t do deficiency testing, but Alimonti insisted. “Nope,” she said. “I’m not starting it until I get the test back.”

    The test showed that Alimonti had a copy of a risky gene variant, so doctors gave her a lower dose of the drug. Even that has been hard to tolerate; she’s had to skip doses because of low white blood cell counts, Alimonti said. She still doesn’t know whether her insurer will cover the test.

    Around 300,000 people are treated with 5-FU or capecitabine in the United States each year, but its toxicity could well have prevented FDA approval were it up for approval today. Short of withdrawing a drug, however, U.S. regulators have little power to manage its use. And 5-FU and capecitabine are still powerful tools against many cancers.

    At a January workshop that included FDA officials and cancer specialists, Venook, the NCCN panel’s co-chair, asked whether it was reasonable to recommend that doctors obtain a genetic test “without saying what to do with the result.”

    But Richard Pazdur, the FDA’s top cancer expert, said it was time to end the debate and commence testing, even if the results could be ambiguous. “If you don’t have the information, how do you have counseling?” he asked.

    Two months later, Venook’s panel changed course. The price of tests has fallen below $300 and results can be returned as soon as three days, Venook said. Doubts about the FDA’s ability to further confront the issue spurred the panel’s change of heart, he said.

    “I don’t know if FDA is going to exist tomorrow,” Venook told KFF Health News. “They’re taking a wrecking ball to common sense, and that’s one of the reasons we felt we had to go forward.”

    On May 20, the FDA posted a Federal Register notice seeking public input on the issue, a move that suggested it was considering further action.

    Venook said he often tests his own patients, but the results can be fuzzy. If the test finds two copies of certain dangerous gene variants in a patient, he avoids using the drug. But such cases are rare — and Zembruski-Ruple was one of them, according to her sister and Khavkine.

    Many more patients have a single copy of a suspect gene, an ambiguous result that requires clinical judgment to assess, Venook said.

    A full-gene scan would provide more information but adds expense and time, and even then the answer may be murky, Venook said. He worries that starting patients on lower doses could mean fewer cures, especially for newly diagnosed colon cancer patients.

    Power Should Rest With Patients

    Scott Kapoor, a Toronto-area emergency room physician whose brother Anil, a much-loved urologist and surgeon, died of 5-FU toxicity at age 58 in 2023, views Venook’s arguments as medical paternalism. Patients should decide whether to test and what to do with the results, he said.

    “What’s better — don’t tell the patient about the test, don’t test them, potentially kill them in 20 days?” he said. “Or tell them about the testing while warning that potentially the cancer will kill them in a year?”

    “People say oncologists don’t know what to do with the information,” said Karen Merritt, whose mother died after an infusion of 5-FU in 2014. “Well, I’m not a doctor, but I can understand the Mayo Clinic report on it.”

    The Mayo Clinic recommends starting patients on half a dose if they have one suspect gene variant. And “the vast majority of patients will be able to start treatment without delays,” Daniel Hertz, a clinical pharmacologist from the University of Michigan, said at the January meeting.

    Some hospitals began testing after patients died because of the deficiency, said Lindsay Murray, of Andover, Massachusetts, who has advocated for widespread testing since her mother was treated with capecitabine and died in 2021.

    In some cases, Venook said, relatives of dead patients have sued hospitals, leading to settlements.

    Kapoor said his brother — like many patients of non-European origin — had a gene variant that hasn’t been widely studied and isn’t included in most tests. But a full-gene scan would have detected it, Kapoor said, and such scans can also be done for a few hundred dollars.

    The cancer network panel’s changed language is disappointing, he said, though “better than nothing.”

    In video tributes to Zembruski-Ruple, her friends, colleagues, and clients remembered her as kind, helpful, and engaging. “JoEllen was beautiful both inside and out,” said Barbara McKeon, a former colleague at the MS Society. “She was funny, creative, had a great sense of style.”

    “JoEllen had this balance of classy and playful misbehavior,” psychotherapist Anastatia Fabris said. “My beautiful, vibrant, funny, and loving friend JoEllen.”

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

    Subscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.

    This article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Surviving with Beans And Rice – by Eliza Whool

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    If you’d like to be well-set the next time a crisis shuts down supply lines, this is one of those books you’ll want to have read.

    Superficially, “have in a large quantity of dried beans and rice” is good advice, but obvious. Why a book?

    Whool gives a lot of advice on keeping your nutrition balanced while subsisting on the same quite few ingredients, which is handy.

    More than that, she offers 100 recipes using the ingredients that will be in your long-term pantry. That’s over three months without repeating a meal! And if you don’t think rice and beans can be tasty and exciting and varied, then most of the chefs of the Global South might want to have a word about that.

    Anyway, we’re not here to sell you rice and beans (we’re just enthusiastic and correct). What we are here to do is to give you a fair overview of this book.

    The recipes are just-the-recipes, very simple clear instructions, one two-page spread per recipe. Most of the book is devoted to these. As a quick note, it does cover making things gluten-free if necessary, and other similar adjustments for medical reasons.

    The planning-and-storage section of the book is helpful too though, especially as it covers common mistakes to avoid.

    Bottom line: this is a great book, and remember what we said about doing the things now that future you will thank you for!

    Get yourself a copy of Surviving with Beans And Rice from Amazon today!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Water Bath + More Cookbook for Beginners – by Sarah Roslin

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Whether you want to be prepared for the next major crisis that shuts down food supply chains, or just learn a new skill, this book provides the tools!

    Especially beneficial if you also grow your own vegetables, but even you just buy those… Home-canned food is healthy, contains fewer additives and preservatives, and costs less in the long run.

    Roslin teaches an array of methods, including most importantly:

    1. fermentation and pickling
    2. water bath canning, and
    3. pressure canning.

    As for what’s inside? She covers not just vegetables, but also fruit, seafood, meat… Basically, anything that can be canned.

    The book explains the tools and equipment you will need as well as how to perform it safely—as well as common mistakes to avoid!

    Lest we be intimidated by the task of acquiring appropriate equipment, she also walks us through what we’ll need in that regard too!

    Last but not least, there’s also a (sizeable) collection of simple, step-by-step recipes, catering to a wide variety of tastes.

    Bottom line: a highly valuable resource that we recommend heartily.

    Get your copy of “Water Bath + Pressure Canning & Preserving Cookbook for Beginners” from Amazon today!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: