Do eggs really make you constipated? A gut expert on what the evidence says

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

You might’ve heard too many eggs make you constipated. Influencers on Instagram claim it too. The United Kingdom has slang for it – being “egg bound”.

Eggs were once blamed for raising blood cholesterol levels, which turned out to be false. Did we get it wrong about eggs and constipation too?

Here’s what the mixed bag of evidence tells us.

Popovo Bros/Shutterstock

Starting with constipation

Constipation means different things to different people, and there are many different types.

Let’s focus on “functional constipation”, when people have hard, infrequent and often difficult-to-pass bowel movements. This constipation isn’t due to a physical blockage of the bowel or from disease.

Functional constipation is very common. Globally, about one in ten adults (10.1%) and one in seven children (14.4%) have it at any one time.

Is eating eggs to blame?

Several studies link eating eggs with constipation, but not necessarily how you’d think.

A 2002 study of 1,699 Japanese residents over 40 found Japanese women who ate eggs at least five times a week were less likely to be constipated. Eating eggs didn’t affect constipation rates in men. The researchers couldn’t explain the difference.

A later study involved 3,770 female Japanese university students who filled in a questionnaire about what they’d eaten over the past month. A Western diet high in foods such as processed meats and eggs was linked to more constipation than a traditional Japanese diet (which has lots of rice but not much bread or confectionary).

Another study looked at middle-aged adults in southern China who ate duck or chicken eggs as part of a Western diet. This was linked to a higher risk of constipation compared with the traditional southern Chinese diet, which has lots of refined grains, vegetables, fruits, pickled vegetables, fish and prawns.

However, such dietary studies mostly rely on participants remembering what they ate. People also don’t always fill in dietary questionnaires truthfully, and tend to under-report eating unhealthy food and over-report eating healthy food. So dietary questionnaires aren’t always accurate.

They also rarely look at a single food item (such as eggs) in isolation.

Even if these studies mention eggs, the population studied can vary in age, gender and ethnicity. So the findings may not apply universally.

How about other evidence?

Laboratory based experiments looking at how egg proteins are digested in the bowel may offer some clues.

When researchers fed constipated rats protein from egg yolk, their constipation improved. This could be due to an egg yolk protein called phosvitin. This retains water around itself in the colon (the large intestine) and makes the stool bulkier and easier to pass.

Human gut
We’re learning more about how the gut handles eggs. Christos Georghiou/Shutterstock

How about humans? As far as I’m aware, no specific research involved feeding people eggs to see if this cured their constipation or made it worse. But we know a little about what happens in the gut when people eat eggs.

Although eggs are quite a digestible food for humans, research shows even cooked egg proteins are not completely digested and absorbed in the small intestine.

A small amount reaches the colon where it is linked to increased numbers of good bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium and Prevotella. There’s often more Prevotella, in particular, in people with looser stools.

So some research supports the idea eating eggs improves constipation.

What about eating lots of protein?

Eggs are rich in protein. Could a diet with lots of protein cause constipation?

No, protein itself is not to blame, according to research involving adults and children in the United States.

That study found someone eating a diet low in carbohydrate was more likely to be constipated after eating extra protein (the equivalent of an extra two small eggs a day). That’s compared with someone eating a moderate amount of carbohydrate.

Why the difference? The researchers said low carbohydrate intake could be linked to less Prevotella in their stools, potentially making the stools firmer.

This makes sense. Fibre is a type of carbohydrate the body can’t readily digest. Low dietary fibre is linked to constipation.

If we have adequate fibre in our diet then eat extra protein, this won’t worsen constipation. It may actually improve it.

However, not eating enough fibre on a high-protein diet is very likely to increase the risk of constipation.

Fried egg on top of steak on plate with rosemary sprig
Adding fibre to your high-protein diet could help. Daniil Demin/Shutterstock

Kids with allergies

There’s also a type of functional constipation associated with kids’ food allergies.

A study from Greece tested children with chronic (long-term) constipation to see if they had food allergies.

The children found to have food allergies ate a diet without these foods (including eggs) for eight weeks. Constipation improved in most of these children.

How are food allergies in children and constipation related? A type of immune cell found in people with allergies – known as mast cells – can affect the bowels. These cells can contribute to bowel muscles not contracting well. Food is less able to move along, leading to constipation.

So if all other causes of a child’s constipation have been ruled out, and they have a food allergy, their constipation may be allergy-related.

However, it’s recommended to try healthy eating, with enough fluid and fibre first. If that doesn’t resolve the constipation, the child could try an elimination diet, under medical supervision.

What are we to make of all this?

Overall, there’s no firm evidence that eating more eggs leads to constipation.

Provided you eat a diverse diet containing fibre along with your eggs there should be no increased risk of constipation.

If chronic constipation doesn’t get better with extra fluids and fibre, talk to your doctor.

Vincent Ho, Associate Professor and clinical academic gastroenterologist, Western Sydney University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • What Yoga Will Do For You (If Overweight)

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    First, let’s quickly address the word “overweight”. Over what weight, exactly?

    And the answer is: over the weight that, when measured in kilograms and divided by your height in square meters*, is sufficient to put your body-mass index (BMI) into the “overweight” category of 25+.

    *No, your height doesn’t come in square meters, because it’s a height not an area, but that’s the formula anyway.

    BMI is not very useful (see When BMI Doesn’t Measure Up if you’re unfamiliar) but unfortunately, it’s been used for a sufficiently large amount of research that new research becomes difficult without referencing the old research that depended on BMI, so we’re stuck with it for a while yet.

    Fun two-part fact about BMI before we move on:

    • If, by some accident or incident, you unfortunately lose a leg, your BMI will go down considerably (because your mass will be quite a bit lower)
    • If, by some accident or incident, you unfortunately lose both legs, your BMI will go up considerably (because your height will be quite a bit lower)

    BMI is a fabulous, highly functional system.

    Enough about BMI. What about yoga?

    Two things generally held to be true:

    1. Body fat above a certain level is not good for your health
    2. Yoga is good for your health

    So, how well do these things go together?

    Let’s start with the obvious question: is yoga good for weight loss?

    And the answer is: no, not really

    Or, at least, we were not able to find any particularly strong evidence to support it. While there were countless tiny studies with shoddy methodologies published in fringe publications making claims such as “self-reported weight loss after a year met the threshold for significance”, when we narrowed our search to only systematic reviews, suddenly there were only a few pages of results, and most of them weren’t actually relevant (i.e. they merely contained the keywords but in other contexts).

    Two were relevant, of which, one didn’t have the full text available (only an abstract that was lacking certain little details such as… the results), and the other one, well…

    ❝Out of 445 records identified during literature search, 30 trials with a total of 2173 participants were included. No effects on weight, body mass index, body fat percentage or waist circumference were found❞

    In other words, they also got the countless tiny studies that we found, carefully went through them to remove the worthless ones, and found 30 out of 445 that met appropriate standards, and those 30 studies that were robustly-conducted found no clear benefits, and the strongest positive conclusion they could draw was the benefits couldn’t be ruled out preliminarily, and that it was safe.

    Read in full: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of yoga on weight-related outcomes

    So, what can it do?

    Researchers (Dr. Widya Wasityastuti et al.) did a meta-analysis of 30 randomized controlled trials (2,689 participants) examined yoga’s effects on cardiometabolic health in adults in the overweight or obese categories of BMI, using outcomes like blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, inflammation, and antioxidant markers.

    The results, in few words:

    • Blood pressure effects: yoga was associated with a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 4.35 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure of 2.06 mmHg
    • Cholesterol effects: yoga produced modest improvements in lipid profiles, lowering LDL cholesterol by 0.08 mmol/L and increasing HDL cholesterol by 0.06 mmol/L
    • Other metabolic markers: yoga “may” improve glucose regulation, oxidative stress (redox balance), and inflammation, but the evidence for these outcomes remains uncertain

    Note that “may” is scientist-speak for “we haven’t proven it doesn’t”

    This means, of course, that the biggest deal here is the blood pressure reductions.

    This is quite in line with what we wrote about here: What Most People Don’t Know About Blood Pressure

    As for Dr. Wasityastuti’s paper, you can read it in full here: Impact of yoga on cardiometabolic health in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Want to learn more?

    You might want to swing by:

    Which Style Of Yoga Is Best For You?

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • Are Age Spots Inevitable? And What Do They Mean For Skin Health?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We’ll file this one under “life hacks” as we will address reducing them too!

    First though, what are they? Also called liver spots, they’re yellow-brown (depending on intensity) marks in the skin that typically come with age.

    You may be wondering: is it about liver health? And the answer is: no

    In fact they have nothing to do with liver function, except insofar as a diseased liver will promote metabolic problems in general more rapid aging, but that is systemic, and is no more reasonably considerable a matter of liver function than graying hair or arthritis.

    Liver health is very important for many things, though so do also check out: How To Unfatty A Fatty Liver

    As for “liver spots”, however, the name comes from color, and that once upon a time it was popularly believed that they were connected, but there is no scientific basis to that.

    What, then, does cause them?

    As our cells age, they start bringing forward mistakes that accumulate over time, like a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy.

    One common mistake is to bring forward senescent fibroblasts, whose non-senescent versions are supposed to be there, but whose senescent editions contain more melanin than average (as in, average for your normal skintone) which consequently also gets brought forward and with no reason to disappear, also accumulates over time.

    You may be wondering: is this related to cancer? And the answer is: yes and no

    More helpfully: it’s a somewhat similar process, but benign (in contrast to cancer cells that would be similar, but multiply rapidly as they divide without any programmed cell death).

    However, since they can look a lot like skin cancer, that also means that they can mask skin cancer. For this reason, get it checked if what you have assumed to be an age spot…

    • turns black
    • turns multicolored
    • gets bigger
    • bleeds (for a reason other than: you just stabbed it with something)

    Any one (or more) of those happening is cause for concern. Note, we say cause for concern, not cause for panic; it will quite possibly be fine, but it also might not be, so book yourself a doctor visit about it.

    Learn more: We don’t all need regular skin cancer screening–but you can know your risk and check yourself

    The other major factor besides simply “how many times your cells have been copied” is sun exposure, because UV radiation not only can cause cellular mutations in the long-run, but also cues our skin to speed up melanin production (it’s trying to save us by giving us darker skin*).

    *Note: dark skin is moderately protective against sun damage (and resultant cancer risk) initially, but this is a double-edged sword, so please do still wear sunscreen even if you have naturally dark skin! Darker-skinned people who do get skin cancer have higher mortality rates than people with lighter skin (even if the same race/ethnicity and just lighter- or darker-skinned)—at least in part because it will then spread more aggressively. Simply put: dark skin will stop a lot of skin cancers from starting, but the cancers that do get past that initial hurdle are, on average, much worse.

    How, then, to reduce them?

    In advance:

    After they show up:

    • The same things as above; they will slow any exacerbation, and killing senescent cells does work retroactively too, per that (justified) “reverses aging” claim.
    • Normal anti-aging skincare: here we’re talking things like: Undo The Sun’s Damage To Your Skin
    • Laser treatment: or an at-home IPL device which is not technically laser but works on the same principles; it breaks up the pigment and allows your immune system to eat the resultant parts. However, this is only suitable for small, moderate pigmented spots, and only on skin that is notably lighter than it (or else it’ll superheat the natural pigmentation there, too, which means much more heat will be absorbed, creating a burn risk)

    There are also harsher clinical options like cryotherapy (freezing it off) or chemical peels (corrosively removing the affected skin), and… Well, we’re not the boss of you, but we would encourage you to consider whether that’s really worth it for something that’s not harmful in itself, and will probably be a losing battle in the long run—since, if we be so fortunate as to live many more years, we’ll accumulate more as we go no matter how careful we are.

    Want to tackle things the tastiest way?

    Check out:

    The Diet That Slows Skin Aging

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • Covering obesity: 6 tips for dispelling myths and avoiding stigmatizing news coverage

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    When researchers looked at news coverage of obesity in the United States and the United Kingdom a few years ago, they found that images in news articles often portrayed people with larger bodies “in a stigmatizing manner” — they emphasized people’s abdomens, for example, or showed them eating junk food, wearing tight clothes or lounging in front of a TV. 

    When people with larger bodies were featured in photos and videos, nearly half were shown only from their necks down or with part of their heads missing, according to the analysis, published in November 2023. The researchers examined a total of 445 images posted to the websites of four U.S. news outlets and four U.K. news outlets between August 2018 and August 2019.

    The findings underscore the need for dramatic changes in the way journalists report on obesity and people who weigh more than what medical authorities generally consider healthy, Rebecca Puhl, one of the paper’s authors, told The Journalist’s Resource in an email interview.

    “Using images of ‘headless stomachs’ is dehumanizing and stigmatizing, as are images that depict people with larger bodies in stereotypical ways (e.g., eating junk food or being sedentary),” wrote Puhl, deputy director of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Health at the University of Connecticut and a leading scholar on weight stigma.

    She noted that news images influence how the public views and interacts with people with obesity, a complicated and often misunderstood condition that the American Medical Association considers a disease.

    In the U.S., an estimated 42% of adults aged 20 years and older have obesity, a number researchers predict will rise to 50% over the next six years. While the disease isn’t as common in other parts of the planet, the World Obesity Federation projects that by 2035, more than half the global population will have obesity or overweight.

    Several other studies Puhl has conducted demonstrate that biased new images can have damaging consequences for individuals affected by obesity.

    “Our research has found that seeing the stigmatizing image worsens people’s attitudes and weight bias, leading them to attribute obesity to laziness, increasing their dislike of people with higher weight, and increasing desire for social distance from them,” Puhl explained.

    Dozens of studies spotlight problems in news coverage of obesity in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to stigmatizing images, journalists use stigmatizing language, according to a 2022 research review in eClinicalMedicine, a journal published by The Lancet.

    The research also suggests people with higher weights feel excluded and ridiculed by news outlets.

    “Overt or covert discourses in news media, social media, and public health campaigns included depictions of people with overweight or obesity as being lazy, greedy, undisciplined, unhappy, unattractive, and stupid,” write the authors of the review, which examines 113 academic studies completed before Dec. 2, 2021.

    To help journalists reflect on and improve their work, The Journalist’s Resource asked for advice from experts in obesity, weight stigma, health communication and sociolinguistics. They shared their thoughts and opinions, which we distilled into the six tips that appear below.

    In addition to Puhl, we interviewed these six experts:

    Jamy Ard, a professor of epidemiology and prevention at Wake Forest University School of Medicine and co-director of the Wake Forest Baptist Health Weight Management Center. He’s also president of The Obesity Society, a professional organization of researchers, health care providers and other obesity specialists.

    Leslie Cofie, an assistant professor of health education and promotion at East Carolina University’s College of Health and Human Performance. He has studied obesity among immigrants and military veterans.

    Leslie Heinberg, director of Enterprise Weight Management at the Cleveland Clinic, an academic medical center. She’s also vice chair for psychology in the Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Behavioral Health Department of Psychiatry and Psychology.

    Monu Khanna, a physician in Missouri who is board certified in obesity medicine.

    Jenn Lonzer, manager of the Cleveland Clinic Health Library and the co-author of several academic papers on health communication.

    Cindi SturtzSreetharan, an anthropologist and professor at the Arizona State University School of Human Evolution and Social Change. She studies the language people of different cultures use to describe human bodies.

    1. Familiarize yourself with recent research on what causes obesity and how obesity can affect a person’s health. Many long-held beliefs about the disease are wrong.

    Journalists often report incorrect or misleading information about obesity, possibly because they’re unaware that research published in recent decades dispels many long-held beliefs about the disease, the experts say. Obesity isn’t simply the result of eating too many calories and doing too little exercise. A wide range of factors drive weight gain and prevent weight loss, many of which have nothing to do with willpower or personal choices.

    Scholars have learned that stress, gut health, sleep duration and quality, genetics, medication, personal income, access to healthy foods and even climate can affect weight regulation. Prenatal and early life experiences also play a role. For example, childhood trauma such as child abuse can become “biologically embedded,” altering children’s brain structures and influencing their long-term physical and mental health, according to a 2020 research review published in the journal Physiology & Behavior.

    “The causes of obesity are numerous and each individual with obesity will have a unique set of contributors to their excess weight gain,” Jamy Ard, president of The Obesity Society, wrote to The Journalist’s Resource.

    The experts urge journalists to help dispel myths, correct misinformation and share new research findings. News outlets should examine their own work, which often “ignores the science and sets up situation blaming,” says Leslie Heinberg, director of Enterprise Weight Management at the Cleveland Clinic.

    “So much of the media portrayal is simply ‘This is a person who eats too much and the cure is simply to eat less or cut out that food’ or something overly, overly simplistic,” Heinberg says.

    Journalists need to build their knowledge of the problem before they can explain it to their audiences. Experts point out that educating policymakers, health care providers and the public about obesity is key to eliminating the stigma associated with having a larger body.

    Weight stigma alone is so physically and emotionally damaging that 36 international experts issued a consensus statement in 2020 to raise awareness about it. The document, endorsed by dozens of medical and academic organizations, outlines 13 recommendations for eliminating weight bias and stigma.

    Recommendation No. 5: “We call on the media to produce fair, accurate, and non-stigmatizing portrayals of obesity. A commitment from the media is needed to shift the narrative around obesity.”

    2. Use person-first language — the standard among health and medical professionals for communicating about people with chronic diseases.

    The experts we interviewed encourage journalists to ditch the adjectives “obese” and “overweight” because they are dehumanizing. Use person-first language, which avoids labeling people as their disease by putting the person before the disease.

    Instead of saying “an obese teenager,” say “a teenager who has obesity” or “a teenager affected by obesity.” Instead of writing “overweight men,” write “men who have overweight.”

    Jenn Lonzer, manager of the Cleveland Clinic Health Library, says using “overweight” as a noun might look and sound awkward at first. But it makes sense considering other diseases are treated as nouns, she notes. Journalists would not typically refer to someone in a news story as “a cancerous person,” for example. They would report that the individual has cancer.

    It’s appropriate to refer to people with overweight or obesity using neutral weight terminology. Puhl wrote that she uses “people with higher body weight” or “people with high weight” and, sometimes, “people with larger bodies” in her own writing.

    While the Associated Press stylebook offers no specific guidance on the use of terms such as “obese” or “overweight,” it advises against “general and often dehumanizing ‘the’ labels such as the poor, the mentally ill, the disabled, the college-educated.”

    The Association of Health Care Journalists recommends person-first language when reporting on obesity. But it also advises journalists to ask sources how they would like to be characterized, provided their weight or body size is relevant to the news story.

    Anthropologist Cindi SturtzSreetharan, who studies language and culture, says sources’ responses to that question should be part of the story. Some individuals might prefer to be called “fat,” “thick” or “plus-sized.”

    “I would include that as a sentence in the article — to signal you’ve asked and that’s how they want to be referred to,” SturtzSreetharan says.

    She encourages journalists to read how authors describe themselves in their own writing. Two books she recommends: Thick by Tressie McMillan Cottom and Heavy: An American Memoir by Kiese Laymon.

    3. Carefully plan and choose the images that will accompany news stories about obesity.

    Journalists need to educate themselves about stigma and screen for it when selecting images, Puhl noted. She shared these four questions that journalists should ask themselves when deciding how to show people with higher weights in photos and video.

    • Does the image imply or reinforce negative stereotypes?
    • Does it provide a respectful portrayal of the person?
    • Who might be offended, and why?
    • Can an alternative image convey the same message and eliminate possible bias?

    “Even if your written piece is balanced, accurate, and respectful, a stigmatizing image can undermine your message and promote negative societal attitudes,” Puhl wrote via email.

    Lonzer says newsrooms also need to do a better job incorporating images of people who have different careers, interests, education levels and lifestyles into their coverage of overweight and obesity.

    “We are diverse,” says Lonzer, who has overweight. “We also have diversity in body shape and size. It’s good to have images that reflect what Americans look like.”

    If you’re looking for images and b-roll videos that portray people with obesity in non-stigmatizing ways, check out the Rudd Center Media Gallery. It’s a collection of original images of people from various demographic groups that journalists can use for free in their coverage.

    The Obesity Action Coalition, a nonprofit advocacy organization, also provides images. But journalists must sign up to use the OAC Bias-Free Image Gallery.

    Other places to find free images: The World Obesity Image Bank, a project of the World Obesity Federation, and the Flickr account of Obesity Canada.

    4. Make sure your story does not reinforce stereotypes or insinuate that overcoming obesity is simply a matter of cutting calories and doing more exercise.

    “Think about the kinds of language used in the context of eating habits or physical activity, as some can reinforce shame or stereotypes,” Puhl wrote.

    She suggested journalists avoid phrases such as “resisting temptations,” “cheating on a diet,” “making excuses,” “increasing self-discipline” and “lacking self-control” because they perpetuate the myth that individuals can control their weight and that the key to losing weight is eating less and moving more.

    Lonzer offers this advice: As you work on stories about obesity or weight-related issues, ask yourself if you would use the same language and framing if you were reporting on someone you love.

    Here are other questions for journalists to contemplate:

    “Am I treating this as a complex medical condition or am I treating it as ‘Hey, lay off the French fries?’” Lonzer adds. “Am I treating someone with obesity differently than someone with another disease?”

    It’s important to also keep in mind that having excess body fat does not, by itself, mean a person is unhealthy. And don’t assume everyone who has a higher weight is unhappy about it.

    “Remember, not everyone with obesity is suffering,” physician Monu Khanna wrote to The Journalist’s Resource.

    5. To help audiences understand how difficult it is to prevent and reduce obesity, explain that even the places people live can affect their waistlines.

    When news outlets report on obesity, they often focus on weight-loss programs, surgical procedures and anti-obesity medications. But there are other important issues to cover. Experts stress the need to help the public understand how factors not ordinarily associated with weight gain or loss can influence body size.

    For example, a paper published in 2018 in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine indicates adults who are regularly exposed to loud noise have a higher waist circumference than adults who are not. Research also finds that people who live in neighborhoods with sidewalks and parks are more active.

    “One important suggestion I would offer to journalists is that they need to critically explore environmental factors (e.g., built environment, food deserts, neighborhood safety, etc.) that lead to disproportionately high rates of obesity among certain groups, such as low-income individuals and racial/ethnic minorities,” Leslie Cofie, an assistant professor at East Carolina University, wrote to The Journalist’s Resource.

    Cofie added that moving to a new area can prompt weight changes.

    “We know that immigrants generally have lower rates of obesity when they first migrate to the U.S.,” he wrote. “However, over time, their obesity rates resemble that of their U.S.-born counterparts. Hence, it is critical for journalists to learn about how the sociocultural experiences of immigrants change as they adapt to life in the U.S. For example, cultural perspectives about food, physical activities, gender roles, etc. may provide unique insights into how the pre- and post-migration experiences of immigrants ultimately contribute to the unfavorable trends in their excessive weight gain.”

    Other community characteristics have been linked to larger body sizes for adults or children: air pollution, lower altitudes, higher temperatures, lower neighborhood socioeconomic status, perceived neighborhood safety, an absence of local parks and closer proximity to fast-food restaurants.

    6. Forge relationships with organizations that study obesity and advocate on behalf of people living with the disease.

    Several organizations are working to educate journalists about obesity and help them improve their coverage. Five of the most prominent ones collaborated on a 10-page guide book, “Guidelines for Media Portrayals of Individuals Affected by Obesity.”

    • The Rudd Center for Food Policy and Health, based at the University of Connecticut, “promotes solutions to food insecurity, poor diet quality, and weight bias through research and policy,” according to its website. Research topics include food and beverage marketing, weight-related bullying and taxes on sugary drinks.
    • The Obesity Society helps journalists arrange interviews with obesity specialists. It also offers journalists free access to its academic journal, Obesity, and free registration to ObesityWeek, an international conference of researchers and health care professionals held every fall. This year’s conference is Nov. 2-6 in San Antonio, Texas.
    • The Obesity Medicine Association represents health care providers who specialize in obesity treatment and care. It also helps journalists connect with obesity experts and offers, on an individual basis, free access to its events, including conferences and Obesity Medicine Fundamentals courses.
    • The Obesity Action Coalition offers free access to its magazine, Weight Matters, and guides on weight bias at work and in health care.
    • The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery represents surgeons and other health care professionals who work in the field of metabolic and bariatric surgery. It provides the public with resources such as fact sheets and brief explanations of procedures such as the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

    For further reading

    Weight Stigma in Online News Images: A Visual Content Analysis of Stigma Communication in the Depictions of Individuals with Obesity in U.S. and U.K. News
    Aditi Rao, Rebecca Puhl and Kirstie Farrar. Journal of Health Communication, November 2023.

    Influence and Effects of Weight Stigmatization in Media: A Systematic Review
    James Kite; et al. eClinicalMedicine, June 2022.

    Has the Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity and Central Obesity Leveled Off in the United States? Trends, Patterns, Disparities, and Future Projections for the Obesity Epidemic
    Youfa Wang; et al. International Journal of Epidemiology, June 2020.

    This article first appeared on The Journalist’s Resource and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

    Share This Post

  • The Ageless Brain – by Dr. Dale Bredesen

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We previously reviewed this author’s groundbreaking “The End of Alzheimer’s”, and now in this volume he expands on the work done there, to focus on the practical aspect of, as the subtitle promises, how to sharpen and protect your mind for a lifetime.

    When we say “groundbreaking”, this is because it’s not just the usual same old things (that are very important, and/but probably quite well-known to most 10almonds readers), but rather, 36 metabolic factors that are implicated in Alzheimer’s pathology, and the good news is, most of them are within our control.

    He explores these, and how to tweak them to our advantage, through much of the first half of the book, before getting to more general advice—some of which is the “same old things”, but some are factors that at best, don’t get much attention: like the relationship between oral health and cognitive health, for example.

    The style is more varied this time; sometimes once again on the hard end of pop science, since there’s a lot of technical clinical data and information in here, but he does explain everything as we go, making it still quite readable for the layperson; sometimes, on the other hand, it’s quite light and narrative in style. The author being a physician-scientist in his 70s, he has a lot of experience and that means a lot of stories to tell to illustrate his points.

    Bottom line: if you’d like to protect your brain with the very latest science in a comprehensive fashion, this book will enable you to do just that.

    Click here to check out The Ageless Brain, and defy brain aging!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • How Does Chemotherapy Actually Work?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Including why it often causes hair loss:

    From death to life

    Chemotherapy was discovery born from war: during World War I, mustard gas was found to severely damage bone marrow and stop blood-cell production. Because cancer cells, like bone marrow cells, divide rapidly, researchers wondered whether mustard-gas compounds could destroy cancer cells. By the end of World War II, this research had produced the first chemotherapy drugs.

    More than a 100 years after that initial research began, more than 100 chemotherapy drugs now exist, using cytotoxic agents that damage or kill cells. They work in different ways, for example alkylating agents damage DNA, particularly affecting rapidly dividing cancer cells, while microtubule stabilizers interfere with the structures needed for cell division.

    This explains why side effects occur: chemotherapy also harms healthy cells that divide rapidly, including your hair follicles, mouth, gastrointestinal lining, reproductive system, and bone marrow. Thus, we often see side effects such as hair loss, fatigue, infertility, nausea, and vomiting.

    Unwanted side effects can at least be mitigated somewhat; for example, anti-nausea medications can help control nausea and vomiting, while cold caps can reduce blood flow around your hair follicles and potentially limit hair loss. The good news is, healthy tissues generally recover after treatment ends.

    And yes, “after treatment ends” is more often a happy story than a sad one, because chemotherapy has transformed cancer survival, with (per the examples given in the video) up to 95% of people with testicular cancer surviving and an estimated 60% of people under 60 with acute myeloid leukemia entering remission after their initial treatment phase. Researchers are also developing increasingly precise treatments designed to target cancer cells while reducing harm to healthy tissue.

    Cancer is one of the most well-funded medical research areas, so it’s little wonder that advances keep on coming.

    For more on all of this, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like:

    Your friend has been diagnosed with cancer. Here are 6 things you can do to support them

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Beat Osteoporosis with Exercise – by Dr. Karl Knopf

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    There are a lot of books about beating osteoporosis, and yet when it comes to osteoporosis exercises, it took us some work to find a good one. But, this one’s it!

    A lot of books give general principles and a few sample exercises. This one, in contrast, gives:

    • An overview of osteopenia and osteoporosis, first
    • A brief overview of non-exercise osteoporosis considerations
    • Principles for exercising a) to reduce one’s risk of osteoporosis b) if one has osteoporosis
    • Clear explanations of about 150 exercises that fit both categories

    This last item’s important, because a lot of popular advice is exercises that are only good for one or the other (given that a lot of things that strengthen a healthy person’s bones can break the bones of someone with osteoporosis), so having 150 exercises that are safe and effective in both cases, is a real boon.

    That doesn’t mean you have to do all 150! If you want to, great. But even just picking and choosing and putting together a little program is good.

    Bottom line: if you’d like a comprehensive guide to exercise to keep you strong in the face of osteoporosis, this is a great one.

    Click here to check out Beat Osteoporosis With Exercise, and stay strong!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: