Debunking the vitamin D fad

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

Throughout the pandemic, many unproven miracle COVID-19 “cures” emerged, and vitamin D claims have been one of the most persistent. This is not new for the vitamin. It’s been touted in recent decades as a way to “boost” the immune system, improve overall health, prevent a host of diseases, and allegedly even substitute for vaccines. 

But as with many internet-popular health “remedies,” the reality is far less flashy and far more nuanced.

What is vitamin D, and why is it important?

Vitamin D is a nutrient that helps the body absorb calcium, which is essential for bone health. In the sunlight, your skin naturally produces vitamin D that is then stored in fat cells until it is used.

The skin pigment melanin absorbs the UV rays necessary for vitamin D production, meaning that more highly pigmented or darker skin produces less vitamin D than lighter skin with the same amount of sun exposure. Thus, people with darker skin are at higher risk of vitamin D deficiency.

Most of our vitamin D comes from the sun. An additional 10 percent to 20 percent of our vitamin D comes from foods like fatty fish (such as salmon), eggs, and mushrooms. Vitamin D supplements are another source of the nutrient for people who are unable to get enough from sun exposure and diet.

Vitamin D deficiency is real, but there’s no epidemic

Some people who promote vitamin D supplements claim that vitamin D deficiency is an epidemic causing widespread health issues. There is little evidence to support this claim. A 2022 analysis of 2001-2018 data found that 2.6 percent of people in the U.S. had severe vitamin D deficiency. 

Severe vitamin D deficiency can cause serious health issues, such as muscle weakness, bone loss in adults, and rickets (weak bones) in children. Some people are at higher risk for the deficiency, including individuals with certain disorders that prevent the body from absorbing or processing vitamin D or those with a family history of vitamin D deficiency. 

Black Americans have the highest rates of severe vitamin D deficiency at nearly 12 percent. Severe vitamin D deficiency is also slightly higher in the U.S. during the winter when people get less sun exposure. Rates of moderate vitamin D deficiency are higher at 22 percent overall and are highest among Black Americans (49 percent) and Mexican Americans (35 percent). 

Although severe vitamin D deficiency exists in the U.S., it is far from common. Most tellingly, conditions that are directly linked to vitamin D deficiency are not widespread. There is no epidemic of rickets, for example, or bone loss in adults. 

There’s little evidence that vitamin D supplements improve overall health

Vitamin D supplements have clear, proven positive effects for people with vitamin D deficiency. Other health benefits of vitamin D supplements are less certain. 

There is some evidence that the supplement may reduce the risk of fracture in adults with osteoporosis, a condition that causes weak, fragile bones. However, the benefit appears to be limited to people who have low vitamin D levels. In adults with normal vitamin D levels, supplements have no effect on fracture risk.

The largest randomized controlled trial of vitamin D, called VITAL, investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation in people without an existing deficiency. The study found that vitamin D supplements had no effects on the risk of cancer, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease, including heart attack and stroke. The study concluded that more research is necessary to determine who may benefit from vitamin D supplements. 

Independent analyses found that vitamin D supplementation may be associated with a long-term decrease in cancer mortality, but results are mixed and also require more investigation.

A 2021 analysis of past vitamin D trials found no overall health benefits from vitamin D supplements in people with normal vitamin D levels. Most large-scale studies have found no link between vitamin D supplements and lower all-cause mortality (deaths from any cause), except in older adults and those with vitamin D deficiency.

Vitamin D provides modest protection against respiratory infections

Vitamin D is important for immune function, but this is often misconstrued as vitamin D “boosting” the immune system. 

Some people falsely believe that taking vitamin D supplements will keep them healthy and prevent infections like the flu or COVID-19. In reality, clinical trials and large-scale studies of vitamin D have found only minimal protective effects against respiratory infections. 

A 2021 analysis of 46 trials found that 61.3 percent of participants who took daily vitamin D supplements got respiratory infections during the study periods—compared to 62.3 percent of people who did not take the supplements. A 2024 meta-analysis of 43 trials found no overall protective effect against respiratory infections, but it detected a slight decrease in risk among people who took specific doses daily. 

In young children, there is some evidence that vitamin D supplementation may reduce the length of respiratory infections. However, it does not affect the number or severity of infections that children have.

Despite claims that taking vitamin D can protect against COVID-19, two clinical trials found that taking daily vitamin D supplements did not reduce the risk or severity of COVID-19 infections, even at high doses. 

Context is key when considering vitamin D’s benefits

None of these studies contradict the well-established evidence that people with vitamin D deficiency benefit from vitamin D supplements. But it’s important to remember that many of the most popular health claims about vitamin D’s benefits are based on research in people with vitamin D deficiency.

Research in vitamin D-deficient populations is important, but it tells us little about how vitamin D will affect people with normal or close to normal vitamin D levels. A closer look at vitamin D research in people without low levels reveals little evidence to support the idea that the general population benefits from taking vitamin D supplements. 

For more information, or to learn about your vitamin D levels, talk to your health care provider.

This article first appeared on Public Good News and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Pulse – by Jenny Chandler

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Beans, chickpeas, and lentils are well-established super-healthy foods, but they’re often not a lot of people’s favorite. And why? Usually because of unhappy associations with boring dishes that can barely be called dishes.

    This book raises the bar for pulses of various kinds, and not only provides recipes (180 of them) but also guidelines on principles, tips and tricks, what works and what doesn’t, what makes things better or worse, perfect partners, sprouting, and more.

    The recipes themselves are not all vegan, nor even all vegetarian, but the beans are the star throughout. For those who are vegan or vegetarian, it’s easy to make substitutions, not least of all because the author is generous with “try this instead of that” and “consider also” suggestions, to help us tailor each dish to our personal preferences, and even the desired vibe of a given meal.

    The dishes are neither overly simplistic (it’s not a student survival cookbook, by any means) nor overly complicated; rather, enough is done to make each dish invitingly tasty, and nothing extraneous or pretentious is added for the sake of being fancy. This is about delicious home cooking, nothing more nor less.

    If the book has a weakness, it’s that visual learners will feel the absence of pictures for many recipes. But, the text is clear, the instructions are easy to follow, and a photo for each dish would probably have doubled the cost of the book, at least, while halving the number of recipes.

    Bottom line: if you’d like to get more beans and other pulses in your diet, but are unsure how to make it exciting, this is an excellent option.

    Click here to check out Pulse, and expand your kitchen repertoire!

    Share This Post

  • Every Body Should Know This – by Dr. Federica Amati

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    This book is very much a primer on how to eat healthily. The science is high-quality (the author is the head nutritionist at ZOE) and well-explained, and the advice is reasonable.

    Limitations: this book is not very deep, which we might expect from a book with this title. So, if you’ve been a long-time 10almonds reader, you might not learn a lot here, and this book might make a better gift for someone else.

    In particular, the book may be well-suited for someone who is thinking of having children soon, as there is an unusual amount of focus on fertility and young motherhood—perhaps because the author herself has young children and so was preoccupied with this when writing. For those of us who are definitely not having any more children, the focus on young motherhood is a little superfluous.

    The writing style is very readable pop-science, and nobody who is able to read English is likely to struggle with this one. It’s also quite conversational in parts, as the author discusses her own experiences with implementing the science at hand.

    Bottom line: if you want a good, solid, primer of how to eat well for a lifetime of health, especially if you are (or are thinking of becoming) a young mother, then this is a very good book. Otherwise, it’s probably a better to give it as a gift.

    Click here to check out Every Body Should Know This, and know the things!

    Share This Post

  • Body Recomposition: How To Get Toned Quickly

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Personal trainer Elisi Wolf explains how to cut straight to it:

    As easy as 1-2-3

    Many women say they want to “get toned,” which really means they want a body recomposition; looking leaner at the same weight is due to gaining muscle while losing fat—not weight.

    Elisi says the sweet spot for effective recomposition is around 25% body fat, allowing for noticeable muscle gain and fat loss simultaneously, ending up with more like 21% body fat as a reasonable healthy end point to the recomposition phase (i.e., the point at which you’ll stop recomposing and start maintaining), though of course you might prefer more or less than that; that’s up to you.

    How to do it, her way:

    1. Calculate maintenance calories: use a calorie calculator and subtract 400 to find your true maintenance; eat this amount for a week to confirm the scale doesn’t change
    2. Progress your workouts: consistently increase effort by adding weight, improving control (an oft-neglected factor that Elisi focuses on a lot in her training), and/or increasing movement (e.g. daily walks)
    3. Enjoy a high protein diet: protein is essential for muscle building, fat loss, and satiety; it also burns more energy to digest and keeps you full with fewer calories

    About the progression: she recommends to, for example, start with 20 lb hip thrusts and increase weight every second week; eventually, this builds visible muscle without changing calories. Adapt the same model for your preferred exercises, of course.

    About the protein: she also notes that we should not just increase protein intake, but also prioritize protein over carbs and fats; it’s not used for energy unless absolutely necessary, so most of it supports muscle gain. She advises that this works whether you still eat meat or enjoy a vegan diet—just ensure your protein intake is high and “clean” (i.e. unprocessed whole foods, or minimally-processed where some kind of processing is necessary—for example, cooking lentils is indeed a process).

    About maintenance: once you’ve got to the body composition you want, you should find that your newly recomposed body is actually pretty easy to maintain, because muscle has a thermogenic effect, helping you burn more calories at rest and aiding fat loss (i.e. muscle “costs” calories just by being there—unlike fat, which triggers the body to slow down the metabolism to survive the famine for which we were surely preparing when we put the fat on).

    For more on all of this, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like:

    Can You Gain Muscle & Lose Fat At The Same Time? ← we got this question in our Q&A day a little while ago, and here was our answer. We went for a less numbers-based approach, and a more principles-based approach. Both ways work, so by all means pick whichever method you personally find better suits how you like to do things!

    See also: Can We Do Fat Redistribution? ← the answer is “yes” and this article explains how

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • The Distracted Mind – by Dr. Adam Gazzaley and Dr. Larry Rosen

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Yes, yes, we know, unplug once in a while. But what else do this highly-qualified pair of neuroscientists have to offer?

    Rather than being a book for the sake of being a book, with lots of fluff and the usual advice about single-tasking, the authors start with a reframe:

    Neurologically speaking, the hit of dopamine we get when looking for information is the exact same as the hit of dopamine that we, a couple of hundred thousand years ago, got when looking for nuts and berries.

    • When we don’t find them, we become stressed, and search more.
    • When we do find them, we are encouraged and search more nearby, and to the other side of nearby, and near around, to find more.

    But in the case of information (be it useful information or celebrity gossip or anything in between), the Internet means that’s always available now.

    So, we jitter around like squirrels, hopping from one to the next to the next.

    A strength of this book is where it goes from there. Specifically, what evidence-based practices will actually keep our squirrel-brain focused… and which are wishful thinking for anyone who lives in this century.

    Bringing original research from their own labs, as well as studies taken from elsewhere, the authors present a science-based toolkit of genuinely useful resources for actual focus.

    Bottom line: if you think you could really optimize your life if you could just get on track and stay on track, this is the book for you.

    Click here to check out The Distracted Mind, and get yours to focus!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Cabbage vs Spinach – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing cabbage to spinach, we picked the spinach.

    Why?

    Why, oh why indeed? ← lamentations of this cabbage-loving writer

    But more seriously:

    In terms of macros, these are very similar: mostly water, small amounts of carbs and protein, and enough fiber to hold them together. The only notable point of distinction here is that cabbage higher in soluble fiber, while spinach has more insoluble fiber, however these are both important, just different, and ultimately balanced in any case, so we’ll call this round a tie.

    In the category of vitamins, cabbage has more of vitamins B5 and C, while spinach has more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B6, B7, B9, E, K, and choline; a clear win for spinach.

    When it comes to minerals, cabbage is not higher in any minerals, and spinach has more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc. Another easy win for spinach.

    With regard to phytochemicals, spinach has a much higher polyphenol content (mostly flavonols), and on the flipside, spinach has a much higher oxalate content (that’s not a problem for most people, but bad if you have certain kidney issues). So this category could be swung any which way depending on the state of your kidneys. For simplicity, we’ll record this round as a tie, but its constituent parts are worth bearing in mind.

    Adding up the sections makes for an overall win for spinach, but by all means enjoy either or both; diversity is good!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    What Do The Different Kinds Of Fiber Do? 30 Foods That Rank Highest

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Why Keto Fat Loss Doesn’t Work So Well For Women

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We’ve written before about the ketogenic diet:

    Ketogenic Diet: Burning Fat Or Burning Out?

    …and the answer to the question posed by that title is “both”:

    • the one thing that it is generally considered good for (aside from managing refractory epilepsy in children, which is what the diet was originally designed for) is fat loss
    • however, this comes at the cost of cumulative health issues, mostly for the heart, which risks thus become more dangerous over time, for example:

    ❝As obesity rates in the populace keep rising, dietary fads such as the ketogenic diet are gaining traction.

    Although they could help with weight loss, this study had a notable observation of severe hypercholesterolemia and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among the ketogenic diet participants.❞

    ~ Dr. Shadan Khdher et al.

    Read in full: The Significant Impact of High-Fat, Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet on Serum Lipid Profile and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Overweight and Obese Adults

    …although there are other problems too, for example: Is Losing Weight Worth Losing Your Kidney: Keto Diet Resulting in Renal Failure

    Nevertheless, let’s take a look at that fat loss for which so many people turn to keto:

    Ketogenic diet and sex differences

    Like most health science for anything outside of “the bikini zone” (i.e. places covered by a bikini), most research into the ketogenic diet has not taken sex differences into account, and has typically looked at either male participants, or participants of any sex and/but without those sex differences being looked at.

    However, “most” is not “all”, and a team of researchers (Dr. Yingying Jiao et al.) did examine those sex differences.

    She and her team found that over the same period of time, men lost 11.63% of body weight vs 8.95% for women on identical ketogenic diet protocols.

    Grabbing a calculator (100(11.63-8.95)/11.63), we see that that means 23% less weight loss for women.

    You can read the paper in full, here: Sex differences in ketogenic diet: are men more likely than women to lose weight?

    As to why, it comes down to several factors, but first, let’s do a quick recap of how the ketogenic diet works for fat loss: it’s an extremely low-carb, moderate-protein, high-fat diet that mimics fasting. In response to this, the body shifts from using glucose for energy to using ketones. This promotes fat breakdown, reduces appetite, and maintains blood glucose levels as it goes.

    Now, let’s look at the process piece by piece.

    In terms of hormone signalling:

    • estrogen conserves fat breakdown via α-adrenergic receptors
    • testosterone accelerates fat breakdown by increasing β-adrenergic receptors

    In terms of metabolic energy use:

    • estrogen promotes the storage fatty acids as triglycerides and use of carbs as energy
    • testosterone promotes the oxidization of fatty acids for energy and store carbs

    In terms of where body fat is stored (and thus how easy it is for the body to get at it):

    • estrogen promotes the storage of fat subcutaneously (harder to mobilize)
    • testosterone promotes the storage of fat viscerally (easier to burn)

    In short, everything estrogen does in this regard improves our endurance and helps us survive famine.

    Which, on an evolutionary level, is fabulous. However, when it comes to trying to use fasting (or, as in the case of keto, a fast-mimicking diet) to lose weight, then it isn’t so helpful.

    Our body is just too well-prepared for it and responds to the “famine” (extremely low-carb diet) by going “don’t worry, we’ve got this!” and carefully rationing our body fat to ensure we can survive the winter.

    You may be wondering: if all this is about estrogen vs testosterone, then does untreated menopause (and thus much lower estrogen levels) change this?

    And the answer is: yes, it does, albeit not completely, because testosterone levels will still not be so high as in men. Thus, in the category of fat loss, the ketogenic diet:

    • works well for men,
    • works moderately well for women in untreated menopause, and
    • works least well for premenopausal women and women on HRT.

    (This is all discussed in the above-linked paper too, by the way)

    On that latter note (the menopause etc), it’s also worth bearing in mind that an extra concern that typically comes with the menopause anyway, is further compounded in the case of conforming to a ketogenic diet, because even in the short term, keto already increases osteoporosis risk:

    ❝Markers of bone modeling/remodeling were impaired after short-term low-carbohydrate high-fat diet, and only one marker of resorption recovered after acute carbohydrate restoration❞

    ~ Dr. Ida Heikura et al.

    A Short-Term Ketogenic Diet Impairs Markers of Bone Health in Response to Exercise

    If you, dear reader, are a woman and perhaps of a certain age, and all this has prompted you to wonder what dietary balance (especially: ratio of energy from fat to energy from carbs) might be better for you, then this is quite personalizable, so check out:

    What Macronutrient Balance Is Right For You?

    Want to lose weight, but not on keto?

    We’ve got you covered:

    How To Lose Weight (Healthily!)

    Want to learn more?

    For more on sex differences in nutrition (and exercise), with a focus on what’s best with female physiology, you might like this very good book that we reviewed recently:

    ROAR: Match Your Food and Fitness to Your Unique Female Physiology for Great Health, Optimum Performance, and a Strong Body for Life – by Dr. Stacy Sims

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: