How community health screenings get more people of color vaccinated

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

U.S. preventive health screening rates dropped drastically at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. They have yet to go back to pre-pandemic levels, especially for Black and Latine communities

Screenings, or routine medical checkups, are important ways to avoid and treat disease. They’re key to finding problems early on and can even help save people’s lives. 

Community health workers say screenings are also a key to getting more people vaccinated. Screening fairs provide health workers the chance to build rapport and trust with the communities they serve, while giving their clients the chance to ask questions and get personalized recommendations according to their age, gender, and family history.

But systemic barriers to health care can often keep people from marginalized communities from accessing recommended screenings, exacerbating racial health disparities. 

Public Good News spoke with Dr. Marie-Jose Francois, president and chief executive officer, and April Johnson, outreach coordinator, at the Center for Multicultural Wellness and Prevention (CMWP), in Central Florida, to learn how they promote the benefits of screening and leverage screenings for vaccination outreach among their diverse communities. 

Here’s what they said. 

[Editor’s note: This content has been edited for clarity and length.]

PGN: What is CMWP’s mission? How does vaccine outreach fit into the work you do in the communities you serve?

Dr. Marie-Jose Francois: Since 1995, our mission has been to enhance the health, wellness, and quality of life for diverse populations in Central Florida. At the beginning, our main focus was education, wellness, and screening for HIV/AIDS, and we continue to do case management for HIV screening and testing. 

When the issue of COVID-19 came into the picture, we included COVID-19 information and education and stressed the importance of screening and receiving vaccinations during all of our outreach activities. 

We try to meet the community where they are. Because there is so much misconception—and taboo—in regard to immunization. 

April Johnson: So our job is to disperse accurate information. And how we do that is we go into rural communities. We build partnerships with local apartment complexes, hair salons, nail salons, laundromats, and provide a little community engagement, where people just hang out in different areas. 

We build gatekeepers in those communities because you first have to get in there. You have to know that they trust you. Being in this field for about 30 years, I’ve [learned that] flexibility is key. Because sometimes you can’t get them from 9 to 5, or [from] Monday through Friday. So, you have to be very flexible in doing the outreach portion in order to get what you need. 

I’ve built collaborations with senior citizen centers, community centers, schools, clinics, churches in Orlando and [in] different areas in Orange, Osceola, Seminole, and Lake counties. And we also partner with other community-based organizations to try to make it like a one-stop shop. So, partnership is a big thing. 

PGN: How do you promote the importance of preventive screenings in the communities you serve?

M.F.: We try to make them view their health in a more comprehensive way, for them to understand the importance of screening. [That] self care is key, and for them to not be afraid. 

We empower them to know what to ask when they go to the doctor. We ask them, ‘Do you know your status? Do you know your numbers?’ 

For example, if you go to the doctor, do you know your blood pressure? If you’re diabetic? Do you know your hemoglobin (A1C)? Do you know your cholesterol levels

And now, [we also ask them]: ‘Have you received your flu shot for the year? Have you received all of your vaccine doses for COVID-19?’ We are even adding the mpox vaccine now, based on risk factors. 

[We recommend they] ask their provider. For women, [we ask], ‘When do you need to have your mammogram?’ For the men, ‘You need to ask about your PSA and also about when and when to have your colonoscopy based on your age.’ 

We also try to explain to the community that the more they know their family history, the more they can engage in their own health. Because sometimes you have mom and dad who have a history of cancer. They have a history of diabetes or blood pressure—and they don’t talk to their children. So, we try to [recommend they] talk to their children. Your own family needs to know what’s going on so they can be proactive in their screenings.

PGN: What strategies or methods have you found most effective in getting people screened? 

M.F.: Not everybody wants to be screened, not everybody wants to receive vaccines. 

But with patience, just give them the facts. It goes right back to education, people have to be assured. 

When you talk to them about COVID, or even HIV, you may hear them say, ‘Oh, I don’t see myself at risk for HIV.’  But we have to repeat to them that the more they get screened to make sure they’re OK, the better it is for them. ‘The more you use condoms, [the] safer it is for you.’ 

In Haitian culture, they listen to the radio. So we use the radio as a tool to educate and deliver information [to] get vaccinated, wash your hands. ‘If you’re coughing, cover your mouth. If you have a fever, wear your masks. Call your doctor.’ 

In our target population, we have people who have chronic conditions. We have people with HIV. So, we have to motivate them to receive the flu vaccine, to receive the COVID vaccine, to receive that RSV [vaccine], or to get the mpox vaccine. We have people with diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, depressed immune systems. We have people with lupus, we have people with sickle cell disease. 

So, this is a way to [ensure that] whomever you’re talking to one-on-one understands the value of being safe. 

This article first appeared on Public Good News and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

  • This Week In Brain News
    Bad breath may predict brain health, cannabis use impacts memory, and new tech decodes thoughts into text. Read how these findings redefine wellness and brain science.

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Inner Sense – by Caroline Williams

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    When a book has “the new science of” in its subtitle, we invariably ask: “is it really the new science of?”, and in this case, the answer is no, it isn’t.

    However! It is “the good and useful science of”, so we’ll not count that against the book.

    The case is made for interoception (the sense of what is going on inside us) being important for general health. At 10almonds we’ve written about this before in the context of mindful eating, but Williams takes it further, to extend to all aspects of life.

    The trick, she argues, is in developing the skill to selectively tune out external stimuli, to focus on the internal—and then to maintain that contact, such that even if it’s not generally at the forefront of one’s mind, it can be accessed quickly and easily, and in the event of something not being quite right, we’ll generally notice sooner than otherwise.

    Another way she takes it further is noting how our gut, brain, and immune system all talk to each other, and how we can best make use of that knowledge, too.

    The style of the book is mostly light pop-science with pointers for papers to read to get more details on certain things.

    Bottom line: if you’d like to increase your own bodily awareness, this book will walk you through it, system by system.

    Click here to check out Inner Sense, and develop your inner sense!

    Share This Post

  • Grapefruit vs Orange – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing grapefruit to orange, we picked the orange.

    Why?

    It’s easy, when guessing which is the healthier out of two things, to guess that the more expensive or perhaps less universally available one is the healthier. But it’s not always so, and today is one of those cases!

    In terms of macros, they are very similar fruits, with almost identical levels of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, as well as water. Looking more carefully, we find that grapefruit’s sugars contain a slightly high proportion of fructose; not enough to make it unhealthy by any means (indeed, no whole unprocessed fruit is unhealthy unless it’s literally poisonous), but it is a thing to note if we’re micro-analysing the macronutrients. Also, oranges have slightly more fiber, which is always a plus. So, a very slight win for oranges in this round.

    When it comes to vitamins, oranges stand out with more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B6, B9, C, and E, while grapefruit boasts more vitamin A (hence its color). Still, we’re calling this category another win for oranges.

    In the category of minerals, oranges again sweep with more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, and selenium, while grapefruit has just a little more phosphorus. So, another easy win for oranges.

    One final consideration that’s not shown in the nutritional values, is something we’ve written about before. Namely, that grapefruit contains furanocoumarin, which can inhibit cytochrome P-450 3A4 isoenzyme and P-glycoptrotein transporters in the intestine and liver—slowing down their drug metabolism capabilities, thus effectively increasing the bioavailability of many drugs manifold. It can also be found in lower quantities in Seville (sour) oranges, and it’s not present (or at least, if it is, it’s in truly tiny quantities) in most oranges.

    This may sound superficially like a good thing (improving bioavailability of things we want), but in practice it means that in the case of many drugs, if you take them with (or near in time to) grapefruit or grapefruit juice, then congratulations, you just took an overdose. This happens with a lot of meds for blood pressure, cholesterol (including statins), calcium channel-blockers, anti-depressants, benzo-family drugs, beta-blockers, and more. Oh, and Viagra, too. Which latter might sound funny, but remember, Viagra’s mechanism of action is blood pressure modulation, and that is not something you want to mess around with unduly. So, do check with your pharmacist to know if you’re on any meds that would be affected by grapefruit or grapefruit juice!

    Adding up the sections makes for a very clear overall win for oranges, but by all means do enjoy either or both, unless you’re on any meds that contraindicate grapefruit!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    Watch Out For Furanocoumarins!

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Feel The Difference: Mobility Mistakes That Are Making You Tighter

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Marina Sarenac, mobility coach, shows us how to do it better:

    It makes a big difference

    Some common mistakes and their solutions:

    • Stretching too aggressively: forcing a stretch can trigger your body’s protective response so your muscles tighten instead of relaxing.
      • Frog hip rock: sounds like a music genre, but instead is an exercise whereby you sit on the floor in a frog position with your knees aligned with your hips and your feet turned outward, lower onto your elbows with a natural spine, slowly push your hips backwards without rotating them or rounding your lower back, pause briefly at your deepest stretch, then return.
      • Foam roller thoracic extension: lie on your stomach with a foam roller in front of you and your hands resting on it, move your hands closer towards your body to lift your chest into a back extension while maintaining pressure on the roller, then raise one arm near your ear and then the other without letting your torso collapse, before lowering and relaxing.
    • Only passive stretching: holding stretches without activation doesn’t teach your nervous system to use that range, so your body doesn’t maintain the mobility.
      • Seated hip activation with kettlebells: sit with your feet close to your hips and let your knees fall outward, place kettlebells on your legs, keep your posture upright, then slowly lift and lower your legs to activate your hips (while maintaining the stretch).
      • Lunge rotation with kettlebell: step into a lunge with both knees at about 90° and a neutral spine, place a kettlebell on the shoulder opposite your front leg, rotate your torso while pressing the kettlebell upward with your arm close to your ear, keep your hips stable, and move slowly.
    • Skipping progression levels: jumping directly into advanced stretches can make your body defensive because it isn’t prepared for the range.
      • Start at “too easy”: it’s fine to do something that’s too easy first, just progress little by little, and you’ll find where it stops being easy; work onwards from there.
    • Ignoring strength: tight muscles sometimes reflect weakness rather than shortness, so your body resists relaxing in positions where it doesn’t feel strong.
      • Dumbbell hip hinge: hold dumbbells in front of your body with your feet about shoulder-width apart and your spine neutral, push your hips backwards while your torso leans forwards with a slight knee bend, go only as far as you can without rounding your back, briefly hold the bottom position, then return to an upright position.
      • Cable lunge rotation: step into a lunge with both knees around 90° and a neutral spine, hold a cable handle in the same hand as your front leg, rotate your torso towards that side while keeping your hips and front leg stable, and keep your elbow close to your body throughout the movement.

    For more on all of this plus visual demonstrations, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like:

    Why Stretching Doesn’t Work After 50 (Unless You Fix These 3 Mistakes)

    Take care!

    Share This Post

Related Posts

  • Avocado vs Blackberries – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing avocado to blackberries, we picked the avocado.

    Why?

    Both are great and both have their merits! But there is a clear winner:

    In terms of macros, avocado has more fiber, protein, and (famously healthy) fats, while blackberries have slightly more carbs; an easy first-round win for avocado.

    In the category of vitamins, avocado has more of vitamins B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, B9, E, and K, while blackberries have more of vitamins A and C; another clear win for avocados.

    Looking at minerals, avocado has more copper, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc, while blackberries have more calcium, iron, and manganese, yielding to avocado a 5:3 win here.

    In other considerations, blackberries are higher in polyphenols, so that’s a point in their favor.

    Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for avocados, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    What’s Your Plant Diversity Score?

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Blackberries vs Gooseberries – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing blackberries to gooseberries, we picked the blackberries.

    Why?

    Both are great! But…

    In terms of macros, blackberries have more fiber and protein, while gooseberries have more carbs. An easy win for blackberries.

    In the category of vitamins, blackberries have more of vitamins B3, B9, E, K, and choline, while gooseberries have more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, and C, making a 5:5 tie in this round.

    Looking at minerals, blackberries have more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, and zinc, while gooseberries have more phosphorus, potassium, and selenium, making a compelling 6:3 win for blackberries.

    When it comes to other considerations, blackberries are much higher in polyphenols, which is an extra point in their favor.

    Adding up the sections makes an overall win for blackberries, but by all means enjoy either or both (you might grow them in your garden—they are both very low-maintenance hardy perennials, if your climate is suitable); diversity is good!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    21 Most Beneficial Polyphenols & What Foods Have Them

    Enjoy!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Is period syncing real? Two reproductive health experts explain

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Have you ever heard two or more women say they’re on the same cycle?

    This is a common claim among women who live together, for example in a family or as housemates.

    This idea that people menstruate, or have their period, at the same time is known as “menstrual synchrony”. If their menstrual periods happen to regularly align, they might describe themselves as being “in sync”.

    But is menstrual synchrony possible, according to science? Let’s unpack the evidence.

    www.kaboompics.com/Pexels

    The ‘menstrual synchrony’ myth

    The term “menstrual synchrony” is difficult to define.

    In popular culture, it’s generally thought to be the result of various unknown factors which cause two or more people to have their period at the same time. So it is supposedly due to biology, not coincidence.

    Scientists also struggle to define menstrual synchrony. According to one 2023 study, it is when people’s menstrual periods start at roughly the same time, not necessarily on the same day.

    But as we’ll see, research suggests being on the exact same menstrual cycle as someone else is scientifically very unlikely.

    Where did this idea come from?

    A psychologist named Martha McClintock likely popularised the concept of menstrual synchrony. In a 1971 study published in the journal Nature, McClintock studied 135 women aged between 17 and 22 who all lived together in a college dormitory.

    Her main finding was the menstrual cycles of women who shared a room or spent lots of time together aligned over time. But this was not the case among those who lived in the same building or spent more time with men, both of which are factors that influence mating behaviour in animals.

    Despite being published in a reputable and widely-read journal, today there are as many studies refuting McClintock’s 1971 study as there are supporting it. Critics mainly point to the flawed assumptions and calculations McClintock made as part of the study.

    For example, when the boarders first moved in, McClintock recorded the date when each person’s period started. Several months later, she again noted the boarders’ menstrual start date. However, she did not record the length of each person’s cycle over the course of the study. That makes it hard to know whether the boarders’ periods synced purely by chance.

    McClintock’s study also assumed each boarder had a standard 28-day menstrual cycle. Before the 2000s, this was widely accepted as scientific fact. But multiple landmark studies which used apps to track pregnancy and contraception show the length of a menstrual cycle can vary. We now know it commonly lasts between 28 and 35 days.

    One 2017 study examined the menstrual cycles of pairs of close friends or housemates. It found three-quarters of the pairs saw the timing of their periods become less, not more, aligned. But this study was not peer-reviewed, so we must interpret it with caution.

    So, why is this myth still around?

    Here are three reasons.

    It makes some evolutionary sense

    In one 2008 study, researchers suggested menstrual synchrony could lead to greater genetic diversity among groups of primates. They argued that if multiple females are capable of reproducing at the same time, it’s less likely that one alpha male will father all offspring. In theory, this would increase the group’s long-term survival through natural selection. This is the idea that beneficial genetic mutations are passed onto the next generation through reproduction.

    It’s a common misconception

    Many people believe menstrual synchrony is real. This could be because they’ve noticed their period starting around the same time as a friend, housemate or family member. But they may hold onto this myth because of confirmation bias. This is the idea that people look for evidence that affirms their existing beliefs, even if they don’t do it deliberately. So confirmation bias means we’re less likely to notice the times our periods are not in sync, or to simply dismiss that possibility.

    It may help women connect

    One American study found 90% of women surveyed believed in menstrual synchrony. Many described it as a “magical” concept which made them feel more connected to other women. Some also said it helped them cope with the challenges of menstruation. Another study found 70% of participants said they had experienced period syncing firsthand, with most viewing menstrual synchrony as a real and positive experience.

    So the evidence suggests period syncing is not scientifically supported. But it still persists in popular culture. And for some women, it may make menstruation that bit more tolerable.

    Emmalee Ford, Adjunct Lecturer, Sexual and Reproductive Health, University of Sydney and Tessa Copp, NHMRC Emerging Leader Research Fellow in Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: