Parsnips vs Potatoes – Which is Healthier?

Our Verdict

When comparing parsnips to potatoes, we picked the parsnips.

Why?

To be more specific, we’re looking at russet potatoes, and in both cases we’re looking at cooked without fat or salt, and with the skin on. In other words, the basic nutritional values of these plants in their edible form, without adding anything. With this in mind, once we get to the root of things (so to speak), there’s a clear winner:

Looking at the macros first, parsnips have more fiber, while potatoes have more carbs. Potatoes do have more protein too, but given the small numbers involved when it comes to protein we don’t think this is enough of a plus to outweigh the extra fiber in the parsnips. So, that’s a win for parsnips in this category.

In the category of vitamins, again a champion emerges: parsnips have more of vitamins B1, B2, B5, B9, C, E, and K, while potatoes have more of vitamins B3 and B6. So, a 7:2 win for parsnips here!

When it comes to minerals, parsnips have more calcium copper, manganese, selenium, and zinc, while potatoes have more iron and potassium. Potatoes do also have more sodium, but for most people most of the time, this is not a plus, healthwise. Disregarding the sodium, this category sees a 5:2 win for parsnips.

Adding up the sections makes a clear overall win for parsnips, but by all means enjoy either or both (in moderation, as with all starchy vegetables), as diversity is good!

Want to learn more?

You might like to read:

Why You’re Probably Not Getting Enough Fiber (And How To Fix It)

Take care!