
Vaccines and cancer: The myth that won’t die
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Two recent studies reported rising cancer rates among younger adults in the U.S. and worldwide. This prompted some online anti-vaccine accounts to link the studies’ findings to COVID-19 vaccines.
But, as with other myths, the data tells a very different story.
What you need to know
- Baseless claims that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer have persisted online for several years and gained traction in late 2023.
- Two recent reports finding rising cancer rates among younger adults are based on pre-pandemic cancer incidence data. Cancer rates in the U.S. have been on the rise since the 1990s.
- There is no evidence of a link between COVID-19 vaccination and increased cancer risk.
False claims about COVID-19 vaccines began circulating months before the vaccines were available. Chief among these claims was misinformed speculation that vaccine mRNA could alter or integrate into vaccine recipients’ DNA.
It does not. But that didn’t prevent some on social media from spinning that claim into a persistent myth alleging that mRNA vaccines can cause or accelerate cancer growth. Anti-vaccine groups even coined the term “turbo cancer” to describe a fake phenomenon of abnormally aggressive cancers allegedly linked to COVID-19 vaccines.
They used the American Cancer Society’s 2024 cancer projection—based on incidence data through 2020—and a study of global cancer trends between 1999 and 2019 to bolster the false claims. This exposed the dishonesty at the heart of the anti-vaccine messaging, as data that predated the pandemic by decades was carelessly linked to COVID-19 vaccines in viral social media posts.
Some on social media cherry-pick data and use unfounded evidence because the claims that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer are not true. According to the National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society, there is no evidence of any link between COVID-19 vaccines and an increase in cancer diagnosis, progression, or remission.
Why does the vaccine cancer myth endure?
At the root of false cancer claims about COVID-19 vaccines is a long history of anti-vaccine figures falsely linking vaccines to cancer. Polio and HPV vaccines have both been the target of disproven cancer myths.
Not only do HPV vaccines not cause cancer, they are one of only two vaccines that prevent cancer.
In the case of polio vaccines, some early batches were contaminated with simian virus 40 (SV40), a virus that is known to cause cancer in some mammals but not humans. The contaminated batches were discovered, and no other vaccine has had SV40 contamination in over 60 years.
Follow-up studies found no increase in cancer rates in people who received the SV40-contaminated polio vaccine. Yet, vaccine opponents have for decades claimed that polio vaccines cause cancer.
Recycling of the SV40 myth
The SV40 myth resurfaced in 2023 when vaccine opponents claimed that COVID-19 vaccines contain the virus. In reality, a small, nonfunctional piece of the SV40 virus is used in the production of some COVID-19 vaccines. This DNA fragment, called the promoter, is commonly used in biomedical research and vaccine development and doesn’t remain in the finished product.
Crucially, the SV40 promoter used to produce COVID-19 vaccines doesn’t contain the part of the virus that enters the cell nucleus and is associated with cancer-causing properties in some animals. The promoter also lacks the ability to survive on its own inside the cell or interact with DNA. In other words, it poses no risk to humans.
Over 5.6 billion people worldwide have received COVID-19 vaccines since December 2020. At that scale, even the tiniest increase in cancer rates in vaccinated populations would equal hundreds of thousands of excess cancer diagnoses and deaths. The evidence for alleged vaccine-linked cancer would be observed in real incidence, treatment, and mortality data, not social media anecdotes or unverifiable reports.
This article first appeared on Public Good News and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Healing Back Pain – by Dr. John Sarno
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Often when we review books with titles like this one, we preface it with a “what it’s not: a think-yourself-better book”.
In this case… It is, in fact, a think-yourself-better book. However, its many essay-length rave reviews caught our attention, and upon reading, we can report: its ideas are worth reading.
The focus of this book is on TMS, or “Tension Myoneural Syndrome”, to give it its full name. The author asserts (we cannot comment on the accuracy) that many cases of TMS are misdiagnosed as other things, from sciatica to lupus. When other treatments fail, or are simply not available (no cure for lupus yet, for example) or are unenticing (risky surgeries, for example), he offers an alternative approach.
Dr. Sarno lays out the case for TMS being internally fixable, since our muscles and nerves are all at the command of our brain. Rather than taking a physical-first approach, he takes a psychological-first approach, before building into a more holistic model.
The writing style is… A little dated and salesey and unnecessarily padded, to be honest, but the content makes it worthwhile.
Bottom line: if you have back pain, then the advice of this book, priced not much more than a box of top brand painkillers, seems a very reasonable thing to try.
Click here to check out Healing Back Pain, and see if it works for you!
Share This Post
-
Aging Solo – by Ellen Dawson
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Many of us will face the challenge of “aging solo”, if indeed we’re not already. The premise of this book is that while it may indeed be a challenge, it can be an exciting challenge rather than a scary one.
Thus, Dawson bids us empower ourselves to tackle it head on, proactively.
To that end, she offers her “EMPOWER” framework:
- Embrace the challenge of living solo
- Manage money mindfully while welcoming desires
- Prioritize vitality and live a vibrant life
- Own your identity; build resilience and confidence
- Weave bonds: build and maintain relationships (solo doesn’t mean lacking connections!
- Energize yourself and discover new passions
- Renew yourself and create a joyful environment
Now, as listed, those may seem a little vague, but rest assured she goes into great detail in the book, with a whole chapter for each.
For example, prioritizing vitality and energizing oneself can seem like a double-up, but the former chapter is about healthy living in the context of the solo life, while the latter chapter is more about avocation lifelong learning, overcoming fear of the unknown, and making sure to actually live this one precious life, not just go through the motions.
The style is energetic and motivational, and yet backed up with 19 pages of scientific references.
Bottom line: this book is, in essence, a roadmap for aging solo and creating the future we deserve, on our own terms. An enjoyable, practical, and uplifting read!
Click here to check out Aging Solo, and thrive as a “Soloist”!
Share This Post
-
Two Weeks Mixing With Flu Patients, Nobody Caught The Flu (Here’s Why!)
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Indoors, close quarters, no masks, no latest flu vaccine, so what was the secret?
Influencing the influenza
First, let’s be clear:
- Being outdoors is better for reducing flu transmission than being indoors
- In other words, do avoid enclosed spaces with lots of people where possible, because this is a big factor. In fact, while people think of cold weather as increasing the risk of colds and flu, the main real difference comes from “when it’s cold, people spend more time indoors in close quarters together with the windows closed”. You can learn more about that here: The Pathogens That Came In From The Cold
- Facemasks are better for reducing flu transmission than being unmasked
- Importantly, masks do help, but are more important on an epidemiological level than personal (i.e. they protect society more than they protect the wearer), and they are impractical in many circumstances, and use of them is very low in most countries. So in other words: they’re good! But may be a lost cause at least for the time being. See also: Mythbusting The Mask Debate
- Vaccination is better for reducing flu transmission than being unvaccinated
- Vaccines are considered the “gold standard” against COVID and many other infectious diseases, for their very high rate of efficacy, clear science, and at least moderately lasting effects (i.e., it’s not something like handwashing*, which must be redone very frequently). Since vaccines are not without their popular misunderstanders, we have written a little about that, here: Vaccine Mythbusting
That being said, none of those things were the reason in this case.
So, what exactly was the case?
First, the setting: researchers (Dr. Jianiu Lai et al.) ran a controlled hotel-based experiment in which young adults with confirmed influenza infections spent two weeks indoors with healthy middle-aged adults, yet no transmission occurred.
And, what was the explanation?
Coughs and sneezes spread diseases: a big factor here was that infected young adults had high viral loads in their noses but rarely coughed, which greatly limited how much virus entered the air.
Reproducing the outdoors, indoors: while the experiment was all self-contained with no access to the outside world, fan heaters and dehumidifiers rapidly mixed the room air, diluting viral particles and reducing inhalation exposure.
You can read the paper itself, here: Evaluating modes of influenza transmission (EMIT-2): Insights from lack of transmission in a controlled transmission trial with naturally infected donors
So if you’d like to benefit in the same way, then (besides what we already talked about above, consider:
Why Some People Get Sick More (And How To Not Be One Of Them)
And for the matter of indoor climate control specifically (in health terms, when it comes to ventilation, temperature, humidity, and pollution*, see:
What’s Lurking In Your Household Air?
*You might be thinking “pollution, indoors?”, and yes, pollution indoors, for two main reasons:
- You May Have More Air Pollution In Your Home Than In The Street
- Why Your Air Is Probably Worse Quality Than You Think ← half of the US has dangerously polluted air, and the air outside eventually becomes the air inside (assuming you live in a house, not a bubble with recycled air)
…but those things are of course a separate matter to the main topic of flu management.
So for a more holistic approach, we invite you to check out: Seven Things To Do For Good Lung Health!
Want to learn more?
For a deeper dive into immunity, here you go:
The 21-Day Immunity Plan – by Dr. Aseem Malhotra
Take care!
Share This Post
- Being outdoors is better for reducing flu transmission than being indoors
Related Posts
-
Cherries vs Gooseberries – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing cherries to gooseberries, we picked the gooseberries.
Why?
In terms of macros, cherries have slightly more carbs while gooseberries have nearly 3x the fiber, winning this round easily.
In the category of vitamins, cherries have more of vitamins A, B2, B3, and B9, while gooseberries have more of vitamins B1, B5, B6, C, and E, scoring a modestly marginal win here.
Looking at minerals, cherries have more copper, while gooseberries have more calcium, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, for an easy third win.
When it comes to other consideration, cherries have more polyphenols by far, mostly anthocyanins and hydroxycinnamic acids, which are largely responsible for the special health benefits of cherries detailed in the link in the “Learn more” section below.
Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for gooseberries, but as you can see, cherries absolutely have their merits too, so by all means enjoy either or both!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
Cherries’ Very Healthy Wealth Of Benefits!
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Your Brain on Art – by Susan Magsamen & Ivy Ross
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
The notion of art therapy is popularly considered a little wishy-washy. As it turns out, however, there are thousands of studies showing its effectiveness.
Nor is this just a matter of self-expression. As authors Magsamen and Ross explore, different kinds of engagement with art can convey different benefits.
That’s one of the greatest strengths of this book: “this form of engagement with art will give these benefits, according to these studies”
With benefits ranging from reducing stress and anxiety, to overcoming psychological trauma or physical pain, there’s a lot to be said for art!
And because the book covers many kinds of art, if you can’t imagine yourself taking paintbrush to canvas, that’s fine too. We learn of the very specific cognitive benefits of coloring in mandalas (yes, really), of sculpting something terrible in clay, or even just of repainting the kitchen, and more. Each thing has its set of benefits.
The book’s main goal is to encourage the reader to cultivate what the authors call an aesthetic mindset, which involves four key attributes:
- a high level of curiosity
- a love of playful, open-ended exploration
- a keen sensory awareness
- a drive to engage in creative activities
And, that latter? It’s as a maker and/or a beholder. We learn about what we can gain just by engaging with art that someone else made, too.
Bottom line: come for the evidence-based cognitive benefits; stay for the childlike wonder of the universe. If you already love art, or have thought it’s just “not for you”, then this book is for you.
Click here to check out Your Brain On Art, and open up whole new worlds of experience!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Brussels Sprouts vs Kale – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing Brussels sprouts to kale, we picked the kale.
Why?
In today’s battle of Brassica oleracea vs Brassica oleracea (these two plants today are the same species, just a different cultivar), there’s a clear winner when all’s said and done:
In terms of macros, there’s really nothing between them, so this round’s a tie. However…
In the category of vitamins, Brussels sprouts have more of vitamins B1 and B5, while kale has more of vitamins A, B2, B3, B6, B7, B9, C, E, and K, winning easily.
Looking at minerals next, Brussels sprouts have more selenium, while kale has more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc, winning this round too.
In other considerations, both are abundant sources of polyphenols, but kale has more, especially kaempferol and quercetin, winning kale its third round in a row.
Adding up the sections makes for a clear overall win for kale, but by all means enjoy either or both, as diversity is best, and Brussels sprouts really are a superfood too; they just don’t look it when standing next to kale!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
- The Best Foods for Clear, Healthy Skin
- What Does Kaempferol Do, Anyway?
- Fight Inflammation & Protect Your Brain, With Quercetin
Enjoy!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:








