Top 8 Habits Of The Top 1% Healthiest Over-50s

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

Will Harlow, over-50s specialist physio, compiled some stats from over a thousand over-50s clients:

Checklist

The findings:

  1. Consistency: the healthiest individuals practised some kind(s) of health habit daily. Consistency was emphasized as more important than perfection.
  2. Resistance training: 75% of the sample engaged in resistance training for better mobility, strength, and mental health. Not all used gyms; some used household objects like bags of books or resistance bands.
  3. Walking: everyone walked at least 6,000 steps per day, often briskly. Walking speed, not just step count, made a significant difference
  4. Purpose: most participants (bearing in mind that 80% of the total sample were retired) engaged in purposeful activities like volunteering, joining groups, or writing. Having a sense of purpose correlated with longer and healthier lives.
  5. Flexible dieting: participants paid attention to their eating without strictly following specific diets. Portion size discipline and consistency (eating well 90% of the time) were key.
  6. Mobility: they worked on joint stiffness with regular mobility and stretching routines. And, importantly, they do not accept stiffness as inevitable.
  7. Social engagement: they maintained at-least-weekly social contact (e.g. clubs, family meetups, outings). Social isolation, in contrast, was linked to severe health risks like dementia and early death.
  8. Positivity: participants maintained a positive attitude despite hardships, focussing on the things they could control. Broader scientific consensus supports the premise that a positive outlook improves health and longevity.

10almonds note: we’re curious as to how causality was established in some of these, since (for example) it could easily be that someone who is in better health will more readily walk more quickly, meaning that a higher walking speed was not necessarily such a causative factor in good health, but rather a result thereof. Of course, there may also be a degree of two-way causality, but still, we like good science and there seem to be some leaps of logic here that have otherwise gone unacknowledged.

This does not take away from the fact that those eight things are most certainly good things to be doing for one’s health, all the same.

For more on each of these, enjoy:

Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

Want to learn more?

You might also like:

The Most Anti Aging Exercise

Take care!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

  • Tasty Tofu Scramble
    Savor the essence of scrambled eggs the plant-based way with tofu and a blend of flavorful, nutritious ingredients. Simple steps for a delicious, guilt-free meal!

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • How Your Emotions Affect GLP-1 Drug Results!

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs (such as Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and others) have a good reputation for working well, and the most talked-about downside is that they often have unpleasant side effects:

    Most People Who Start GLP-1 RAs Quit Them Within A Year (Here’s Why) ← there are 4 main reasons

    …and of course, some do work better than others: Better Than Ozempic?

    As with almost any drug, some people are simply “non-responders”, meaning that for some reason (often a genetic factor, often not known for sure why), the drug will simply not work as it does for most people.

    For GLP-1 receptor agonists, there is a portion of the general population for whom they simply will not work, and so far there is no known way of predicting it (probably at someone point it’ll be figured out, and this writer’s money would be on it being either a SNP mutation or a microbiome thing). So, you roll the dice, you take the GLP-1 drug, you wait and see, and there’s a 15% chance (that doesn’t sound like a lot, but it’s about 1 in 6, in other words, the same probability as rolling a “1” on a fair, six-sided die).

    You can read about how that can go, here: Ozempic didn’t work for me. I was furious—and ashamed

    But why?

    The key is in why you are overeating in the first place (and if you’re looking to lose weight and/but are not overeating, then probably GLP-1 drugs are not for you, since that is primarily how they work).

    In few words:

    • If you are overeating in response to the sight and/or smell of tasty food, then probably you will benefit well from GLP-1 RAs in the long-term
    • If you are overeating for emotional reasons (e.g. because of depression, or as a coping strategy to deal with stress/anxiety, for example) then probably GLP-1 RAs cannot be replied on to help you.

    By “cannot be relied on” does not mean you will necessarily be a “non-responder” as described above, but it does mean that it’s likely your results will be intermittent at best. Which, after all, is not a big improvement on regular yo-yo dieting, an approach that is famously Not Good™.

    Indeed, per the categories in the study we’re about to cite:

    • Emotional eaters (eating due to negative feelings, not hunger) responded best to glp-1 drugs, showing greater weight loss and better blood sugar improvements
    • External eaters (eating because food looks or smells appealing) were less likely to benefit in the long term
    • Restrained eaters (deliberately restricting diet to lose weight) exercised more restraint temporarily, but returned to baseline by 12 months

    Notably, all three categories of eaters here were people with type 2 diabetes—in other words, the very people that GLP-1 drugs were first developed to help, before they took off as weight-loss drugs.

    So in theory, these should be the people for whom GLP-1 RAs work best—and yet, as we see, it’s still not always so, and is highly dependent on what goes on between one’s ears.

    You can read this paper in full, here: Association between eating behavior patterns and the therapeutic efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter prospective observational study

    Want a different approach?

    It is possible to get many of the effects of GLP-1 RAs without taking GLP-1 RAs, by enjoying foods that increase incretin, a hormone group (the most well-known of which is GLP-1) that slows down stomach emptying, which means a gentler blood sugar curve and feeling fuller for longer. It also acts on the hypothalamus, controlling appetite via the brain too (signalling fullness and reducing hunger).

    For what foods to focus on, see: 5 Ways To Naturally Boost The “Ozempic Effect” ← this is from Dr. Jason Fung, who is perhaps most well-known for his work in functional medicine for reversing diabetes, and he’s once again giving us sound advice about metabolic hormone-hacking with dietary tweaks!

    Or to curb emotional eating specifically, check out: Emotional Eating And The Five Pillars Of Craving Control

    Or for a deeper dive, you might like this book we reviewed not long back:

    Breaking Free from Emotional Eating – by Geneen Roth

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Exercise… In A Pill?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Exercise is, of course, vitally important for many aspects of health. So, can it be replaced by a pill?

    And the answer is: in part, at least!

    Here’s how…

    Trick the muscles; trick the brain

    First, what this won’t do:

    • Give all the cardiovascular benefits of exercise
    • Give all the strength (muscular or skeletal) benefits of exercise

    You may be thinking: isn’t that everything then?

    And no it isn’t, because the word “all” was doing a fair bit of heavy-lifting (so to speak) in those bullet points.

    For example, there are a lot of physiological benefits, such as to muscle metabolism and knock-on effects in brain health (not just due to improved circulation, but also due to assorted chemicals being released too).

    Researchers (Dr. Bernard Jasmin et al.) noted that in cases of depression, exercise can be similarly effective to first-line treatments such as medication and psychotherapy, but adherence is often lower and drop-out rates are higher than with antidepressants despite their side effects.

    It’s not laziness, either; symptoms such as low energy, lack of motivation, and anhedonia—along with socio-economic pressures, co-morbidities, inexperience, time constraints, older age, stroke history, and functional limitations—can prevent people from starting or maintaining exercise.

    You can learn more about this here, by the way: Laziness Is A Scooby-Doo Villain ← which means: to tackle it requires doing a Scooby-Doo unmasking. You know, when the mystery-solving gang has the “ghost” or “monster” tied to a chair, and they pull the mask off, to reveal that there was no ghost etc, and in fact it was a real estate scammer or somesuch. So it is with “laziness” too; there’s always something else underneath (e.g. the debilitating factors we mentioned in the previous paragraph)

    Social psychologist Dr. Devon Price wrote about this (not with that metaphor though) in his book: Laziness Does Not Exist – by Dr. Devon Price

    So the trick that Dr. Jasmin et al. went for is making use of muscle as a signalling organ that communicates with the brain.

    This is because of the muscle–brain axis: skeletal muscle makes up approximately 40–50% of adult body mass and releases cehmicals collectively known as a myosecretome during contraction, which can reduce inflammation and increase neurotrophic factors that support brain health.

    Sounds like a job for exercise mimetics!

    What exercise mimetics are: exercise mimetics—which can be called “exercise pills”—are natural or synthetic compounds that activate key endurance-related signalling pathways in skeletal muscle, shifting fibres towards slower, more oxidative properties without physical training.

    For example, compounds such as AICAR, GW501516, metformin, resveratrol, NAD+ boosters, and urolithin A, all of which may alter muscle metabolism and the composition of molecules released into the bloodstream. We wrote about several of these, by the way, in: Dr. Greger’s Anti-Aging Eight

    Which can help a lot in this case too, as you can see in the paper itself: Exercise mimetics as unexplored therapeutics for treating depression

    Want to learn more?

    If you like this, then you’ll love the already-available…

    Mediterranean Diet… In A Pill?

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • ‘I went out and I had a cry’: what aged-care staff say about their grief when residents die

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    As our population ages, we’re living longer and dying older. End-of-life care is therefore an increasingly important part of aged care. In Australia, around 50% of people aged over 85 die in an aged care home.

    But what does this mean for those who work in aged care? Research suggests aged-care staff experience a unique type of grief when residents die. However, their grief often goes unrecognised, and they may be left with insufficient support.

    Maskot/Getty Images

    Forming relationships over time

    Aged-care staff don’t just do tasks such as helping with showering or delivering meals, but engage actively and connect with residents.

    In our own research we’ve spoken with aged-care staff who care for older people both in aged-care facilities and in their own homes.

    Aged-care staff are aware many of those they look after will die, and that they have a role in supporting older people as they come to the end of their life. In their caring role, they will often form meaningful and rewarding relationships with the older people in their care.

    As a result, when the older person dies, this can be a source of profound loss for aged-care workers. As one told us:

    I know I cry over some of them that die […] You spend time with them and you love them.

    Some aged-care workers we interviewed talked about being present with the older person, talking to them or holding their hands as they died. Others spoke of how they shed tears for the person who had died, but that the tears were also for their loss, because they have known the older person and been involved in their life.

    I think what made it worse was when her breathing got very shallow, and I knew she was coming to the end. I did go out. I told her I was going out for a minute. I went out and I had a cry because I wish that I could have saved her, but I knew that I couldn’t.

    Sometimes aged-care staff indicated there wasn’t an opportunity for them to say goodbye or be acknowledged as someone who had suffered a loss, even if they had been providing care to the person for a number of months or years. One aged-care worker noted:

    If people die in hospital, that’s another grief. Because they don’t get to say goodbye. Often the hospital won’t tell you.

    Aged-care staff often must also support families and loved ones as they come to terms with the death of a parent, relative or friend. This can add to the to the emotional toll for staff who may be experiencing their own feelings of grief.

    Cumulative grief

    Repeated experiences of death can lead to cumulative grief and emotional strain. While staff saw meaning and value in their work, they also found regular exposure to death challenging.

    One staff member told us that with time and seeing multiple deaths, you can “feel a little robotic. Because you’ve had to become that way to manage”.

    Organisational issues such as staff shortages or high workloads can also exacerbate these feelings of burnout and dissatisfaction. Staff highlighted the need for support in coping.

    Sometimes all you want to do is talk. You don’t need someone to solve anything for you. You just want to be heard.

    Supporting aged-care staff to manage their grief

    Aged-care organisations must take steps to support the wellbeing of their workforce, including acknowledging the grief many feel when older people die.

    Following the death of an older person, offering support to staff who have worked closely with that person and acknowledging the emotional bonds that existed are powerful ways of recognising and validating staff grief. Simply asking the staff member how they are going or giving them the chance to take some time to process that the person has died is a good place to start.

    Workplaces should also encourage self-care more broadly, promoting activities such as taking scheduled breaks, connecting with colleagues, and prioritising time for relaxation and physical activities. Staff value workplaces that encourage, normalise, and support their self-care practices.

    We also need to look at how we can normalise the ability to talk about death and dying within our families and communities. A reluctance to recognise death as part of life can add to the emotional load staff carry, especially if families see dying as a failure of care.

    Conversely, aged-care staff have consistently told us how meaningful it is to receive positive feedback and acknowledgement from families. As one worker recalled:

    We had a death over the weekend. A really long-term resident here. And the daughter drove in especially this morning to tell me what fantastic care she had. That makes me feel better, that what we’re doing is right.

    As members of families and communities, we need to recognise aged-care workers are uniquely vulnerable to feelings of grief and loss, often having built relationships with those in their care over months or years. Supporting the wellbeing of this important workforce supports them to continue to care for us and our loved ones as we age and come to the end of our lives.

    Jennifer Tieman, Matthew Flinders Professor and Director of the Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, Flinders University and Priyanka Vandersman, Senior Research Fellow, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Share This Post

  • The Toe-Tapping Tip For Better Balance

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Balance is critical for health especially in older age, since it’s amazing how much else can go dramatically and suddenly wrong after a fall. So, here’s an exercise to give great balance and stability:

    How to do it

    You will need:

    • Something to hold onto, such as a countertop
    • A target on the floor, such as a mark or a coin

    The steps:

    • Lift one leg up, bring your foot forward, and tap the object in front of you.
    • Then, bring that foot back to where it started.
    • Next, switch to the other leg and tap.
    • Alternate between your right and left legs, shifting back and forth.
    • Your goal is to do this for 10 repetitions on each leg without holding on.

    How it works:

    Whenever you tap, you have to lift one leg up and reach it out in front of you. Doing this requires you to stand on one leg while moving a weight (namely: your other leg), which is something many people, especially upon getting older, are hesitant to do. If you’re unable to stand on one leg, let alone move your center of gravity (per the counterbalance of the other leg) while doing so, you may end up shuffling and walking with your feet sliding across the ground—something you really want to avoid.

    For more on all of this plus a visual demonstration, enjoy:

    Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like to read:

    Fall Special ← this is about not falling, or, failing that, minimizing injury if you do

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Biggest Collagen Study Yet Shows What It Does (& Doesn’t) Improve

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    On May the 4th (International Star Wars Day), we joked:

    May The Fourth Be With You ✨

    If you’re trying to remember what that mystical web-like thing is that surrounds us, fills us, and binds us together… It’s collagen! So, to help your body make more collagen, make sure to get plenty of protein, vitamins C & D, and also copper and zinc!

    Read the science: We Are Such Stuff As Fish Are Made Of

    …and we were also telling the truth, because as collagen really is…

    The stuff that holds us together

    The name literally means “makes sticky” (coll— = to stick, —gen = to make), and that’s exactly what it does. It’s necessary for many “body bits”, including bones, joints, skin, and more.

    But there are a lot of conflicting claims about what it will and won’t do as a supplement. We’ve talked about this before, doing some mythbusting such as:

    Are Collagen Molecules Too Big To Be Absorbed? ← the short version is: 1) through the skin? Definitely 2) through the gut? Yes, unless you take them apart first, in a way the body can reassemble later

    This latter thing (taking the collagen molecules apart first, in a way the body can reassemble later) is what is going on in the case of collagen peptides.

    However, even they aren’t a panacea.

    Researchers (Dr. Julia Gawronska et al.) did the biggest research review of this topic yet, and analyzed 16 systematic reviews, 113 randomized controlled trials, and 7,983 participants to assess collagen supplementation across multiple health outcomes.

    The review itself is interesting, and/but we know you’ll be most interested in the answers it arrived at, so we’ll skip straight to those:

    • Skin and joint benefits: collagen supplementation showed consistent improvements in skin elasticity and hydration, and it reduced osteoarthritis-related pain and stiffness, with stronger effects seen when taken over longer periods.
      • Most of these studies started at 5g/day, by the way, though doses up to 20g/day are also very common. More than 30g/day is unlikely to give meaningful additional benefits, unless your diet is very low in protein (in which case, because collagen is made of proteins, yes, the extra will be beneficial, but only because of the dietary shortfall for which you are in that case compensating)
    • Musculoskeletal effects beyond the above: collagen was linked to modest improvements in muscle mass, muscle structure, and tendon structure, suggesting limited but plausible support for aspects of healthy aging.
      • This is likely a combination of the same effects as the above, and also that once again yes, collagen taken as a supplement is supplementing dietary protein, so if your diet was low in that, getting more will help—hence the “modest improvements” on the population level, since the numbers are population averages.
    • Sports performance, for some reason: the review found little evidence that collagen improves exercise performance, post-workout recovery, muscle soreness, or tendon mechanical function.
      • We’re unsure as to why why anyone thought that collagen would improve those things, but we acknowledge that it’s good in science to not leave assumptions untested, so it’s as well that the science was done, even if the results were not exciting and just confirmed what a reasonable person might already have expected.
    • Other health outcomes: results for cardiometabolic health and oral health were mixed or inconclusive, with no strong evidence for major benefits in cholesterol, blood pressure, blood sugar, or dental outcomes.

    You can read the paper in full, here: Collagen Supplementation for Skin and Musculoskeletal Health: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses on Elasticity, Hydration, and Structural Outcomes

    Prefer to do things as naturally as possible, and/or perhaps you are vegetarian/vegan?

    Check out: The Best Foods For Collagen Production

    Want to learn more?

    For a much more in-depth understanding of the pharmacokinetics of collagen, you might like this book we reviewed:

    The Collagen Cure: The Forgotten Role of Glycine and Collagen in Optimal Health and Longevity – by Dr. James DiNicolantonio

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Intermittent fasting doesn’t have an edge for weight loss, but might still work for some

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Intermittent fasting has become a buzzword in nutrition circles, with many people looking to it as a way to lose weight or improve their health.

    But new research from the Cochrane Collaboration shows intermittent fasting is no more effective for weight loss than receiving traditional dietary advice or even doing nothing at all.

    In this international review, researchers assessed 22 studies involving 1,995 adults who were classified as overweight (with a body mass index of 25–29.9 kg/m²) or obese (with a BMI of 30 kg/m² or above) to assess the effectiveness of intermittent fasting for up to 12 months.

    The authors found, when compared to energy restricted dieting, intermittent fasting doesn’t seem to work for people who are overweight or obese and are trying to lose weight. However they note intermittent fasting may still be a reasonable option for some people.

    fcafotodigital/Getty Images

    Remind me, what’s intermittent fasting?

    Intermittent fasting is a tool for weight management, which includes three main strategies:

    • alternate day fasting, where every second day is reduced to low or no energy intake
    • periodic fasting or the 5:2 diet, where one or two days of the week are spent with low or no energy intake
    • time-restricted eating or the 16:8 diet, where daily energy intake is reduced to a shorter window, usually between eight and ten waking hours.

    What did previous research show?

    Previous reviews have found differences between types of intermittent fasting.

    Alternate day fasting, for example, resulted in more weight loss when compared to time-restricted eating.

    This is because participants who fasted every second day consumed about 20% less energy than those following time-restricted eating.

    What did the Cochrane review find?

    Cochrane review use gold-standard techniques to give an objective overview of the evidence. This review looked at 22 individual randomised controlled trials published between 2016 and 2024 from North America, Europe, China, Australia and South America.

    The trials compared the outcomes of almost 2,000 adults who were classified as being overweight or obese. These participants either:

    • received standard dietary advice, such as restricting calories or eating different types of foods
    • practised intermittent fasting
    • received either regular dietary advice, no intervention or were on a wait list.

    The authors found:

    1. Intermittent fasting was no better than getting dietary advice

    The researchers found intermittent fasting and receiving dietary advice to restrict energy intake led to similar levels of weight loss.

    This finding was based on 21 studies involving 1,713 people, with the researchers measuring the change from the participants’ starting weight.

    Dietary advice (from registered dietitians or trained researchers) could include an eating plan focused on fruit, vegetables, whole grains and seafood, restricting calories, or any specific dietary advice for weight loss.

    The amount of weight the participants lost ranged from a 10% loss to a 1% gain, with either intermittent fasting or dietary advice.

    These findings are similar to several recent meta-analyses which found intermittent fasting is no better than dieting.

    Previous research has found most of the alternate day fasting and periodic diet studies leads to about 6% to 7% weight loss. This is compared to very low energy “shake” diets (about 10%), GLP-1 medications (15% to 20%) and surgery (above 20%).

    The review also found intermittent fasting likely makes little difference to a person’s quality of life, based on only three studies.

    2. Intermittent fasting was no better than doing nothing

    The researchers found intermittent fasting and no intervention led to similar levels of weight loss. This finding was based on six studies involving 448 people.

    In the intermittent fasting studies, participants experienced about 5% weight loss. The “no intervention” or control group lost about 2% of their original weight.

    In research, a 3% difference in weight loss is not considered clinically meaningful. That’s why the authors of this review concluded intermittent fasting is no more effective for weight loss than doing nothing at all.

    However, the result for the “no intervention” condition could be due to the Hawthorne effect: the tendency for people to behave differently because they know they are being watched, such as in a clinical trial.

    What are the review’s limitations?

    There were few large, high-quality randomised controlled trials to draw on.

    Only six studies were included in the part of the review which compared intermittent fasting and doing nothing. Two of these focused on time-restricted eating, which is arguably the least effective weight-loss strategy. One looked at the effects of fasting for one day per week. The other three were intermittent fasting studies, each with varying control groups, where some received guidance and others did not.

    Also, the review only looked at studies where the interventions lasted between six and 12 months. It’s possible intermittent fasting strategies could be a long-term tool for weight maintenance. So we need to do more research, and ideally studies of longer duration.

    What about the other health benefits of fasting?

    Studies have found intermittent fasting can lower blood pressure, improve fertility, and reduce the incidence of metabolic syndrome which refers to a group of conditions that increase the risk of cardiovascular disease.

    In one 2024 study, researchers found intermittent fasting may lead to changes in metabolism and the gut that restrict how cancer develops. Another study from 2025 found intermittent fasting could improve the metabolic health of shift workers.

    So if you’re practising or considering intermittent fasting, the current evidence suggests it can be a safe and effective way to manage your weight.

    But for any weight loss strategy to work, it needs to align with your personal preferences. And it’s best to consult a health-care professional before starting any new diet, especially if you have any underlying health conditions.

    Evelyn Parr, Research Fellow in Exercise Metabolism and Nutrition, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: