The Problem With Sweeteners

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

The WHO’s view on sugar-free sweeteners

The WHO has released a report offering guidance regards the use of sugar-free sweeteners as part of a weight-loss effort.

In a nutshell, the guidance is: don’t

They make for interesting reading, so if you don’t have time now, you might want to just quickly open and bookmark them for later!

Some salient bits and pieces:

Besides that some sweeteners can cause gastro-intestinal problems, a big problem is desensitization:

Because many sugar substitutes are many times (in some cases, hundreds of times) sweeter than sugar, this leads to other sweet foods tasting more bland, causing people to crave sweeter and sweeter foods for the same satisfaction level.

You can imagine how that’s not a spiral that’s good for the health!

The WHO recommendation applies to artificial and naturally-occurring non-sugar sweeteners, including:

  • Acesulfame K
  • Advantame
  • Aspartame
  • Cyclamates
  • Neotame
  • Saccharin
  • Stevia

Sucralose and erythritol, by the way, technically are sugars, just not “that kind of sugar” so they didn’t make the list of non-sugar sweeteners.

That said, a recent study did find that erythritol was linked to a higher risk of heart attack, stroke, and early death, so it may not be an amazing sweetener either:

Read: The artificial sweetener erythritol and cardiovascular event risk

Want to know a good way of staying healthy in the context of sweeteners?

Just get used to using less. Your taste buds will adapt, and you’ll get just as much pleasure as before, from progressively less sweetening agent.

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

  • Hair-Loss Remedies, By Science
    Combat hair loss with finasteride, spironolactone, and minoxidil. Effective remedies for both men and women. Consult your doctor for more information.

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • How Much Does Caffeine Affect Sleep, Really?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    We have written before about the health benefits (and risks) of coffee; for most people, the benefits far outweigh the risks, but individual cases may vary:

    The Bitter Truth About Coffee (or is it?) ← this is a mythbusting edition

    Speaking of bitterness; coffee has abundant polyphenols, which means an abundance of benefits that we discuss in the links above and below this line 😉

    See also: Why Bitter Is Better: Enjoy Bitter Foods For Your Heart & Brain ← while it says foods in the title, this does cover coffee too.

    For mythbusting on caffeine specifically, enjoy: Caffeine: Cognitive Enhancer Or Brain-Wrecker?

    There are also gut health benefits from drinking coffee, and what’s good for our gut is invariably good for our heart and brain:

    Coffee & Your Gut ← gut bacteria do not, by the way, have a preference about how you make your coffee or whether it is caffeinated or not

    Aaaaaand, we recently shared new research on how coffee appears to be protective against frailty in older age. We say “appears to be”, because it was a longitudinal study and so technically we cannot say categorically that the link was causal, but the association is very strong, to the point that it’d take quite some explaining if it’s anything other than the coffee consumption that caused it.

    You can read about that here: Coffee vs Frailty!

    But what about sleep?

    Common sense has of course long served to tell us: taking a stimulant before bed can disrupt your sleep. Shocking, breaking news!

    Except, even we at 10almonds have never actually examined the science for this. After all, it seems so obvious; it’s like how one does not need a peer-reviewed study to conclude that water is wet.

    However…

    A study was conducted, and found that, upon investigating, caffeine indeed disrupts sleep, by an average of two hours per night!

    Except…

    That study, from 1974, had 6 participants (in fact the abstract says “subjects”, but that is how scientists referred to people in the 70s), and the methodology went:

    ❝…comparison being made with decaffeinated coffee and with no drink prior to sleep, using each condition five times in a balanced order on non-consecutive nights.

    After caffeine the mean total sleep time decreased on average by 2 h, the mean sleep latency increased to 66 minutes. The number of awakenings increased and the mean total intervening wakefulness was more than doubled after caffeine.❞

    Read in full: Effect of caffeine on sleep

    Did you spot the problem? Aside from “n=6 is not a relevant sample size”… The methodology of using each condition five times in a balanced order on non-consecutive nights means that not only did they completely break from placebo (there is no mention of whether they even tried to blind or double-blind this) but also, think about this:

    • It’s your first night at a sleep clinic. You take caffeine before bed, and you don’t sleep well; perhaps because of the caffeine or the strange environment.
    • It’s the next night at a sleep clinic. Last night you slept 2 hours less than normal, so you absolutely crash out this time, and sleep extra to compensate.
    • It’s the third night at a sleep clinic. Having overslept the previous morning, you’re not too tired tonight, and so you don’t sleep as much.
    • The study only lasts 10 days so this pattern doesn’t get a long time to diminish.

    See also: What’s Really Keeping You Awake? The Brain’s Role in Sleepless Nights

    A more recent study was almost equally tiny (n=10) because it was just a pilot study, but used a better methodology with a double-blind control group design. For the first 7 days, all participants consumed caffeinated coffee. In the following 7 days, subjects consumed caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee according to their assigned group. This study found:

    ❝There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) among the data of the two groups identified. No significant changes (p > 0.05) were found in the sleep quality of either group during the study.

    This study confirms that caffeine abstinence in the evening might not be helpful in sleep promotion. It highlights the need to implement evidence-based practice in health promotion.❞

    Read in full: The effects of caffeine abstinence on sleep: A pilot study

    What caffeine actually does, in the context of sleep

    Now we’ll get into some meatier science, by which we mean that the same size is enough (n=40) to give us real statistical significance, and also it compared the effects on younger adults (20–27 years) and middle-aged adults (41–58 years), and monitored their brains with electroencephalography (EEG) during REM sleep and non-REM sleep.

    They found:

    • Caffeine reduced alpha and theta waves, linked to deep sleep.
    • Caffeine increased beta waves, associated with wakefulness* and mental activity.

    *Note: it increased these beta waves during sleep. It did not affect sleep quantity, it merely changed its quality. And, not necessarily badly, because that’s needed too (such as for memory consolidation and other mental faculties), but meaningfully.

    They also found that these effects were more pronounced in young adults (ages 20–27) than in middle-aged participants (41–58).

    You can read the paper in full here: Caffeine induces age-dependent increases in brain complexity and criticality during sleep

    And you can learn about brain waves during sleep, here: Alpha, beta, theta: what are brain states and brain waves? And can we control them?

    And for getting into hacking some of these: Non-Sleep Deep Rest: A Neurobiologist’s Take ← How to get many benefits of sleep stages, while awake!

    We’re running out of space today, but before we go, we’ll mention this larger (n=99) longer (12 months) study into matcha green tea instead. Of those 99 participants, the study included 64 with subjective cognitive decline and 35 with mild cognitive impairment; these were randomized, with 49 receiving 2 g of matcha and 50 receiving a placebo daily, and to quote from the conclusions in the paper:

    Despite the presence of caffeine, which disrupts sleep, matcha demonstrated a sleep-enhancing effect. This beneficial effect is attributed to theanine, a constituent of matcha.

    The present study suggests regular consumption of matcha could improve emotional perception and sleep quality in older adults with mild cognitive decline❞

    Read in full: Effect of matcha green tea on cognitive functions and sleep quality in older adults with cognitive decline: A randomized controlled study over 12 months

    Don’t love coffee?

    Two excellent alternatives are green tea (and/or green tea extract), and green coffee extract. You can read about them both here:

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • Red Lentils vs Green Lentils – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing red lentils to green lentils, we picked the green.

    Why?

    Yes, they’re both great. But there are some clear distinctions!

    First, know: red lentils are, secretly, hulled brown lentils. Brown lentils are similar to green lentils, just a little less popular and with (very) slightly lower nutritional values, as a rule.

    By hulling the lentils, the first thing that needs mentioning is that they lose some of their fiber, since this is what was removed. While we’re talking macros, this does mean that red lentils have proportionally more protein, because of the fiber weight lost. However, because green lentils are still a good source of protein, we think the fat that green lentils have much more fiber is a point in their favor.

    In terms of micronutrients, they’re quite similar in vitamins (mostly B-vitamins, of which, mostly folate / vitamin B9), and when it comes to minerals, they’re similarly good sources of iron, but green lentils contain more magnesium and potassium.

    Green lentils also contain more antixoidants.

    All in all, they both continue to be very respectable parts of anyone’s diet—but in a head-to-head, green lentils do come out on top (unless you want to prioritize slightly higher protein above everything else, in which case, red).

    Want to get some in? Here are the specific products we featured today:

    Red Lentils | Green Lentils

    Enjoy!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like to read:

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • Blackberries vs Gooseberries – Which is Healthier?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Our Verdict

    When comparing blackberries to gooseberries, we picked the blackberries.

    Why?

    Both are great! But…

    In terms of macros, blackberries have more fiber and protein, while gooseberries have more carbs. An easy win for blackberries.

    In the category of vitamins, blackberries have more of vitamins B3, B9, E, K, and choline, while gooseberries have more of vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, and C, making a 5:5 tie in this round.

    Looking at minerals, blackberries have more calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, and zinc, while gooseberries have more phosphorus, potassium, and selenium, making a compelling 6:3 win for blackberries.

    When it comes to other considerations, blackberries are much higher in polyphenols, which is an extra point in their favor.

    Adding up the sections makes an overall win for blackberries, but by all means enjoy either or both (you might grow them in your garden—they are both very low-maintenance hardy perennials, if your climate is suitable); diversity is good!

    Want to learn more?

    You might like:

    21 Most Beneficial Polyphenols & What Foods Have Them

    Enjoy!

    Share This Post

  • Olfactory Training, Better

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Anosmia, by any other name…

    The loss of the sense of smell (anosmia) is these days well-associated with COVID and Long-COVID, but also can simply come with age:

    National Institute of Aging | How Smell & Taste Change With Age

    …although it can also be something else entirely:

    ❝Another possibility is a problem with part of the nervous system responsible for smell.

    Some studies have suggested that loss of smell could be an early sign of a neurodegenerative disease, such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease.

    However, a recent study of 1,430 people (average age about 80) showed that 76% of people with anosmia had normal cognitive function at the study’s end.❞

    Read more: Harvard Health | Is it normal to lose my sense of smell as I age?

    We’d love to look at and cite the paper that they cite, but they didn’t actually provide a source. We did find some others, though:

    ❝Olfactory capacity declines with aging, but increasing evidence shows that smell dysfunction is one of the early signs of prodromal neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.

    The loss of smell is considered a clinical sign of early-stage disease and a marker of the disease’s progression and cognitive impairment.❞

    ~ Dr. Irene Fatuzzo et al.

    Read more: Neurons, Nose, and Neurodegenerative Diseases: Olfactory Function and Cognitive Impairment

    What’s clear is the association; what’s not clear is whether one worsens the other, and what causal role each might play. However, the researchers conclude that both ways are possible, including when there is another, third, underlying potential causal factor:

    ❝Ongoing studies on COVID-19 anosmia could reveal new molecular aspects unexplored in olfactory impairments due to neurodegenerative diseases, shedding a light on the validity of smell test predictivity of cognitive dementia.

    The neuroepithelium might become a new translational research target (Neurons, Nose, and Neurodegenerative diseases) to investigate alternative approaches for intranasal therapy and the treatment of brain disorders. ❞

    ~ Ibid.

    Another study explored the possible mechanisms of action, and found…

    ❝Olfactory impairment was significantly associated with increased likelihoods of MCI, amnestic MCI, and non-amnestic MCI.

    In the subsamples, anosmia was significantly associated with higher plasma total tau and NfL concentrations, smaller hippocampal and entorhinal cortex volumes, and greater WMH volume, and marginally with lower AD-signature cortical thickness.

    These results suggest that cerebral neurodegenerative and microvascular lesions are common neuropathologies linking anosmia with MCI in older adults❞

    ~ Dr. Yi Dong et al.

    • MCI = Mild Cognitive Impairment
    • NfL = Neurofilament Light [Chain]
    • WMH = White Matter Hyperintensity
    • AD =Alzheimer’s Disease

    Read more: Anosmia, mild cognitive impairment, and biomarkers of brain aging in older adults

    How to act on this information

    You may be wondering, “this is fascinating and maybe even a little bit frightening, but how is this Saturday’s Life Hacks?”

    We wanted to set up the “why” before getting to the “how”, because with a big enough “why”, it’s much easier to find the motivation to act on the “how”.

    Test yourself

    Or more conveniently, you and a partner/friend/relative can test each other.

    Simply do like a “blind taste testing”, but for smell. Ideally these will be a range of simple and complex odors, and commercially available smell test kits will provide these, if you don’t want to make do with random items from your kitchen.

    If you’d like to use a clinical diagnostic tool, you can check out:

    Clinical assessment of patients with smell and taste disorders

    …and especially, this really handy diagnostic flowchart:

    Algorithm of evaluation of a patient who has olfactory loss

    Train yourself

    “Olfactory training” has been the got-to for helping people to regain their sense of smell after losing it due to COVID.

    In simple terms, this means simply trying to smell things that “should” have a distinctive odor, and gradually working up one’s repertoire of what one can smell.

    You can get some great tips here:

    AbScent | Useful Insights Into Smell Training

    Hack your training

    An extra trick was researched deeply in a recent study which found that multisensory integration helped a) initially regain the ability to smell things and b) maintain that ability later without the cross-sensory input.

    What that means: you will more likely be able to smell lemon while viewing the color yellow, and most likely of all to be able to smell lemon while actually holding and looking at a slice of lemon. Having done this, you’re more likely to be able to smell (and distinguish) the odor of lemon later in a blind smell test.

    In other words: with this method, you may be able to cut out many months of frustration of trying and failing to smell something, and skip straight to the “re-adding specific smells to my brain’s olfactory database” bit.

    Read the study: Olfactory training: effects of multisensory integration, attention towards odors and physical activity

    Or if you prefer, here’s a pop-science article based on that:

    One in twenty people has no sense of smell—here’s how they might get it back

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • GLP-1 Oral Meds: Any Drawbacks?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    First introduced as a diabetes medication, GLP-1 drugs quickly took hold for off-label use as weight loss aids, even when the science was still very young.

    Here’s one of our first articles on that, back in the day: Semaglutide’s Surprisingly Big Research Gap

    As for that popularity? Check out: 1 in 5 US Women Aged 50–64 Has Used GLP-1 RAs: What We’ve Learned

    Spoiler, one of the things we’ve learned is: Most People Who Start GLP-1 RAs Quit Them Within A Year (Here’s Why)

    One of the main things in their favor is, of course, that (for most people, anyway), they work (except when they don’t: Why Intermittent Fasting (& GLP-1 Drugs!) Might Not Work For You).

    In other words, a rocky road with pros and cons. But today, let’s talk about the question many have been asking:

    Does it come in a pill?

    Most people don’t love injections, and GLP-1 drugs being injection-only for these past years has not been simply because the drug companies like to be annoying.

    In fact, there are often technical challenges with making a drug work by different routes of administration, for example:

    • Skincare products are usually not best taken rectally
    • It’s hard to make a gut-repair drug that can be taken as a transdermal skin cream
    • And so on

    For this reason, subcutaneous injections have worked as a way of delivering drugs to agonize GLP-1 receptors, in ways it’s been hard to do with a pill that has to get past stomach acid and your gut barrier, before getting into your bloodstream.

    However! Most recently, researchers (Dr. Vanita Aroda et al.) tested elecoglipron, a once-daily oral GLP-1 receptor agonist for type 2 diabetes, in a sizeable trial involving 406 participants across 9 countries.

    Unlike most GLP-1 drugs, elecoglipron is a non-peptide tablet taken once daily with no food or fluid restrictions, making treatment much more convenient.

    In numbers:

    • Before starting: the average participant was 58.4 years old, weighed 99.8 kg, had a BMI of 34.9 kg/m², and started with an HbA1c of 7.9%.
    • Blood sugar results: after 26 weeks, HbA1c fell by 0.91 to 1.88 percentage points depending on dose, compared with a 0.15 percentage-point reduction in the placebo group.
    • HbA1c results: up to 89.6% of participants receiving elecoglipron reached an HbA1c of 7% or below, compared with 24.9% of those receiving placebo.
    • Weight loss results: up to 72.3% of participants taking elecoglipron lost at least 5% of their body weight, compared with 20.2% in the placebo group.
    • Side effects: adverse events occurred in 63% to 87% of participants across the elecoglipron groups versus 63% with placebo, with the most common being nausea, constipation, diarrhoea, and vomiting. This sounds bad, and by itself it is, but it’s worth noting that the drug’s safety and tolerability were generally consistent with other GLP-1 receptor agonists. So in other words, in terms of adverse effects it’s very comparable to Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and all the others of that ilk.

    In other words: it works! Very comparable to other GLP-1 RAs. Same drug-related drawbacks, just without the needles.

    You can find the paper itself, here: Elecoglipron, an oral small molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist in adults with type 2 diabetes (SOLSTICE): a multicentre, phase 2b, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    Want to learn more?

    You might also like this book that we reviewed a little while back:

    Magic Pill: The Extraordinary Benefits and Disturbing Risks of the New Weight-Loss Drugs – by Johann Hari

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • 5 Steps To Beat Overwhelm

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Dealing With Overwhelm

    Whether we live a hectic life in general, or we usually casually take each day as it comes but sometimes several days gang up on us at once, everyone gets overwhelmed sometimes.

    Today we’re going to look at how to deal with it healthily.

    Step 1: Start anywhere

    It’s easy to get stuck in “analysis paralysis” and not know how to tackle an unexpected large problem. An (unhealthy) alternative is to try to tackle everything at once, and end up doing nothing very well.

    Even the most expert juggler will not successfully juggle 10 random things thrown unexpectedly at them.

    So instead, just pick any part of the the mountain of to-dos, and start.

    If you do want a little more finesse though, check out:

    Procrastination, And How To Pay Off The To-Do List Debt

    Step 2: Accept what you’re capable of

    This one works both ways. It means being aware of your limitations yes, but also, of your actual abilities:

    • Is the task ahead of you really beyond what you are capable of?
    • Could you do it right now without hesitation if a loved one’s life depended on it?
    • Could you do it, but there’s a price to pay (e.g. you can do it but it’ll wipe you out in some other life area)?

    Work out what’s possible and acceptable to you, and make a decision. And remember, it could be that someone else could do it, but everyone has taken the “if you want something doing, give it to someone busy” approach. It’s flattering that people have such confidence in our competence, but it is also necessary to say “no” sometimes, or at least enlisting help.

    Step 3: Listen to your body

    …like a leader listening to an advisory council. Your perception of tiredness, pain, weakness, and all your emotions are simply messengers. Listen to the message! And then say “thank you for the information”, and proceed accordingly.

    Sometimes that will be in the way the messengers seem to be hoping for!

    Sometimes, however, maybe we (blessed with a weighty brain and not entirely a slave to our limbic system) know better, and know when it’s right to push through instead.

    Similarly, that voice in your head? You get to decide where it goes and doesn’t. On which note…

    Step 4: Be responsive, not reactive

    We wrote previously on the difference between these:

    A Bone To Pick… Up And Then Put Back Where We Found It

    Measured responses will always be better than knee-jerk reactions, unless it is literally a case of a split-second making a difference. 99% of our problems in life are not so; usually the problem will still be there unchanged after a moment’s mindful consideration, so invest in that moment.

    You’ve probably heard the saying “give me six hours to chop down a tree, and I’ll spend the first four sharpening the axe”. In this case, that can be your mind. Here’s a good starting point:

    No-Frills, Evidence-Based Mindfulness

    And if your mental state is already worse than that, mind racing with threats (real or perceived) and doom-laden scenarios, here’s how to get out of that negative spiral first, so that you can apply the rest of this:

    The Off-Button For Your Brain

    Do remember to turn it on again afterwards, though

    Step 5: Transcend discomfort

    This is partly a callback to step 3, but it’s now coming from a place of a clear ready mind, so the territory should be looking quite different now. Nevertheless, it’s entirely possible that your clear view shows discomfort ahead.

    You’re going to make a conscious decision whether or not to proceed through the discomfort (and if you’re not, then now’s the time to start calmly and measuredly looking at alternative plans; delegating, ditching, etc).

    If you are going to proceed through discomfort, then it can help to frame the discomfort as simply a neutral part of the path to getting where you want. Maybe you’re going to be going way out of your comfort zone in order to deal with something, and if that’s the case, make your peace with it now, in advance.

    “Certainly it hurts” / “Well, what’s the trick then?” / “The trick, William Potter, is not minding that it hurts”

    (lines from a famous scene from the 1962 movie Lawrence of Arabia)

    It’s ok to say to yourself (if it’s what you decide is the right thing to do) “Yep, this experience is going to suck terribly, but I’m going to do it anyway”.

    See also (this being about Radical Acceptance):

    What’s The Worst That Could Happen?

    Take care!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: