
Hashimoto’s Food Pharmacology – by Dr. Izabella Wentz
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
The author is a doctor of pharmacology, and we’ve featured her before as an expert on Hashimoto’s, which she has. She has recommendations about specific blood tests and medications, but in this book she’s mainly focussing on what she calls the “three Rs” of managing hypothyroidism:
- Remove the causes and triggers of your hypothyroidism, so far as possible
- Repair the damage caused to your body, especially your gut
- Replace the thyroid hormones and related things in which your body has become deficient
To this end, she provides recipes that avoid processed meats and unfermented dairy, and include plenty of nutrient-dense whole foods specifically tailored to meet the nutritional needs of someone with hypothyroidism.
A nice bonus of the presentation of recipes (of which there are 125, if we include things like “mint tea” and “tomato sauce” and “hot lemon water” as recipes) is explaining the thyroid-supporting elements of each recipe.
A downside for some will be that if you are vegetarian/vegan, this book is very much not, and since many recipes are paleo-style meat dishes, substitutions will change the nutritional profile completely.
Bottom line: if you have hypothyroidism (especially if: Hashimoto’s) and like meat, this will be a great recipe book for you.
Click here to check out Hashimoto’s Food Pharmacology, and get cooking!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Recommended
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
The Only Exercise You Need To Strengthen Every Hip Muscle (Ages 50+)
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
One exercise, no equipment, and easy to do without even getting changed:
You may be on the fence about this one
Standing on one leg is great, of course, and then…
Basic exercise:
- Imagine stepping over an electric fence side to side.
- Lift each leg high but slowly to engage hip muscles.
- Adjust the height and speed based on ease/difficulty.
Variations:
- Step over an imaginary side fence.
- Step over an imaginary front fence.
- Step sideways in the opposite direction.
- Step backward to complete a square.
- Ensure both legs are worked evenly.
As a bonus, it also improves balance!
For more on all this plus visual demonstrations, enjoy:
Click Here If The Embedded Video Doesn’t Load Automatically!
Want to learn more?
You might also like:
How Tight Are Your Hips? Test (And Fix!) With This
Take care!
Share This Post
-
Two Weeks Mixing With Flu Patients, Nobody Caught The Flu (Here’s Why!)
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Indoors, close quarters, no masks, no latest flu vaccine, so what was the secret?
Influencing the influenza
First, let’s be clear:
- Being outdoors is better for reducing flu transmission than being indoors
- In other words, do avoid enclosed spaces with lots of people where possible, because this is a big factor. In fact, while people think of cold weather as increasing the risk of colds and flu, the main real difference comes from “when it’s cold, people spend more time indoors in close quarters together with the windows closed”. You can learn more about that here: The Pathogens That Came In From The Cold
- Facemasks are better for reducing flu transmission than being unmasked
- Importantly, masks do help, but are more important on an epidemiological level than personal (i.e. they protect society more than they protect the wearer), and they are impractical in many circumstances, and use of them is very low in most countries. So in other words: they’re good! But may be a lost cause at least for the time being. See also: Mythbusting The Mask Debate
- Vaccination is better for reducing flu transmission than being unvaccinated
- Vaccines are considered the “gold standard” against COVID and many other infectious diseases, for their very high rate of efficacy, clear science, and at least moderately lasting effects (i.e., it’s not something like handwashing*, which must be redone very frequently). Since vaccines are not without their popular misunderstanders, we have written a little about that, here: Vaccine Mythbusting
That being said, none of those things were the reason in this case.
So, what exactly was the case?
First, the setting: researchers (Dr. Jianiu Lai et al.) ran a controlled hotel-based experiment in which young adults with confirmed influenza infections spent two weeks indoors with healthy middle-aged adults, yet no transmission occurred.
And, what was the explanation?
Coughs and sneezes spread diseases: a big factor here was that infected young adults had high viral loads in their noses but rarely coughed, which greatly limited how much virus entered the air.
Reproducing the outdoors, indoors: while the experiment was all self-contained with no access to the outside world, fan heaters and dehumidifiers rapidly mixed the room air, diluting viral particles and reducing inhalation exposure.
You can read the paper itself, here: Evaluating modes of influenza transmission (EMIT-2): Insights from lack of transmission in a controlled transmission trial with naturally infected donors
So if you’d like to benefit in the same way, then (besides what we already talked about above, consider:
Why Some People Get Sick More (And How To Not Be One Of Them)
And for the matter of indoor climate control specifically (in health terms, when it comes to ventilation, temperature, humidity, and pollution*, see:
What’s Lurking In Your Household Air?
*You might be thinking “pollution, indoors?”, and yes, pollution indoors, for two main reasons:
- You May Have More Air Pollution In Your Home Than In The Street
- Why Your Air Is Probably Worse Quality Than You Think ← half of the US has dangerously polluted air, and the air outside eventually becomes the air inside (assuming you live in a house, not a bubble with recycled air)
…but those things are of course a separate matter to the main topic of flu management.
So for a more holistic approach, we invite you to check out: Seven Things To Do For Good Lung Health!
Want to learn more?
For a deeper dive into immunity, here you go:
The 21-Day Immunity Plan – by Dr. Aseem Malhotra
Take care!
Share This Post
- Being outdoors is better for reducing flu transmission than being indoors
-
Brussels Sprouts vs Spirulina – Which is Healthier?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Our Verdict
When comparing Brussels sprouts to spirulina, we picked the sprouts.
Why?
Pitting these two well-known superfoods against each other, we get the following:
Looking at the macros first, sprouts have nearly 10x the fiber and slightly more carbs, while spirulina has slightly more protein. So, we call this a win for sprouts.
In terms of vitamins, sprouts have a lot more of vitamins A, B6, B9, C, E, and K, while spirulina has a little more of vitamins B1, B2, and B3. An easy win for sprouts.
In the category of minerals, sprouts have more calcium, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, and zinc, while spirulina has more copper and iron. Another clear win for sprouts!
Adding up the sections makes the winner very clear: Brussels sprouts enjoy a well-earned victory, but by all means do enjoy either or both, as diversity is best!
Want to learn more?
You might like:
A Deeper Dive Into Seaweed ← there’s nothing here to knock Brussels sprouts off their throne, but seaweeds of various kinds do have some interesting properties worth knowing about 🙂
Enjoy!
Share This Post
Related Posts
-
Why won’t my cough go away?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
A persistent cough can be embarrassing, especially if people think you have COVID.
Coughing frequently can also make you physically tired, interfere with sleep and trigger urinary incontinence. As a GP, I have even treated patients whose repetitive forceful coughing has caused stress fractures in their ribs.
So, why do some coughs linger so long? Here are some of the most common causes – and signs you should get checked for something more serious.
Mladen Zivkovic/Shutterstock Why do we cough?
The cough reflex is an important protective mechanism. Forcefully expelling air helps clear our lungs and keep them safe from irritants, infections and the risk of choking.
Some people who have long-term conditions, such as chronic bronchitis or bronchiectasis, have to cough frequently. This is because the lung’s cilia – tiny hair-like structures that move mucus, debris and germs – no longer work to clear the lungs.
A wet or “productive” cough means coughing up a lot of mucus.
A cough can also be dry or “unproductive”. This happens when the cough receptors in the airways, throat and upper oesophagus have become overly sensitised, triggering a cough even when there’s no mucus to clear.
Causes of a chronic cough
A cough is considered chronic when it lasts longer than eight weeks in adults, or four weeks in children.
The three most common causes are:
- post-nasal drip (where mucus drips from the back of the nose into the throat)
- asthma
- acid reflux from the stomach.
These often go together. One study found 23% of people with chronic cough had two of these conditions, and 3% had all three.
This makes sense – people prone to airway allergies are more likely to develop both asthma and hayfever (allergic rhinitis). Hayfever is probably the main cause of persistent post-nasal drip.
Meanwhile, prolonged, vigorous coughing can also cause reflux, possibly triggering further coughing.
Chronic cough is the primary symptom of two other conditions, although these can be more challenging to diagnose: cough-variant asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis. Both conditions inflame the airways. However, they don’t rapidly improve with ventolin (the standard clinic test to diagnose asthma).
Allergies can cause inflammation that triggers a chronic cough. Kmpzzz/Shutterstock Coughs after respiratory infections
Coughs can also persist long after a viral or bacterial infection. In children with colds, one systematic review found it took 25 days for more than 90% to be free of their cough.
After an infection, cough hypersensitivity may develop thanks to inflamed airways and over-responsive cough receptors. Even minor irritants will then trigger the coughing reflex.
The body’s response to infection makes the mucus more sticky – and more difficult for the overworked, recovering cilia to clear. Allergens in the air can also more easily penetrate the upper airway’s damaged lining.
This can trigger an unhelpful feedback loop that slows the body’s recovery after an infection. Excessive and unhelpful coughing tends to further fatigue the recovering cilia and irritate the airway lining.
Could I still have an infection?
When a cough persists, a common concern is whether a secondary bacterial infection has followed the first viral infection, requiring antibiotics.
Simply coughing up yellow or green phlegm is not enough to tell.
To diagnose a serious chest infection, your doctor will consider the whole picture of your symptoms. For example, whether you also have shortness of breath, worsening fever or your lungs make abnormal sounds through a stethoscope.
The possibility you have undiagnosed asthma or allergies should also be considered.
What treats a persistent cough?
People with a persistent cough who are otherwise healthy may request and be prescribed antibiotics. But these rarely shorten how long your cough lasts, as irritation – not infection – is the primary cause of cough.
The most effective treatments for shifting sticky mucus from the airways are simple ones: saline nose sprays and washes, steam inhalation and medicated sore throat sprays.
Honey has also been shown to reduce throat irritation and the need to cough.
The effectiveness of cough syrup is less clear. As these mixtures have potential side effects, they should be used with care.
The most effective treatments are simple ones, including steam inhalation. New Africa/Shutterstock Signs of something more serious
Sometimes, a cough that won’t go away could be the sign of a serious condition, including lung cancer or unusual infections. Fortunately, these aren’t common.
To rule them out, Australia’s chronic cough guidelines recommend a chest x-ray and spirometry (which tests lung volume and flow) for anyone presenting to their doctor with a chronic cough.
You should seek prompt medical attention if, in addition to your cough, you:
- cough up blood
- produce a lot of phlegm
- are very short of breath, especially when resting or at night
- have difficulty swallowing
- lose weight or have a fever
- have recurring pneumonia
- are a smoker older than 45, with a new or changed cough.
What if there’s no clear cause?
Very occasionally, despite thorough testing and treatment, a cough persists. This is called refractory chronic cough.
When no cause can be identified, it’s known as unexplained chronic cough. In the past, unexplained cough may have been diagnosed as a “psychogenic” or “habit” cough, a term which has fallen from favour.
We now understand that cough hypersensitivity makes a person cough out of proportion to the trigger, and that both the peripheral and central nervous systems play a role in this. But our understanding of the relationship between hypersensitivity and chronic cough remains incomplete.
These are disabling conditions and should be referred to a respiratory clinic or a chronic cough specialist. Speech pathology treatments may also be effective for refractory and unexplained coughs.
There are a class of new medications in the pipeline that block cough receptors, and seem promising for persisting, troublesome coughs.
David King, Senior Lecturer in General Practice, The University of Queensland
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
Could not getting enough sleep increase your risk of type 2 diabetes?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
Not getting enough sleep is a common affliction in the modern age. If you don’t always get as many hours of shut-eye as you’d like, perhaps you were concerned by news of a recent study that found people who sleep less than six hours a night are at higher risk of type 2 diabetes.
So what can we make of these findings? It turns out the relationship between sleep and diabetes is complex.
The study
Researchers analysed data from the UK Biobank, a large biomedical database which serves as a global resource for health and medical research. They looked at information from 247,867 adults, following their health outcomes for more than a decade.
The researchers wanted to understand the associations between sleep duration and type 2 diabetes, and whether a healthy diet reduced the effects of short sleep on diabetes risk.
As part of their involvement in the UK Biobank, participants had been asked roughly how much sleep they get in 24 hours. Seven to eight hours was the average and considered normal sleep. Short sleep duration was broken up into three categories: mild (six hours), moderate (five hours) and extreme (three to four hours). The researchers analysed sleep data alongside information about people’s diets.
Some 3.2% of participants were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes during the follow-up period. Although healthy eating habits were associated with a lower overall risk of diabetes, when people ate healthily but slept less than six hours a day, their risk of type 2 diabetes increased compared to people in the normal sleep category.
The researchers found sleep duration of five hours was linked with a 16% higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, while the risk for people who slept three to four hours was 41% higher, compared to people who slept seven to eight hours.
One limitation is the study defined a healthy diet based on the number of servings of fruit, vegetables, red meat and fish a person consumed over a day or a week. In doing so, it didn’t consider how dietary patterns such as time-restricted eating or the Mediterranean diet may modify the risk of diabetes among those who slept less.
Also, information on participants’ sleep quantity and diet was only captured at recruitment and may have changed over the course of the study. The authors acknowledge these limitations.
Why might short sleep increase diabetes risk?
In people with type 2 diabetes, the body becomes resistant to the effects of a hormone called insulin, and slowly loses the capacity to produce enough of it in the pancreas. Insulin is important because it regulates glucose (sugar) in our blood that comes from the food we eat by helping move it to cells throughout the body.
We don’t know the precise reasons why people who sleep less may be at higher risk of type 2 diabetes. But previous research has shown sleep-deprived people often have increased inflammatory markers and free fatty acids in their blood, which impair insulin sensitivity, leading to insulin resistance. This means the body struggles to use insulin properly to regulate blood glucose levels, and therefore increases the risk of type 2 diabetes.
Further, people who don’t sleep enough, as well as people who sleep in irregular patterns (such as shift workers), experience disruptions to their body’s natural rhythm, known as the circadian rhythm.
This can interfere with the release of hormones like cortisol, glucagon and growth hormones. These hormones are released through the day to meet the body’s changing energy needs, and normally keep blood glucose levels nicely balanced. If they’re compromised, this may reduce the body’s ability to handle glucose as the day progresses.
These factors, and others, may contribute to the increased risk of type 2 diabetes seen among people sleeping less than six hours.
Millions of people around the world have diabetes. WESTOCK PRODUCTIONS/Shutterstock While this study primarily focused on people who sleep eight hours or less, it’s possible longer sleepers may also face an increased risk of type 2 diabetes.
Research has previously shown a U-shaped correlation between sleep duration and type 2 diabetes risk. A review of multiple studies found getting between seven to eight hours of sleep daily was associated with the lowest risk. When people got less than seven hours sleep, or more than eight hours, the risk began to increase.
The reason sleeping longer is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes may be linked to weight gain, which is also correlated with longer sleep. Likewise, people who don’t sleep enough are more likely to be overweight or obese.
Good sleep, healthy diet
Getting enough sleep is an important part of a healthy lifestyle and may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes.
Based on this study and other evidence, it seems that when it comes to diabetes risk, seven to eight hours of sleep may be the sweet spot. However, other factors could influence the relationship between sleep duration and diabetes risk, such as individual differences in sleep quality and lifestyle.
While this study’s findings question whether a healthy diet can mitigate the effects of a lack of sleep on diabetes risk, a wide range of evidence points to the benefits of healthy eating for overall health.
The authors of the study acknowledge it’s not always possible to get enough sleep, and suggest doing high-intensity interval exercise during the day may offset some of the potential effects of short sleep on diabetes risk.
In fact, exercise at any intensity can improve blood glucose levels.
Giuliana Murfet, Casual Academic, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney and ShanShan Lin, Senior Lecturer, School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:
-
The Worst Halloween Candy For Teeth?
10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.
…and other items from this week in the health science world:
More than a sour taste in your mouth
Everyone knows that sugar is bad for teeth; mostly only know that this is because it feeds harmful bacteria in the mouth, though.
People also know that acid isn’t good for the teeth, either! And after eating sugary foods, your mouth becomes more acidic and starts pulling minerals like calcium and potassium from your teeth.
So, guess what makes it worst of all? Food that’s sugary and acidic! Consequently, sour candies are the absolute worst, since they combine sugar with high acidity from ingredients like citric, malic, tartaric, and fumaric acids. that acidic mix rapidly lowers mouth pH and weakens tooth enamel.
And on a population level, it’s getting worse: sales of sour treats have surged by about 70% over the past decade, driven by viral “sour candy challenges”, and it’s not only kids: around 1 in 8 adults now seek intensely sour sensations too.
Two quick tips in this regard:
- Do not brush your teeth right away! It only spreads the acid and worsens enamel damage. Instead, rinse with water, floss if needed, and wait at least 30 minutes before brushing with your usual toothpaste.
- If (like this writer) you love sour foods: naturally sour foods like pickles, sauerkraut, and kombucha can benefit gut health, and unlike sour candies, they aren’t sugary, and thus are much less harmful to your teeth. You should still drink plenty of water with them though, as a) it rinses the acid b) fermented foods are often a bit high in salt, so hydration keeps things balanced.
Read in full: This common Halloween candy might be the scariest thing you eat
Related: From Apples to Bees, and High-Fructose Cs: Which Sugars Are Healthier, And Which Are Just The Same?
The blood of long life
Researchers (Dr. Motohiro Sekiya et al.) at the University of Tsukuba have discovered that a molecule found in the blood (known to its friends as CtBP2), appears to act as a master regulator of aging across the body.
How it works: it functions as a metabolic sensor, adjusting to changes in energy balance. When active, it supports healthy metabolism and cellular communication; when it declines, systemic aging accelerates.
This is quite big news, as it means aging is coordinated throughout the body rather than occurring in isolated organs—when CtBP2 activity drops, multiple systems appear to age together. Definitely another argument for tackling our health holistically!
Read in full: A hidden blood molecule may hold the secret to healthy aging and long life
Related: Blood Labs Demystified – by Dr. Ken Berry & Kim Howerton
The witch doctor is in
Fun fact: before the 14th century, women folk healers were accepted as essential community medical providers, but the rise of university-trained male physicians and church power led to their demonization as “witches”.
Ok, maybe that latter part isn’t so fun. And to add insult to injury, this also meant that as women were persecuted from the 14th to mid-18th centuries, a remarkable lot of traditional herbal knowledge was suppressed or outright lost.
Modern researchers are now reassessing the plants once used in “witches’ brews” for their pharmacological value. Many “magical ingredients” are erstwhile common names for certain plants, for example:
- Eye of newt: mustard seed (Sinapis alba)—shown to have anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, and anti-tumour effects.
- Wool of bat: holly leaves—can lower blood fats and cholesterol, though toxic in large doses.
- Tongue of dog: hound’s tongue—historically used for malaria and hepatitis but contains liver-toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids.
- Adder’s fork: adder’s-tongue fern—used for wound healing and circulation, now also found in cosmetic formulations.
There were also psychoactive phytochemicals that saw use, for example:
- Flying ointments: made from tropane alkaloid plants like deadly nightshade and henbane, absorbed through skin to cause hallucinations and sensations of flight—essentially an early form of transdermal delivery.
- Furthermore, the idea of witches flying with broomsticks between their legs likely came from this, too. Transdermal absorption is strongest places with thin skin and a lot of capillaries, making the armpits and groin amongst the most effective application sites to brush the ointment onto, and the other best sites are places with an accessible mucus membrane, which means bodily orifices. Add these two facts together, and there’s one very obvious most potent application site.
- Sleep potions: included foxglove (source of cardiac glycosides) and Indian snakeroot (source of reserpine, later rediscovered as a blood-pressure drug).
- Love potions: used mandrake, Ephedra sinica, and betel nut, all stimulant or euphoric agents; at higher doses they became poisonous though.
We don’t recommend these!
Read in full: Women folk healers were branded as witches, but their treatments may have been medically sound
Related: Herbs For Evidence-Based Health & Healing
Take care!
Don’t Forget…
Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!
Learn to Age Gracefully
Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:











