5 Ways To Beat Cancer (And Other Diseases)

10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

A Systematic Approach To Healthy Eating

Dr. William Li, known for ways to beat cancer and other diseases, in front of a blue background.

This is Dr. William Li. He’s a physician, cancer researcher, and educator. He also founded the Angiogenesis Foundation back in 1994.

We recently reviewed one of his books, “Eat To Beat Disease”.

He has another book that we haven’t reviewed at time of writing, “Eat To Beat Your Diet“, which you might like to check out.

What does he want us to know?

He wants us to know how to eat to beat cancer and other diseases, by means of five specific angles:

Angiogenesis

This is about replacing blood vessels, which of course happens all the time, but it becomes a problem when it is feeding a cancer in the process.

Here, based on Dr. Li’s work, is what can be done about it:

A List of Anti-Angiogenic Foods for a Cancer-Fighting Diet

Regeneration

Generally speaking, we want to replace healthy cells early, because if we wait until they get damaged, then that damage will be copied forwards. As well as intermittent fasting, there are other things we can do to promote this—even, Dr. Li’s research shows, for stem cells:

Doctor’s Tip: Regeneration (stem cells)—one of your body’s five defense systems

Microbiome health

Healthy gut, healthy rest of the body. We’ve written about this before:

Making Friends With Your Gut (You Can Thank Us Later)

DNA protection

DNA gets unravelled and damaged with age, the telomere caps get shorter, and mistakes get copied forward. So there more we can protect our DNA, the longer we can live healthily. There are many ways to do this, but Dr. Li was one of the first to bring to light the DNA-protecting benefits of kiwi fruit:

Kiwi: A Darling for DNA

Immunity

Paradoxically, what’s good for your immune system (making it stronger) also helps to protect against autoimmune diseases (for most people, for the most part).

In short: it’s good to have an immune system that’s powerful not just in its counterattacks, but also in its discerning nature. There are dietary and other lifestyle approaches to both, and they’re mostly the same things:

Beyond Supplements: The Real Immune-Boosters!

and thus see also:

Keep Inflammation At Bay

Want to know more?

You might enjoy his blog or podcast, and here’s his TED talk:

!

Want to watch it, but not right now? Bookmark it for later

Enjoy!

Don’t Forget…

Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

  • Intermittent Fasting In Women
    Intermittent fasting for women can decrease fat mass and increase performance, with potential benefits for weight loss and disease risk.

Learn to Age Gracefully

Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Will medicinal cannabis help my mental health? Here are the evidence and the risks

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are among the most common mental health conditions for which Australians are prescribed medicinal cannabis.

    Most prescriptions for mental health conditions, and for other conditions more broadly, are for products containing higher levels of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol). This is the part of cannabis that causes a “high” and can affect thinking and mood.

    Many of these prescriptions are for inhaled products, such as dried leaf or flower that people smoke or inhale.

    This pattern of use – of inhaled, higher-THC content for mental health conditions – appears to be partly driven by prescribing trends among 18 to 44-year-old men.

    For anxiety alone, there are almost three times more approvals for the products containing the highest levels of THC than for products containing only CBD (cannabidiol).

    But this prescribing pattern doesn’t line up with the best available research. Most higher-quality clinical trials for anxiety have tested CBD-based products, not THC.

    This is just one example of how Australians are using medicinal cannabis to treat mental health conditions without the best available evidence to back it.

    Unsplash, Canva, The Conversation, CC BY-NC

    Let’s start with anxiety

    Anxiety is the most common mental health reason people seek medicinal cannabis in Australia.

    There is emerging evidence CBD may help some people with anxiety, but the findings are inconsistent.

    The largest and most comprehensive systematic review on medicinal cannabis and mental health found it did not meaningfully improve anxiety symptoms. The authors said we still need larger, high-quality trials, and studies that reflect how people use medicinal cannabis in the real world.

    Evidence for THC is even more mixed. In our previous article we described how some people find THC makes them feel calmer, but others say it worsens their anxiety. As few trials have investigated THC for anxiety, it is hard to draw firm conclusions.


    CC BY-NC

    Medicinal cannabis prescriptions have skyrocketed in Australia, mostly for legal but unapproved products we don’t even know work or are safe. In this series, experts tease out what’s fuelling the rise of medicinal cannabis, the fallout, and what needs to happen next.


    How about PTSD?

    The evidence so far for using medicinal cannabis to treat PTSD is limited.

    While some people report benefit, the findings from the small number of high-quality randomised controlled trials (the gold standard for medical evidence) are mixed.

    In one very small study, only five people completed the entire protocol. This tested vaporised cannabis containing either a combination of 10% THC and 10% CBD, or a product with mainly 10% THC.

    Both products appeared to improve PTSD symptoms in the short term, but the trial had trouble recruiting participants. A larger study would be needed to know if the results are reliable.

    Another trial tested smoked cannabis with three strengths: 12% THC, one mainly containing CBD, and one with equal amounts of THC and CBD. There was no change in the severity of PTSD symptoms for any of the products compared to placebo. Smoking cannabis, including medicinal cannabis, is also not recommended because of its well known harms.

    The limited and uncertain evidence is one reason the Department of Veterans’ Affairs has decided not to fund medicinal cannabis to treat mental health conditions, including PTSD.

    What about depression?

    There is even less high-quality evidence for using medicinal cannabis to treat depression. A recent systematic review found no relevant randomised controlled trials.

    A small pilot study tested 150–300 milligrams a day of CBD alongside standard treatment for bipolar depression. CBD was well tolerated, meaning it didn’t cause serious side effects, but it didn’t help symptoms.

    Studies for different types of depression are mixed. Some show possible benefits but also unfavourable effects including worse symptoms or acute mental health effects such as psychosis, suicidal thoughts or anxiety. It is also unclear whether unfavourable effects are due to the product or underlying mental health condition.

    Is medicinal cannabis safe?

    Emerging evidence shows psychosis has been reported among people using medicinal cannabis containing higher levels of THC.

    Australia’s medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (or TGA) says products containing THC are generally not appropriate for people who have a personal or family history of psychosis or schizophrenia. This caution also extends to people with past or current mood or anxiety disorders.

    This is largely because THC can worsen or trigger symptoms in people who are already vulnerable to these conditions.

    Why the increased risk?

    Is this due to the THC or were these people already at higher risk? It’s likely a mix of both.

    Daily or near-daily cannabis use (which is common with medicinal use) is linked to a higher risk of psychosis, or it may contribute to developing it.

    Young people may be particularly vulnerable to side effects after taking medicinal cannabis (and cannabis in general) for mental health conditions as their brains are still developing.

    Other research shows higher-strength THC products appear to carry higher mental health risks for everyone. People who use frequently, or for long periods, are at further risk.

    So the emerging picture is that the product used, how it is used, and the person matter and can influence health outcomes. Higher THC products raise risks across the board, but those risks are increased in people who start young, use often, or continue long term.

    What happens when I stop taking it?

    Some people whose mental health symptoms increase when they stop taking medicinal cannabis see that as evidence their medicine was working. But that’s not necessarily the case. They could be experiencing withdrawal from cannabis.

    Many people who use cannabis (medicinal or otherwise) experience a rebound in symptoms – such as anxiety or sleep difficulties – when they stop. This can feel very similar to the symptoms that prompted them to seek treatment.

    We also know around one in three or four people who use cannabis medically will develop cannabis dependence and are likely to experience withdrawal symptoms if they stop using it suddenly.

    So, cannabis withdrawal may be more common than people realise, and may well explain symptoms that emerge when someone stops taking it.

    How do I know what is right for me?

    Many studies that look at whether medicinal cannabis could help different mental health conditions are low quality or have conflicting findings. So the evidence is not yet strong enough to recommend it as the best treatment for any mental health condition.

    So talk to your trusted, regular medical professional to help you weigh up the potential benefits and risks of medicinal cannabis, especially if you have a history of mental health concerns.

    Given the mixed evidence and the TGA’s cautions, it’s really important to seek personalised medical advice.


    If you or someone you know is struggling with anxiety, mood changes, or any mental health concerns – whether or not these relate to cannabis use – the following support is available: Beyond Blue (24/7 support): 1300 22 4636 and Lifeline (crisis support): 13 11 14.

    Suzanne Nielsen, Professor and Deputy Director, Monash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University and Myfanwy Graham, NHMRC Postgraduate Scholar and Fulbright Alumna in Public Health Policy, Monash University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Share This Post

  • What HRT Starting Age Means For Alzheimer’s Risk

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    …and other items from this week’s health science news:

    The brain needs hormones too

    Women get Alzheimer’s at nearly twice the rate than men do, and deteriorate more rapidly after onset, too.

    It’s tempting to think that estrogen might be to blame, but Alzheimer’s typically happens after menopause, so what gives?

    A recent study followed 183,450 postmenopausal women for an average of 13.3 years, covering more than 2.43 million person-years and 3,948 dementia cases, investigating the relationship between HRT starting age and dementia risk.

    The overall finding: HRT use was associated with an average 10% lower risk of all-cause dementia compared with non-use.

    However, there is some nuance, as that global average contains quite a lot of different scenarios:

    For most people, HRT was associated with lower dementia risk when started between ages 46 and 56, but not when started after 56. The strongest overall association was seen when HRT began at 51–56 years, corresponding to a 23% lower risk, suggesting an ideal “window of opportunity” for starting.

    However, women who had surgical menopause showed a stronger association still, with HRT linked to a 26% lower dementia risk (or 28% lower in those with the APOE ε4 genetic variant that’s associated with increased Alzheimer’s risk), regardless of age of starting.

    Additionally, HRT was also associated with an even lower Alzheimer’s disease risk specifically. The association was stronger after surgical menopause, at 32% lower risk, compared with 11% lower risk after natural menopause.

    In other words, it’s not really about age, so much as it’s about minimizing the low/no-estrogen phase, which also explains why for those with a naturally later menopause, starting HRT commensurately later wasn’t a problem (because those people had still had their endogenously produced E-levels for longer, before menopause and then starting HRT after that).

    Read in full: HRT linked to lower dementia risk, but timing and menopause type matter ← unclear why the article header photo currently shows someone loosely holding a sterile pad to their upper arm. Our hypotheses: a) they thought this was an HRT patch (it’s not) and that that would be a good site for an HRT patch (it’s not), or b) they thought the upper arm was a good site for HRT injections (it’s not) and additionally thought that this was the way to hold a sterile pad to stem bleeding (it’s not).

    Related: Alzheimer’s Sex Differences May Not Be What They Appear

    What does “plant-based” actually mean?

    While the term “plant-based” gets used a lot, it has no single agreed-upon meaning, just a large consensus, and even that general consensus varies by age.

    In numbers:

    • Vegan interpretation: 56% of respondents understood “plant-based” to mean vegan, with no animal products.
    • Plant-forward interpretation: 35% interpreted it as eating plenty of plant foods while still consuming some meat, dairy, and eggs.

    As for the age differences, 63% of adults ages 65–94 equated “plant-based” with vegan, compared with 51% of adults ages 18–34.

    At 10almonds, we agree with the majority consensus there, i.e. that which is incidentally also the interpretation as generally used by relatively older people.

    But since we’re aware of the potential ambiguity, we usually try to remember to clarify that we indeed mean “entirely plant-based”.

    Read in full: The term ‘plant-based’ diet is ambiguously used in US. Interpretation differs between older and younger adults

    Related: Be A Plant-Based Woman Warrior – by Jane Esselstyn & Ann Esselstyn

    The shingles vaccine and your heart

    Researchers (Dr. Fabiana Corsi-Zuelli et al.) analyzed US electronic health records from the TriNetX network, covering more than 100 million people across approximately 60 healthcare organizations, and found some heartening results about the US transition from the live-attenuated shingles vaccine to the recombinant vaccine.

    In few words:

    • Overall cardiovascular disease: 9% lower overall cardiovascular disease burden over seven years.
    • Heart failure: the recombinant-vaccine group had a 12% lower burden of heart failure.
    • Ischemic heart disease: the burden of ischemic heart disease was 10% lower.
    • Atrial fibrillation: atrial fibrillation was 7% lower in the predominantly recombinant-vaccine group.

    As for how this probably works: Dr. Corsi-Zuelli and her team suggest that the recombinant vaccine’s AS01 adjuvant could influence immune and endothelial function. It may cause longer-lasting changes in monocytes and reduce inflammatory responses involving interleukin-6 (IL-6), thus lowering cardiovascular risk. Have you got yours?

    Read in full: The US switch in shingles vaccines revealed an unexpected heart health pattern

    Related: Could the shingles vaccine lower your risk of dementia?

    Take care!

    Share This Post

  • What Would a Second Trump Presidency Look Like for Health Care?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    On the presidential campaign trail, former President Donald Trump is, once again, promising to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act — a nebulous goal that became one of his administration’s splashiest policy failures.

    “We’re going to fight for much better health care than Obamacare. Obamacare is a catastrophe,” Trump said at a campaign stop in Iowa on Jan. 6.

    The perplexing revival of one of Trump’s most politically damaging crusades comes at a time when the Obama-era health law is even more popular and widely used than it was in 2017, when Trump and congressional Republicans proved unable to pass their own plan to replace it. That failed effort was a big part of why Republicans lost control of the House of Representatives in the 2018 midterms.

    Despite repeated promises, Trump never presented his own Obamacare replacement. And much of what Trump’s administration actually accomplished in health care has been reversed by the Biden administration.

    Still, Trump secured some significant policy changes that remain in place today, including efforts to bring more transparency to prices charged by hospitals and paid by health insurers.

    Trying to predict Trump’s priorities in a second term is even more difficult given that he frequently changes his positions on issues, sometimes multiple times.

    The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

    Perhaps Trump’s biggest achievement is something he rarely talks about on the campaign trail. His administration’s “Operation Warp Speed” managed to create, test, and bring to market a covid-19 vaccine in less than a year, far faster than even the most optimistic predictions.

    Many of Trump’s supporters, though, don’t support — and some even vehemently oppose — covid vaccines.

    Here is a recap of Trump’s health care record:

    Public Health

    Trump’s pandemic response dominates his overall record on health care.

    More than 400,000 Americans died from covid over Trump’s last year in office. His travel bans and other efforts to prevent the global spread of the virus were ineffective, his administration was slower than other countries’ governments to develop a diagnostic test, and he publicly clashed with his own government’s health officials over the response.

    Ahead of the 2020 election, Trump resumed large rallies and other public campaign events that many public health experts regarded as reckless in the face of a highly contagious, deadly virus. He personally flouted public health guidance after contracting covid himself and ending up hospitalized.

    At the same time, despite what many saw as a politicization of public health by the White House, Trump signed a massive covid relief bill (after first threatening to veto it). He also presided over some of the largest boosts for the National Institutes of Health’s budget since the turn of the century. And the mRNA-based vaccines Operation Warp Speed helped develop were an astounding scientific breakthrough credited with helping save millions of lives while laying the groundwork for future shots to fight other diseases including cancer.

    Abortion

    Trump’s biggest contribution to abortion policy was indirect: He appointed three Supreme Court justices, who were instrumental in overturning the constitutional right to an abortion.

    During his 2024 campaign, Trump has been all over the place on the red-hot issue. Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, Trump has bemoaned the issue as politically bad for Republicans; criticized one of his rivals, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, for signing a six-week abortion ban; and vowed to broker a compromise with “both sides” on abortion, promising that “for the first time in 52 years, you’ll have an issue that we can put behind us.”

    He has so far avoided spelling out how he’d do that, or whether he’d support a national abortion ban after any number of weeks.

    More recently, however, Trump appears to have mended fences over his criticism of Florida’s six-week ban and more with key abortion opponents, whose support helped him get elected in 2016 — and whom he repaid with a long list of policy changes during his presidency.

    Among the anti-abortion actions taken by the Trump administration were a reinstatement of the “Mexico City Policy” that bars giving federal funds to international organizations that support abortion rights; a regulation to bar Planned Parenthood and other organizations that provide abortions from the federal family planning program, Title X; regulatory changes designed to make it easier for health care providers and employers to decline to participate in activities that violate their religious and moral beliefs; and other changes that made it harder for NIH scientists to conduct research using fetal tissue from elective abortions.

    All of those policies have since been overturned by the Biden administration.

    Health Insurance

    Unlike Trump’s policies on reproductive health, many of his administration’s moves related to health insurance still stand.

    For example, in 2020, Trump signed into law the No Surprises Act, a bipartisan measure aimed at protecting patients from unexpected medical bills stemming from payment disputes between health care providers and insurers. The bill was included in the $900 billion covid relief package he opposed before signing, though Trump had expressed support for ending surprise medical bills.

    His administration also pushed — over the vehement objections of health industry officials — price transparency regulations that require hospitals to post prices and insurers to provide estimated costs for procedures. Those requirements also remain in place, although hospitals in particular have been slow to comply.

    Medicaid

    While first-time candidate Trump vowed not to cut popular entitlement programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, his administration did not stick to that promise. The Affordable Care Act repeal legislation Trump supported in 2017 would have imposed major cuts to Medicaid, and his Department of Health and Human Services later encouraged states to require Medicaid recipients to prove they work in order to receive health insurance.

    Drug Prices

    One of the issues the Trump administration was most active on was reducing the price of prescription drugs for consumers — a top priority for both Democratic and Republican voters. But many of those proposals were blocked by the courts.

    One Trump-era plan that never took effect would have pegged the price of some expensive drugs covered by Medicare to prices in other countries. Another would have required drug companies to include prices in their television advertisements.

    A regulation allowing states to import cheaper drugs from Canada did take effect, in November 2020. However, it took until January 2024 for the FDA, under Trump’s successor, to approve the first importation plan, from Florida. Canada has said it won’t allow exports that risk causing drug shortages in that country, leaving unclear whether the policy is workable.

    Trump also signed into law measures allowing pharmacists to disclose to patients when the cash price of a drug is lower than the cost using their insurance. Previously pharmacists could be barred from doing so under their contracts with insurers and pharmacy benefit managers.

    Veterans’ Health

    Trump is credited by some advocates for overhauling Department of Veterans Affairs health care. However, while he did sign a major bill allowing veterans to obtain care outside VA facilities, White House officials also tried to scuttle passage of the spending needed to pay for the initiative.

    Medical Freedom

    Trump scored a big win for the libertarian wing of the Republican Party when he signed into law the “Right to Try Act,” intended to make it easier for patients with terminal diseases to access drugs or treatments not yet approved by the FDA.

    But it is not clear how many patients have managed to obtain treatment using the law because it is aimed at the FDA, which has traditionally granted requests for “compassionate use” of not-yet-approved drugs anyway. The stumbling block, which the law does not address, is getting drug companies to release doses of medicines that are still being tested and may be in short supply.

    Trump said in a Jan. 10 Fox News town hall that the law had “saved thousands and thousands” of lives. There’s no evidence for the claim.

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

    Subscribe to KFF Health News’ free Morning Briefing.

    Share This Post

  • Is it too late to get a flu shot?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    It’s almost spring. And while respiratory infections seem to have passed their peak many people are still getting sick.

    So is it still worth getting a flu shot?

    The short answer is “yes”. If you haven’t had one already this year, it’s not too late.

    milan2099/Getty

    Flu season started early, could end late

    Flu seasons are notoriously unpredictable. Temperature swings, population immunity, and new viral strains are among factors influencing how widely the virus spreads.

    Australia’s flu season usually runs from April to October, peaking between June and September.

    But this year was different. It started early. Laboratory-confirmed cases between January and March 2025 were almost 60% higher than the same period in 2024. Since then, numbers have dipped slightly compared to last year.

    However, we could still see thousands more cases before 2025 ends if the season follows last year’s pattern, and extends well beyond October.

    This year, influenza A has been the dominant strain across all age groups. Think of influenza A as the more common, quickly evolving type of flu that often triggers larger, more severe outbreaks. The other main type, influenza B, evolves more slowly and usually causes milder illness, although it can still be serious, especially for children.

    Is it still worth getting vaccinated in August?

    Absolutely. While flu activity usually declines after July, the number of laboratory-confirmed cases of flu shows the virus does still circulate outside the typical flu season.

    If you’ve already had flu this year, natural infection offers some protection. But this is generally less reliable and narrower than vaccination. Natural infection cannot reliably provide immunity in older people, who have a much poorer immune response to infection. For younger people, although their immmune system mounts a strong response, it is against the specific influenza strain that has infected them, and gives little protection against other strains. This is why vaccination is preferable.

    If you are still sick with the flu, current recommendations are that you should wait until you are recovered before getting a flu shot. This allows your immune system to generate a strong response to the vaccine.

    Once vaccinated, it takes about two weeks to develop immunity. Protection is strongest in the first few months.

    Pregnant women and international travellers can benefit from vaccination at any time of year.

    How well do they work?

    Effectiveness of flu vaccines varies year to year, depending on how well the vaccine strains match those going around. This season, the match appears excellent – about a 98% match (for key strains).

    However, the vaccine doesn’t completely protect you from getting infected (no vaccine does). This is because levels of immunity and our response to infection vary from person to person.

    Flu vaccines are generally 40–60% effective against experiencing a negative health outcome, for example developing the flu and attending a GP practice or being hospitalised.

    So vaccination against the flu is particularly important for high-risk groups such as elderly people, young children, pregnant women, and people with chronic (long-term) conditions.

    Are they safe?

    Data about vaccine safety are reassuring. According to AusVaxSafety, a surveillance system that monitors vaccine safety, since Mar 31 this year about 197,950 people have reported their experience after a flu shot, and 82% reported no adverse reactions.

    The most common were mild and short-lived, such as a sore arm, headache or fatigue. Only 0.3% needed to see a doctor.

    You cannot catch the flu from the vaccine itself. This is because it contains an inactivated or “killed” version of the virus. This means it is not live and cannot cause infection.

    Which flu vaccine should I get?

    All flu vaccines in Australia this year are quadrivalent, which means they protect against four strains.

    There’s an option called Flucelvax Quad, which is produced in mammalian cells instead of chicken eggs. There are also special, higher-dose formulations for older adults, such as Fluad Quad for those 65 and older, and Fluzone High-Dose Quadrivalent for those 60 and over.

    Your health-care provider will discuss the best option for you.

    Is it free?

    Under the National Immunisation Program, the flu vaccine is free for:

    • children aged six months to under five years
    • pregnant women
    • adults aged 65 and over
    • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from six months of age
    • people with certain medical conditions, such as heart disease or with weakened immunity.

    Everyone else can pay about A$20–30 at GPs or pharmacies. If your GP does not bulk bill, you may also need to pay an out-of-pocket cost for the consultation.

    Currently, Queensland is the only state offering free flu vaccination to all ages over six months. But that program ends on September 30.

    So what’s the verdict?

    The bottom line is that it’s not too late to get vaccinated. Even as winter eases, getting a flu shot can make a real difference, protecting both you and the people around you from serious illness.

    Correction: An earlier version of the article contained out-of-date statistics from AusVaxSafety about the flu vaccine, and implied flu vaccines made in chicken eggs were unsafe for people with egg allergies, which is not the case.

    Adrian Esterman, Professor of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of South Australia

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • Bored of Lunch – by Nathan Anthony

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    Cooking with a slow cooker is famously easy, but often we settle down on a few recipes and then don’t vary. This book brings a healthy dose of inspiration and variety.

    The recipes themselves range from comfort food to fancy entertaining, pasta dishes to risottos, and even what the author categorizes as “fakeaways” (a play on the British English “takeaway”, cf. AmE “takeout”), so indulgent nights in have never been healthier!

    For each recipe, you’ll see a nice simple clear layout of all you’d expect (ingredients, method, etc) plus calorie count, so that you can have a rough idea of how much food each meal is.

    In terms of dietary restrictions you may have, there’s quite a variety here so it’ll be easy to find things for all needs, and in addition to that, optional substitutions are mostly quite straightforward too.

    Bottom line: if you have a slow cooker but have been cooking only the same three things in it for the past ten years, this is the book to liven things up, while staying healthy!

    Click here to check out Bored of Lunch: The Healthy Slow Cooker Book, and take the effort out of healthy cooking!

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails:

  • What’s the difference between a home birth and a free birth?

    10almonds is reader-supported. We may, at no cost to you, receive a portion of sales if you purchase a product through a link in this article.

    If you’re looking on social media for information and experiences of giving birth at home, you’ll find widely varied content.

    On the one hand, you’ll find women who develop a relationship with their midwife over time and eventually have a “home birth” where they feel comfortable and safe.

    Others choose to birth outside the medical system in a “free birth”. They might birth at home but feel compelled to forgo specialist skills and equipment.

    While free births and home births sound similar, they come with very different potential risks.

    Layland Masuda/Getty Images

    What is a home birth?

    Planned home births involve care from registered midwives. They care for women through the pregnancy, support them to give birth at home and continue this care for around six weeks following the birth.

    Registered midwives either work privately or are employed by a hospital to provide home births.

    Around 20 publicly funded home birth programs operate nationally for low-risk women who don’t live far from the hospital. Most set a maximum distance (time or kilometres) from the hospital so women can get there quickly if they need medical care or in an emergency.

    Private midwives work for themselves and charge for care before, during and after a home birth. Women are able to get some money back from Medicare or through some private health funds.

    Midwives are highly skilled and carry resuscitation equipment and medications to deal with emergencies, for instance, if the baby isn’t breathing or the mother is bleeding heavily.

    What is a free birth?

    When a woman chooses to have a free birth they make the decision to have a baby, usually at home, without a registered health professional such as a midwife or doctor in attendance. These are also called unassisted or wild births.

    Those who plan a free birth may hire an unregulated birth worker or doula to support them at the birth. But they don’t have the training, regulation or medical equipment and skills needed to manage emergencies.

    Women may have limited or no antenatal health care, so risk factors such as twins and breech presentations (the baby coming bottom first) aren’t detected beforehand and given the right kind of specialist care.

    Free birth isn’t the same as when a baby comes too fast to make it to hospital. This is called being “born before arrival”.

    How common are home births and free births?

    In 2023, 97% of women give birth in hospital. Of these, three-quarters birthed in a public hospital; the rest went private.

    A small proportion of women gave birth out of hospital, including in birth centres (1.5%), at home (0.7%), or in other settings (such as being before arrival at a hospital) (0.7%).

    There was a slight increase in the number of home births in recent years, from 923 (0.3%) in 2019 to 2,081 (0.7%) in 2023.

    It’s unclear how common free birth is, as data is not collected. But there is some evidence free births increased during the COVID pandemic and this trend has continued.

    Are home births safe?

    The research shows that for women with low-risk pregnancies, planned home births attended by competent midwives (with links to hospitals) are safe.

    Private midwives are required to book a woman into the nearby hospital and share information with the hospital at the start of a pregnancy in case medical care is needed at any time.

    Midwives across Australia follow national referral guidelines and safety and quality guidelines from the Nursing and Midwifery Board about when to consult or refer women for medical care. Around 12-35% of women who plan to give birth at home will be transferred to hospital. Some midwives can continue to care for women who need extra medical support in hospital.

    Women with risk factors are recommended to not give birth at home as there is a greater chance of needing extra medical care for her or her baby. Risk factors include being pregnant with twins, having a baby in a breech position, or having high blood pressure.

    For low-risk women and their babies, there is no difference in the risk of death between planned home and hospital births.

    However, compared with hospital births, women who plan to give birth at home have a lower chance of having an episiotomy (a surgical cut to the perineum), a perineal tear, significant blood loss, or an infection. They are less likely to be induced, have a caesarean section, or have a forceps or vacuum delivery.

    Women who have a home birth more often report positive experiences than in hospitals and tend to make the same choice for the next birth. A home birth can also be healing for women who have experienced a traumatic birth.

    Why would a woman choose to have a free birth?

    The main reason women choose to free birth is a previous traumatic birth or feeling coerced to make certain choices, such as being induced or having an episiotomy or caesarean section.

    Sometimes, women can’t access a midwife to attend them at home. For others, the cost is prohibitive.

    Others are motivated by a strong belief in their own capacity to give birth without professional support, with social media influencers impacting these decisions.

    The risks of free birth are primarily are due to not having a trained midwife in attendance and the lack of skills to detect complications and transfer to a hospital, or to manage complications at home.

    If you choose to birth at home, it’s important to have a registered midwife supporting you during labour to make this option as safe as possible.

    Hannah Dahlen, Professor of Midwifery, Associate Dean Research and HDR, Midwifery Discipline Leader, Western Sydney University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Don’t Forget…

    Did you arrive here from our newsletter? Don’t forget to return to the email to continue learning!

    Learn to Age Gracefully

    Join the 98k+ American women taking control of their health & aging with our 100% free (and fun!) daily emails: